Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Hematology 7/2016

01-06-2016 | Original Article

Communication during haematological consultations; patients’ preferences and professionals’ performances

Authors: Inge R. van Bruinessen, Lotte E. van der Hout, Evelyn M. van Weel-Baumgarten, Hans Gouw, Josée M. Zijlstra, Sandra van Dulmen

Published in: Annals of Hematology | Issue 7/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Many patients with haematological malignancies experience barriers in clinical communication. Reaching effective communication is of great importance as it has been linked to a range of improved patient outcomes such as satisfaction, compliance to treatment, perceived quality of life and physical and mental health. To get a better understanding how communication in haematological consultations can be improved, the current study focussed on patients’ preferences and perceived performances regarding the communicative behaviour of their health care professional. Secondly, the mediation of an online communication tool for patients was analysed. Within a controlled pre- post-test design, 78 datasets of clinical consultations could be analysed. Patients considered both affective and instrumental communication aspects important. The affective communication behaviour of the health care professional met the patients’ pre-visit preferences well. In the information exchange, more variability and discrepancies were found. Overall, the online intervention did not seem to influence the patients’ perceived communication performance of their health care professional much. To further improve the communication during clinical consultations, health care professionals should inquire about patients’ expectations, especially during the exchange of information and advices. At the same time, patients should be supported to express their preferences at the start of the consultation. The study was registered in the Netherlands Trial Register, number 3779.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Baile WF, Aaron J (2005) Patient-physician communication in oncology: past, present, and future. Curr Opin Oncol 17(4):331–335CrossRefPubMed Baile WF, Aaron J (2005) Patient-physician communication in oncology: past, present, and future. Curr Opin Oncol 17(4):331–335CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference de Haes HC, Bensing J (2009) Endpoints in medical communication research, proposing a framework of functions and outcomes. Patient Educ Couns 74(3):287–294CrossRefPubMed de Haes HC, Bensing J (2009) Endpoints in medical communication research, proposing a framework of functions and outcomes. Patient Educ Couns 74(3):287–294CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Bensing JM, Dronkers J (1992) Instrumental and affective aspects of physician behavior. Med Care 30(4):283–298CrossRefPubMed Bensing JM, Dronkers J (1992) Instrumental and affective aspects of physician behavior. Med Care 30(4):283–298CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Engel GL (1988) How much longer must medicine’s science be bound by a seventeenth century world view? In: White KL (ed) The task of medicine: Dialogue at Wickenburg. The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, Menlo park, pp 113–136 Engel GL (1988) How much longer must medicine’s science be bound by a seventeenth century world view? In: White KL (ed) The task of medicine: Dialogue at Wickenburg. The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, Menlo park, pp 113–136
5.
go back to reference Borrell-Carrio F, Suchman AL, Epstein RM (2004) The biopsychosocial model 25 years later: principles, practice, and scientific inquiry. Ann Fam Med 2(6):576–582CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Borrell-Carrio F, Suchman AL, Epstein RM (2004) The biopsychosocial model 25 years later: principles, practice, and scientific inquiry. Ann Fam Med 2(6):576–582CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Ong LM, de Haes HC, Hoos AM, Lammes FB (1995) Doctor-patient communication: a review of the literature. Soc Sci Med 40(7):903–918CrossRefPubMed Ong LM, de Haes HC, Hoos AM, Lammes FB (1995) Doctor-patient communication: a review of the literature. Soc Sci Med 40(7):903–918CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Zolnierek KB, Dimatteo MR (2009) Physician communication and patient adherence to treatment: a meta-analysis. Med Care 