Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 6/2011

01-06-2011 | Original Article

A phase II and pharmacokinetic study of first line S-1 for advanced gastric cancer in Taiwan

Authors: Jen-Shi Chen, Yee Chao, Ruey-Kuen Hsieh, Ann-Lii Cheng, Po-Min Chen, Tzeon-Jye Chiou, Tsu-Yi Chao, Kun-Huei Yeh, Li-Tzong Chen, Jacqueline Whang-Peng

Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology | Issue 6/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetic profiles of S-1, which composed of tegafur (FT, a prodrug of 5-FU), 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine and potassium oxonate (Oxo), in Taiwanese advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients.

Methods

Patients with chemo-naïve, histologically confirmed AGC were eligible. S-1 was given orally at dose of 40, 50 or 60 mg, twice daily for patients with body surface <1.25, 1.25–1.5 and >1.5 m2, respectively, on day 1–28 every 42 days/cycle.

Results

Thirty-four patients were included. On intent-to-treat analysis, the overall response rate, median progression-free and overall survival were 35.3% [95% confidence interval (CI): 19.2–51.3%], 2.9 (95% CI: 2.4–5.8) months and 9.8 (95% CI: 6.1–NA) months, respectively. The most common grade 3–4 toxicities were anemia 23.5% and neutropenia 11.8%. There were two treatment-related mortality, which occurred in patients with suboptimal renal function underestimated by serum creatinine level at study entry. Single-dose pharmacokinetic study showed trend toward lower AUC5–FU, and higher AUCFT and AUCOxo comparing to most Western reports.

