Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 8/2015

01-08-2015 | Original Scientific Report

The Tight Adaptation at Pancreatic Anastomosis Without Parenchymal Laceration: An Institutional Experience in Introducing and Modifying the New Procedure

Authors: Tatsuya Oda, Shinji Hashimoto, Ryoichi Miyamoto, Osamu Shimomura, Kiyoshi Fukunaga, Keisuke Kohno, Yukio Ohshiro, Yoshimasa Akashi, Tsuyoshi Enomoto, Nobuhiro Ohkohchi

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 8/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Among the types of pancreatic anastomosis used after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), Blumgart type reconstruction has rapidly been distributed for its theoretical reasonableness, including secure tight adaptation of jejunal wall and pancreatic parenchyma without cause of parenchymal laceration. The clinical appropriateness of our modified Blumgart method was demonstrated by comparing to that of Kakita method.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of 156 patients underwent elective open PD, reconstructed former 78 patients with the Kakita method, utilizing a full-thickness penetrating suture for tight stump adhesion. The later 78 patients were treated with the modified Blumgart method, which involved clamping the pancreatic parenchymal stump by the jejunal seromuscular layers with horizontal mattress-type penetration sutures. Evaluated variables were the rate of pancreatic fistula (PF) and the length of postoperative hospital stay (POHS).

Results

The rate of ISGPF grade B + C PF was 29/78 (37.2 %) in the Kakita group and 16/78 (20.5 %) in the Blumgart group (P = 0.033). The median POHS for the Kakita group was 23 days, whereas that for the Blumgart group was 16 days (P < 0.001), one of the shortest value among Japanese high-volume centers. There was no perioperative intensive hemorrhage or deaths in either group.