47(8):826–834CrossRefPubMed Zolnierek KB, Dimatteo MR (2009) Physician communication and patient adherence to treatment: a meta-analysis. Med Care 47(8):826–834CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Clever SL, Jin L, Levinson W, Meltzer DO (2008) Does doctor-patient communication affect patient satisfaction with hospital care? Results of an analysis with a novel instrumental variable. Health Serv Res 43(5 Pt 1):1505–1519CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Clever SL, Jin L, Levinson W, Meltzer DO (2008) Does doctor-patient communication affect patient satisfaction with hospital care? Results of an analysis with a novel instrumental variable. Health Serv Res 43(5 Pt 1):1505–1519CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Venetis MK, Robinson JD, Turkiewicz KL, Allen M (2009) An evidence base for patient-centered cancer care: a meta-analysis of studies of observed communication between cancer specialists and their patients. Patient Educ Couns 77(3):379–383CrossRefPubMed Venetis MK, Robinson JD, Turkiewicz KL, Allen M (2009) An evidence base for patient-centered cancer care: a meta-analysis of studies of observed communication between cancer specialists and their patients. Patient Educ Couns 77(3):379–383CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Zandbelt LC, Smets EM, Oort FJ, Godfried MH, de Haes HC (2007) Medical specialists’ patient-centered communication and patient-reported outcomes. Med Care 45(4):330–339CrossRefPubMed Zandbelt LC, Smets EM, Oort FJ, Godfried MH, de Haes HC (2007) Medical specialists’ patient-centered communication and patient-reported outcomes. Med Care 45(4):330–339CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Feldman-Stewart D, Brundage MD, Tishelman C (2005) A conceptual framework for patient-professional communication: an application to the cancer context. Psychooncology 14(10):801–809CrossRefPubMed Feldman-Stewart D, Brundage MD, Tishelman C (2005) A conceptual framework for patient-professional communication: an application to the cancer context. Psychooncology 14(10):801–809CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Chaitchik S, Kreitler S, Shaked S, Schwartz I, Rosin R (1992) Doctor-patient communication in a cancer ward. J Cancer Educ : Off J Am Assoc Cancer Educ 7(1):41–54CrossRef Chaitchik S, Kreitler S, Shaked S, Schwartz I, Rosin R (1992) Doctor-patient communication in a cancer ward. J Cancer Educ : Off J Am Assoc Cancer Educ 7(1):41–54CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Epstein RM, Franks P, Fiscella K et al (2005) Measuring patient-centered communication in patient-physician consultations: theoretical and practical issues. Soc Sci Med 61(7):1516–1528CrossRefPubMed Epstein RM, Franks P, Fiscella K et al (2005) Measuring patient-centered communication in patient-physician consultations: theoretical and practical issues. Soc Sci Med 61(7):1516–1528CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Timmermans LM, van der Maazen RW, Verhaak CM, van Roosmalen MS, van Daal WA, Kraaimaat FW (2005) Patient participation in discussing palliative radiotherapy. Patient Educ Couns 57(1):53–61CrossRefPubMed Timmermans LM, van der Maazen RW, Verhaak CM, van Roosmalen MS, van Daal WA, Kraaimaat FW (2005) Patient participation in discussing palliative radiotherapy. Patient Educ Couns 57(1):53–61CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Verhaak CM, Kraaimaat FW, Staps AC, van Daal WA (2000) Informed consent in palliative radiotherapy: participation of patients and proxies in treatment decisions. Patient Educ Couns 41(1):63–71CrossRefPubMed Verhaak CM, Kraaimaat FW, Staps AC, van Daal WA (2000) Informed consent in palliative radiotherapy: participation of patients and proxies in treatment decisions. Patient Educ Couns 41(1):63–71CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Butow PN, Maclean M, Dunn SM, Tattersall MH, Boyer MJ (1997) The dynamics of change: cancer patients’ preferences for information, involvement and support. Ann Oncol : Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol/ESMO 8(9):857–863CrossRef Butow PN, Maclean M, Dunn SM, Tattersall MH, Boyer MJ (1997) The dynamics of change: cancer patients’ preferences for information, involvement and support. Ann Oncol : Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol/ESMO 8(9):857–863CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hack TF, Degner LF, Parker PA (2005) The