Conclusions

The efficacy, toxicity and pharmacokinetic profiles of S-1 in current study are compatible with those from other Asian populations. Accurate renal function assessment and more closely monitoring is mandatory for S-1 therapy in patients with low body mass. Literature review suggests that, besides AUC5–FU, AUCOxo may also attribute to the difference in the compliance to S-1 between Asian and Caucasian populations.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Garcia M, Jemal A, Ward EM et al (2007) Global cancer facts & figures 2007. American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA Garcia M, Jemal A, Ward EM et al (2007) Global cancer facts & figures 2007. American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
2.
go back to reference Hsu PY (2008) Statistics on causes of death. In: Health statistics in Taiwan 2006 Department of Health, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan), Taipei, pp 12–43 Hsu PY (2008) Statistics on causes of death. In: Health statistics in Taiwan 2006 Department of Health, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan), Taipei, pp 12–43
3.
go back to reference Hunahl SA, Menck HR, Mansour EG, Winchester DP (1997) The National Cancer Data Base report on gastric carcinoma. Cancer 80:2333–2341CrossRef Hunahl SA, Menck HR, Mansour EG, Winchester DP (1997) The National Cancer Data Base report on gastric carcinoma. Cancer 80:2333–2341CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Wagner AD, Grothe W, Haerting J, Kleber G, Grothey A, Fleig WE (2006) Chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on aggregate data. J Clin Oncol 24:2903–2909PubMedCrossRef Wagner AD, Grothe W, Haerting J, Kleber G, Grothey A, Fleig WE (2006) Chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on aggregate data. J Clin Oncol 24:2903–2909PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ohtsu A (2005) Current status and future prospects of chemotherapy for metastatic gastric cancer: a review. Gastric Cancer 8:95–102PubMedCrossRef Ohtsu A (2005) Current status and future prospects of chemotherapy for metastatic gastric cancer: a review. Gastric Cancer 8:95–102PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Shirasaka T (2009) Development history and concept of an oral anticancer agent S-1 (TS-1). Its clinical usefulness and future vistas. Jpn J Clin Oncol 39:2–15PubMedCrossRef Shirasaka T (2009) Development history and concept of an oral anticancer agent S-1 (TS-1). Its clinical usefulness and future vistas. Jpn J Clin Oncol 39:2–15PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sakata Y, Ohtsu A, Horikoshi N, Sugimachi K, Mitachi Y, Taguchi T (1998) Late phase II study of novel oral fluoropyrimidine anticancer drug S-1 (1M Tegafur-0.4M Gimestat-1M Otastat Potassium) in advanced gastric cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 34:1715–1720PubMedCrossRef Sakata Y, Ohtsu A, Horikoshi N, Sugimachi K, Mitachi Y, Taguchi T (1998) Late phase II study of novel oral fluoropyrimidine anticancer drug S-1 (1M Tegafur-0.4M Gimestat-1M Otastat Potassium) in advanced gastric cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 34:1715–1720PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Koizumi W, Kurihara M, Nakano S, Hasegawa K (2000) The S-1 Cooperative Gastric Cancer Study Group. Phase II study of S-1, a novel oral derivative of 5-fluorouracil, in advanced gastric cancer. Oncology 58:191–197PubMedCrossRef Koizumi W, Kurihara M, Nakano S, Hasegawa K (2000) The S-1 Cooperative Gastric Cancer Study Group. Phase II study of S-1, a novel oral derivative of 5-fluorouracil, in advanced gastric cancer. Oncology 58:191–197PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Boku N, Yamamoto S, Fukuda H et al (2009) Fluorouracil versus combination of irinotecan plus cisplatin versus S-1 in metastatic gastric cancer: a randomised phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 10:1063–1069PubMedCrossRef Boku N, Yamamoto S, Fukuda H et al (2009) Fluorouracil versus combination of irinotecan plus cisplatin versus S-1 in metastatic gastric cancer: a randomised phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 10:1063–1069PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Jeung HC, Rha SY, Kim HK et al (2007) Multi-Institutional phase II study of S-1 monotherapy in advanced gastric cancer with pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenomic evaluations. Oncologist 12:543–554PubMedCrossRef Jeung HC, Rha SY, Kim HK et al (2007) Multi-Institutional phase II study of S-1 monotherapy in advanced gastric cancer with pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenomic evaluations. Oncologist 12:543–554PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hirata K, Horikoshi N, Aiba K et al (1999) Pharmacokinetic study of S-1, a novel oral fluorouracil antitumor drug. Clin Cancer Res 5:2000–2005PubMed Hirata K, Horikoshi N, Aiba K et al (1999) Pharmacokinetic study of S-1, a novel oral fluorouracil antitumor drug. Clin Cancer Res 5:2000–2005PubMed
12.
go back to reference Van Groeningen CJ, Peters GJ, Schornagel JH et al (2000) Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of oral S-1 in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 18:2772–2779PubMed Van Groeningen CJ, Peters GJ, Schornagel JH et al (2000) Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of oral S-1 in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 18:2772–2779PubMed
13.
go back to reference Chu QS, Hammond LA, Schwartz G et al (2004) Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 on a once-daily-for-28-day schedule in patients with advanced malignancies. Clin Cancer Res 10:4913–4921PubMedCrossRef Chu QS, Hammond LA, Schwartz G et al (2004) Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 on a once-daily-for-28-day schedule in patients with advanced malignancies. Clin Cancer Res 10:4913–4921PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Zhu AX, Clark JW, Ryan DP et al (2007) Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of S-1 administered for 14 days in a 21-day cycle in patients with advanced upper gastrointestinal cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 59:285–293PubMedCrossRef Zhu AX, Clark JW, Ryan DP et al (2007) Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of S-1 administered for 14 days in a 21-day cycle in patients with advanced upper gastrointestinal cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 59:285–293PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hoff PM, Saad ED, Ajani JA et al (2003) Phase I study with pharmacokinetics of S-1 on an oral daily schedule for 28 days in patients with solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 9:134–142PubMed Hoff PM, Saad ED, Ajani JA et al (2003) Phase I study with pharmacokinetics of S-1 on an oral daily schedule for 28 days in patients with solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 9:134–142PubMed
16.
