Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgery Today 1/2015

01-01-2015 | Original Article

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: what factors are related to the learning curve?

Authors: Claudio Ricci, Riccardo Casadei, Salvatore Buscemi, Giovanni Taffurelli, Marielda D’Ambra, Carlo Alberto Pacilio, Francesco Minni

Published in: Surgery Today | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The factors related to the learning curve for laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy have rarely been evaluated.

Methods

A retrospective study of 32 patients who underwent a laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy performed at a high-volume center by a single pancreatic surgeon experienced with laparoscopic surgery was conducted. Pre-, intra- and postoperative data were collected. The primary endpoint was the length of the operation. The secondary endpoints were the conversion and reoperation rates, overall postoperative morbidity and mortality rates, the length of hospital stay and rate of unplanned splenectomy.

Results

The length of the operation and the cumulative sum of the procedures presented a logarithmic correlation (P = 0.048). The learning curve appeared to have been completed after 17 procedures (P = 0.040). The multivariate analysis confirmed that the completion of the learning curve (CLC) reduced the length of the operation by 18 % (P = 0.009), but extended resection increased the length of the operation (P = 0.023). The conversion and reoperation rates, overall postoperative morbidity and mortality rates and length of the hospital stay were not related to the CLC. Unplanned splenectomy was more frequently performed during the first 17 procedures.

Conclusions

The length of the operation seems to be the main factor related to the CLC for laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. The learning curve could be considered to be completed after about 17 procedures if performed by surgeons experienced with laparoscopic techniques at high-volume centers.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pericleous S, Middleton N, McKay SC, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of case-matched studies comparing open and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: is it a safe procedure? Pancreas. 2012;41:993–1000.PubMedCrossRef Pericleous S, Middleton N, McKay SC, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of case-matched studies comparing open and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: is it a safe procedure? Pancreas. 2012;41:993–1000.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Venkat R, Edil BH, Schulick RD, et al. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is associated with significantly less overall morbidity compared to the open technique. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2012;255:1048–59.PubMedCrossRef Venkat R, Edil BH, Schulick RD, et al. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is associated with significantly less overall morbidity compared to the open technique. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2012;255:1048–59.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Makino I, Kitagawa H, Nakagawara H, et al. Management of remnant pancreatic stump fto prevent the development of postoperative pancreatic fistulas after distal pancreatectomy: current evidence and our strategy. Surg Today. 2013;43:595–602.PubMedCrossRef Makino I, Kitagawa H, Nakagawara H, et al. Management of remnant pancreatic stump fto prevent the development of postoperative pancreatic fistulas after distal pancreatectomy: current evidence and our strategy. Surg Today. 2013;43:595–602.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Choi DH, Jeong WK, Lim SW, et al. Learning curves for laparoscopic sigmoidectomy used to manage curable sigmoid colon cancer: single-institute, three-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc. 2008;23:622–8.PubMedCrossRef Choi DH, Jeong WK, Lim SW, et al. Learning curves for laparoscopic sigmoidectomy used to manage curable sigmoid colon cancer: single-institute, three-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc. 2008;23:622–8.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Goitein D, Mintz Y, Gross D, et al. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: ascending the learning curve. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:771–3.PubMedCrossRef Goitein D, Mintz Y, Gross D, et al. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: ascending the learning curve. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:771–3.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Braga M, Ridolfi C, Balzano G, et al. Learning curve for laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in a high-volume hospital. Updates Surg. 2012;64:179–83.PubMedCrossRef Braga M, Ridolfi C, Balzano G, et al. Learning curve for laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in a high-volume hospital. Updates Surg. 2012;64:179–83.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Margiotta A, Marrano N, Casadei R, et al. Laparoscopic colic resection: a short term results in 4 years experience. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:S139.CrossRef Margiotta A, Marrano N, Casadei R, et al. Laparoscopic colic resection: a short term results in 4 years experience. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:S139.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ricci C, Marrano N, Casadei R, et al. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a 5-year experience of 38 cases. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:S112. Ricci C, Marrano N, Casadei R, et al. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a 5-year experience of 38 cases. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:S112.
9.
go back to reference Casadei R, Ricci C, Pezzilli R, et al. Usefulness of the Clavien-Dindo classification after pancreaticoduodenectomy. ANZ J Surg. 2011;81:747–8.PubMedCrossRef Casadei R, Ricci C, Pezzilli R, et al. Usefulness of the Clavien-Dindo classification after pancreaticoduodenectomy. ANZ J Surg. 2011;81:747–8.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Casadei R, Ricci C, Pezzilli R, et al. The usefulness of a grading system for complications resulting from pancreatic resections: a single center experience. Updates Surg. 2011;63:97–102.PubMedCrossRef Casadei R, Ricci C, Pezzilli R, et al. The usefulness of a grading system for complications resulting from pancreatic resections: a single center experience. Updates Surg. 2011;63:97–102.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Casadei R, Ricci C, Pezzilli R, et al. Assessment of complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification after distal pancreatectomy. JOP. 2011;12:126–30.PubMed Casadei R, Ricci C, Pezzilli R, et al. Assessment of complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification after distal pancreatectomy. JOP. 2011;12:126–30.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Casadei R, Ricci C, D’Ambra M, et al. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy in pancreatic tumours: a case-control study. Updates Surg. 2010;62:171–4.PubMedCrossRef Casadei R, Ricci C, D’Ambra M, et al. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy in pancreatic tumours: a case-control study. Updates Surg. 2010;62:171–4.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187–96.PubMedCrossRef Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187–96.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005;138:8–13.PubMedCrossRef Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005;138:8–13.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, et al. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery. 2007;142:20–5.PubMedCrossRef Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, et al. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery. 2007;142:20–5.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: what factors are related to the learning curve?
Authors
Claudio Ricci
Riccardo Casadei
Salvatore Buscemi
Giovanni Taffurelli
Marielda D’Ambra
Carlo Alberto Pacilio
Francesco Minni
Publication date
01-01-2015
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Surgery Today / Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 0941-1291
Electronic ISSN: 1436-2813
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-014-0872-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Surgery Today 1/2015 Go to the issue