Skip to main content
Top
Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 5/2009

Open Access 01-09-2009 | Laboratory Investigation

Carotid Artery Stenting Using a Novel Self-Expanding Braided Nickel–Titanium Stent: Feasibility and Safety Porcine Trial

Authors: Frank Ahlhelm, Ralf Kaufmann, Dirk Ahlhelm, Mai Fang Ong, Christian Roth, Wolfgang Reith

Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | Issue 5/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

We studied the deliverability and safety of a braided, self-expanding, closed-cell nickel–titanium (NiTi) stent (E-volution, Jotec GmbH, Hechingen, Germany) especially designed for the endovascular treatment of carotid artery bifurcation stenosis with special regard to in-stent stenosis and thrombosis compared with a laser-cut reference nitinol stent in a porcine model of percutaneous vascular interventions. We aimed to assess histopathologic response in minipig carotid and subclavian arteries. Eight minipigs received a total of 42 stents: 14 reference stents and 28 E-volution stents. Eleven of the E-volution stents were additionally coated with heparin. Control angiography was obtained immediately before and after vascular intervention as well as 4 weeks after the procedure. Primary endpoints were 28 days of angiographic analyses as well as histomorphometric analysis, including injury score, inflammation score, luminal diameter, vessel diameter, maximal neointimal thickness, and area of in-stent stenosis. Secondary end points were procedural success, 28-day mortality, and stent thrombosis. All stents could be delivered successfully without procedural complications, morbidity, or mortality during our observation time. As confirmed by histology, no in-stent thrombosis was observed. Compared with common carotid arteries, subclavian arteries are significantly more vulnerable to developing in-stent stenosis caused by neointima proliferation (p < 0.05). Compared with the use of 1 single stent/artery, serial application of two stents leads to a more excessive but not significantly different neointimal proliferation (p > 0.05). The E-volution stent, especially when heparin coated, is in line with the comparison to the laser-cut reference stent displaying similar results of angiographic, histologic, and histomorphometric analyses (p > 0.05). Compared with the reference laser-cut stent, the self-expanding nitinol stent (E-volution) with its advanced braiding technology is feasible and safe. In our opinion, the high radial resistive force and the advanced braided design with tight stent-strut interstices may be beneficial in terms of plaque stabilization. Further studies are necessary and warranted.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Theron JG, Payell GG, Coskun O, Huet HF, Guimaraens L (1996) Carotid artery stenosis: treatment with protected balloon angioplasty and stent placement. Radiology 201:627–636PubMed Theron JG, Payell GG, Coskun O, Huet HF, Guimaraens L (1996) Carotid artery stenosis: treatment with protected balloon angioplasty and stent placement. Radiology 201:627–636PubMed
2.
go back to reference Wholey MH, Wholey M, Bergeron P, Diethrich EB, Henry M, Laborde JC et al (1998) Current global status of carotid artery stent placement. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 44:1–6PubMedCrossRef Wholey MH, Wholey M, Bergeron P, Diethrich EB, Henry M, Laborde JC et al (1998) Current global status of carotid artery stent placement. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 44:1–6PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Yadav J, for the SAPPHIRE Investigators (2002) Stenting and Angioplasty with Protection in Patients at High Risk for Endarterectomy: The SAPPHIRE study. Circulation 106:2986–2989 Yadav J, for the SAPPHIRE Investigators (2002) Stenting and Angioplasty with Protection in Patients at High Risk for Endarterectomy: The SAPPHIRE study. Circulation 106:2986–2989
4.
go back to reference Yadav JS, Wholey MH, Kuntz RE et al (2004) Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 351:1493–1501PubMedCrossRef Yadav JS, Wholey MH, Kuntz RE et al (2004) Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 351:1493–1501PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gurm HS, Yadav JS, Fayad P, Katzen BT, Mishkel GJ, Bajwa TK et al (2008) Long-term results of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 358:1572–1579PubMedCrossRef Gurm HS, Yadav JS, Fayad P, Katzen BT, Mishkel GJ, Bajwa TK et al (2008) Long-term results of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 358:1572–1579PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Jiang WJ, Du B, Leung TW, Xu XT, Jin M, Dong KH (2007) Symptomatic intracranial stenosis: cerebrovascular complications from elective stent placement. Radiology 