Skip to main content
Top
Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 1/2018

01-01-2018 | Clinical Investigation

The European Board of Interventional Radiology Examination: A Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey

Authors: Emma Tong, Muirne Spooner, Otto Van Delden, Raman Uberoi, Mark Sheehan, Damien C. O’Neill, Michael Lee

Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Society of Europe established the European Board of Interventional Radiology (EBIR) as an international examination in Interventional Radiology (IR), in 2010. The main objective of this study was to examine candidates’ variables which could influence examination success. The secondary objective was to evaluate candidate feedback.

Materials and Methods

This study was a cross-sectional web-based survey incorporating 30 questions which reviewed candidates’ demographics; use of English language; education; and radiology training. Free-text responses provided perspective on the examination process and any potential career implications. This survey was distributed via SurveygizmoTM and emailed to 227 candidates, and the results were then anonymised and analysed.

Results

A total of 115 candidates responded to the survey. 4.4% (N = 5/115) of candidates were women, and 38.3% (N = 44/115) of candidates were fluent in English. Over 45.2% (N = 52/115) of the respondents achieved a distinction, or >70% equivalent in their medical degree, and 60.8% (N = 70/115) achieved some form of higher degree after medical school. 54.8% (N = 63/115) spent time in other medical specialties, of which the majority (33.8%, N = 39/115) was in surgery. 67.5% (N = 77/114) completed a dedicated fellowship in IR. 61.9% (70/113) felt the EBIR qualification helped their career, for example with academic promotion or increased clinical privileges.

Conclusion

EBIR applicants were predominantly male (>95%). Clinical training, prior to radiology training, was very common in this cohort. Overall, most candidates expressed satisfaction with the examination process, and many felt this qualification helped their career. The recent recognition by national accreditation bodies should hopefully improve the profile of the examination greatly.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lewis RS, Bhargavan M, Sunshine JH. Women radiologists in the United States: results from the American College of Radiology’s 2003 survey. Radiology. 2007;242(3):802–10.CrossRefPubMed Lewis RS, Bhargavan M, Sunshine JH. Women radiologists in the United States: results from the American College of Radiology’s 2003 survey. Radiology. 2007;242(3):802–10.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Higher Education Statistics Agency. Qualifications obtained by and examination results of higher education students at higher education institutions in the United Kingdom for the academic year 2010/11. 2011. Higher Education Statistics Agency. Qualifications obtained by and examination results of higher education students at higher education institutions in the United Kingdom for the academic year 2010/11. 2011.
4.
go back to reference The American Association of Medical Schools. The Official Guide To Medical School Admissions. 2016:11–15. The American Association of Medical Schools. The Official Guide To Medical School Admissions. 2016:11–15.
7.
go back to reference European Curriculum and Syllabus for Interventional Radiology. Cardiovascular and interventional radiological society of Europe. 1st ed; 2013. European Curriculum and Syllabus for Interventional Radiology. Cardiovascular and interventional radiological society of Europe. 1st ed; 2013.
9.
go back to reference Maertens H, Madani A, Landry T, Vermassen F, Van Herzeele I, Aggarwal R. Systematic review of e-learning for surgical training. Br J Surg. 2016;10(1002):1428–37.CrossRef Maertens H, Madani A, Landry T, Vermassen F, Van Herzeele I, Aggarwal R. Systematic review of e-learning for surgical training. Br J Surg. 2016;10(1002):1428–37.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Case SM, Swanson DB. Constructing written test questions for the basic and clinical sciences. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: National Board of Medical Examiners; 2003. Case SM, Swanson DB. Constructing written test questions for the basic and clinical sciences. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: National Board of Medical Examiners; 2003.
Metadata
Title
The European Board of Interventional Radiology Examination: A Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey
Authors
Emma Tong
Muirne Spooner
Otto Van Delden
Raman Uberoi
Mark Sheehan
Damien C. O’Neill
Michael Lee
Publication date
01-01-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Electronic ISSN: 1432-086X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-017-1762-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 1/2018 Go to the issue