Top

Published in:

Open Access 01-10-2017 | Original Article

Ossification center of the humeral shaft in the human fetus: a CT, digital, and statistical study

Authors: Marcin Wiśniewski, Mariusz Baumgart, Magdalena Grzonkowska, Bogdan Małkowski, Arnika Wilińska-Jankowska, Zygmunt Siedlecki, Michał Szpinda

Published in: Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy | Issue 10/2017

Abstract

Purpose

The knowledge of the development of the humeral shaft ossification center may be useful both in determining the fetal stage and maturity and for detecting congenital disorders, as well. This study was performed to quantitatively examine the humeral shaft ossification center with respect to its linear, planar, and volumetric parameters.

Materials and method

Using methods of CT, digital image analysis, and statistics, the size of the humeral shaft ossification center in 48 spontaneously aborted human fetuses aged 17–30 weeks was studied.

Results

With no sex differences, the best-fit growth dynamics for the humeral shaft ossification center was modeled by the following functions: y = −78.568 + 34.114 × ln (age) ± 2.160 for its length, y = −12.733 + 5.654 × ln(age) ± 0.515 for its proximal transverse diameter, y = −4.750 + 2.609 × ln (age) ± 0.294 for its middle transverse diameter, y = −10.037 + 4.648 × ln (age) ± 0.560 for its distal transverse diameter, y = −146.601 + 11.237 × age ± 19.907 for its projection surface area, and y = 121.159 + 0.001 × (age)⁴ ± 102.944 for its volume.

Conclusions

With no sex differences, the ossification center of the humeral shaft grows logarithmically with respect to its length and transverse diameters, linearly with respect to its projection surface area, and fourth-degree polynomially with respect to its volume. The obtained morphometric data of the humeral shaft ossification center are considered normative for respective prenatal weeks and may be of relevance in both the estimation of fetal ages and the ultrasonic diagnostics of congenital defects.

Arias–Martorell J, Potau JM, Bello–Hellegouarch G, Perez–Perez A (2014) Brief communication: developmental versus functional three–dimensional geometric morphometric–based modularity of the human proximal humerus. Am J Phys Anthropol 154:459–465CrossRefPubMed

Barkova E, Mohan U, Chitayat D, Keating S, Toi A, Frank J, Frank R, Tomlinson G, Glanc P (2015) Fetal skeletal dysplasias in a tertiary care center: radiology, pathology, and molecular analysis of 112 cases. Clin Genet 87:330–337CrossRefPubMed

Baumgart M, Wiśniewski M, Grzonkowska M, Badura M, Dombek M, Małkowski B, Szpinda M (2016) Morphometric study of the two fused primary ossification centers of the clavicle in the human fetus. Surg Radiol Anat. doi:10.1007/s00276-016-1640-y

Benacerraf BR, Cnann A, Gelman R, Laboda LA, Frigoletto FD Jr (1989) Can sonographers reliably identify anatomic features associated with Down syndrome in fetuses? Radiology 173(2):377–380CrossRefPubMed

Benacerraf BR, Gelman R, Frigoletto FD Jr (1987) Sonographic identification of second trimester fetuses with Down’s syndrome. N Engl J Med 317:1371–1376CrossRefPubMed

Benacerraf BR, Neuberg D, Frigoletto FD Jr (1991) Humeral shortening in second-trimester fetuses with Down syndrome. Obset Gynecol 77:223–227CrossRef

Bober MB, Taylor M, Heinle R, Mackenzie W (2012) Achondroplasia hypochondroplasia complex and abnormal pulmonary anatomy. Am J Med Genet 158:2336–2341CrossRef

Bonafe L, Cormier-Daire V, Hall C, Lachman R, Mortier G, Mundos S, Nishimura G, Sangiorgi L, Savarirayan R, Sillence D, Spranger J, Superti-Furga A, Warman M, Unger S (2015) Nosology and classification of genetic skeletal disorders: 2015 revision. Am J Med Genet A 167(12):2869–2892CrossRef

Broker FHL, Burbac T (1990) Ultrasonic diagnosis of separation of the proximal humeral epiphysis in the newborn. J Bone Joint Surg 72(2):187–191CrossRefPubMed

10.

Cassart M, Massez A, Cos T, Tecco L, Thomas D, Van Regemorter N, Avni F (2007) Contribution of three-dimensional computed tomography in the assessment of fetal skeletal dysplasia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29:537–543CrossRefPubMed

11.

Chessare JW, Rogers LF, White H, Tachdjian MO (1977) Injuries of the medial epicondylar ossification center of the humerus. Am J Roentgenol 129:49–55CrossRef

12.

Chinn DH, Bolding DB, Callen PW, Gross BH, Filly RA (1983) Ultrasonographic identification of fetal lower exteremity epiphyseal ossification centers. Radiology 147(3):815–818CrossRefPubMed

13.

Cho SY, Jin DK (2015) Guidelines for genetic skeletal dysplasias for pediatricians. Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 20:187–191CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Cocchi U (1950) Zur Frage der Epiphyse Ossifikation des Humeruskopfes das Tuberculum minus. Radiol Clin 19:18–23PubMed

15.

Davies DA, Parsons FG (1927) The age order of the appearance and union of the normal epiphyses as seen by X rays. J Anat 62:58–71PubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Donne HD, Faúndes A, Tristão EG, de Sousa MH, Urbanetz AA (2005) Sonographic identification and measurement of the epiphyseal ossification centers as markers of fetal gestational age. J Clin Ultrasound 33(8):394–400CrossRefPubMed

17.