243:188–197PubMedCrossRef Jiang WJ, Du B, Leung TW, Xu XT, Jin M, Dong KH (2007) Symptomatic intracranial stenosis: cerebrovascular complications from elective stent placement. Radiology 243:188–197PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hart JP, Peeters P, Verbist J, Deloose K, Bosiers M (2006) Do device characteristics impact outcome in carotid artery stenting? J Vasc Surg 44:725–731PubMedCrossRef Hart JP, Peeters P, Verbist J, Deloose K, Bosiers M (2006) Do device characteristics impact outcome in carotid artery stenting? J Vasc Surg 44:725–731PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bosiers M, de Donato G, Deloose K, Verbist J, Peeters P, Castriota F et al (2007) Does free cell area influence the outcome in carotid artery stenting? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 33:135–1423PubMedCrossRef Bosiers M, de Donato G, Deloose K, Verbist J, Peeters P, Castriota F et al (2007) Does free cell area influence the outcome in carotid artery stenting? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 33:135–1423PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Tanaka N, Martin JB, Tokunaga K, Abe T, Uchiyama Y, Hayabuchi N et al (2004) Conformity of carotid stents with vascular anatomy: evaluation in carotid models. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 25:604–607PubMed Tanaka N, Martin JB, Tokunaga K, Abe T, Uchiyama Y, Hayabuchi N et al (2004) Conformity of carotid stents with vascular anatomy: evaluation in carotid models. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 25:604–607PubMed
10.
go back to reference Theiss W, Hermanek P, Mathias K, Ahmadi R, Heuser L, Hoffmann FJ et al (2004) Pro-CAS: a prospective registry of carotid angioplasty and stenting. Stroke 35:2134–2139PubMedCrossRef Theiss W, Hermanek P, Mathias K, Ahmadi R, Heuser L, Hoffmann FJ et al (2004) Pro-CAS: a prospective registry of carotid angioplasty and stenting. Stroke 35:2134–2139PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Schwartz RS, Huber KC, Murphy JG, Edwards WD, Camrud AR, Vlietstra RE et al (1992) Restenosis and the proportional neointimal response to coronary artery injury: results in a porcine model. J Am Coll Cardiol 19:267–274PubMedCrossRef Schwartz RS, Huber KC, Murphy JG, Edwards WD, Camrud AR, Vlietstra RE et al (1992) Restenosis and the proportional neointimal response to coronary artery injury: results in a porcine model. J Am Coll Cardiol 19:267–274PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kornowski R, Hong MK, Tio FO, Bramwell O, Wu H, Leon MB (1998) In-stent restenosis contributions of inflammatory responses and arterial injury to neointimal hyperplasia. J Am Coll Cardiol 31:224–230PubMedCrossRef Kornowski R, Hong MK, Tio FO, Bramwell O, Wu H, Leon MB (1998) In-stent restenosis contributions of inflammatory responses and arterial injury to neointimal hyperplasia. J Am Coll Cardiol 31:224–230PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Wholey MH, Wholey M, Mathias K, Roubin GS, Diethrich EB, Henry M et al (2000) Global experience in cervical carotid artery stenting. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 50:160–167 Wholey MH, Wholey M, Mathias K, Roubin GS, Diethrich EB, Henry M et al (2000) Global experience in cervical carotid artery stenting. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 50:160–167
14.
go back to reference Kovacic JC, Roy PR, Baron DW, Gunalingam B, Muller DW (2005) Percutaneous carotid artery stenting: a strategy in evolution. Intern Med J 35:143–150PubMedCrossRef Kovacic JC, Roy PR, Baron DW, Gunalingam B, Muller DW (2005) Percutaneous carotid artery stenting: a strategy in evolution. Intern Med J 35:143–150PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Coward LJ, Featherstone RL, Brown MM (2005) Safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of carotid artery stenosis compared with carotid endarterectomy: a Cochrane systematic review of the randomized evidence. Stroke 36:905–911PubMedCrossRef Coward LJ, Featherstone RL, Brown MM (2005) Safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of carotid artery stenosis compared with carotid endarterectomy: a Cochrane systematic review of the randomized evidence. Stroke 36:905–911PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hauth EA, Jansen C, Drescher R, Schwarz M, Christmann A, Jaeger H et al (2006) Angiographic follow-up after carotid artery stenting of bifurcation stenosis. Rofo 178:794–800PubMed Hauth EA, Jansen C, Drescher R, Schwarz M, Christmann A, Jaeger H et al (2006) Angiographic follow-up after carotid artery stenting of bifurcation stenosis. Rofo 178:794–800PubMed
17.
