Skip to main content
Top
Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 2/2011

01-04-2011 | Letter to the Editor

Detachment of Introducer Sheath Radiopaque Marker during Retrieval of G2 Filter

Authors: Craig Johnson, Ahmad I. Alomari, Gulraiz Chaudry

Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | Issue 2/2011

Login to get access

Excerpt

The use of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters in children has increased during the last few years [13] and is associated with an increase in the number of children presenting with a deep venous thrombosis [4] and the increased availability of retrievable filters. The indication for IVC filter placement in children is the same as that in adults: contraindication to anticoagulation, recurrent pulmonary emboli despite therapeutic anticoagulation, and prophylaxis in high-risk surgery [5]. However, complications are associated with long-term placement of IVC filters, including strut penetration, caval occlusion, and filter migration and fracture [6]. In addition, in children there is also the theoretical impact on the growth of the IVC. Therefore, an attempt is made to retrieve the filters in the majority of children. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chaudry G, Padua HM, Alomari A (2008) The use of inferior vena cava filters in young children. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19:1103–1106CrossRefPubMed Chaudry G, Padua HM, Alomari A (2008) The use of inferior vena cava filters in young children. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19:1103–1106CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Raffini L, Cahill AM, Hellinger J et al (2008) A prospective observational study of IVC filters in pediatric patients. Pediatr Blood Cancer 51:517–520CrossRefPubMed Raffini L, Cahill AM, Hellinger J et al (2008) A prospective observational study of IVC filters in pediatric patients. Pediatr Blood Cancer 51:517–520CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Cahn MD, Rohrer MJ, Martella MB et al (2001) Long-term follow-up of Greenfield inferior vena cava filter placement in children. J Vasc Surg 34:820–825CrossRefPubMed Cahn MD, Rohrer MJ, Martella MB et al (2001) Long-term follow-up of Greenfield inferior vena cava filter placement in children. J Vasc Surg 34:820–825CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Chalmers EA (2006) Epidemiology of venous thromboembolism in neonates and children. Thromb Res 118:3–12CrossRefPubMed Chalmers EA (2006) Epidemiology of venous thromboembolism in neonates and children. Thromb Res 118:3–12CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Imberti D, Ageno W, Carpenedo M (2006) Retrievable vena cava filters: a review. Curr Opin Hematol 13:351–356CrossRefPubMed Imberti D, Ageno W, Carpenedo M (2006) Retrievable vena cava filters: a review. Curr Opin Hematol 13:351–356CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Joels CS, Sing RF, Heniford BT (2003) Complications of inferior vena cava filters. Am Surg 69:654–659PubMed Joels CS, Sing RF, Heniford BT (2003) Complications of inferior vena cava filters. Am Surg 69:654–659PubMed
7.
go back to reference Charles HW, Black M, Kovacs S et al (2009) G2 inferior vena cava filter: retrievability and safety. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20:1046–1051CrossRefPubMed Charles HW, Black M, Kovacs S et al (2009) G2 inferior vena cava filter: retrievability and safety. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20:1046–1051CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Oliva VL, Perreault P, Giroux MF et al (2008) Recovery G2 inferior vena cava filter: technical success and safety of retrieval. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19:884–889CrossRefPubMed Oliva VL, Perreault P, Giroux MF et al (2008) Recovery G2 inferior vena cava filter: technical success and safety of retrieval. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19:884–889CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Cantwell CP, Pennypacker J, Singh H et al (2009) Comparison of the recovery and G2 filter as retrievable inferior vena cava filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20:1193–1199CrossRefPubMed Cantwell CP, Pennypacker J, Singh H et al (2009) Comparison of the recovery and G2 filter as retrievable inferior vena cava filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20:1193–1199CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Grande WJ, Trerotola SO, Reilly PM et al (2005) Experience with the recovery filter as a retrievable inferior vena cava filter. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16:1189–1193PubMed Grande WJ, Trerotola SO, Reilly PM et al (2005) Experience with the recovery filter as a retrievable inferior vena cava filter. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16:1189–1193PubMed
11.
go back to reference Kalva SP, Athanasoulis CA, Fan CM et al (2006) “Recovery” vena cava filter: experience in 96 patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 29:559–564CrossRefPubMed Kalva SP, Athanasoulis CA, Fan CM et al (2006) “Recovery” vena cava filter: experience in 96 patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 29:559–564CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Binkert CA, Drooz AT, Caridi JG et al (2009) Technical success and safety of retrieval of the G2 filter in a prospective, multicenter study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20:1449–1453CrossRefPubMed Binkert CA, Drooz AT, Caridi JG et al (2009) Technical success and safety of retrieval of the G2 filter in a prospective, multicenter study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20:1449–1453CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Miller MJ, Smith TP, Stavas JM (2006) Retrieval of the Gunther Tulip and OptEase filters using the recovery cone removal system. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17:899–902CrossRefPubMed Miller MJ, Smith TP, Stavas JM (2006) Retrieval of the Gunther Tulip and OptEase filters using the recovery cone removal system. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17:899–902CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Detachment of Introducer Sheath Radiopaque Marker during Retrieval of G2 Filter
Authors
Craig Johnson
Ahmad I. Alomari
Gulraiz Chaudry
Publication date
01-04-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology / Issue 2/2011
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Electronic ISSN: 1432-086X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-010-0064-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2011

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 2/2011 Go to the issue