Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 8/2013

01-12-2013 | Original Article

Pancreatoduodenectomy—current status of surgical and perioperative techniques in Germany

Authors: Christina Haane, Wolf Arif Mardin, Britta Schmitz, Sameer Dhayat, Richard Hummel, Norbert Senninger, Christina Schleicher, Soeren Torge Mees

Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Issue 8/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Pancreatoduodenectomy in Germany is performed by a broad range of hospitals. A diversity of operative techniques is employed as no guidelines exist for intra- and perioperative management. We carried out a national survey to determine the de facto German standards for pancreatoduodenectomy, assess quality assurance measures, and identify relevant issues for further investigation.

Methods

A questionnaire evaluating major outcome variables, case load, preferred surgical procedures, and perioperative management during pancreatoduodenectomy was developed and sent to 211 German hospitals performing >12 pancreatoduodenectomies per year (requirement for certification as a pancreas center). Statistical analysis was carried out using the Fisher Exact, Mann–Whitney U, and Spearman tests.

Results

The final response rate was 86 % (182/211). The preferred technique and de facto German standard for pancreatoduodenectomy was pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy with pancreatojejunostomy carried out via duct-to-mucosa anastomosis with interrupted sutures using PDS 4.0. The minority of German pancreas centers were certified (18–48 %). The certification rate increased with higher capacity levels and case load (P < 0.05); however, significant correlations between the fistula rate and hospital case load, hospital capacity level, or hospital certification status were not seen.