Conclusion

A unique concept of Blumgart pancreatic anastomosis, i.e., utilizing the jejunum as an interstitial cushion to prevent pancreatic laceration at the knot site, has become realistic through a simple “one step” modification. This technique, also providing flexible handling space at main pancreatic duct anastomosis, should contribute to the improved PF prevention and shortening the POHS.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA et al (1997) Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990 s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg 226:248–257PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA et al (1997) Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990 s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg 226:248–257PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Buchler MW, Wagner M, Schmied BM et al (2003) Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection: toward the end of completion pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 138:1310–1314PubMedCrossRef Buchler MW, Wagner M, Schmied BM et al (2003) Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection: toward the end of completion pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 138:1310–1314PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13PubMedCrossRef Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Teh SH, Diggs BS, Deveney CW et al (2009) Patient and hospital characteristics on the variance of perioperative outcomes for pancreatic resection in the United States: a plea for outcome-based and not volume-based referral guidelines. Arch Surg 144:713–721PubMedCrossRef Teh SH, Diggs BS, Deveney CW et al (2009) Patient and hospital characteristics on the variance of perioperative outcomes for pancreatic resection in the United States: a plea for outcome-based and not volume-based referral guidelines. Arch Surg 144:713–721PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Harnoss JC, Ulrich AB, Harnoss JM et al (2014) Use and results of consensus definitions in pancreatic surgery: a systematic review. Surgery 155:47–57PubMedCrossRef Harnoss JC, Ulrich AB, Harnoss JM et al (2014) Use and results of consensus definitions in pancreatic surgery: a systematic review. Surgery 155:47–57PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kimura W, Miyata H, Gotoh M et al (2014) A pancreaticoduodenectomy risk model derived from 8575 cases from a national single-race population (Japanese) using a web-based data entry system: the 30-day and in-hospital mortality rates for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 259:773–780PubMedCrossRef Kimura W, Miyata H, Gotoh M et al (2014) A pancreaticoduodenectomy risk model derived from 8575 cases from a national single-race population (Japanese) using a web-based data entry system: the 30-day and in-hospital mortality rates for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 259:773–780PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Poon RTP, Lo SH, Fong D et al (2002) Prevention of pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 183:42–52PubMedCrossRef Poon RTP, Lo SH, Fong D et al (2002) Prevention of pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 183:42–52PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Duffas JP, Suc B, Msika S et al (2005) A controlled randomized multicenter trial of pancreatogastrostomy or pancreatojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 189:720–729PubMedCrossRef Duffas JP, Suc B, Msika S et al (2005) A controlled randomized multicenter trial of pancreatogastrostomy or pancreatojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 189:720–729PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Topal B, Fieuws S, Aerts R et al (2013) Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 14:655–662PubMedCrossRef Topal B, Fieuws S, Aerts R et al (2013) Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 14:655–662PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kennedy EP, Yeo CJ (2011) Dunking pancreaticojejunostomy versus duct-to-mucosa anastomosis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 18:769–774CrossRef Kennedy EP, Yeo CJ (2011) Dunking pancreaticojejunostomy versus duct-to-mucosa anastomosis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 18:769–774CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Haane C, Mardin WA, Schmitz B et al (2013) Pancreatoduodenectomy–current status of surgical and perioperative techniques in Germany. Langenbecks Arch Surg 398:1097–1105PubMedCrossRef Haane C, Mardin WA, Schmitz B et al (2013) Pancreatoduodenectomy–current status of surgical and perioperative techniques in Germany. Langenbecks Arch Surg 398:1097–1105PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Peng SY, Wang JW, Lau WY et al (2007) Conventional versus binding pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 245:692–698PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Peng SY, Wang JW, Lau WY et al (2007) Conventional versus binding pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 245:692–698PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kakita A, Takahashi T, Yoshida M et al (1996) A simpler and more reliable technique of pancreatojejunal anastomosis. Surg Today 26:532–535PubMedCrossRef Kakita A, Takahashi T, Yoshida M et al (1996) A simpler and more reliable technique of pancreatojejunal anastomosis. Surg Today 26:532–535PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kakita A, Yoshida M, Takahashi T (2001) History of pancreaticojejunostomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy: development of a more reliable anastomosis technique. J Hepatobilary Pancreat Surg 8:230–237CrossRef Kakita A, Yoshida M, Takahashi T (2001) History of pancreaticojejunostomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy: development of a more reliable anastomosis technique. J Hepatobilary Pancreat Surg 8:230–237CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Satoi S, Toyokawa H, Yanagimoto H et al (2010) Is a nonstented duct-to-mucosa anastomosis using the modified Kakita method a safe procedure? Pancreas 39:165–170PubMedCrossRef Satoi S, Toyokawa H, Yanagimoto H et al (2010) Is a nonstented duct-to-mucosa anastomosis using the modified Kakita method a safe procedure? Pancreas 39:165–170PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Brennan M (2000) Pancreaticojejunostomy. In: Blumgart LH, Fong Y (eds) Surgery of the liver and biliary tract, 3rd edn. Saunders, New York, pp 1073–1089 Brennan M (2000) Pancreaticojejunostomy. In: Blumgart LH, Fong Y (eds) Surgery of the liver and biliary tract, 3rd edn. Saunders, New York, pp 1073–1089