communication goals and needs of cancer patients: a review. Psychooncology 14(10):831–845CrossRefPubMed Hack TF, Degner LF, Parker PA (2005) The communication goals and needs of cancer patients: a review. Psychooncology 14(10):831–845CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Barg FK, Cronholm PF, Straton JB et al (2007) Unmet psychosocial needs of Pennsylvanians with cancer: 1986–2005. Cancer 110(3):631–639CrossRefPubMed Barg FK, Cronholm PF, Straton JB et al (2007) Unmet psychosocial needs of Pennsylvanians with cancer: 1986–2005. Cancer 110(3):631–639CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Cegala DJ (2006) Emerging trends and future directions in patient communication skills training. Health Commun 20(2):123–129CrossRefPubMed Cegala DJ (2006) Emerging trends and future directions in patient communication skills training. Health Commun 20(2):123–129CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Harrington J, Noble LM, Newman SP (2004) Improving patients’ communication with doctors: a systematic review of intervention studies. Patient Educ Couns 52(1):7–16CrossRefPubMed Harrington J, Noble LM, Newman SP (2004) Improving patients’ communication with doctors: a systematic review of intervention studies. Patient Educ Couns 52(1):7–16CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference van Bruinessen IR, van Weel-Baumgarten EM, Gouw H, Zijlstra JM, Albada A, van Dulmen S (2013) Barriers and facilitators to effective communication experienced by patients with malignant lymphoma at all stages after diagnosis. Psycho-Oncology 22(12):2807–2814CrossRefPubMed van Bruinessen IR, van Weel-Baumgarten EM, Gouw H, Zijlstra JM, Albada A, van Dulmen S (2013) Barriers and facilitators to effective communication experienced by patients with malignant lymphoma at all stages after diagnosis. Psycho-Oncology 22(12):2807–2814CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Stienen JJ, Ottevanger PB, Wennekes L et al (2014) Delivering high-quality care to patients with a non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: barriers perceived by patients and physicians. Neth J Med 72(1):41–48PubMed Stienen JJ, Ottevanger PB, Wennekes L et al (2014) Delivering high-quality care to patients with a non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: barriers perceived by patients and physicians. Neth J Med 72(1):41–48PubMed
23.
go back to reference Kattlove H, Winn RJ (2003) Ongoing care of patients after primary treatment for their cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 53(3):172–196CrossRefPubMed Kattlove H, Winn RJ (2003) Ongoing care of patients after primary treatment for their cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 53(3):172–196CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Oerlemans S, Mols F, Issa DE et al (2013) A high level of fatigue among long-term survivors of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: results from the longitudinal population-based PROFILES registry in the south of the Netherlands. Haematologica 98(3):479–486CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Oerlemans S, Mols F, Issa DE et al (2013) A high level of fatigue among long-term survivors of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: results from the longitudinal population-based PROFILES registry in the south of the Netherlands. Haematologica 98(3):479–486CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Oerlemans S, Mols F, Nijziel MR, Zijlstra WP, Coebergh JW, van de Poll-Franse LV (2014) The course of anxiety and depression for patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma or diffuse large B cell lymphoma: a longitudinal study of the PROFILES registry. J cancer Surviv : Res Pract 8(4):555–564CrossRef Oerlemans S, Mols F, Nijziel MR, Zijlstra WP, Coebergh JW, van de Poll-Franse LV (2014) The course of anxiety and depression for patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma or diffuse large B cell lymphoma: a longitudinal study of the PROFILES registry. J cancer Surviv : Res Pract 8(4):555–564CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Epstein R, Street R (2007) Patient-centered communication in cancer care: promoting healing and reducing suffering. Bethesda, MD; 2007. Report No.: 07–6225 Epstein R, Street R (2007) Patient-centered communication in cancer care: promoting healing and reducing suffering. Bethesda, MD; 2007. Report No.: 07–6225
27.