Conclusion

This study revealed a distinct variety of management strategies for pancreatic surgery and available evidence-based data was not necessarily translated into clinical practice. The limited certification rate represented a shortcoming of quality assurance. The data emphasize the need for further trials to answer the questions whether hospital certifications and omission of drains improve outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy and for the establishment of guidelines for pancreatoduodenectomy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Glanemann M, Bahra M, Neuhaus P (2008) Pylorus-preserving pancreatic head resection: a new standard for tumors. Chirurg 79(12):1107–1114PubMedCrossRef Glanemann M, Bahra M, Neuhaus P (2008) Pylorus-preserving pancreatic head resection: a new standard for tumors. Chirurg 79(12):1107–1114PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Smigielski J, Piskorz L, Kutwin L, Brocki M (2012) Comparison of early results of surgical treatment in patients with pancreatic cancer. Pol Przegl Chir 84(1):1–5PubMedCrossRef Smigielski J, Piskorz L, Kutwin L, Brocki M (2012) Comparison of early results of surgical treatment in patients with pancreatic cancer. Pol Przegl Chir 84(1):1–5PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference McKay A, Mackenzie S, Sutherland FR, Bathe OF, Doig C, Dort J, Vollmer CM Jr, Dixon E (2006) Meta-analysis of pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 93(8):929–936PubMedCrossRef McKay A, Mackenzie S, Sutherland FR, Bathe OF, Doig C, Dort J, Vollmer CM Jr, Dixon E (2006) Meta-analysis of pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 93(8):929–936PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Wente MN, Shrikhande SV, Muller MW, Diener MK, Seiler CM, Friess H, Buchler MW (2007) Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 193(2):171–183PubMedCrossRef Wente MN, Shrikhande SV, Muller MW, Diener MK, Seiler CM, Friess H, Buchler MW (2007) Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 193(2):171–183PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Schlitt HJ, Schmidt U, Simunec D, Jager M, Aselmann H, Neipp M, Piso P (2002) Morbidity and mortality associated with pancreatogastrostomy and pancreatojejunostomy following partial pancreatoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 89(10):1245–1251PubMedCrossRef Schlitt HJ, Schmidt U, Simunec D, Jager M, Aselmann H, Neipp M, Piso P (2002) Morbidity and mortality associated with pancreatogastrostomy and pancreatojejunostomy following partial pancreatoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 89(10):1245–1251PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference di Sebastiano P, Festa L, De Bonis A, Ciuffreda A, Valvano MR, Andriulli A, di Mola FF (2011) A modified fast-track program for pancreatic surgery: a prospective single-center experience. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396(3):345–351PubMedCrossRef di Sebastiano P, Festa L, De Bonis A, Ciuffreda A, Valvano MR, Andriulli A, di Mola FF (2011) A modified fast-track program for pancreatic surgery: a prospective single-center experience. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396(3):345–351PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference van Bree SH, Vlug MS, Bemelman WA, Hollmann MW, Ubbink DT, Zwinderman AH, de Jonge WJ, Snoek SA, Bolhuis K, van der Zanden E et al (2011) Faster recovery of gastrointestinal transit after laparoscopy and fast-track care in patients undergoing colonic surgery. Gastroenterology 141(3):872–880, e871-874PubMedCrossRef van Bree SH, Vlug MS, Bemelman WA, Hollmann MW, Ubbink DT, Zwinderman AH, de Jonge WJ, Snoek SA, Bolhuis K, van der Zanden E et al (2011) Faster recovery of gastrointestinal transit after laparoscopy and fast-track care in patients undergoing colonic surgery. Gastroenterology 141(3):872–880, e871-874PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hall TC, Dennison AR, Bilku DK, Metcalfe MS, Garcea G (2012) Enhanced recovery programmes in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a systematic review. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 94(5):318–326PubMedCrossRef Hall TC, Dennison AR, Bilku DK, Metcalfe MS, Garcea G (2012) Enhanced recovery programmes in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a systematic review. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 94(5):318–326PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Buchler M (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138(1):8–13PubMedCrossRef Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Buchler M (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138(1):8–13PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Shukla PJ, Barreto SG, Fingerhut A, Bassi C, Buchler MW, Dervenis C, Gouma D, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos J, Padbury R et al (2010) Toward improving uniformity and standardization in the reporting of pancreatic anastomoses: a new classification system by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 147(1):144–153PubMedCrossRef Shukla PJ, Barreto SG, Fingerhut A, Bassi C, Buchler MW, Dervenis C, Gouma D, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos J, Padbury R et al (2010) Toward improving uniformity and standardization in the reporting of pancreatic anastomoses: a new classification system