Skip to main content
Top
Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 1/2011

01-02-2011 | Technical Note

MR-Guided Freehand Biopsy of Liver Lesions With Fast Continuous Imaging Using a 1.0-T Open MRI Scanner: Experience in 50 Patients

Authors: Frank Fischbach, Jürgen Bunke, Markus Thormann, Gunnar Gaffke, Kerstin Jungnickel, Jouke Smink, Jens Ricke

Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess a new open system with a field-strength of 1.0 T for the feasibility of liver biopsy using the freehand technique with fast continuous imaging. Fifty patients with focal liver lesions measuring 5 to 30 mm in diameter were included in the study. Guidance and monitoring was performed using a 1.0-T open magnetic resonance (MR) scanner (Panorama HFO; Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands). With fast continuous imaging using a T1-weighted (T1W) gradient echo (GRE) sequence after administration of gadolinium (Gd)-EOB-DTPA, the needle was placed into the lesion. An interface for interactive dynamic viewing in two perpendicular planes prevented needle deviations T2-weighted turbo spin echo (TSE) fat-suppressed sequence was added to rule out postinterventional hematoma or biloma. All lesions were visible on the interventional images. Biopsy was technically successful, and solid specimens were obtained in all cases. Forty-six patients showed a histopathologic pattern other than native liver tissue, thus confirming correct position of the needle. Time between determination of the lesion and performance of the control scan was on average 18 min. No major complications were recorded. MR guidance with the new 1-T open system must be considered an attractive alternative for liver punction. An interface for dynamic imaging of needle guidance and T1W-GRE imaging with administration of Gd-EOB-DTPA for contrast enhancement allows the pinpoint puncture of liver lesions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kettenbach J, Blum M, El-Rabadi K et al (2005) Percutaneous liver biopsy. Übers über verschied Verfahr Radiol 45:44–54 Kettenbach J, Blum M, El-Rabadi K et al (2005) Percutaneous liver biopsy. Übers über verschied Verfahr Radiol 45:44–54
2.
go back to reference Schmidt AJ, Kee ST, Sze DY et al (1999) Diagnostic yield of MR-guided liver biopsies compared with CT- and US-guided liver biopsies. J Vasc Interv Radiol 10:1323–1329CrossRefPubMed Schmidt AJ, Kee ST, Sze DY et al (1999) Diagnostic yield of MR-guided liver biopsies compared with CT- and US-guided liver biopsies. J Vasc Interv Radiol 10:1323–1329CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Stattaus J, Kuehl H, Hauth EA et al (2007) Liver biopsy under guidance of multislice computed tomography: comparison of 16G and 18G biopsy needles. Radiologe 47:430–438CrossRefPubMed Stattaus J, Kuehl H, Hauth EA et al (2007) Liver biopsy under guidance of multislice computed tomography: comparison of 16G and 18G biopsy needles. Radiologe 47:430–438CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Stattaus J, Kuehl H, Ladd S et al (2007) CT-guided biopsy of small liver lesions: visibility, artefacts, and corresponding diagnostic accuracy. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 30:928–935CrossRef Stattaus J, Kuehl H, Ladd S et al (2007) CT-guided biopsy of small liver lesions: visibility, artefacts, and corresponding diagnostic accuracy. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 30:928–935CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Oliver JH III, Baron RL (1996) Helical biphasic contrast-enhanced CT of the liver: technique, indications, interpretation, and pitfalls. Radiology 201:1–14PubMed Oliver JH III, Baron RL (1996) Helical biphasic contrast-enhanced CT of the liver: technique, indications, interpretation, and pitfalls. Radiology 201:1–14PubMed
6.
go back to reference Lu DS, Lee H, Farahani K et al (1997) Biopsy of hepatic dome lesions: semi-real-time coronal MR guidance technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:737–739PubMed Lu DS, Lee H, Farahani K et al (1997) Biopsy of hepatic dome lesions: semi-real-time coronal MR guidance technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:737–739PubMed
7.
go back to reference Stattaus J, Maderwald S, Forsting M et al (2008) MR-guided core biopsy with MR fluoroscopy using a short, wide-bore 1.5 Tesla scanner: feasibility and initial results. J Magn Reson Imaging 27:1181–1187CrossRefPubMed Stattaus J, Maderwald S, Forsting M et al (2008) MR-guided core biopsy with MR fluoroscopy using a short, wide-bore 1.5 Tesla scanner: feasibility and initial results. J Magn Reson Imaging 27:1181–1187CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Streitparth F, Walter T, Wonneberger U et al (2009) Image-guided spinal injection procedures in open high-field MRI with vertical field orientation: Feasibility and technical features. Eur Radiol [Epub ahead of print] Streitparth F, Walter T, Wonneberger U et al (2009) Image-guided spinal injection procedures in open high-field MRI with vertical field orientation: Feasibility and technical features. Eur Radiol [Epub ahead of print]
9.