go back to reference van Bruinessen IR, van Weel-Baumgarten EM, Snippe HW, Gouw H, Zijlstra JM, van Dulmen S (2014) Active patient participation in the development of an online intervention. JMIR Res protocol 3(4), e59CrossRef van Bruinessen IR, van Weel-Baumgarten EM, Snippe HW, Gouw H, Zijlstra JM, van Dulmen S (2014) Active patient participation in the development of an online intervention. JMIR Res protocol 3(4), e59CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Post DM, Cegala DJ, Miser WF (2002) The other half of the whole: teaching patients to communicate with physicians. Fam Med 34(5):344–352PubMed Post DM, Cegala DJ, Miser WF (2002) The other half of the whole: teaching patients to communicate with physicians. Fam Med 34(5):344–352PubMed
29.
go back to reference Henselmans I, de Haes HC, Smets EM (2013) Enhancing patient participation in oncology consultations: a best evidence synthesis of patient-targeted interventions. Psycho-Oncology 22(5):961–977CrossRefPubMed Henselmans I, de Haes HC, Smets EM (2013) Enhancing patient participation in oncology consultations: a best evidence synthesis of patient-targeted interventions. Psycho-Oncology 22(5):961–977CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Brown RF, Butow PN, Dunn SM, Tattersall MH (2001) Promoting patient participation and shortening cancer consultations: a randomised trial. Br J Cancer 85(9):1273–1279CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Brown RF, Butow PN, Dunn SM, Tattersall MH (2001) Promoting patient participation and shortening cancer consultations: a randomised trial. Br J Cancer 85(9):1273–1279CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference van Weert JC, Bolle S, van Dulmen S, Jansen J (2013) Older cancer patients’ information and communication needs: what they want is what they get? Patient Educ Couns 92(3):388–397CrossRefPubMed van Weert JC, Bolle S, van Dulmen S, Jansen J (2013) Older cancer patients’ information and communication needs: what they want is what they get? Patient Educ Couns 92(3):388–397CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Sixma HJ, Kerssens JJ, Campen CV, Peters L (1998) Quality of care from the patients’ perspective: from theoretical concept to a new measuring instrument. Health Expect 1(2):82–95CrossRefPubMed Sixma HJ, Kerssens JJ, Campen CV, Peters L (1998) Quality of care from the patients’ perspective: from theoretical concept to a new measuring instrument. Health Expect 1(2):82–95CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Noordman J, Verhaak P, van Dulmen S (2011) Web-enabled video-feedback: a method to reflect on the communication skills of experienced physicians. Patient Educ Couns 82(3):335–340CrossRefPubMed Noordman J, Verhaak P, van Dulmen S (2011) Web-enabled video-feedback: a method to reflect on the communication skills of experienced physicians. Patient Educ Couns 82(3):335–340CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Brink-Muinen A, van Dulmen SM, de Haes HC, Visser AP, Schellevis FG, Bensing JM (2006) Has patients’ involvement in the decision-making process changed over time? Health Expect 9(4):333–342CrossRefPubMed Brink-Muinen A, van Dulmen SM, de Haes HC, Visser AP, Schellevis FG, Bensing JM (2006) Has patients’ involvement in the decision-making process changed over time? Health Expect 9(4):333–342CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference van den Brink-Muinen A, Verhaak PF, Bensing JM et al (2000) Doctor-patient communication in different European health care systems: relevance and performance from the patients’ perspective. Patient Educ Couns 39(1):115–127CrossRefPubMed van den Brink-Muinen A, Verhaak PF, Bensing JM et al (2000) Doctor-patient communication in different European health care systems: relevance and performance from the patients’ perspective. Patient Educ Couns 39(1):115–127CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Brink-Muinen A, Van Dulmen AM, Jung HP, Bensing JM (2007) Do our talks with patients meet their expectations? J Fam Pract 56(7):559–568PubMed Brink-Muinen A, Van Dulmen AM, Jung HP, Bensing JM (2007) Do our talks with patients meet their expectations? J Fam Pract 56(7):559–568PubMed
38.