by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 147(1):144–153PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Balzano G, Zerbi A, Capretti G, Rocchetti S, Capitanio V, Di Carlo V (2008) Effect of hospital volume on outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy in Italy. Br J Surg 95(3):357–362PubMedCrossRef Balzano G, Zerbi A, Capretti G, Rocchetti S, Capitanio V, Di Carlo V (2008) Effect of hospital volume on outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy in Italy. Br J Surg 95(3):357–362PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, Stukel TA, Lucas FL, Batista I, Welch HG, Wennberg DE (2002) Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 346(15):1128–1137PubMedCrossRef Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, Stukel TA, Lucas FL, Batista I, Welch HG, Wennberg DE (2002) Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 346(15):1128–1137PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference de Wilde RF, Besselink MG, van der Tweel I, de Hingh IH, van Eijck CH, Dejong CH, Porte RJ, Gouma DJ, Busch OR, Molenaar IQ (2012) Impact of nationwide centralization of pancreaticoduodenectomy on hospital mortality. Br J Surg 99(3):404–410PubMedCrossRef de Wilde RF, Besselink MG, van der Tweel I, de Hingh IH, van Eijck CH, Dejong CH, Porte RJ, Gouma DJ, Busch OR, Molenaar IQ (2012) Impact of nationwide centralization of pancreaticoduodenectomy on hospital mortality. Br J Surg 99(3):404–410PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Topal B, Van de Sande S, Fieuws S, Penninckx F (2007) Effect of centralization of pancreaticoduodenectomy on nationwide hospital mortality and length of stay. Br J Surg 94(11):1377–1381PubMedCrossRef Topal B, Van de Sande S, Fieuws S, Penninckx F (2007) Effect of centralization of pancreaticoduodenectomy on nationwide hospital mortality and length of stay. Br J Surg 94(11):1377–1381PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference van Heek NT, Kuhlmann KF, Scholten RJ, de Castro SM, Busch OR, van Gulik TM, Obertop H, Gouma DJ (2005) Hospital volume and mortality after pancreatic resection: a systematic review and an evaluation of intervention in the Netherlands. Ann Surg 242(6):781–788, discussion 788–790PubMedCrossRef van Heek NT, Kuhlmann KF, Scholten RJ, de Castro SM, Busch OR, van Gulik TM, Obertop H, Gouma DJ (2005) Hospital volume and mortality after pancreatic resection: a systematic review and an evaluation of intervention in the Netherlands. Ann Surg 242(6):781–788, discussion 788–790PubMedCrossRef
16.
17.
go back to reference Adler TS G, Bischoff SC, Brambs H-J, Feuerbach S, Grabenbauer G, Hahn S, Heinemann V, Hohenberger W, Langrehr JM, Lutz MP, Micke O, Neuhaus H, Neuhaus P, Oettle H, Schlag PM, Schmid R, Schmiegel W, Schlottmann K, Werner J, Wiedenmann B, Kopp I (2007) S3-Leitlinie, Exokrines Pankreaskarzinom 2007. Z Gastroenterol 45(6):487–523CrossRef Adler TS G, Bischoff SC, Brambs H-J, Feuerbach S, Grabenbauer G, Hahn S, Heinemann V, Hohenberger W, Langrehr JM, Lutz MP, Micke O, Neuhaus H, Neuhaus P, Oettle H, Schlag PM, Schmid R, Schmiegel W, Schlottmann K, Werner J, Wiedenmann B, Kopp I (2007) S3-Leitlinie, Exokrines Pankreaskarzinom 2007. Z Gastroenterol 45(6):487–523CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Shen HN, Lu CL (2011) Incidence, resource use, and outcome of acute pancreatitis with/without intensive care: a nationwide population-based study in Taiwan. Pancreas 40(1):10–15PubMedCrossRef Shen HN, Lu CL (2011) Incidence, resource use, and outcome of acute pancreatitis with/without intensive care: a nationwide population-based study in Taiwan. Pancreas 40(1):10–15PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Sargent M, Boeck S, Heinemann V, Jauch KW, Seufferlein T, Bruns CJ (2011) Surgical treatment concepts for patients with pancreatic cancer in Germany—results from a national survey conducted among members of the "Chirurgische Arbeitsgemeinschaft Onkologie" (CAO) and the "Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie" (AIO) of the Germany Cancer Society (DKG). Langenbecks Arch Surg 396(2):223–229PubMedCrossRef Sargent M, Boeck S, Heinemann V, Jauch KW, Seufferlein T, Bruns CJ (2011) Surgical treatment concepts for patients with pancreatic cancer in Germany—results from a national survey conducted among members of the "Chirurgische Arbeitsgemeinschaft Onkologie" (CAO) and the "Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie" (AIO) of the Germany Cancer Society (DKG). Langenbecks Arch Surg 396(2):223–229PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Alsfasser G, Kittner J, Eisold S, Klar E (2012) Volume-outcome relationship in pancreatic surgery: the situation in Germany. Surgery 152(3 Suppl 1):S50–S55PubMedCrossRef Alsfasser G, Kittner J, Eisold S, Klar E (2012) Volume-outcome relationship in pancreatic surgery: the situation in Germany. Surgery 152(3 Suppl 1):S50–S55PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Karanicolas PJ, Davies E, Kunz R, Briel M, Koka HP, Payne DM, Smith SE, Hsu HP, Lin PW, Bloechle C et al (2007) The pylorus: take it or leave it? Systematic review and meta-analysis of pylorus-preserving versus standard Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14(6):1825–1834PubMedCrossRef Karanicolas PJ, Davies E, Kunz R, Briel M, Koka HP, Payne DM, Smith SE, Hsu HP, Lin PW, Bloechle C et al (2007) The pylorus: take it or leave it? Systematic review and meta-analysis of pylorus-preserving versus standard Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14(6):1825–1834PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Diener MK, Heukaufer C, Schwarzer G, Seiler CM, Antes G, Buchler MW, Knaebel HP (2008) Pancreaticoduodenectomy (classic Whipple) versus pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (pp Whipple) for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2, CD006053PubMed Diener MK, Heukaufer C, Schwarzer G, Seiler CM, Antes G, Buchler MW, Knaebel HP (2008) Pancreaticoduodenectomy (classic Whipple) versus pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (pp Whipple) for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2, CD006053PubMed
