Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 1/2021

Open Access 01-01-2021 | Pancreatectomy | Original Scientific Report

The Usefulness of a Preoperative Nomogram for Predicting the Probability of Conversion from Laparoscopic to Open Distal Pancreatectomy: A Single-Center Experience

Authors: Riccardo Casadei, Claudio Ricci, Carlo Ingaldi, Laura Alberici, Maria Chiara Vaccaro, Elisa Galasso, Francesco Minni

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) represents a challenging procedure with a high conversion rate. A nomogram is a simple statistical predictive tool which is superior to risk groups. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a preoperative nomogram for predicting the probability of conversion from laparoscopic to open distal pancreatectomy.

Methods

This is a retrospective study of 100 consecutive patients who underwent LDP. For each patient demographic, pre-intra- and postoperative data were collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out to identify the factors significantly influencing the conversion rate. The effect of each factor was weighted using the beta coefficient (β), and a nomogram was built. Finally, a logistic regression between the score and the conversion rate was carried out to calibrate the nomogram.

Results

The conversion rate was 19.0%. At multivariate analysis, female (β =  − 1.8 ± 0.9; P = 0.047) and tail location of the tumor (β =  − 2.1 ± 1.1; P = 0.050) were significantly related to a low probability of conversion. Body mass index (BMI) (β = 0.2 ± 0.1; P = 0.011) and subtotal pancreatectomy (β = 2.4 ± 0.9; P = 0.006) were factors independently related to a high probability of conversion. The nomogram constructed had a minimum value of 4 and a maximum value of 18 points. The probability of conversion increased significantly starting from a minimum score of 6 points (P = 0.029; conversion probability 14.4%; 95%CI, 1.5–27.3%) up to 16 (P = 0.048; 27.8%; 95%CI, 0.2–48.7%).