go back to reference Collaborative Group SPACE, Ringleb PA, Allenberg J, Brückmann H, Eckstein HH, Fraedrich G et al (2006) Thirty-day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomized noninferiority trial. Lancet 368(9543):1239–1247CrossRef Collaborative Group SPACE, Ringleb PA, Allenberg J, Brückmann H, Eckstein HH, Fraedrich G et al (2006) Thirty-day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomized noninferiority trial. Lancet 368(9543):1239–1247CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Citron SJ, Wallace RC, Lewis CA, Dawson RC, Dion JE, Fox AJ et al (2003) Quality improvement guidelines for adult diagnostic neuroangiography. Cooperative study between ASITN, ASNR, and SIR. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:257–262 Citron SJ, Wallace RC, Lewis CA, Dawson RC, Dion JE, Fox AJ et al (2003) Quality improvement guidelines for adult diagnostic neuroangiography. Cooperative study between ASITN, ASNR, and SIR. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:257–262
19.
go back to reference ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN (2007) Clinical expert consensus document on carotid stenting: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. Am Coll Cardiol 49:126–170CrossRef ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN (2007) Clinical expert consensus document on carotid stenting: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. Am Coll Cardiol 49:126–170CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Bates ER, Babb JD, Casey DE Jr, Cates CU, Duckwiler GR, Feldman TE et al (2007) ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN 2007 clinical expert consensus document on carotid stenting. Vasc Med 12:35–83PubMedCrossRef Bates ER, Babb JD, Casey DE Jr, Cates CU, Duckwiler GR, Feldman TE et al (2007) ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN 2007 clinical expert consensus document on carotid stenting. Vasc Med 12:35–83PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Reimers B, Nikas D. Carotid stent design: closed-cell, open-cell does not really matter. Oral presentation at 6th ICCA, Frankfurt, Germany, November 23–25, 2006 Reimers B, Nikas D. Carotid stent design: closed-cell, open-cell does not really matter. Oral presentation at 6th ICCA, Frankfurt, Germany, November 23–25, 2006
22.
go back to reference Ahlhelm F, Roth C, Kaufmann R, Schulte-Altedorneburg G, Romeike BF, Reith W (2007) Treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms with a novel self-expanding two-zonal endovascular stent device. Neuroradiology 49:921–926PubMedCrossRef Ahlhelm F, Roth C, Kaufmann R, Schulte-Altedorneburg G, Romeike BF, Reith W (2007) Treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms with a novel self-expanding two-zonal endovascular stent device. Neuroradiology 49:921–926PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Schürmann K, Vorwerk D, Kulisch A, Stroehmer-Kulisch E, Biesterfeld S, Stopinski T et al (1996) Neointimal hyperplasia in low-profile Nitinol stents, Palmaz stents, and Wallstents: a comparative experimental study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 19:248–254PubMedCrossRef Schürmann K, Vorwerk D, Kulisch A, Stroehmer-Kulisch E, Biesterfeld S, Stopinski T et al (1996) Neointimal hyperplasia in low-profile Nitinol stents, Palmaz stents, and Wallstents: a comparative experimental study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 19:248–254PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Verheye S, Salame MY, Robinson KA, Post MJ Carrozza JP Jr, Baim DS et al (1999) Short- and long-term histopathologic evaluation of stenting using a self-expanding nitinol stent in pig carotid and iliac arteries. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 48:123–316CrossRef Verheye S, Salame MY, Robinson KA, Post MJ Carrozza JP Jr, Baim DS et al (1999) Short- and long-term histopathologic evaluation of stenting using a self-expanding nitinol stent in pig carotid and iliac arteries. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 48:123–316CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Carter AJ, Scott D, Laird JR, Bailey L, Kovach JA, Hoopes TG et al (1998) Progressive vascular remodeling and reduced neointimal formation after placement of a thermoelastic self-expanding nitinol stent in an experimental model. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 44:193–201PubMedCrossRef Carter AJ, Scott D, Laird JR, Bailey L, Kovach JA, Hoopes TG et al (1998) Progressive vascular remodeling and reduced neointimal formation after placement of a thermoelastic self-expanding nitinol stent in an experimental model. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 44:193–201PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Kastrati A, Elezi S, Dirschinger J, Hadamitzky M, Neumann FJ, Schömig A (1999) Influence of lesion length on restenosis after coronary stent placement. Am J Cardiol 83:1617–1622PubMedCrossRef Kastrati A, Elezi S, Dirschinger J, Hadamitzky M, Neumann FJ, Schömig A (1999) Influence of lesion length on restenosis after coronary stent placement. Am J Cardiol 83:1617–1622PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Hårdhammar PA, van Beusekom HM, Emanuelsson HU, Hofma SH, Albertsson PA, Verdouw PD et al (1996) Reduction in thrombotic events with heparin-coated Palmaz-Schatz stents in normal porcine coronary arteries. Circulation 93:423–430PubMed Hårdhammar PA, van Beusekom HM, Emanuelsson HU, Hofma SH, Albertsson PA, Verdouw PD et al (1996) Reduction in thrombotic events with heparin-coated Palmaz-Schatz stents in normal porcine coronary arteries. Circulation 93:423–430PubMed