23.
go back to reference Diener MK, Fitzmaurice C, Schwarzer G, Seiler CM, Antes G, Knaebel HP, Buchler MW (2011) Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (pp Whipple) versus pancreaticoduodenectomy (classic Whipple) for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 5, CD006053PubMed Diener MK, Fitzmaurice C, Schwarzer G, Seiler CM, Antes G, Knaebel HP, Buchler MW (2011) Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (pp Whipple) versus pancreaticoduodenectomy (classic Whipple) for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 5, CD006053PubMed
24.
go back to reference Oussoultzoglou E, Bachellier P, Bigourdan JM, Weber JC, Nakano H, Jaeck D (2004) Pancreaticogastrostomy decreased relaparotomy caused by pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy compared with pancreaticojejunostomy. Arch Surg 139(3):327–335PubMedCrossRef Oussoultzoglou E, Bachellier P, Bigourdan JM, Weber JC, Nakano H, Jaeck D (2004) Pancreaticogastrostomy decreased relaparotomy caused by pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy compared with pancreaticojejunostomy. Arch Surg 139(3):327–335PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Maher MM, Sauter PK, Zahurak ML, Talamini MA, Lillemoe KD, Pitt HA (1995) A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 222(4):580–588, discussion 588–592PubMed Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Maher MM, Sauter PK, Zahurak ML, Talamini MA, Lillemoe KD, Pitt HA (1995) A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 222(4):580–588, discussion 588–592PubMed
26.
go back to reference Wellner UF, Sick O, Olschewski M, Adam U, Hopt UT, Keck T (2012) Randomized controlled single-center trial comparing pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after partial pancreatoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 16(9):1686–1695PubMedCrossRef Wellner UF, Sick O, Olschewski M, Adam U, Hopt UT, Keck T (2012) Randomized controlled single-center trial comparing pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after partial pancreatoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 16(9):1686–1695PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Wellner UF, Brett S, Bruckner T, Limprecht R, Rossion I, Seiler C, Sick O, Wegener I, Hopt UT, Keck T (2012) Pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreatojejunostomy for RECOnstruction after partial PANCreatoduodenectomy (RECOPANC): study protocol of a randomized controlled trial UTN U1111-1117-9588. Trials 13:45PubMedCrossRef Wellner UF, Brett S, Bruckner T, Limprecht R, Rossion I, Seiler C, Sick O, Wegener I, Hopt UT, Keck T (2012) Pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreatojejunostomy for RECOnstruction after partial PANCreatoduodenectomy (RECOPANC): study protocol of a randomized controlled trial UTN U1111-1117-9588. Trials 13:45PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Greene BS, Loubeau JM, Peoples JB, Elliott DW (1991) Are pancreatoenteric anastomoses improved by duct-to-mucosa sutures? Am J Surg 161(1):45–49, discussion 49–50PubMedCrossRef Greene BS, Loubeau JM, Peoples JB, Elliott DW (1991) Are pancreatoenteric anastomoses improved by duct-to-mucosa sutures? Am J Surg 161(1):45–49, discussion 49–50PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Matsumoto Y, Fujii H, Miura K, Inoue S, Sekikawa T, Aoyama H, Ohnishi N, Sakai K, Suda K (1992) Successful pancreatojejunal anastomosis for pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 175(6):555–562PubMed Matsumoto Y, Fujii H, Miura K, Inoue S, Sekikawa T, Aoyama H, Ohnishi N, Sakai K, Suda K (1992) Successful pancreatojejunal anastomosis for pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 175(6):555–562PubMed
30.
go back to reference Berger AC, Howard TJ, Kennedy EP, Sauter PK, Bower-Cherry M, Dutkevitch S, Hyslop T, Schmidt CM, Rosato EL, Lavu H et al (2009) Does type of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy decrease rate of pancreatic fistula? A randomized, prospective, dual-institution trial. J Am Coll Surg 208(5):738–747, discussion 747–739PubMedCrossRef Berger AC, Howard TJ, Kennedy EP, Sauter PK, Bower-Cherry M, Dutkevitch S, Hyslop T, Schmidt CM, Rosato EL, Lavu H et al (2009) Does type of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy decrease rate of pancreatic fistula? A randomized, prospective, dual-institution trial. J Am Coll Surg 208(5):738–747, discussion 747–739PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Kim JH, Yoo BM, Kim WH (2009) Which method should we select for pancreatic anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy? World J Surg 33(2):326–332PubMedCrossRef