go back to reference Hamm B, Staks T, Muhler A et al (1995) Phase I clinical evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA as a hepatobiliary MR contrast agent: safety, pharmacokinetics, and MR imaging. Radiology 195:785–792PubMed Hamm B, Staks T, Muhler A et al (1995) Phase I clinical evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA as a hepatobiliary MR contrast agent: safety, pharmacokinetics, and MR imaging. Radiology 195:785–792PubMed
10.
go back to reference Huppertz A, Balzer T, Blakeborough A et al (2004) Improved detection of focal liver lesions at MR imaging: multicenter comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR images with intraoperative findings. Radiology 230:266–275CrossRefPubMed Huppertz A, Balzer T, Blakeborough A et al (2004) Improved detection of focal liver lesions at MR imaging: multicenter comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR images with intraoperative findings. Radiology 230:266–275CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Reimer P, Rummeny EJ, Shamsi K et al (1996) Phase II clinical evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA: dose, safety aspects, and pulse sequence. Radiology 199:177–183PubMed Reimer P, Rummeny EJ, Shamsi K et al (1996) Phase II clinical evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA: dose, safety aspects, and pulse sequence. Radiology 199:177–183PubMed
12.
go back to reference Mueller PR, Stark DD, Simeone JF et al (1986) MR-guided aspiration biopsy: needle design and clinical trials. Radiology 161:605–609PubMed Mueller PR, Stark DD, Simeone JF et al (1986) MR-guided aspiration biopsy: needle design and clinical trials. Radiology 161:605–609PubMed
13.
go back to reference Moche M, Trampel R, Kahn T et al (2008) Navigation concepts for MR image-guided interventions. J Magn Reson Imaging 27:276–291CrossRefPubMed Moche M, Trampel R, Kahn T et al (2008) Navigation concepts for MR image-guided interventions. J Magn Reson Imaging 27:276–291CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Hatfield MK, Beres RA, Sane SS et al (2008) Percutaneous imaging-guided solid organ core needle biopsy: coaxial versus noncoaxial method. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:413–417CrossRefPubMed Hatfield MK, Beres RA, Sane SS et al (2008) Percutaneous imaging-guided solid organ core needle biopsy: coaxial versus noncoaxial method. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:413–417CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Lewin JS, Duerk JL, Jain VR et al (1996) Needle localization in MR-guided biopsy and aspiration: effects of field strength, sequence design, and magnetic field orientation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:1337–1345PubMed Lewin JS, Duerk JL, Jain VR et al (1996) Needle localization in MR-guided biopsy and aspiration: effects of field strength, sequence design, and magnetic field orientation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:1337–1345PubMed
16.
go back to reference Frahm C, Gehl HB, Melchert UH et al (1996) Visualization of magnetic resonance-compatible needles at 1.5 and 0.2 Tesla. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 19:335–340CrossRef Frahm C, Gehl HB, Melchert UH et al (1996) Visualization of magnetic resonance-compatible needles at 1.5 and 0.2 Tesla. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 19:335–340CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Nour SG, Lewin JS (2005) Percutaneous biopsy from blinded to MR guided: an update on current techniques and applications. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 13:441–464CrossRefPubMed Nour SG, Lewin JS (2005) Percutaneous biopsy from blinded to MR guided: an update on current techniques and applications. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 13:441–464CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Weiss CR, Nour SG, Lewin JS (2008) MR-guided biopsy: a review of current techniques and applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 27:311–325CrossRefPubMed Weiss CR, Nour SG, Lewin JS (2008) MR-guided biopsy: a review of current techniques and applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 27:311–325CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Zangos S, Kiefl D, Eichler K et al (2003) MR-guided biopsies of undetermined liver lesions: technique and results. Rofo 175:688–694PubMed Zangos S, Kiefl D, Eichler K et al (2003) MR-guided biopsies of undetermined liver lesions: technique and results. Rofo 175:688–694PubMed
20.
go back to reference Langen HJ, Kugel H, Ortmann M et al (2001) Functional capacity of MRI-compatible biopsy needles in comparison with ferromagnetic biopsy needles. In vitro studies. Rofo 173:658–662PubMed Langen HJ, Kugel H, Ortmann M et al (2001) Functional capacity of MRI-compatible biopsy needles in comparison with ferromagnetic biopsy needles. In vitro studies. Rofo 173:658–662PubMed
Metadata
Title
MR-Guided Freehand Biopsy of Liver Lesions With Fast Continuous Imaging Using a 1.0-T Open MRI Scanner: Experience in 50 Patients
Authors
Frank Fischbach
Jürgen Bunke
Markus Thormann
Gunnar Gaffke
Kerstin Jungnickel
Jouke Smink
Jens Ricke
Publication date
01-02-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology / Issue 1/2011
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Electronic ISSN: 1432-086X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-010-9836-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 1/2011 Go to the issue