Skip to main content
Top
Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 3/2018

01-03-2018 | Clinical Investigation

C-Arm Cone Beam CT for Intraprocedural Image Fusion and 3D Guidance in Portal Vein Embolization (PVE)

Authors: Willie M. Lüdemann, Georg Böning, Julius Chapiro, Martin Jonczyk, Dominik Geisel, Dirk Schnapauff, Gero Wieners, Moritz Schmelzle, Sascha Chopra, Rolf W. Günther, Bernhard Gebauer, Florian Streitparth

Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Portal vein embolization (PVE) is applied in patients with extended oncologic liver disease to induce hyperplasia of the future liver remnant and make resection feasible. Ultrasound (US) guidance is the gold standard for percutaneous portal vein access. This study evaluated feasibility and safety of C-arm cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for needle guidance.

Materials and Methods

In 10 patients, puncture was performed under 3D needle guidance in a CBCT data set. Contrast-enhanced (CE) CBCT was generated (n = 7), or native CBCT was registered to pre-examination CE-CT via image fusion (n = 3). Technical success, number of punctures, puncture time (time between CBCT acquisition and successful portal vein access), dose parameters and safety were evaluated. For comparison, 10 patients with PVE under US guidance were analyzed retrospectively. Study and control group were matched for age, BMI, INR, platelets, portal vein anatomy.

Results

All interventions were technically successful without intervention-related complications. In the study group, the mean number of puncture attempts was 3.1 ± 2.5. Mean puncture time was 12 min (±10). Mean total dose area product (DAP) was 288 Gy cm2 (±154). The mean relative share of CBCT-related radiation exposure was 6% (±3). Intervention times and DAP were slightly higher compared to the control group without reaching significance.