Kim JH, Yoo BM, Kim WH (2009) Which method should we select for pancreatic anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy? World J Surg 33(2):326–332PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Pessaux P, Sauvanet A, Mariette C, Paye F, Muscari F, Cunha AS, Sastre B, Arnaud JP (2011) External pancreatic duct stent decreases pancreatic fistula rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy: prospective multicenter randomized trial. Ann Surg 253(5):879–885PubMedCrossRef Pessaux P, Sauvanet A, Mariette C, Paye F, Muscari F, Cunha AS, Sastre B, Arnaud JP (2011) External pancreatic duct stent decreases pancreatic fistula rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy: prospective multicenter randomized trial. Ann Surg 253(5):879–885PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Zhou Y, Yang C, Wang S, Chen J, Li B (2011) Does external pancreatic duct stent decrease pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatic resection?: a meta-analysis. Pancreatology 11(3):362–370PubMedCrossRef Zhou Y, Yang C, Wang S, Chen J, Li B (2011) Does external pancreatic duct stent decrease pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatic resection?: a meta-analysis. Pancreatology 11(3):362–370PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Frozanpor F, Lundell L, Segersvard R, Arnelo U (2012) The effect of prophylactic transpapillary pancreatic stent insertion on clinically significant leak rate following distal pancreatectomy: results of a prospective controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg 255(6):1032–1036PubMedCrossRef Frozanpor F, Lundell L, Segersvard R, Arnelo U (2012) The effect of prophylactic transpapillary pancreatic stent insertion on clinically significant leak rate following distal pancreatectomy: results of a prospective controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg 255(6):1032–1036PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Xiong JJ, Altaf K, Mukherjee R, Huang W, Hu WM, Li A, Ke NW, Liu XB (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes after intraoperative pancreatic duct stent placement during pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 99(8):1050–1061PubMedCrossRef Xiong JJ, Altaf K, Mukherjee R, Huang W, Hu WM, Li A, Ke NW, Liu XB (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes after intraoperative pancreatic duct stent placement during pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 99(8):1050–1061PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Gans SL, van Westreenen HL, Kiewiet JJ, Rauws EA, Gouma DJ, Boermeester MA (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of somatostatin analogues for the treatment of pancreatic fistula. Br J Surg 99(6):754–760PubMedCrossRef Gans SL, van Westreenen HL, Kiewiet JJ, Rauws EA, Gouma DJ, Boermeester MA (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of somatostatin analogues for the treatment of pancreatic fistula. Br J Surg 99(6):754–760PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Kollmar O, Moussavian MR, Richter S, de Roi P, Maurer CA, Schilling MK (2008) Prophylactic octreotide and delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy: results of a prospective randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial. Eur J Surg Oncol 34(8):868–875PubMedCrossRef Kollmar O, Moussavian MR, Richter S, de Roi P, Maurer CA, Schilling MK (2008) Prophylactic octreotide and delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy: results of a prospective randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial. Eur J Surg Oncol 34(8):868–875PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Alghamdi AA, Jawas AM, Hart RS (2007) Use of octreotide for the prevention of pancreatic fistula after elective pancreatic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Surg 50(6):459–466PubMed Alghamdi AA, Jawas AM, Hart RS (2007) Use of octreotide for the prevention of pancreatic fistula after elective pancreatic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Surg 50(6):459–466PubMed
39.
go back to reference Graham JA, Johnson LB, Haddad N, Al-Kawas F, Carroll J, Jha R, Wong J, Maglaris D, Mertens S, Fishbein T (2011) A prospective study of prophylactic long-acting octreotide in high-risk patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 201(4):481–485PubMedCrossRef Graham JA, Johnson LB, Haddad N, Al-Kawas F, Carroll J, Jha R, Wong J, Maglaris D, Mertens S, Fishbein T (2011) A prospective study of prophylactic long-acting octreotide in high-risk patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 201(4):481–485PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Vanounou T, Pratt WB, Callery MP, Vollmer CM Jr (2007) Selective administration of prophylactic octreotide during pancreaticoduodenectomy: a clinical and cost-benefit analysis in low- and high-risk glands. J Am Coll Surg 205(4):546–557PubMedCrossRef Vanounou T, Pratt WB, Callery MP, Vollmer CM Jr (2007) Selective administration of prophylactic octreotide during pancreaticoduodenectomy: a clinical and cost-benefit analysis in low- and high-risk glands. J Am Coll Surg 205(4):546–557PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Tsuji M, Kimura H, Konishi K, Yabushita K, Maeda K, Kuroda Y (1998) Management of continuous anastomosis of pancreatic duct and jejunal mucosa after pancreaticoduodenectomy: historical study of 300 