Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 9/2020

01-09-2020 | Original Scientific Report

Global Survey of Perceptions of the Surgical Safety Checklist Among Medical Students, Trainees, and Early Career Providers

Authors: Nikhil Panda, Luca Koritsanszky, Megan Delisle, Theophilus T. K. Anyomih, Eesha V. Desai, Yves Sonnay, George Molina, Katayoun Madani, Dominique Vervoort, Thomas G. Weiser, Evan M. Benjamin, Alex B. Haynes

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 9/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) has been shown to reduce perioperative complications across global health systems. We sought to assess perceptions of the SSC and suggestions for its improvement among medical students, trainees, and early career providers.

Methods

From July to September 2019, a survey assessing perceptions of the SSC was disseminated through InciSioN, the International Student Surgical Network comprising medical students, trainees, and early career providers pursuing surgery. Individuals with ≥2 years of independent practice after training were excluded. Respondents were categorized according to any clinical versus solely non-clinical SSC exposure. Logistic regression was used to evaluate associations between clinical/non-clinical exposure and promoting future use of the SSC, adjusting for potential confounders/mediators: training level, human development index, and first perceptions of the SSC. Thematic analysis was conducted on suggestions for SSC improvement.

Results

Respondent participation rate was 24%. Three hundred and eighteen respondents were included in final analyses; 215 (67%) reported clinical exposure and 190 (60%) were promoters of future SSC use. Clinical exposure was associated with greater odds of promoting future SSC use (aOR 1.81 95% CI [1.03–3.19], p = 0.039). A greater proportion of promoters reported “Improved Operating Room Communication” as a goal of the SSC (0.21 95% CI [0.15–0.27]-vs.-0.12 [0.06–0.17], p = 0.031), while non-promoters reported the SSC goals were “Not Well Understood” (0.08 95% CI [0.03–0.12]-vs.-0.03 [0.01–0.05], p = 0.032). Suggestions for SSC improvement emphasized context-specific adaptability and earlier formal training.

Conclusions

Clinical exposure to the SSC was associated with promoting its future use. Earlier formal clinical training may improve perceptions and future use among medical students, trainees, and early career providers.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Haynes AB et al (2009) A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 360(5):491–499CrossRef Haynes AB et al (2009) A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 360(5):491–499CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Faherty LJ, Mate KS, Moses JM (2016) Leveraging trainees to improve quality and safety at the point of care: three models for engagement. Acad Med 91(4):503–509CrossRef Faherty LJ, Mate KS, Moses JM (2016) Leveraging trainees to improve quality and safety at the point of care: three models for engagement. Acad Med 91(4):503–509CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lenguerrand E, Winter C, Siassakos D et al (2020) Effect of hands-on interprofessional simulation training for local emergencies in Scotland: the THISTLE stepped-wedge design randomised controlled trial. BMJ Qual Saf 29:122–134CrossRef Lenguerrand E, Winter C, Siassakos D et al (2020) Effect of hands-on interprofessional simulation training for local emergencies in Scotland: the THISTLE stepped-wedge design randomised controlled trial. BMJ Qual Saf 29:122–134CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Contemporary Issues in Medicine: Quality of Care Medical School Objectives Project (2001) Contemporary Issues in Medicine: Quality of Care Medical School Objectives Project (2001)
8.
go back to reference Gehlbach H, Artino AR (2018) The survey checklist (Manifesto). Acad Med 93(3):360–366CrossRef Gehlbach H, Artino AR (2018) The survey checklist (Manifesto). Acad Med 93(3):360–366CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kelley K (2003) Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. Int J Qual Health Care 15(3):261–266CrossRef Kelley K (2003) Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. Int J Qual Health Care 15(3):261–266CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Krol MW, de Boer D, Delnoij DM, Rademakers JJDJM (2015) The Net Promoter Score—an asset to patient experience surveys? Health Expect 18(6):3099–3109CrossRef Krol MW, de Boer D, Delnoij DM, Rademakers JJDJM (2015) The Net Promoter Score—an asset to patient experience surveys? Health Expect 18(6):3099–3109CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Delisle M, Ward MAR, Pradarelli JC, Panda N, Howard JD, Hannenberg AA (2019) Comparing the learning effectiveness of healthcare simulation in the observer versus active role: systematic review and meta-analysis. Simul Healthc 14(5):318–332CrossRef Delisle M, Ward MAR, Pradarelli JC, Panda N, Howard JD, Hannenberg AA (2019) Comparing the learning effectiveness of healthcare simulation in the observer versus active role: systematic review and meta-analysis. Simul Healthc 14(5):318–332CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Vohra RS, Cowley JB, Bhasin N, Barakat HM, Gough MJ (2015) Attitudes towards the surgical safety checklist and factors associated with its use: a global survey of frontline medical professionals. Ann Med Surg 4(2):119–123CrossRef Vohra RS, Cowley JB, Bhasin N, Barakat HM, Gough MJ (2015) Attitudes towards the surgical safety checklist and factors associated with its use: a global survey of frontline medical professionals. Ann Med Surg 4(2):119–123CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kilduff CLS, Leith TO, Drake TM, Fitzgerald JEF (2018) Surgical safety checklist training: a national study of undergraduate medical and nursing student teaching, understanding and influencing factors. Postgrad Med J 94(1109):143–150CrossRef Kilduff CLS, Leith TO, Drake TM, Fitzgerald JEF (2018) Surgical safety checklist training: a national study of undergraduate medical and nursing student teaching, understanding and influencing factors. Postgrad Med J 94(1109):143–150CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ng-Kamstra JS et al (2016) Global surgery 2030: a roadmap for high income country actors. BMJ Global Health 1(1):2016CrossRef Ng-Kamstra JS et al (2016) Global surgery 2030: a roadmap for high income country actors. BMJ Global Health 1(1):2016CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kaplan HC, Provost LP, Froehle CM, Margolis PA (2012) The model for understanding success in quality (MUSIQ): building a theory of context in healthcare quality improvement. BMJ Qual Saf 21(1):13–20CrossRef Kaplan HC, Provost LP, Froehle CM, Margolis PA (2012) The model for understanding success in quality (MUSIQ): building a theory of context in healthcare quality improvement. BMJ Qual Saf 21(1):13–20CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Global Survey of Perceptions of the Surgical Safety Checklist Among Medical Students, Trainees, and Early Career Providers
Authors
Nikhil Panda
Luca Koritsanszky
Megan Delisle
Theophilus T. K. Anyomih
Eesha V. Desai
Yves Sonnay
George Molina
Katayoun Madani
Dominique Vervoort
Thomas G. Weiser
Evan M. Benjamin
Alex B. Haynes
Publication date
01-09-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 9/2020
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05518-x

Other articles of this Issue 9/2020

World Journal of Surgery 9/2020 Go to the issue