Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 7/2014

01-07-2014

Ethical Issues Regarding Related and Nonrelated Living Organ Donors

Author: Giuliano Testa

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 7/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

The ethics of the clinical practice of transplanting human organs for end-stage organ disease is a fascinating topic. Who is the “owner” of the transplantable organs of a deceased, brain-dead patient? Who should have a right to receive these organs? Who set the boundaries between a living donor’s autonomy and a “paternalistic” doctor? What constitutes a proper consent? These questions are only some of the ethical issues that have been discussed in the last 60 years. All of these ethical issues are intensified by the fact that supply of human organs does not match demand, and that, as a consequence, living-donor organ transplantation is widely utilized. The aim of this article is not to be exhaustive but to present the general ethical principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice as applied to organ transplantation. Moreover, the topic of reimbursement for organ donation is also discussed.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kodner IJ, Siegler M, Freeman DM et al (2007) Ethical and legal considerations. In: Wolff BG, Fleshman JW, Beck DE et al (eds) The ASCRS textbook of colon and rectal surgery. Springer, New York, pp 735–763CrossRef Kodner IJ, Siegler M, Freeman DM et al (2007) Ethical and legal considerations. In: Wolff BG, Fleshman JW, Beck DE et al (eds) The ASCRS textbook of colon and rectal surgery. Springer, New York, pp 735–763CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Task Force on Organ Transplantation (1986) Organ transplantation: issues and recommendations. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville Task Force on Organ Transplantation (1986) Organ transplantation: issues and recommendations. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville
3.
go back to reference Beauchamp TL, Childress JF (2001) Principles of biomedical ethics, 5th edn. Oxford University Press, New York Beauchamp TL, Childress JF (2001) Principles of biomedical ethics, 5th edn. Oxford University Press, New York
4.
go back to reference Moore FD (1964) New problems for surgery: drugs that act on the cell nucleus affect the surgeon’s work on cancer and on transplantation. Science 144:388–392PubMedCrossRef Moore FD (1964) New problems for surgery: drugs that act on the cell nucleus affect the surgeon’s work on cancer and on transplantation. Science 144:388–392PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cronin DC II, Millis JM, Siegler M (2001) Transplantation of liver grafts from living donors into adults—too much, too soon. N Engl J Med 344:1633–1637PubMedCrossRef Cronin DC II, Millis JM, Siegler M (2001) Transplantation of liver grafts from living donors into adults—too much, too soon. N Engl J Med 344:1633–1637PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Singer PA, Siegler M, Whitington PF et al (1989) Ethics of liver transplantation with living donors. N Engl J Med 321:620–622PubMedCrossRef Singer PA, Siegler M, Whitington PF et al (1989) Ethics of liver transplantation with living donors. N Engl J Med 321:620–622PubMedCrossRef
8.
9.
go back to reference Crouch RA, Elliott C (1999) Moral agency and the family: the case of living related organ transplantation. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 8:275–287PubMedCrossRef Crouch RA, Elliott C (1999) Moral agency and the family: the case of living related organ transplantation. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 8:275–287PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Stiller CR, Lindberg MC, Rimstead D et al (1985) Living related donation. Transplant Proc 17(6 Suppl 3):85–100PubMed Stiller CR, Lindberg MC, Rimstead D et al (1985) Living related donation. Transplant Proc 17(6 Suppl 3):85–100PubMed
11.
go back to reference Fujita M, Slingsby BT, Akabayashi A (2004) Three patterns of voluntary consent in the case of adult-to-adult living related liver transplantation in Japan. Transplant Proc 36:1425–1428PubMedCrossRef Fujita M, Slingsby BT, Akabayashi A (2004) Three patterns of voluntary consent in the case of adult-to-adult living related liver transplantation in Japan. Transplant Proc 36:1425–1428PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Simmons RG, Klein Marine S, Simmons RL (1987) Gift of life: the effect of organ transplantation on individual, family, and societal dynamics. Transaction Books, New Brunswick, pp 233–285 Simmons RG, Klein Marine S, Simmons RL (1987) Gift of life: the effect of organ transplantation on individual, family, and societal dynamics. Transaction Books, New Brunswick, pp 233–285