Goldfisher R, Amodio J (2015) Separation of the proximal humeral epiphysis in the newborn: rapid diagnosis with ultrasonography. Case Rep Pediatr 2015:1–3

18.

Kuhns LR, Finnstrom O (1976) New standards of ossification of the newborn. Radiology 119:655–660CrossRefPubMed

19.

Kuhns LR, Sherman MP, Poznanski AK, Holt JF (1973) Humeral head and coracoid ossification in the newborn. Radiology 107:145–149CrossRefPubMed

20.

Kumari R, Yadav AK, Bhandari K, Nimmagadda HK, Singh R (2015) Ossification centers of distal femur, proximal tibia and proximal humerus as a tool for estimating gestational age of fetuses in third trimester of pregnancy in west Indian population: an ultrasonographic study. Int J Basic Appl Med Sc 5(2):316–321

21.

Kwong S, Kothary S, Poncinelli LL (2014) Skeletal development of the proximal humerus in the pediatric population: MRI features. AJR 202:418–425CrossRefPubMed

22.

Macé G, Sonigo P, Cormier-Daire V, Aubry MC, Martinovic J, Elie C, Gonzales M, Carbonne B, Dumzes Y, Le Merrier M, Brunelle F, Benachi A (2013) Three-dimensional helical computed tomography in prenatal diagnosis of fetal skeletal dysplasia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 42(2):161–168CrossRefPubMed

23.

Mahony BS, Bowie JS, Killam AP, Kay HH, Cooper C (1986) Epiphyseal ossification centers in the assessment of fetal maturity: sonographic correlation with the amniocentesis lung profile. Radiology 159(2):521–524CrossRefPubMed

24.

McCollough CH, Schueler BA, Atwell TD, Braun NN, Regner DM, Brown DL, LeRoy AJ (2007) Radiation exposure and pregnancy: when should we be concerned? Radiographics 27(4):909–918CrossRefPubMed

25.

Menees TO, Holly LE (1932) The ossification in the extremities of the newborn. Am J Roentgenol 28:389–390

26.

Nazário AC, Tanaka CI, Novo NF (1993) Proximal humeral ossification center of the fetus: time of appearance and the sensitivity and specificity of this finding. J Ultrasound Med 12(9):513–515CrossRefPubMed

27.

Noback CR (1944) The development anatomy of the human osseous skeleton during the embryonic, fetal and circumnatal periods. Anat Rec 88:91–117CrossRef

28.

Ogden JA, Conlogue GJ, Jensen J (1978) Radiology of postnatal skeletal development: the proximal humerus. Skeletal Radiol 2:153–160CrossRef

29.

Paterson RS (1929) A radiological investigation of the epiphyses of the long bones. J Anat 64:28–46PubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Stempfle N, Huten Y, Fredouille C, Brisse H, Nessmann C (1999) Skeletal abnormalities in fetuses with Down’s syndrome: a radiographic post-mortem study. Pediatr Radiol 29(90):682–688CrossRefPubMed

31.

Ulla M, Aiello H, Cobos MP, Orioli I, Garcia-Mónako R, Etchegaray A, Igarzábal ML, Otaňo L (2011) Prenatal diagnosis of skeletal dysplasias: contribution of three-dimensional computed tomography. Fetal Diagn Ther 29:238–247CrossRefPubMed

32.

Victoria T, Epelman M, Coleman BG, Horii S, Oliver ER, Mahboubi S, Khalek N, Kasperski S, Edgar JCh, Jaramillo D (2013) Low-dose fetal CT in the prenatal evaluation of skeletal dysplasias and other severe skeletal abnormalities. Am J Radiol 200(5):989–1000

33.

Victoria T, Shakir NU, Andronikou S, Edgar JC, Germaine P, Epelman M, Johnson AM, Jaramillo D (2016) Normal fetal long bone length from computed tomography: potential value in the prenatal evaluation of skeletal dysplasias. Fetal Diagn Ther 40(4):291–297CrossRefPubMed

34.

Zoetis T, Tassinari MS, Bagi C, Walthall K, Hurtt ME (2003) Species comparison of postnatal bone growth and development. Birth Defects Res B 68:86–110CrossRef

Title: Ossification center of the humeral shaft in the human fetus: a CT, digital, and statistical study
Authors: Marcin Wiśniewski
Mariusz Baumgart
Magdalena Grzonkowska
Bogdan Małkowski
Arnika Wilińska-Jankowska
Zygmunt Siedlecki
Michał Szpinda
Publication date: 01-10-2017
Publisher: Springer Paris
Published in: Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy / Issue 10/2017
Print ISSN: 0930-1038
Electronic ISSN: 1279-8517
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-017-1849-4

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

Ossification center of the humeral shaft in the human fetus: a CT, digital, and statistical study

Abstract

Purpose

Materials and method

Results

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Materials and method

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 10/2017

Erratum to: The aberrant right subclavian artery: cadaveric study and literature review

Dynamic measurements of cervical neural foramina during neck movements in asymptomatic young volunteers

The arterial supply of the nipple areola complex (NAC) and its relations: an analysis of angiographic CT imaging for breast pedicle design

Triticeal cartilage: the forgotten cartilage

Median pericallosal artery with double proximal origin: case report and clinical consideration

Chronic sialadenitis due to the stone inside the accessory duct of submandibular gland