Skip to main content
Top
Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 2/2013

01-04-2013 | Clinical Investigation

Management of Postoperative Lymphoceles After Lymphadenectomy: Percutaneous Catheter Drainage With and Without Povidone-Iodine Sclerotherapy

Authors: William Alago Jr., Ajita Deodhar, Hans Michell, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, Anne M. Covey, Stephen B. Solomon, George I. Getrajdman, Guido Dalbagni, Karen T. Brown

Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | Issue 2/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To report our single-center experience in managing symptomatic lymphoceles after lymphadenectomy for genitourinary and gynecologic malignancy and to compare clinical outcomes of percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) alone versus PCD with transcatheter povidone-iodine sclerotherapy (TPIS).

Methods

The medical records of patients who presented for percutaneous drainage of pelvic lymphoceles from February 1999 to September 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. Catheters with prolonged outputs >50 cc/day were treated with TPIS. Technical success was defined as the ability to achieve complete resolution of the lymphocele. Clinical success was defined as resolution of the patient’s symptoms that prompted the intervention.

Results

Sixty-four patients with 70 pelvic lymphoceles were treated. Forty-six patients (71.9 %) had PCD, and 18 patients (28.1 %) had multisession TPIS. The mean initial cavity size was 294.9 cc for those treated with TPIS and 228.2 cc for those treated with PCD alone (range 15–1,600) (p = 0.59). Mean duration of catheter drainage was 19 days (29 days with TPIS, 16 days with PCD, p = 0.001). Mean clinical follow-up was 22.6 months. Technical success was 74.3 % with PCD and 100 % with TPIS. Clinical success was 97 % with PCD and 100 % with TPIS. Postprocedural complications included pericatheter fluid leakage (n = 4), catheter dislodgement (n = 3), catheter occlusion (n = 9), and secondary infection of the collection (n = 4).