Conclusion

CBCT-guided PVE is feasible and safe. The relative dose of CBCT is low compared to the overall dose of the intervention. This technique may be a promising approach for difficult anatomic situations that limit the use of US for needle guidance.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(2):87–108.CrossRefPubMed Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(2):87–108.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Garden OJ, Rees M, Poston GJ, et al. Guidelines for resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases. Gut. 2006;55(Suppl 3):iii1–8.PubMedPubMedCentral Garden OJ, Rees M, Poston GJ, et al. Guidelines for resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases. Gut. 2006;55(Suppl 3):iii1–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
3.
4.
go back to reference Kopetz S, Chang GJ, Overman MJ, et al. Improved survival in metastatic colorectal cancer is associated with adoption of hepatic resection and improved chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(22):3677–83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kopetz S, Chang GJ, Overman MJ, et al. Improved survival in metastatic colorectal cancer is associated with adoption of hepatic resection and improved chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(22):3677–83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Adam R, Delvart V, Pascal G, et al. Rescue surgery for unresectable colorectal liver metastases downstaged by chemotherapy: a model to predict long-term survival. Ann Surg. 2004;240(4):644–57 (discussion 657–648).PubMedPubMedCentral Adam R, Delvart V, Pascal G, et al. Rescue surgery for unresectable colorectal liver metastases downstaged by chemotherapy: a model to predict long-term survival. Ann Surg. 2004;240(4):644–57 (discussion 657–648).PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference May BJ, Talenfeld AD, Madoff DC. Update on portal vein embolization: evidence-based outcomes, controversies, and novel strategies. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;24(2):241–54.CrossRefPubMed May BJ, Talenfeld AD, Madoff DC. Update on portal vein embolization: evidence-based outcomes, controversies, and novel strategies. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;24(2):241–54.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Lewandowski RJ, Kulik LM, Riaz A, et al. A comparative analysis of transarterial downstaging for hepatocellular carcinoma: chemoembolization versus radioembolization. Am J Transplant. 2009;9(8):1920–8.CrossRefPubMed Lewandowski RJ, Kulik LM, Riaz A, et al. A comparative analysis of transarterial downstaging for hepatocellular carcinoma: chemoembolization versus radioembolization. Am J Transplant. 2009;9(8):1920–8.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Abulkhir A, Limongelli P, Healey AJ, et al. Preoperative portal vein embolization for major liver resection: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2008;247(1):49–57.CrossRefPubMed Abulkhir A, Limongelli P, Healey AJ, et al. Preoperative portal vein embolization for major liver resection: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2008;247(1):49–57.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Geisel D, Malinowski M, Powerski MJ, et al. Improved hypertrophy of future remnant liver after portal vein embolization with plugs, coils and particles. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2014;37(5):1251–8.CrossRef Geisel D, Malinowski M, Powerski MJ, et al. Improved hypertrophy of future remnant liver after portal vein embolization with plugs, coils and particles. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2014;37(5):1251–8.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference van Lienden KP, van den Esschert JW, de Graaf W, et al. Portal vein embolization before liver resection: a systematic review. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2013;36(1):25–34.CrossRef van Lienden KP, van den Esschert JW, de Graaf W, et al. Portal vein embolization before liver resection: a systematic review. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2013;36(1):25–34.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Denys A, Bize P, Demartines N, Deschamps F, De Baere T. Quality improvement for portal vein embolization. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2010;33(3):452–6.CrossRef Denys A, Bize P, Demartines N, Deschamps F, De Baere T. Quality improvement for portal vein embolization. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2010;33(3):452–6.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Di Stefano DR, de Baere T, Denys A, et al. Preoperative percutaneous portal vein embolization: evaluation of adverse events in 188 patients. Radiology. 2005;234(2):625–30.CrossRefPubMed Di Stefano DR, de Baere T, Denys A, et al. Preoperative percutaneous portal vein embolization: evaluation of adverse events in 188 patients. Radiology. 2005;234(2):625–30.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Kodama Y, Shimizu T, Endo H, Miyamoto N, Miyasaka K. Complications of percutaneous transhepatic portal vein embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2002;13(12):1233–7.CrossRefPubMed Kodama Y, Shimizu T, Endo H, Miyamoto N, Miyasaka K. Complications of percutaneous transhepatic portal vein embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2002;13(12):1233–7.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Floridi C, Radaelli A, Abi-Jaoudeh N, et al. C-arm cone-beam computed tomography in interventional oncology: technical aspects and clinical applications. Radiol Med. 2014;119(7):521–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Floridi C, Radaelli A, Abi-Jaoudeh N, et al. C-arm cone-beam computed tomography in interventional oncology: technical aspects and clinical applications. Radiol Med. 2014;119(7):521–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference McKay T, Ingraham CR, Johnson GE, Kogut MJ, Vaidya S, Padia SA. Cone-beam CT with fluoroscopic overlay versus conventional CT guidance for percutaneous abdominopelvic abscess drain placement. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016;27(1):52–7.CrossRefPubMed McKay T, Ingraham CR, Johnson GE, Kogut MJ, Vaidya S, Padia SA. Cone-beam CT with fluoroscopic overlay versus conventional CT guidance for percutaneous abdominopelvic abscess drain placement. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016;27(1):52–7.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Lucatelli P, Corona M, Argiro R, et al. Impact of 3D rotational angiography on liver embolization procedures: review of technique and applications. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2015;38(3):523–35.CrossRef Lucatelli P, Corona M, Argiro R, et al. Impact of 3D rotational angiography on liver embolization procedures: review of technique and applications. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2015;38(3):523–35.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ribero D, Chun YS, Vauthey JN. Standardized liver volumetry for portal vein embolization. Semin Interv Radiol. 2008;25(2):104–9.CrossRef Ribero D, Chun YS, Vauthey JN. Standardized liver volumetry for portal vein embolization. Semin Interv Radiol. 2008;25(2):104–9.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Abdalla EK, Adam R, Bilchik AJ, Jaeck D, Vauthey JN, Mahvi D. Improving resectability of hepatic colorectal metastases: expert consensus statement. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13(10):1271–80.CrossRefPubMed Abdalla EK, Adam R, Bilchik AJ, Jaeck D, Vauthey JN, Mahvi D. Improving resectability of hepatic colorectal metastases: expert consensus statement. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13(10):1271–80.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Tacher V, Radaelli A, Lin M, Geschwind JF. How I do it: cone-beam CT during transarterial chemoembolization for liver cancer. Radiology. 2015;274(2):320–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tacher V, Radaelli A, Lin M, Geschwind JF. How I do it: cone-beam CT during transarterial chemoembolization for liver cancer. Radiology. 2015;274(2):320–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Couinaud C. Liver anatomy: portal (and suprahepatic) or biliary segmentation. Dig Surg. 1999;16(6):459–67.CrossRefPubMed Couinaud C. Liver anatomy: portal (and suprahepatic) or biliary segmentation. Dig Surg. 1999;16(6):459–67.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Gallego C, Velasco M, Marcuello P, Tejedor D, De Campo L, Friera A. Congenital and acquired anomalies of the portal venous system. Radiographics. 2002;22(1):141–59.CrossRefPubMed Gallego C, Velasco M, Marcuello P, Tejedor D, De Campo L, Friera A. Congenital and acquired anomalies of the portal venous system. Radiographics. 2002;22(1):141–59.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Fraser-Hill MA, Atri M, Bret PM, Aldis AE, Illescas FF, Herschorn SD. Intrahepatic portal venous system: variations demonstrated with duplex and color Doppler US. Radiology. 1990;177(2):523–6.CrossRefPubMed Fraser-Hill MA, Atri M, Bret PM, Aldis AE, Illescas FF, Herschorn SD. Intrahepatic portal venous system: variations demonstrated with duplex and color Doppler US. Radiology. 1990;177(2):523–6.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
C-Arm Cone Beam CT for Intraprocedural Image Fusion and 3D Guidance in Portal Vein Embolization (PVE)
Authors
Willie M. Lüdemann
Georg Böning
Julius Chapiro
Martin Jonczyk
Dominik Geisel
Dirk Schnapauff
Gero Wieners
Moritz Schmelzle
Sascha Chopra
Rolf W. Günther
Bernhard Gebauer
Florian Streitparth
Publication date
01-03-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Electronic ISSN: 1432-086X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-017-1782-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 3/2018 Go to the issue