patients. Surgery 123(6):617–621PubMedCrossRef Tsuji M, Kimura H, Konishi K, Yabushita K, Maeda K, Kuroda Y (1998) Management of continuous anastomosis of pancreatic duct and jejunal mucosa after pancreaticoduodenectomy: historical study of 300 patients. Surgery 123(6):617–621PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Bassi C, Molinari E, Malleo G, Crippa S, Butturini G, Salvia R, Talamini G, Pederzoli P (2010) Early versus late drain removal after standard pancreatic resections: results of a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 252(2):207–214PubMedCrossRef Bassi C, Molinari E, Malleo G, Crippa S, Butturini G, Salvia R, Talamini G, Pederzoli P (2010) Early versus late drain removal after standard pancreatic resections: results of a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 252(2):207–214PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Kawai M, Tani M, Terasawa H, Ina S, Hirono S, Nishioka R, Miyazawa M, Uchiyama K, Yamaue H (2006) Early removal of prophylactic drains reduces the risk of intra-abdominal infections in patients with pancreatic head resection: prospective study for 104 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 244(1):1–7PubMed Kawai M, Tani M, Terasawa H, Ina S, Hirono S, Nishioka R, Miyazawa M, Uchiyama K, Yamaue H (2006) Early removal of prophylactic drains reduces the risk of intra-abdominal infections in patients with pancreatic head resection: prospective study for 104 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 244(1):1–7PubMed
44.
go back to reference Correa-Gallego C, Brennan MF, D’Angelica M, Fong Y, Dematteo RP, Kingham TP, Jarnagin WR, Allen PJ (2013) Operative drainage following pancreatic resection: analysis of 1122 patients resected over 5 years at a single institution. Ann Surg. In press. Correa-Gallego C, Brennan MF, D’Angelica M, Fong Y, Dematteo RP, Kingham TP, Jarnagin WR, Allen PJ (2013) Operative drainage following pancreatic resection: analysis of 1122 patients resected over 5 years at a single institution. Ann Surg. In press.
45.
go back to reference Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, Goodney PP, Wennberg DE, Lucas FL (2003) Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 349(22):2117–2127PubMedCrossRef Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, Goodney PP, Wennberg DE, Lucas FL (2003) Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 349(22):2117–2127PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Kim CG, Jo S, Kim JS (2012) Impact of surgical volume on nationwide hospital mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol 18(31):4175–4181PubMedCrossRef Kim CG, Jo S, Kim JS (2012) Impact of surgical volume on nationwide hospital mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol 18(31):4175–4181PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Parks RW, Bettschart V, Frame S, Stockton DL, Brewster DH, Garden OJ (2004) Benefits of specialisation in the management of pancreatic cancer: results of a Scottish population-based study. Br J Cancer 91(3):459–465PubMedCrossRef Parks RW, Bettschart V, Frame S, Stockton DL, Brewster DH, Garden OJ (2004) Benefits of specialisation in the management of pancreatic cancer: results of a Scottish population-based study. Br J Cancer 91(3):459–465PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Rotter T, Kinsman L, James E, Machotta A, Gothe H, Willis J, Snow P, Kugler J (2010) Clinical pathways: effects on professional practice, patient outcomes, length of stay and hospital costs. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3, CD006632PubMed Rotter T, Kinsman L, James E, Machotta A, Gothe H, Willis J, Snow P, Kugler J (2010) Clinical pathways: effects on professional practice, patient outcomes, length of stay and hospital costs. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3, CD006632PubMed
49.
go back to reference Muller MK, Dedes KJ, Dindo D, Steiner S, Hahnloser D, Clavien PA (2009) Impact of clinical pathways in surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 394(1):31–39PubMedCrossRef Muller MK, Dedes KJ, Dindo D, Steiner S, Hahnloser D, Clavien PA (2009) Impact of clinical pathways in surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 394(1):31–39PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Munitiz V, Martinez-de-Haro LF, Ortiz A, Ruiz-de-Angulo D, Pastor P, Parrilla P (2010) Effectiveness of a written clinical pathway for enhanced recovery after transthoracic (Ivor Lewis) oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 97(5):714–718PubMedCrossRef Munitiz V, Martinez-de-Haro LF, Ortiz A, Ruiz-de-Angulo D, Pastor P, Parrilla P (2010) Effectiveness of a written clinical pathway for enhanced recovery after transthoracic (Ivor Lewis) oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 97(5):714–718PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Pancreatoduodenectomy—current status of surgical and perioperative techniques in Germany
Authors
Christina Haane
Wolf Arif Mardin
Britta Schmitz
Sameer Dhayat
Richard Hummel
Norbert Senninger
Christina Schleicher
Soeren Torge Mees
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Issue 8/2013
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Electronic ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-013-1130-1

Other articles of this Issue 8/2013

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 8/2013 Go to the issue