Conclusion

PCD of symptomatic lymphoceles is an effective postoperative management technique. Initial cavity size is not an accurate predictor of the need for TPIS. When indicated, TPIS is safe and effective with catheter outputs >50 cc/day.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Glass LL, Cockett AT (1998) Lymphoceles: diagnosis and management in urologic patients. Urology 51(Suppl 5A):135–140PubMedCrossRef Glass LL, Cockett AT (1998) Lymphoceles: diagnosis and management in urologic patients. Urology 51(Suppl 5A):135–140PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Karcaaltincaba M, Akhan O (2005) Radiologic imaging and percutaneous treatment of pelvic lymphocele. Eur J Radiol 55(3):340–354PubMedCrossRef Karcaaltincaba M, Akhan O (2005) Radiologic imaging and percutaneous treatment of pelvic lymphocele. Eur J Radiol 55(3):340–354PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kay R, Fuchs E, Barry JM (1980) Management of postoperative pelvic lymphoceles. Urology 15(4):345–347PubMedCrossRef Kay R, Fuchs E, Barry JM (1980) Management of postoperative pelvic lymphoceles. Urology 15(4):345–347PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Khauli RB, Stoff JS, Lovewell T (1993) Post-transplant lymphoceles: a critical look into the risk factors, pathophysiology and management. J Urol 150(1):22–26PubMed Khauli RB, Stoff JS, Lovewell T (1993) Post-transplant lymphoceles: a critical look into the risk factors, pathophysiology and management. J Urol 150(1):22–26PubMed
5.
go back to reference Kim JK, Jeong YY, Kim YH (1999) Postoperative pelvic lymphocele: treatment with simple percutaneous catheter drainage. Radiology 212(2):390–394PubMed Kim JK, Jeong YY, Kim YH (1999) Postoperative pelvic lymphocele: treatment with simple percutaneous catheter drainage. Radiology 212(2):390–394PubMed
6.
go back to reference Akhan O, Karcaaltincaba M, Ozmen MN (2007) Percutaneous transcatheter ethanol sclerotherapy and catheter drainage of postoperative pelvic lymphoceles. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 30(2):237–240PubMedCrossRef Akhan O, Karcaaltincaba M, Ozmen MN (2007) Percutaneous transcatheter ethanol sclerotherapy and catheter drainage of postoperative pelvic lymphoceles. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 30(2):237–240PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference van Sonnenberg E, Wittich GR, Casola G et al (1986) Lymphoceles: imaging characteristics and percutaneous management. Radiology 161(3):593–596 van Sonnenberg E, Wittich GR, Casola G et al (1986) Lymphoceles: imaging characteristics and percutaneous management. Radiology 161(3):593–596
8.
go back to reference Sawhney R, D’Agostino HB, Zinck S et al (1996) Treatment of postoperative lymphoceles with percutaneous drainage and alcohol sclerotherapy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 7(2):241–245PubMedCrossRef Sawhney R, D’Agostino HB, Zinck S et al (1996) Treatment of postoperative lymphoceles with percutaneous drainage and alcohol sclerotherapy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 7(2):241–245PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference White M, Mueller PR, Ferrucci JT Jr et al (1985) Percutaneous drainage of postoperative abdominal and pelvic lymphoceles. AJR Am J Roentgenol 145(5):1065–1069PubMedCrossRef White M, Mueller PR, Ferrucci JT Jr et al (1985) Percutaneous drainage of postoperative abdominal and pelvic lymphoceles. AJR Am J Roentgenol 145(5):1065–1069PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Zuckerman DA, Yeager TD (1997) Percutaneous ethanol sclerotherapy of postoperative lymphoceles. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169(2):433–437PubMedCrossRef Zuckerman DA, Yeager TD (1997) Percutaneous ethanol sclerotherapy of postoperative lymphoceles. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169(2):433–437PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Conte M, Panici PB, Guariglia L (1990) Pelvic lymphocele following radical para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: incidence rate and percutaneous management. Obstet Gynecol 76(2):268–271PubMed Conte M, Panici PB, Guariglia L (1990) Pelvic lymphocele following radical para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: incidence rate and percutaneous management. Obstet Gynecol 76(2):268–271PubMed
12.
go back to reference Dodd GD, Rutledge F, Wallace S (1970) Postoperative pelvic lymphocysts. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 108(2):312–323PubMedCrossRef Dodd GD, Rutledge F, Wallace S (1970) Postoperative pelvic lymphocysts. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 108(2):312–323PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Gilliland JD, Spies JB, Brown SB (1989) Lymphoceles: percutaneous treatment with povidone-iodine sclerosis. Radiology 171(1):227–229PubMed Gilliland JD, Spies JB, Brown SB (1989) Lymphoceles: percutaneous treatment with povidone-iodine sclerosis. Radiology 171(1):227–229PubMed
14.
go back to reference Cohan RH, Saeed M, Schwab SJ (1988) Povidone-iodine sclerosis of pelvic lymphoceles: a prospective study. Urol Radiol 10(4):203–206PubMedCrossRef Cohan RH, Saeed M, Schwab SJ (1988) Povidone-iodine sclerosis of pelvic lymphoceles: a prospective study. Urol Radiol 10(4):203–206PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Montalvo BM, Yrizarry JM, Casillas VJ et al (1996) Percutaneous sclerotherapy of lymphoceles related to renal transplantation. J Vasc Interv Radiol 7(1):117–123PubMedCrossRef Montalvo BM, Yrizarry JM, Casillas VJ et al (1996) Percutaneous sclerotherapy of lymphoceles related to renal transplantation. J Vasc Interv Radiol 7(1):117–123PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Rivera M, Marcen R, Burgos J et al (1996) Treatment of post-transplant lymphocele with povidone-iodine sclerosis: long-term follow-up. Nephron 74(2):324–327PubMedCrossRef Rivera M, Marcen R, Burgos J et al (1996) Treatment of post-transplant lymphocele with povidone-iodine sclerosis: long-term follow-up. Nephron 74(2):324–327PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Management of Postoperative Lymphoceles After Lymphadenectomy: Percutaneous Catheter Drainage With and Without Povidone-Iodine Sclerotherapy
Authors
William Alago Jr.
Ajita Deodhar
Hans Michell
Constantinos T. Sofocleous
Anne M. Covey
Stephen B. Solomon
George I. Getrajdman
Guido Dalbagni
Karen T. Brown
Publication date
01-04-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology / Issue 2/2013
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Electronic ISSN: 1432-086X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-012-0375-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2013

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 2/2013 Go to the issue