Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 10/2019

01-10-2019 | Original Article

Feedback on the usefulness of an illustrated guidebook in an anatomical dissection course

Authors: A. Bellier, G. Cavalie, P. Masson, O. Palombi, P. Chaffanjon

Published in: Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy | Issue 10/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Dissection provides direct experience in anatomy, which constitutes an essential discipline for medical students. For this purpose, we created a dissection guide for students in the 2nd-year of medical studies at the Grenoble University School of Medicine. The objective was to evaluate this tool of reverse pedagogy in terms of student satisfaction and educational interest.

Methods

Every 2nd-year student takes four sessions of limb dissection. To assist this dissection course, we developed a photographic guide launched in 2013. It includes an introduction presenting a methodology for dissection, followed by detailed protocols for each dissection area. Each step is illustrated with captioned photographs associated with a concise explanatory text. A questionnaire was then sent to 242 students to assess the impact of this tool and their overall satisfaction.

Results

Overall student satisfaction with this guidebook was rated 8.1 out of 10 with a 93.2% with significant improvement (p = 0.0137) and 78.7% of them declaring they had a better understanding of anatomy and mastery of the dissection techniques, respectively. In addition, students assessed the usefulness of the dissection guide at 3.6 out of 4 with the relevance of the content and presentation judged at 3.4 out of 4. Finally, the exam scores increased significantly with use of the guidebook (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Students deemed the organization of this anatomy tutorial as highly satisfactory, and using the guidebook as a reference in dissection sessions allowed students to prepare for the dissection and improve their knowledge of anatomy, as demonstrated by improved exam scores.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Alsaid B (2016) Slide shows vs graphic tablet live drawing for anatomy teaching. Morphol Bull Assoc Anat 100:210–215 Alsaid B (2016) Slide shows vs graphic tablet live drawing for anatomy teaching. Morphol Bull Assoc Anat 100:210–215
2.
go back to reference Captier G, Canovas F, Bonnel F (2005) The human body and the computer as pedagogic tools for anatomy: review of the literature. Morphol Bull Assoc Anat 89:142–153 Captier G, Canovas F, Bonnel F (2005) The human body and the computer as pedagogic tools for anatomy: review of the literature. Morphol Bull Assoc Anat 89:142–153
3.
go back to reference Davis CR, Bates AS, Ellis H, Roberts AM (2014) Human anatomy: let the students tell us how to teach. Anat Sci Educ 7:262–272CrossRef Davis CR, Bates AS, Ellis H, Roberts AM (2014) Human anatomy: let the students tell us how to teach. Anat Sci Educ 7:262–272CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Dinsmore CE, Daugherty S, Zeitz HJ (1999) Teaching and learning gross anatomy: dissection, prosection, or “both of the above?”. Clin Anat 12:110–114CrossRef Dinsmore CE, Daugherty S, Zeitz HJ (1999) Teaching and learning gross anatomy: dissection, prosection, or “both of the above?”. Clin Anat 12:110–114CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Dyer N, Sorra JS, Smith SA, Cleary PD, Hays RD (2012) Psychometric properties of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Clinician and Group Adult Visit Survey. Med Care 50(Suppl):S28–S34CrossRef Dyer N, Sorra JS, Smith SA, Cleary PD, Hays RD (2012) Psychometric properties of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Clinician and Group Adult Visit Survey. Med Care 50(Suppl):S28–S34CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fasel JH (1998) Teaching of gross anatomy to medical undergraduates: general practice as a guideline? A synopsis. J Anat 192(Pt 2):305–306CrossRef Fasel JH (1998) Teaching of gross anatomy to medical undergraduates: general practice as a guideline? A synopsis. J Anat 192(Pt 2):305–306CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Holla SJ, Selvaraj K, Isaac B, Chandi G (1999) Significance of the role of self-study and group discussion. Clin Anat 12:277–280CrossRef Holla SJ, Selvaraj K, Isaac B, Chandi G (1999) Significance of the role of self-study and group discussion. Clin Anat 12:277–280CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Jack L, Wilson (1993) Dissection manual. Igaku-Shoin Medical Publishers, New York Jack L, Wilson (1993) Dissection manual. Igaku-Shoin Medical Publishers, New York