Conclusion

The nomogram proposed could serve as an effective preoperative tool capable of assessing the probability of conversion, allowing to take reliable decisions regarding indications and adequate stepwise training program of LDP.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Røsok BI, de Rooij T, van Hilst J et al (2017) Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy. HPB 19:205–214CrossRef Røsok BI, de Rooij T, van Hilst J et al (2017) Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy. HPB 19:205–214CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Zureikat AH, Borrebach J, Pitt HA et al (2017) Minimally invasive hepatopancreatobiliary surgery in North America: an ACS-NSQIP analysis of predictors of conversion for laparoscopic and robotic pancreatectomy and hepatectomy. HPB 19:595–602CrossRef Zureikat AH, Borrebach J, Pitt HA et al (2017) Minimally invasive hepatopancreatobiliary surgery in North America: an ACS-NSQIP analysis of predictors of conversion for laparoscopic and robotic pancreatectomy and hepatectomy. HPB 19:595–602CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Venkat R, Edil BH, Schulick RD et al (2012) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is associated with significantly less overall morbidity compared to the open technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 255:1048–1059CrossRef Venkat R, Edil BH, Schulick RD et al (2012) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is associated with significantly less overall morbidity compared to the open technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 255:1048–1059CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Mehrabi A, Hafezi M, Arvin J et al (2015) A systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign and malignant lesions of the pancreas: it’s time to randomize. Surgery 157:45–55CrossRef Mehrabi A, Hafezi M, Arvin J et al (2015) A systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign and malignant lesions of the pancreas: it’s time to randomize. Surgery 157:45–55CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ricci C, Casadei R, Lazzarini E et al (2014) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in Italy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 13:458–463CrossRef Ricci C, Casadei R, Lazzarini E et al (2014) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in Italy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 13:458–463CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ricci C, Casadei R, Taffurelli G et al (2015) Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 19:770–781CrossRef Ricci C, Casadei R, Taffurelli G et al (2015) Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 19:770–781CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ricci C, Casadei R, Taffurelli G et al (2016) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: many meta-analyses, few certainties. Updates Surg 68:225–234CrossRef Ricci C, Casadei R, Taffurelli G et al (2016) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: many meta-analyses, few certainties. Updates Surg 68:225–234CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Casadei R, Ricci C, D'Ambra M et al (2010) Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy in pancreatic tumours: a case-control study. Updates Surg 62:171–174CrossRef Casadei R, Ricci C, D'Ambra M et al (2010) Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy in pancreatic tumours: a case-control study. Updates Surg 62:171–174CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ohtsuka T, Ban D, Nakamura Y et al (2018) Difficulty scoring system in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 25:489–497CrossRef Ohtsuka T, Ban D, Nakamura Y et al (2018) Difficulty scoring system in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 25:489–497CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Goh BKP, Kabir T, Koh YX et al (2019) External validation of the Japanese difficulty scoring system for minimally-invasive distal pancreatectomies. Am J Surg 218:967–971CrossRef Goh BKP, Kabir T, Koh YX et al (2019) External validation of the Japanese difficulty scoring system for minimally-invasive distal pancreatectomies. Am J Surg 218:967–971CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Goh BKP, Chan CY, Lee SY et al (2017) Factors associated with and consequences of open conversion after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: initial experience at a single institution. ANZ J Surg 87:E271–E275CrossRef Goh BKP, Chan CY, Lee SY et al (2017) Factors associated with and consequences of open conversion after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: initial experience at a single institution. ANZ J Surg 87:E271–E275CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hua Y, Javed AA, Burkhart RA et al (2017) Preoperative risk factors for conversion and learning curve of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy. Surgery 162:1040–1047CrossRef Hua Y, Javed AA, Burkhart RA et al (2017) Preoperative risk factors for conversion and learning curve of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy. Surgery 162:1040–1047CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Casadei R, Ricci C, Pacilio CA et al (2018) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: which factors are related to open conversion? Lessons learned from 68 consecutive procedures in a high-volume pancreatic center. Surg Endosc 32:3839–3845CrossRef Casadei R, Ricci C, Pacilio CA et al (2018) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: which factors are related to open conversion? Lessons learned from 68 consecutive procedures in a high-volume pancreatic center. Surg Endosc 32:3839–3845CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Touijer K, Scardino PT (2009) Nomograms for staging, prognosis, and predicting treatment outcomes. Cancer 115:3107–3111CrossRef Touijer K, Scardino PT (2009) Nomograms for staging, prognosis, and predicting treatment outcomes. Cancer 115:3107–3111CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ricci C, Casadei R, Buscemi S et al (2015) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: what factors are related to the learning curve? Surg Today 45:50–56CrossRef Ricci C, Casadei R, Buscemi S et al (2015) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: what factors are related to the learning curve? Surg Today 45:50–56CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Casadei R, Ricci C, Pezzilli R et al (2011) Assessment of complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification after distal pancreatectomy. JOP 12:126–130PubMed Casadei R, Ricci C, Pezzilli R et al (2011) Assessment of complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification after distal pancreatectomy. JOP 12:126–130PubMed
17.
go back to reference Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C et al (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 161:584–591CrossRef Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C et al (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 161:584–591CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ricci C, Casadei R, Buscemi S et al (2012) Late postpancreatectomy hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy: is it possible to recognize risk factors? JOP 13:193–198PubMed Ricci C, Casadei R, Buscemi S et al (2012) Late postpancreatectomy hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy: is it possible to recognize risk factors? JOP 13:193–198PubMed
19.
go back to reference Kattan MW, Eastham JA, Stapleton AMF et al (1998) A preoperative nomogram for disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 90:766–771CrossRef Kattan MW, Eastham JA, Stapleton AMF et al (1998) A preoperative nomogram for disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 90:766–771CrossRef
20.
go back to reference de Rooij T, van Hilst J, van Santvoort H et al (2019) Minimally Invasive Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): a multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 269:2–9CrossRef de Rooij T, van Hilst J, van Santvoort H et al (2019) Minimally Invasive Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): a multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 269:2–9CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Abu Hilal M, Richardson JR, de Rooij T et al (2016) Laparoscopic radical ‘no-touch’ left pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: technique and results. Surg Endosc 30:3830–3838CrossRef Abu Hilal M, Richardson JR, de Rooij T et al (2016) Laparoscopic radical ‘no-touch’ left pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: technique and results. Surg Endosc 30:3830–3838CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Nassour I, Wang SC, Porembka MR et al (2017) Conversion of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: predictors and outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 24:3725–3731CrossRef Nassour I, Wang SC, Porembka MR et al (2017) Conversion of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: predictors and outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 24:3725–3731CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Usefulness of a Preoperative Nomogram for Predicting the Probability of Conversion from Laparoscopic to Open Distal Pancreatectomy: A Single-Center Experience
Authors
Riccardo Casadei
Claudio Ricci
Carlo Ingaldi
Laura Alberici
Maria Chiara Vaccaro
Elisa Galasso
Francesco Minni
Publication date
01-01-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Keyword
Pancreatectomy
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05806-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

World Journal of Surgery 1/2021 Go to the issue