Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 9/2019

Open Access 01-09-2019 | Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm | Original Scientific Report

Delphi Study to Reach International Consensus Among Vascular Surgeons on Major Arterial Vascular Surgical Complications

Authors: S. M. L. de Mik, F. E. Stubenrouch, D. A. Legemate, R. Balm, D. T. Ubbink, the DISCOVAR Study Group

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 9/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The complications discussed with patients by surgeons prior to surgery vary, because no consensus on major complications exists. Such consensus may improve informed consent and shared decision-making. This study aimed to achieve consensus among vascular surgeons on which complications are considered ‘major’ and which ‘minor,’ following surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), carotid artery disease (CAD) and peripheral artery disease (PAD).

Methods

Complications following vascular surgery were extracted from Cochrane reviews, national guidelines, and reporting standards. Vascular surgeons from Europe and North America rated complications as major or minor on five-point Likert scales via an electronic Delphi method. Consensus was reached if ≥ 80% of participants scored 1 or 2 (minor) or 4 or 5 (major).

Results

Participants reached consensus on 9–12 major and 6–10 minor complications per disease. Myocardial infarction, stroke, renal failure and allergic reactions were considered to be major complications of all three diseases. All other major complications were treatment specific or dependent on disease severity, e.g., spinal cord ischemia, rupture following AAA repair, stroke for CAD or deep wound infection for PAD.

Conclusion

Vascular surgeons reached international consensus on major and minor complications following AAA, CAD and PAD treatment. This consensus may be helpful in harmonizing the information patients receive and improving standardization of the informed consent procedure. Since major complications differed between diseases, consensus on disease-specific complications to be discussed with patients is necessary.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference McManus PL, Wheatley KE (2003) Consent and complications: risk disclosure varies widely between individual surgeons. Ann R Coll Surg 85:79–82CrossRef McManus PL, Wheatley KE (2003) Consent and complications: risk disclosure varies widely between individual surgeons. Ann R Coll Surg 85:79–82CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Knops AM, Ubbink DT, Legemate DA et al (2010) Information communicated with patients in decision making about their abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 39:708–713CrossRefPubMed Knops AM, Ubbink DT, Legemate DA et al (2010) Information communicated with patients in decision making about their abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 39:708–713CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference de Mik SM, Stubenrouch FE, Legemate DA, et al (2018) Treatment of varicose veins, international consensus on which major complications to discuss with the patient: a Delphi study. Phlebology 268355518785482 de Mik SM, Stubenrouch FE, Legemate DA, et al (2018) Treatment of varicose veins, international consensus on which major complications to discuss with the patient: a Delphi study. Phlebology 268355518785482
7.
go back to reference Kunneman M, Pieterse AH, Stiggelbout AM et al (2015) Which benefits and harms of preoperative radiotherapy should be addressed? a Delphi consensus study among rectal cancer patients and radiation oncologists. Radiother Oncol 114:212–217CrossRefPubMed Kunneman M, Pieterse AH, Stiggelbout AM et al (2015) Which benefits and harms of preoperative radiotherapy should be addressed? a Delphi consensus study among rectal cancer patients and radiation oncologists. Radiother Oncol 114:212–217CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Etzkorn JR, Gharavi NM, Carr DR et al (2018) Examining the relevance to patients of complications in the American College of Mohs Surgery registry: results of a Delphi Consensus process. Dermatol Surg 44:763–767CrossRefPubMed Etzkorn JR, Gharavi NM, Carr DR et al (2018) Examining the relevance to patients of complications in the American College of Mohs Surgery registry: results of a Delphi Consensus process. Dermatol Surg 44:763–767CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Ubbink DT, Koelemay MJW (2018) Shared decision making in vascular surgery. Why would you? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 56:749–750CrossRefPubMed Ubbink DT, Koelemay MJW (2018) Shared decision making in vascular surgery. Why would you? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 56:749–750CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Keeney S, Hasson F, McKenna H (2006) Consulting the oracle: ten lessons from using the Delphi technique in nursing research. J Adv Nurs 53:205–212CrossRefPubMed Keeney S, Hasson F, McKenna H (2006) Consulting the oracle: ten lessons from using the Delphi technique in nursing research. J Adv Nurs 53:205–212CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Paravastu SC, Jayarajasingam R, Cottam R et al (2014) Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014:CD004178 Paravastu SC, Jayarajasingam R, Cottam R et al (2014) Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014:CD004178
12.
go back to reference Bonati LH, Lyrer P, Ederle J et al (2012) Percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty and stenting for carotid artery stenosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9:CD000515 Bonati LH, Lyrer P, Ederle J et al (2012) Percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty and stenting for carotid artery stenosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9:CD000515
14.
go back to reference Chaikof EL, Blankensteijn JD, Harris PL et al (2002) Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 35:1048–1060CrossRefPubMed Chaikof EL, Blankensteijn JD, Harris PL et al (2002) Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 35:1048–1060CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Timaran CH, McKinsey JF, Schneider PA et al (2011) Reporting standards for carotid interventions from the Society for Vascular Surgery. J Vasc Surg 53:1679–1695CrossRefPubMed Timaran CH, McKinsey JF, Schneider PA et al (2011) Reporting standards for carotid interventions from the Society for Vascular Surgery. J Vasc Surg 53:1679–1695CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Stoner MC, Calligaro KD, Chaer RA et al (2016) Reporting standards of the Society for Vascular Surgery for endovascular treatment of chronic lower extremity peripheral artery disease: executive summary. J Vasc Surg 64:227–228CrossRefPubMed Stoner MC, Calligaro KD, Chaer RA et al (2016) Reporting standards of the Society for Vascular Surgery for endovascular treatment of chronic lower extremity peripheral artery disease: executive summary. J Vasc Surg 64:227–228CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference George D, Mallery P (2003) In: SPSS for windows step by step: a simple guide and reference. 11.0 update. Allyn & Bacon, Boston, pp 1–386 George D, Mallery P (2003) In: SPSS for windows step by step: a simple guide and reference. 11.0 update. Allyn & Bacon, Boston, pp 1–386
19.
20.
go back to reference Masso Guijarro P, Aranaz Andres JM, Mira JJ et al (2010) Adverse events in hospitals: the patient's point of view. Qual Saf Health Care 19:144–147CrossRefPubMed Masso Guijarro P, Aranaz Andres JM, Mira JJ et al (2010) Adverse events in hospitals: the patient's point of view. Qual Saf Health Care 19:144–147CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Mulley AG, Trimble C, Elwyn G (2012) Stop the silent misdiagnosis: patients' preferences matter. BMJ 345:e6572CrossRefPubMed Mulley AG, Trimble C, Elwyn G (2012) Stop the silent misdiagnosis: patients' preferences matter. BMJ 345:e6572CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Stacey D, Legare F, Lewis K et al (2017) Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD001431PubMed Stacey D, Legare F, Lewis K et al (2017) Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD001431PubMed
23.
go back to reference Stiggelbout AM, Van der Weijden T, De Wit MP et al (2012) Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare. BMJ 344:e256CrossRefPubMed Stiggelbout AM, Van der Weijden T, De Wit MP et al (2012) Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare. BMJ 344:e256CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Clayton MJ (1997) Delphi: a technique to harness expert opinion for critical decision-making tasks in education. Educ Psychol 17:373–386CrossRef Clayton MJ (1997) Delphi: a technique to harness expert opinion for critical decision-making tasks in education. Educ Psychol 17:373–386CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Delphi Study to Reach International Consensus Among Vascular Surgeons on Major Arterial Vascular Surgical Complications
Authors
S. M. L. de Mik
F. E. Stubenrouch
D. A. Legemate
R. Balm
D. T. Ubbink
the DISCOVAR Study Group
Publication date
01-09-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 9/2019
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-05038-3

Other articles of this Issue 9/2019

World Journal of Surgery 9/2019 Go to the issue