9.
go back to reference Johnson JH (2002) Importance of dissection in learning anatomy: personal dissection versus peer teaching. Clin Anat N Y N 15:38–44CrossRef Johnson JH (2002) Importance of dissection in learning anatomy: personal dissection versus peer teaching. Clin Anat N Y N 15:38–44CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Jones NA, Olafson RP, Sutin J (1978) Evaluation of a gross anatomy program without dissection. J Med Educ 53:198–205PubMed Jones NA, Olafson RP, Sutin J (1978) Evaluation of a gross anatomy program without dissection. J Med Educ 53:198–205PubMed
11.
go back to reference Kerby J, Shukur ZN, Shalhoub J (2011) The relationships between learning outcomes and methods of teaching anatomy as perceived by medical students. Clin Anat N Y N 24:489–497CrossRef Kerby J, Shukur ZN, Shalhoub J (2011) The relationships between learning outcomes and methods of teaching anatomy as perceived by medical students. Clin Anat N Y N 24:489–497CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Korf H-W, Wicht H, Snipes RL, Timmermans J-P, Paulsen F, Rune G, Baumgart-Vogt E (2008) The dissection course—necessary and indispensable for teaching anatomy to medical students. Ann Anat Anat Anz 190:16–22CrossRef Korf H-W, Wicht H, Snipes RL, Timmermans J-P, Paulsen F, Rune G, Baumgart-Vogt E (2008) The dissection course—necessary and indispensable for teaching anatomy to medical students. Ann Anat Anat Anz 190:16–22CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lamdin R, Weller J, Kerse N (2012) Orientation to dissection: Assisting students through the transition. Clin Anat N Y N 25:235–240CrossRef Lamdin R, Weller J, Kerse N (2012) Orientation to dissection: Assisting students through the transition. Clin Anat N Y N 25:235–240CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Leung K-K, Lue B-H, Lu K-S, Huang T-S (2006) Students’ evaluation on a two-stage anatomy curriculum. Med Teach 28:e59–e63CrossRef Leung K-K, Lue B-H, Lu K-S, Huang T-S (2006) Students’ evaluation on a two-stage anatomy curriculum. Med Teach 28:e59–e63CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Macchi V, Munari PF, Ninfo V, Parenti A, De Caro R (2003) A short course of dissection for 2nd-year medical students at the School of Medicine of Padova. Surg Radiol Anat SRA 25:132–138CrossRef Macchi V, Munari PF, Ninfo V, Parenti A, De Caro R (2003) A short course of dissection for 2nd-year medical students at the School of Medicine of Padova. Surg Radiol Anat SRA 25:132–138CrossRef
16.
go back to reference McWhorter DL, Forester JP (2004) Effects of an alternate dissection schedule on gross anatomy laboratory practical performance. Clin Anat N Y N 17:144–148CrossRef McWhorter DL, Forester JP (2004) Effects of an alternate dissection schedule on gross anatomy laboratory practical performance. Clin Anat N Y N 17:144–148CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Nnodim JO (1990) Learning human anatomy: by dissection or from prosections? Med Educ 24:389–395CrossRef Nnodim JO (1990) Learning human anatomy: by dissection or from prosections? Med Educ 24:389–395CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Nwachukwu C, Lachman N, Pawlina W (2015) Evaluating dissection in the gross anatomy course: Correlation between quality of laboratory dissection and students outcomes. Anat Sci Educ 8:45–52CrossRef Nwachukwu C, Lachman N, Pawlina W (2015) Evaluating dissection in the gross anatomy course: Correlation between quality of laboratory dissection and students outcomes. Anat Sci Educ 8:45–52CrossRef
19.
