Skip to main content
Top
Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 5/2016

01-05-2016 | Technical Note

MRI-Guided Percutaneous Biopsy of Mediastinal Masses Using a Large Bore Magnet: Technical Feasibility

Authors: J. Garnon, N. Ramamurthy, J. Caudrelier J, G. Erceg, E. Breton, G. Tsoumakidou, P. Rao, A. Gangi

Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | Issue 5/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and safety of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided percutaneous biopsy of mediastinal masses performed using a wide-bore high-field scanner.

Materials and Methods

This is a retrospective study of 16 consecutive patients (8 male, 8 female; mean age 74 years) who underwent MRI-guided core needle biopsy of a mediastinal mass between February 2010 and January 2014. Size and location of lesion, approach taken, time for needle placement, overall duration of procedure, and post-procedural complications were evaluated. Technical success rates and correlation with surgical pathology (where available) were assessed.

Results

Target lesions were located in the anterior (n = 13), middle (n = 2), and posterior mediastinum (n = 1), respectively. Mean size was 7.2 cm (range 3.6–11 cm). Average time for needle placement was 9.4 min (range 3–18 min); average duration of entire procedure was 42 min (range 27–62 min). 2–5 core samples were obtained from each lesion (mean 2.6). Technical success rate was 100 %, with specimens successfully obtained in all 16 patients. There were no immediate complications. Histopathology revealed malignancy in 12 cases (4 of which were surgically confirmed), benign lesions in 3 cases (1 of which was false negative following surgical resection), and one inconclusive specimen (treated as inaccurate since repeat CT-guided biopsy demonstrated thymic hyperplasia). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy in our study were 92.3, 100, 100, 66.7, and 87.5 %, respectively.