17.
go back to reference Grobmyer SR, Kooby D, Blumgart LH et al (2010) Novel pancreaticojejunostomy with a low rate of anastomotic failure-related complications. J Am Coll Surg 210:54–59PubMedCrossRef Grobmyer SR, Kooby D, Blumgart LH et al (2010) Novel pancreaticojejunostomy with a low rate of anastomotic failure-related complications. J Am Coll Surg 210:54–59PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kleespies A, Rentsch M, Seeliger H et al (2009) Blumgart anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy minimizes severe complications after pancreatic head resection. Br J Surg 96:741–750PubMedCrossRef Kleespies A, Rentsch M, Seeliger H et al (2009) Blumgart anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy minimizes severe complications after pancreatic head resection. Br J Surg 96:741–750PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Fujii T, Sugimoto H, Yamada S et al (2014) Modified blumgart anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy: technical improvement in matched historical control study. J Gastrointest Surg 18:1108–1115PubMedCrossRef Fujii T, Sugimoto H, Yamada S et al (2014) Modified blumgart anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy: technical improvement in matched historical control study. J Gastrointest Surg 18:1108–1115PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Berger AC, Howard TJ, Kennedy EP et al (2009) Does type of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy decrease rate of pancreatic fistula? A randomized, prospective, dual-institution trial. J Am Coll Surg 208:738–747; discussion 747-739PubMedCrossRef Berger AC, Howard TJ, Kennedy EP et al (2009) Does type of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy decrease rate of pancreatic fistula? A randomized, prospective, dual-institution trial. J Am Coll Surg 208:738–747; discussion 747-739PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Fong ZV, Ferrone CR, Thayer SP et al (2014) Understanding hospital readmissions after pancreaticoduodenectomy: can we prevent them?: a 10-year contemporary experience with 1,173 patients at the Massachusetts General Hospital. J Gastrointest Surg 18:137–144; discussion 144-135PubMedCrossRef Fong ZV, Ferrone CR, Thayer SP et al (2014) Understanding hospital readmissions after pancreaticoduodenectomy: can we prevent them?: a 10-year contemporary experience with 1,173 patients at the Massachusetts General Hospital. J Gastrointest Surg 18:137–144; discussion 144-135PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Sugimoto M, Takahashi S, Gotohda N et al (2013) Schematic pancreatic configuration: a risk assessment for postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 17:1744–1751PubMedCrossRef Sugimoto M, Takahashi S, Gotohda N et al (2013) Schematic pancreatic configuration: a risk assessment for postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 17:1744–1751PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Sakamoto Y, Kajiwara T, Esaki M et al (2009) Roux-en-Y reconstruction using staplers during pancreaticoduodenectomy: results of a prospective preliminary study. Surg Today 39:32–37PubMedCrossRef Sakamoto Y, Kajiwara T, Esaki M et al (2009) Roux-en-Y reconstruction using staplers during pancreaticoduodenectomy: results of a prospective preliminary study. Surg Today 39:32–37PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Tani M, Kawai M, Hirono S et al (2010) A prospective randomized controlled trial of internal versus external drainage with pancreaticojejunostomy for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 199:759–764PubMedCrossRef Tani M, Kawai M, Hirono S et al (2010) A prospective randomized controlled trial of internal versus external drainage with pancreaticojejunostomy for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 199:759–764PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Kazaure HS, Roman SA, Sosa JA (2012) Association of postdischarge complications with reoperation and mortality in general surgery. Arch Surg 147:1000–1007PubMedCrossRef Kazaure HS, Roman SA, Sosa JA (2012) Association of postdischarge complications with reoperation and mortality in general surgery. Arch Surg 147:1000–1007PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Hyder O, Dodson RM, Nathan H et al (2013) Influence of patient, physician, and hospital factors on 30-day readmission following pancreatoduodenectomy in the United States. JAMA Surg 148:1095–1102PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Hyder O, Dodson RM, Nathan H et al (2013) Influence of patient, physician, and hospital factors on 30-day readmission following pancreatoduodenectomy in the United States. JAMA Surg 148:1095–1102PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Bassi C, Falconi M, Molinari E et al (2003) Duct-to-mucosa versus end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: results of a prospective randomized trial. Surgery 134:766–771PubMedCrossRef Bassi C, Falconi M, Molinari E et al (2003) Duct-to-mucosa versus end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: results of a prospective randomized trial. Surgery 134:766–771PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Tight Adaptation at Pancreatic Anastomosis Without Parenchymal Laceration: An Institutional Experience in Introducing and Modifying the New Procedure
Authors
Tatsuya Oda
Shinji Hashimoto
Ryoichi Miyamoto
Osamu Shimomura
Kiyoshi Fukunaga
Keisuke Kohno
Yukio Ohshiro
Yoshimasa Akashi
Tsuyoshi Enomoto
Nobuhiro Ohkohchi
Publication date
01-08-2015
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 8/2015
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3075-8

Other articles of this Issue 8/2015

World Journal of Surgery 8/2015 Go to the issue