go back to reference O’Carroll RE, Whiten S, Jackson D, Sinclair DW (2002) Assessing the emotional impact of cadaver dissection on medical students. Med Educ 36:550–554CrossRef O’Carroll RE, Whiten S, Jackson D, Sinclair DW (2002) Assessing the emotional impact of cadaver dissection on medical students. Med Educ 36:550–554CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Patel KM, Moxham BJ (2008) The relationships between learning outcomes and methods of teaching anatomy as perceived by professional anatomists. Clin Anat N Y N 21:182–189CrossRef Patel KM, Moxham BJ (2008) The relationships between learning outcomes and methods of teaching anatomy as perceived by professional anatomists. Clin Anat N Y N 21:182–189CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Rouvière H (1976) Précis d’anatomie et de dissection. Elsevier/Masson, New York Rouvière H (1976) Précis d’anatomie et de dissection. Elsevier/Masson, New York
23.
go back to reference Stanford W, Erkonen WE, Cassell MD, Moran BD, Easley G, Carris RL, Albanese MA (1994) Evaluation of a computer-based program for teaching cardiac anatomy. Invest Radiol 29:248–252CrossRef Stanford W, Erkonen WE, Cassell MD, Moran BD, Easley G, Carris RL, Albanese MA (1994) Evaluation of a computer-based program for teaching cardiac anatomy. Invest Radiol 29:248–252CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Stillman PL, Ruggill JS, Sabers DL (1978) The use of live models in the teaching of gross anatomy. Med Educ 12:114–116CrossRef Stillman PL, Ruggill JS, Sabers DL (1978) The use of live models in the teaching of gross anatomy. Med Educ 12:114–116CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Travill AA (1977) The anatomical basis of clinical practice: an anatomy learning programme. Med Educ 11:377–379CrossRef Travill AA (1977) The anatomical basis of clinical practice: an anatomy learning programme. Med Educ 11:377–379CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Tweed MJ, Bagg W, Child S, Wilkinson T, Weller JM (2010) How the trainee intern year can ease the transition from undergraduate education to postgraduate practice. N Z Med J 123:81–91PubMed Tweed MJ, Bagg W, Child S, Wilkinson T, Weller JM (2010) How the trainee intern year can ease the transition from undergraduate education to postgraduate practice. N Z Med J 123:81–91PubMed
27.
go back to reference Utting M, Willan P (1995) What future for dissection in courses of human topographical anatomy in universities in the UK? Clin Anat 8:414–417CrossRef Utting M, Willan P (1995) What future for dissection in courses of human topographical anatomy in universities in the UK? Clin Anat 8:414–417CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Voiglio EJ, Frattini B, Mathieux F, Vaz G, Lifante J-C, Rongieras F, Neidhardt J-PH, Morin A (2002) L’enseignement de l’anatomie à Lyon: un exemple d’évaluation de programme. Pédagogie Médicale 3:27–32CrossRef Voiglio EJ, Frattini B, Mathieux F, Vaz G, Lifante J-C, Rongieras F, Neidhardt J-PH, Morin A (2002) L’enseignement de l’anatomie à Lyon: un exemple d’évaluation de programme. Pédagogie Médicale 3:27–32CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Winkelmann A (2007) Anatomical dissection as a teaching method in medical school: a review of the evidence. Med Educ 41:15–22CrossRef Winkelmann A (2007) Anatomical dissection as a teaching method in medical school: a review of the evidence. Med Educ 41:15–22CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Yeager VL (1996) Learning gross anatomy: dissection and prosection. Clin Anat N Y N 9:57–59CrossRef Yeager VL (1996) Learning gross anatomy: dissection and prosection. Clin Anat N Y N 9:57–59CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Feedback on the usefulness of an illustrated guidebook in an anatomical dissection course
Authors
A. Bellier
G. Cavalie
P. Masson
O. Palombi
P. Chaffanjon
Publication date
01-10-2019
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy / Issue 10/2019
Print ISSN: 0930-1038
Electronic ISSN: 1279-8517
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-019-02194-y

Other articles of this Issue 10/2019

Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 10/2019 Go to the issue