Conclusion

MRI-guided mediastinal biopsy is a safe procedure with high diagnostic accuracy, which may offer a non-ionizing alternative to CT guidance.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Stattaus J, Maderwald S, Baba HA, Gerken G, Barkhausen J, Forsting M, Ladd ME. MR-guided liver biopsy within a short, wide-bore 1.5 Tesla MR system. Eur Radiol. 2008;18(12):2865–73.CrossRefPubMed Stattaus J, Maderwald S, Baba HA, Gerken G, Barkhausen J, Forsting M, Ladd ME. MR-guided liver biopsy within a short, wide-bore 1.5 Tesla MR system. Eur Radiol. 2008;18(12):2865–73.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Lü Y, Liu M, Li C, Wu L, Fritz J. MRI-guided biopsy and aspiration in the head and neck: evaluation of 77 patients. Eur Radiol. 2012;22(2):404–10.CrossRefPubMed Lü Y, Liu M, Li C, Wu L, Fritz J. MRI-guided biopsy and aspiration in the head and neck: evaluation of 77 patients. Eur Radiol. 2012;22(2):404–10.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Genant JW, Vandevenne JE, Bergman AG, Beaulieu CF, Kee ST, Norbash AM, Lang P. Interventional musculoskeletal procedures performed by using MR imaging guidance with a vertically open MR unit: assessment of techniques and applicability. Radiology. 2002;223(1):127–36.CrossRefPubMed Genant JW, Vandevenne JE, Bergman AG, Beaulieu CF, Kee ST, Norbash AM, Lang P. Interventional musculoskeletal procedures performed by using MR imaging guidance with a vertically open MR unit: assessment of techniques and applicability. Radiology. 2002;223(1):127–36.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Duckwiler G, Lufkin RB, Teresi L, Spickler E, Dion J, Viñuela F, Bentson J, Hanafee W. Head and neck lesions: MR-guided aspiration biopsy. Radiology. 1989;170(2):519–22.CrossRefPubMed Duckwiler G, Lufkin RB, Teresi L, Spickler E, Dion J, Viñuela F, Bentson J, Hanafee W. Head and neck lesions: MR-guided aspiration biopsy. Radiology. 1989;170(2):519–22.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Garnon J, Schlier A, Buy X, Tsoumakidou G, de Mathelin M, Breton E, et al. Evaluation of percutaneous biopsies of renal masses under MRI-guidance: a retrospective study about 26 cases. Eur Radiol. 2015;25(3):617–23.CrossRefPubMed Garnon J, Schlier A, Buy X, Tsoumakidou G, de Mathelin M, Breton E, et al. Evaluation of percutaneous biopsies of renal masses under MRI-guidance: a retrospective study about 26 cases. Eur Radiol. 2015;25(3):617–23.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Schmidt AJ, Kee ST, Sze DY, Daniel BL, Razavi MK, Semba CP, Dake MD. Diagnostic yield of MR-guided liver biopsies compared with CT- and US-guided liver biopsies. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1999;10(10):1323–9.CrossRefPubMed Schmidt AJ, Kee ST, Sze DY, Daniel BL, Razavi MK, Semba CP, Dake MD. Diagnostic yield of MR-guided liver biopsies compared with CT- and US-guided liver biopsies. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1999;10(10):1323–9.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kariniemi J, Blanco Sequeiros R, Ojala R, Tervonen O. MRI-guided abdominal biopsy in a 0.23-T open-configuration MRI system. Eur Radiol. 2005;15(6):1256–62.CrossRefPubMed Kariniemi J, Blanco Sequeiros R, Ojala R, Tervonen O. MRI-guided abdominal biopsy in a 0.23-T open-configuration MRI system. Eur Radiol. 2005;15(6):1256–62.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ahrar JU, Stafford RJ, Alzubaidi S, Ahrar K. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy in the musculoskeletal system using a cylindrical 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging unit. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2011;22(4):189–96.CrossRefPubMed Ahrar JU, Stafford RJ, Alzubaidi S, Ahrar K. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy in the musculoskeletal system using a cylindrical 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging unit. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2011;22(4):189–96.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Lü Y, Fritz J, Li C, Liu M, Lee P, Wu L, Carrino JA. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided percutaneous biopsy of mediastinal masses: diagnostic performance and safety. Invest Radiol. 2013;48(6):452–7.CrossRefPubMed Lü Y, Fritz J, Li C, Liu M, Lee P, Wu L, Carrino JA. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided percutaneous biopsy of mediastinal masses: diagnostic performance and safety. Invest Radiol. 2013;48(6):452–7.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Patel IJ, Davidson JC, Nikolic B, Salazar GM, Schwartzberg MS, Walker TG, et al. Consensus guidelines for periprocedural management of coagulation status and hemostasis risk in percutaneous image-guided interventions. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012;23(6):727–36.CrossRefPubMed Patel IJ, Davidson JC, Nikolic B, Salazar GM, Schwartzberg MS, Walker TG, et al. Consensus guidelines for periprocedural management of coagulation status and hemostasis risk in percutaneous image-guided interventions. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012;23(6):727–36.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Liu M, Lv Y, Wu L, Song J, Sequeiros RB, Li C. MRI-guided percutaneous coaxial cutting needle biopsy of small pulmonary nodules: feasibility. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(10):2730–8.CrossRefPubMed Liu M, Lv Y, Wu L, Song J, Sequeiros RB, Li C. MRI-guided percutaneous coaxial cutting needle biopsy of small pulmonary nodules: feasibility. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(10):2730–8.