go back to reference Chollet P, Schoffski P, Weigang-Kohler K et al (2003) Phase II trial with S-1 in chemotherapy-naïve patients with gastric cancer. A trial performed by the EORTC Early Clinical Studies Group (ECSG). Eur J Cancer 39:1264–1270PubMedCrossRef Chollet P, Schoffski P, Weigang-Kohler K et al (2003) Phase II trial with S-1 in chemotherapy-naïve patients with gastric cancer. A trial performed by the EORTC Early Clinical Studies Group (ECSG). Eur J Cancer 39:1264–1270PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216PubMedCrossRef Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Simon R (1998) Optimal two-stage design for phase II clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 10:1–10CrossRef Simon R (1998) Optimal two-stage design for phase II clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 10:1–10CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observation. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481CrossRef Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observation. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ikeda M, Furukawa H, Imamura H et al (2002) Pharmacokinetic study of S-1, a novel oral fluorouracil antitumor agent in animal model and in patients with impaired renal function. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 50:25–32PubMedCrossRef Ikeda M, Furukawa H, Imamura H et al (2002) Pharmacokinetic study of S-1, a novel oral fluorouracil antitumor agent in animal model and in patients with impaired renal function. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 50:25–32PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Peters GJ, Noordhuis P, Van Kuilenburg AB et al (2003) Pharmacokinetics of S-1, an oral formulation of ftorafur, oxonic acid and 5-chloro-2, 4-dihydroxypyridine (molar ratio 1:0.4:1) in patients with solid tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 52:1–12PubMedCrossRef Peters GJ, Noordhuis P, Van Kuilenburg AB et al (2003) Pharmacokinetics of S-1, an oral formulation of ftorafur, oxonic acid and 5-chloro-2, 4-dihydroxypyridine (molar ratio 1:0.4:1) in patients with solid tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 52:1–12PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Koizumi W, Narahara H, Hara T et al (2008) S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 9:215–221PubMedCrossRef Koizumi W, Narahara H, Hara T et al (2008) S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 9:215–221PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Lee JL, Kang YK, Kang HJ et al (2008) A randomized multicentre phase II trial of capecitabine vs S-1 as first-line treatment in elderly patients with metastatic or recurrent unresectable gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 99:584–590PubMedCrossRef Lee JL, Kang YK, Kang HJ et al (2008) A randomized multicentre phase II trial of capecitabine vs S-1 as first-line treatment in elderly patients with metastatic or recurrent unresectable gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 99:584–590PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Ajani JA, Faust J, Ikeda K et al (2005) Phase I pharmacokinetic study of S-1 plus cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 23:6957–6965PubMedCrossRef Ajani JA, Faust J, Ikeda K et al (2005) Phase I pharmacokinetic study of S-1 plus cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 23:6957–6965PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Shirasaka T, Shimamoto Y, Fukushima M (1993) Inhibition by oxonic acid of gastrointestinal toxicity of 5-fluorouracil without loss of its antitumor activity in rats. Cancer Res 53:4004–4009PubMed Shirasaka T, Shimamoto Y, Fukushima M (1993) Inhibition by oxonic acid of gastrointestinal toxicity of 5-fluorouracil without loss of its antitumor activity in rats. Cancer Res 53:4004–4009PubMed
26.
go back to reference Takechi T, Nakano K, Uchida J et al (1997) Antitumor activity and low intestinal toxicity of S-1, a new formulation of oral tegafur, in experimental tumor models in rats. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 39:205–211PubMedCrossRef Takechi T, Nakano K, Uchida J et al (1997) Antitumor activity and low intestinal toxicity of S-1, a new formulation of oral tegafur, in experimental tumor models in rats. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 39:205–211PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Sakuramoto S, Sasako M, Yamaguhi T et al (2007) Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine. N Engl J Med 357:1810–1820PubMedCrossRef Sakuramoto S, Sasako M, Yamaguhi T et al (2007) Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine. N Engl J Med 357:1810–1820PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Tsuruoka Y, Kamano T, Kitajima M et al (2006) Effect of gastrectomy on the pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil and gimeracil after oral administration of S-1. Anticancer Drug 17:393–399CrossRef Tsuruoka Y, Kamano T, Kitajima M et al (2006) Effect of gastrectomy on the pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil and gimeracil after oral administration of S-1. Anticancer Drug 17:393–399CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Kochi M, Fujii M, Kanamori N et al (2007) Effect of gastrectomy on the pharmacokinetics of S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine, in resectable gastric cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 60:693–701PubMedCrossRef Kochi M, Fujii M, Kanamori N et al (2007) Effect of gastrectomy on the pharmacokinetics of S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine, in resectable gastric cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 60:693–701PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Kim WY, Nakata B, Hirakawa K (2007) Alternative pharmacokinetics of S-1 components, 5-fluorouracil, dihydrofluorouracil and α-fluoro-β-alanine after oral administration of S-1 following total gastrectomy. Cancer Sci 98:1604–1608PubMedCrossRef Kim WY, Nakata B, Hirakawa K (2007) Alternative pharmacokinetics of S-1 components, 5-fluorouracil, dihydrofluorouracil and α-fluoro-β-alanine after oral administration of S-1 following total gastrectomy. Cancer Sci 98:1604–1608PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Cunningham D, Starling N, Rao S et al (2008) Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer. N Engl J Med 358:36–46PubMedCrossRef Cunningham D, Starling N, Rao S et al (2008) Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer. N Engl J Med 358:36–46PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Kang YK, Kang WK, Shin DB et al (2009) Capecitabine/cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a randomised phase III noninferiority trial. Ann Oncol 20:666–673PubMedCrossRef Kang YK, Kang WK, Shin DB et al (2009) Capecitabine/cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a randomised phase III noninferiority trial. Ann Oncol 20:666–673PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Seol YM, Song MK, Choi YJ et al (2009) Oral fluoropyrimidines (capecitabine or S-1) and cisplatin as first-line treatment in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective study. Jpn J Clin Oncol 39:43–48PubMedCrossRef Seol YM, Song MK, Choi YJ et al (2009) Oral fluoropyrimidines (capecitabine or S-1) and cisplatin as first-line treatment in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective study. Jpn J Clin Oncol 39:43–48PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A phase II and pharmacokinetic study of first line S-1 for advanced gastric cancer in Taiwan
Authors
Jen-Shi Chen
Yee Chao
Ruey-Kuen Hsieh
Ann-Lii Cheng
Po-Min Chen
Tzeon-Jye Chiou
Tsu-Yi Chao
Kun-Huei Yeh
Li-Tzong Chen
Jacqueline Whang-Peng
Publication date
01-06-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology / Issue 6/2011
Print ISSN: 0344-5704
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-010-1416-8

Other articles of this Issue 6/2011

Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 6/2011 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine