Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 3/2018

01-03-2018 | Original Scientific Report

Disparities in Breast Cancer: Private Patients Have Better Outcomes Than Public Patients

Authors: W. C. Coetzee, J. P. Apffelstaedt, T. Zeeman, M. Du Plessis

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Different outcomes in breast cancer have been reported for low and high socio-economic groups. We present data quantifying disparities between South African public and private patients.

Methods

Records of 240 consecutive patients treated in 2008 in a public versus 97 patients in a private health facility were reviewed for demographic and oncologic data.

Results

The average of patients was 56.2 versus 51.9 years (p = 0.032). Stage at presentation was 0 in 0.83 versus 25.8%, I in 4.5 versus 15.5%, II in 41.3 versus 37.1%, III in 37.1 versus 18.6% and IV in 16.3 versus 3.1% public versus private patients. Seventy-three percent of patients were symptomatic versus 57.7%. Of patients with stage 0–III disease, 17.9 versus 20% had simple tumour excision and 7.5 versus 14%, oncoplastic tumour excision. The mastectomy rate was similar (52 vs. 60%), but immediate reconstruction was performed in 10 versus 63%. Public patients were less likely to have radiotherapy. The pathology was similar, 27.2 versus 20, 54 versus 52, 87 versus 61% of patients with stage I, II and III disease, respectively, had chemotherapy. Hormonal therapy for premenopausal patients in private was a LHRH agonist in 9.3%, ovarian ablation/BSO in 11.7% of public patients; biologicals were given in 7.2 versus 0% of patients. Overall survival for public versus private was 66 versus 80% (p < 0.001) months. Better per stage survival of private patients 100 versus 100, 72.7 versus 93.3, 84.8 versus 88.9, 57.3 versus 77.8 and 33 versus 33% for stages 0, I, II, III and IV, did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusion

The greatest impact on outcome was stage at presentation, but more aggressive therapy for each stage resulted in a trend to better outcome for private patients.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Herbst MC (2015) Cancer Association of South Africa (CANSA) fact sheet on the top ten cancers per population group top ten most common cancers of women top ten most common cancers of Asian men. Cansa 2015:1–6 Herbst MC (2015) Cancer Association of South Africa (CANSA) fact sheet on the top ten cancers per population group top ten most common cancers of women top ten most common cancers of Asian men. Cansa 2015:1–6
3.
go back to reference Liedke PER et al (2014) Outcomes of breast cancer in Brazil related to health care coverage: a retrospective cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 23:126–133CrossRef Liedke PER et al (2014) Outcomes of breast cancer in Brazil related to health care coverage: a retrospective cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 23:126–133CrossRef
4.
5.
go back to reference Woods LM, Rachet B, Coleman MP (2006) Origins of socio-economic inequalities in cancer survival: a review. Ann Oncol 17:5–19CrossRefPubMed Woods LM, Rachet B, Coleman MP (2006) Origins of socio-economic inequalities in cancer survival: a review. Ann Oncol 17:5–19CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ncayiyana D (2007) Racial profiling in medical research: what are we measuring? S Afr Med J 97(12):1225–1226PubMed Ncayiyana D (2007) Racial profiling in medical research: what are we measuring? S Afr Med J 97(12):1225–1226PubMed
10.
go back to reference Carlson RW et al (2009) Breast cancer. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 7:122–192CrossRef Carlson RW et al (2009) Breast cancer. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 7:122–192CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Glick JH et al (2005) Meeting highlights: international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2005. Ann Oncol 16:1569–1583CrossRefPubMed Glick JH et al (2005) Meeting highlights: international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2005. Ann Oncol 16:1569–1583CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481CrossRef Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Jemal A (2014) Cancer in Africa 2012. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 23:953–966CrossRef Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Jemal A (2014) Cancer in Africa 2012. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 23:953–966CrossRef
15.
16.
17.
go back to reference Apffelstaedt JP, Dalmayer L, Baatjes K (2014) Mammographic screening for breast cancer in a resource-restricted environment. S Afr Med J. 104:294CrossRefPubMed Apffelstaedt JP, Dalmayer L, Baatjes K (2014) Mammographic screening for breast cancer in a resource-restricted environment. S Afr Med J. 104:294CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Bleyer A, Welch HG (2012) Effect of three decades of screening mammography on breast-cancer incidence. N Engl J Med 367(21):1998–2005CrossRefPubMed Bleyer A, Welch HG (2012) Effect of three decades of screening mammography on breast-cancer incidence. N Engl J Med 367(21):1998–2005CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Maree JE, Wrights S (2010) How would early detection be possible? An enquiry into cancer related knowledge, understanding and health seeking behaviour in urban black women in Tshwane, South Africa. Eur J Oncol Nurs 14(3):190–196CrossRefPubMed Maree JE, Wrights S (2010) How would early detection be possible? An enquiry into cancer related knowledge, understanding and health seeking behaviour in urban black women in Tshwane, South Africa. Eur J Oncol Nurs 14(3):190–196CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Younis T, Rayson D, Skedgel C (2011) The cost-utility of adjuvant chemotherapy using docetaxel and cyclophosphamide compared with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in breast cancer. Curr Oncol 18(6):e288–e296CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Younis T, Rayson D, Skedgel C (2011) The cost-utility of adjuvant chemotherapy using docetaxel and cyclophosphamide compared with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in breast cancer. Curr Oncol 18(6):e288–e296CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Newman LA et al (2006) Meta-analysis of survival in African American and white American patients with breast cancer: ethnicity compared with socioeconomic status. J Clin Oncol 24(9):1342–1349CrossRefPubMed Newman LA et al (2006) Meta-analysis of survival in African American and white American patients with breast cancer: ethnicity compared with socioeconomic status. J Clin Oncol 24(9):1342–1349CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Dickens C, Duarte R, Zietsman A, Cubasch H, Kellett P (2014) Racial Comparison of receptor-defined breast cancer in Southern African women: subtype prevalence and age-incidence analysis of nationwide cancer registry data. Cancer Epidemiol Prev Biomark. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0603 Dickens C, Duarte R, Zietsman A, Cubasch H, Kellett P (2014) Racial Comparison of receptor-defined breast cancer in Southern African women: subtype prevalence and age-incidence analysis of nationwide cancer registry data. Cancer Epidemiol Prev Biomark. doi:10.​1158/​1055-9965.​EPI-14-0603
27.
go back to reference Sankaranarayanan R et al (2010) Cancer survival in Africa, Asia, and Central America: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 11:165–173CrossRefPubMed Sankaranarayanan R et al (2010) Cancer survival in Africa, Asia, and Central America: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 11:165–173CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Disparities in Breast Cancer: Private Patients Have Better Outcomes Than Public Patients
Authors
W. C. Coetzee
J. P. Apffelstaedt
T. Zeeman
M. Du Plessis
Publication date
01-03-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4187-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

World Journal of Surgery 3/2018 Go to the issue