28.
go back to reference Matsumoto Y, Shimokawa H, Morishige K, Eto Y, Takeshita A (2002) Reduction in neointimal formation with a stent coated with multiple layers of releasable heparin in porcine coronary artery. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 39:513–522PubMedCrossRef Matsumoto Y, Shimokawa H, Morishige K, Eto Y, Takeshita A (2002) Reduction in neointimal formation with a stent coated with multiple layers of releasable heparin in porcine coronary artery. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 39:513–522PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Lin PH, Chronos NA, Marijianowski MM, Chen C, Conklin B, Bush RL et al (2003) Carotid stenting using heparin-coated balloon-expandable stent reduces intimal hyperplasia in a baboon model. J Surg Res 112:84–90PubMedCrossRef Lin PH, Chronos NA, Marijianowski MM, Chen C, Conklin B, Bush RL et al (2003) Carotid stenting using heparin-coated balloon-expandable stent reduces intimal hyperplasia in a baboon model. J Surg Res 112:84–90PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Müller-Hülsbeck S, Gühne A, Tsokos M, Hüsler EJ, Schaffner SR, Paulsen F et al (2006) Stent-protected carotid angioplasty using a membrane stent: a comparative cadaver study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 29:630–636PubMedCrossRef Müller-Hülsbeck S, Gühne A, Tsokos M, Hüsler EJ, Schaffner SR, Paulsen F et al (2006) Stent-protected carotid angioplasty using a membrane stent: a comparative cadaver study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 29:630–636PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Müller-Hülsbeck S, Hüsler EJ, Schaffner SR, Jahnke T, Glass C, Wenke R et al (2004) An in vitro analysis of a carotid artery stent with a protective porous membrane. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15:1295–1305PubMed Müller-Hülsbeck S, Hüsler EJ, Schaffner SR, Jahnke T, Glass C, Wenke R et al (2004) An in vitro analysis of a carotid artery stent with a protective porous membrane. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15:1295–1305PubMed
32.
go back to reference Link J, Feyerabend B, Grabener M, Linstedt U, Brossmann J, Thomsen H et al (1996) Dacron-covered stent-grafts for the percutaneous treatment of carotid aneurysms: effectiveness and biocompatibility experimental study in swine. Radiology 200:397–401PubMed Link J, Feyerabend B, Grabener M, Linstedt U, Brossmann J, Thomsen H et al (1996) Dacron-covered stent-grafts for the percutaneous treatment of carotid aneurysms: effectiveness and biocompatibility experimental study in swine. Radiology 200:397–401PubMed
33.
go back to reference Speck U, Scheller B, Abramjuk C, Breitwieser C, Dobberstein J, Boehm M et al (2006) Neointima inhibition: comparison of effectiveness of non-stent-based local drug delivery and a drug-eluting stent in porcine coronary arteries. Radiology 240:411–418PubMedCrossRef Speck U, Scheller B, Abramjuk C, Breitwieser C, Dobberstein J, Boehm M et al (2006) Neointima inhibition: comparison of effectiveness of non-stent-based local drug delivery and a drug-eluting stent in porcine coronary arteries. Radiology 240:411–418PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Narayanaswamy M, Wright KC, Kandarpa K (2000) Animal models for atherosclerosis, restenosis, and endovascular graft research. J Vasc Interv Radiol 11:5–17PubMedCrossRef Narayanaswamy M, Wright KC, Kandarpa K (2000) Animal models for atherosclerosis, restenosis, and endovascular graft research. J Vasc Interv Radiol 11:5–17PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Carotid Artery Stenting Using a Novel Self-Expanding Braided Nickel–Titanium Stent: Feasibility and Safety Porcine Trial
Authors
Frank Ahlhelm
Ralf Kaufmann
Dirk Ahlhelm
Mai Fang Ong
Christian Roth
Wolfgang Reith
Publication date
01-09-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology / Issue 5/2009
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Electronic ISSN: 1432-086X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-009-9572-0

Other articles of this Issue 5/2009

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 5/2009 Go to the issue