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Liu S, Li C, Yu X, Liu M, Fan T, Chen D, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy of solitary pulmonary nodules. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015;38(2):416–21.CrossRefPubMed Liu S, Li C, Yu X, Liu M, Fan T, Chen D, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy of solitary pulmonary nodules. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015;38(2):416–21.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Bressler EL, Kirkham JA. Mediastinal masses: alternative approaches to CT-guided needle biopsy. Radiology. 1994;191(2):391–6.CrossRefPubMed Bressler EL, Kirkham JA. Mediastinal masses: alternative approaches to CT-guided needle biopsy. Radiology. 1994;191(2):391–6.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Priola AM, Priola SM, Cataldi A, Ferrero B, Garofalo G, Errico L, Marci V, Fava C. CT-guided percutaneous transthoracic biopsy in the diagnosis of mediastinal masses: evaluation of 73 procedures. Radiol Med. 2008;113(1):3–15.CrossRefPubMed Priola AM, Priola SM, Cataldi A, Ferrero B, Garofalo G, Errico L, Marci V, Fava C. CT-guided percutaneous transthoracic biopsy in the diagnosis of mediastinal masses: evaluation of 73 procedures. Radiol Med. 2008;113(1):3–15.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference de Margerie-Mellon C, de Bazelaire C, Amorim S, Brice P, Tazi A, Brière J, Frija J, de Kerviler E. Diagnostic yield and safety of computed tomography-guided mediastinal core needle biopsies. J Thorac Imaging. 2015;30(5):319–27.CrossRefPubMed de Margerie-Mellon C, de Bazelaire C, Amorim S, Brice P, Tazi A, Brière J, Frija J, de Kerviler E. Diagnostic yield and safety of computed tomography-guided mediastinal core needle biopsies. J Thorac Imaging. 2015;30(5):319–27.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Tsalafoutas IA, Tsapaki V, Triantopoulou C, Gorantonaki A, Papailiou J. CT-guided interventional procedures without CT fluoroscopy assistance: patient effective dose and absorbed dose considerations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188(6):1479–84.CrossRefPubMed Tsalafoutas IA, Tsapaki V, Triantopoulou C, Gorantonaki A, Papailiou J. CT-guided interventional procedures without CT fluoroscopy assistance: patient effective dose and absorbed dose considerations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188(6):1479–84.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Prosch H, Stadler A, Schilling M, Burklin S, Eisenhuber E, Schober E, Mostbeck G. CT fluoroscopy-guided vs. multislice CT biopsy mode-guided lung biopsies: accuracy, complications and radiation dose. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(5):1029–33.CrossRefPubMed Prosch H, Stadler A, Schilling M, Burklin S, Eisenhuber E, Schober E, Mostbeck G. CT fluoroscopy-guided vs. multislice CT biopsy mode-guided lung biopsies: accuracy, complications and radiation dose. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(5):1029–33.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Guttikonda R, Herts BR, Dong F, Baker ME, Fenner KB, Pohlman B. Estimated radiation exposure and cancer risk from CT and PET/CT scans in patients with lymphoma. Eur J Radiol. 2014;83(6):1011–5.CrossRefPubMed Guttikonda R, Herts BR, Dong F, Baker ME, Fenner KB, Pohlman B. Estimated radiation exposure and cancer risk from CT and PET/CT scans in patients with lymphoma. Eur J Radiol. 2014;83(6):1011–5.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Schiebler ML, Listerud J. Common artifacts encountered in thoracic magnetic resonance imaging: recognition, derivation, and solutions. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 1992;4(3):1–17.CrossRefPubMed Schiebler ML, Listerud J. Common artifacts encountered in thoracic magnetic resonance imaging: recognition, derivation, and solutions. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 1992;4(3):1–17.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Hoffmann R, Thomas C, Rempp H, Schmidt D, Pereira PL, Claussen CD, Clasen S. Performing MR-guided biopsies in clinical routine: factors that influence accuracy and procedure time. Eur Radiol. 2012;22(3):663–71.CrossRefPubMed Hoffmann R, Thomas C, Rempp H, Schmidt D, Pereira PL, Claussen CD, Clasen S. Performing MR-guided biopsies in clinical routine: factors that influence accuracy and procedure time. Eur Radiol. 2012;22(3):663–71.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Maurer MH, Schreiter N, de Bucourt M, Grieser C, Renz DM, Hartwig T, Hamm B, Streitparth F. Cost comparison of nerve root infiltration of the lumbar spine under MRI and CT guidance. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(6):1487–94.CrossRefPubMed Maurer MH, Schreiter N, de Bucourt M, Grieser C, Renz DM, Hartwig T, Hamm B, Streitparth F. Cost comparison of nerve root infiltration of the lumbar spine under MRI and CT guidance. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(6):1487–94.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
MRI-Guided Percutaneous Biopsy of Mediastinal Masses Using a Large Bore Magnet: Technical Feasibility
Authors
J. Garnon
N. Ramamurthy
J. Caudrelier J
G. Erceg
E. Breton
G. Tsoumakidou
P. Rao
A. Gangi
Publication date
01-05-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology / Issue 5/2016
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Electronic ISSN: 1432-086X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-015-1246-5

Other articles of this Issue 5/2016

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 5/2016 Go to the issue