go back to reference Thorsen H, Witt K, Hollnagel H, Malterud K (2001) The purpose of the general practice consultation from the patient’s perspective—theoretical aspects. Fam Pract 18(6):638–643CrossRefPubMed Thorsen H, Witt K, Hollnagel H, Malterud K (2001) The purpose of the general practice consultation from the patient’s perspective—theoretical aspects. Fam Pract 18(6):638–643CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Gobat N, Kinnersley P, Gregory JW, Robling M (2015) What is agenda setting in the clinical encounter? Consensus from literature review and expert consultation. Patient Educ Couns 98(7):822–829CrossRefPubMed Gobat N, Kinnersley P, Gregory JW, Robling M (2015) What is agenda setting in the clinical encounter? Consensus from literature review and expert consultation. Patient Educ Couns 98(7):822–829CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Toussaint ND, Pedagogos E, Beavis J, Becker GJ, Polkinghorne KR, Kerr PG (2011) Improving CKD-MBD management in haemodialysis patients: barrier analysis for implementing better practice. Nephrol Dial Transplant : Off Publ Eur Dial Transplant Assoc Eur Ren Assoc 26(4):1319–1326CrossRef Toussaint ND, Pedagogos E, Beavis J, Becker GJ, Polkinghorne KR, Kerr PG (2011) Improving CKD-MBD management in haemodialysis patients: barrier analysis for implementing better practice. Nephrol Dial Transplant : Off Publ Eur Dial Transplant Assoc Eur Ren Assoc 26(4):1319–1326CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Robinson A, Thomson R (2001) Variability in patient preferences for participating in medical decision making: implication for the use of decision support tools. Qual Health Care 10(Suppl 1):i34–i38CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Robinson A, Thomson R (2001) Variability in patient preferences for participating in medical decision making: implication for the use of decision support tools. Qual Health Care 10(Suppl 1):i34–i38CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
42.
go back to reference Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport (VWS) Beleidsagenda 2015 Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport (VWS) Beleidsagenda 2015
43.
go back to reference Brown R, Butow PN, Boyer MJ, Tattersall MH (1999) Promoting patient participation in the cancer consultation: evaluation of a prompt sheet and coaching in question-asking. Br J Cancer 80(1–2):242–248CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Brown R, Butow PN, Boyer MJ, Tattersall MH (1999) Promoting patient participation in the cancer consultation: evaluation of a prompt sheet and coaching in question-asking. Br J Cancer 80(1–2):242–248CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
44.
go back to reference Eysenbach G (2000) Consumer health informatics. BMJ (Clin Res Ed) 320(7251):1713–1716CrossRef Eysenbach G (2000) Consumer health informatics. BMJ (Clin Res Ed) 320(7251):1713–1716CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Albada A, van Dulmen S, Bensing JM, Ausems MG (2012) Effects of a pre-visit educational website on information recall and needs fulfilment in breast cancer genetic counselling, a randomized controlled trial. Breast Cancer Res: BCR 14(2):R37CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Albada A, van Dulmen S, Bensing JM, Ausems MG (2012) Effects of a pre-visit educational website on information recall and needs fulfilment in breast cancer genetic counselling, a randomized controlled trial. Breast Cancer Res: BCR 14(2):R37CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
46.
go back to reference Fujimori M, Shirai Y, Asai M et al (2014) Effect of communication skills training program for oncologists based on patient preferences for communication when receiving bad news: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 32(20):3266–2172CrossRef Fujimori M, Shirai Y, Asai M et al (2014) Effect of communication skills training program for oncologists based on patient preferences for communication when receiving bad news: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 32(20):3266–2172CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Communication during haematological consultations; patients’ preferences and professionals’ performances
Authors
Inge R. van Bruinessen
Lotte E. van der Hout
Evelyn M. van Weel-Baumgarten
Hans Gouw
Josée M. Zijlstra
Sandra van Dulmen
Publication date
01-06-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Annals of Hematology / Issue 7/2016
Print ISSN: 0939-5555
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0584
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-016-2669-z

Other articles of this Issue 7/2016

Annals of Hematology 7/2016 Go to the issue