14.
go back to reference Crowley-Matoka M, Siegler M, Cronin DC II (2004) Long-term quality of life issues among adult-to-pediatric living liver donors: a qualitative exploration. Am J Transplant 4:744–750PubMedCrossRef Crowley-Matoka M, Siegler M, Cronin DC II (2004) Long-term quality of life issues among adult-to-pediatric living liver donors: a qualitative exploration. Am J Transplant 4:744–750PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Caplan A (1993) Must I be my brother’s keeper? Ethical issues in the use of living donors as sources of liver and other solid organs. Transplant Proc 25:1997–2000PubMed Caplan A (1993) Must I be my brother’s keeper? Ethical issues in the use of living donors as sources of liver and other solid organs. Transplant Proc 25:1997–2000PubMed
17.
go back to reference Fellner CH, Marshall JR (1970) Kidney donors—the myth of informed consent. Am J Psychiatry 126:1245–1251PubMed Fellner CH, Marshall JR (1970) Kidney donors—the myth of informed consent. Am J Psychiatry 126:1245–1251PubMed
19.
go back to reference Parekh AM, Gordon EJ, Garg AX et al (2008) Living kidney donor informed consent practices vary between US and non-US centers. Nephrol Dial Transplant 23:3316–3324PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Parekh AM, Gordon EJ, Garg AX et al (2008) Living kidney donor informed consent practices vary between US and non-US centers. Nephrol Dial Transplant 23:3316–3324PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Gordon EJ (2012) Informed consent for living donation: a review of key empirical studies, ethical challenges and future research. Am J Transplant 12:2273–2280PubMedCrossRef Gordon EJ (2012) Informed consent for living donation: a review of key empirical studies, ethical challenges and future research. Am J Transplant 12:2273–2280PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Living Kidney Donor Follow-Up Conference Writing Group, Leichtman A, Abecassis M et al (2011) Living kidney donor follow-up: state-of-the-art and future directions, conference summary and recommendations. Am J Transplant 11:2561–2568PubMedCrossRef Living Kidney Donor Follow-Up Conference Writing Group, Leichtman A, Abecassis M et al (2011) Living kidney donor follow-up: state-of-the-art and future directions, conference summary and recommendations. Am J Transplant 11:2561–2568PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Manyalich M, Ricart A, Martínez I et al (2009) EULID project: European living donation and public health. Transplant Proc 41:2021–2024PubMedCrossRef Manyalich M, Ricart A, Martínez I et al (2009) EULID project: European living donation and public health. Transplant Proc 41:2021–2024PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Nuffield Council on Bioethics (1995) Human tissue: ethical and legal issues. Nuffield Council on Bioethics, London Nuffield Council on Bioethics (1995) Human tissue: ethical and legal issues. Nuffield Council on Bioethics, London
24.
go back to reference Spital A (1998) When a stranger offers a kidney: ethical issues in living organ donation. Am J Kidney Dis 32:676–691PubMedCrossRef Spital A (1998) When a stranger offers a kidney: ethical issues in living organ donation. Am J Kidney Dis 32:676–691PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Spital A (2000) Evolution of attitudes at U.S. transplant centers toward kidney donation by friends and altruistic strangers. Transplantation 69:1728–1731PubMedCrossRef Spital A (2000) Evolution of attitudes at U.S. transplant centers toward kidney donation by friends and altruistic strangers. Transplantation 69:1728–1731PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Kranenburg L, Zuidema W, Weimar W et al (2009) Strategies to advance living kidney donation: a single center’s experience. Prog Transplant 19:71–75PubMed Kranenburg L, Zuidema W, Weimar W et al (2009) Strategies to advance living kidney donation: a single center’s experience. Prog Transplant 19:71–75PubMed
27.
go back to reference Adams PL, Cohen DJ, Danovitch GM et al (2002) The nondirected live-kidney donor: ethical considerations and practice guidelines: a National Conference Report. Transplantation 74:582–589PubMedCrossRef Adams PL, Cohen DJ, Danovitch GM et al (2002) The nondirected live-kidney donor: ethical considerations and practice guidelines: a National Conference Report. Transplantation 74:582–589PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Schroder NM, McDonald LA, Etringer G et al (2008) Consideration of psychosocial factors in the evaluation of living donors. Prog Transplant 18:41–48PubMed Schroder NM, McDonald LA, Etringer G et al (2008) Consideration of psychosocial factors in the evaluation of living donors. Prog Transplant 18:41–48PubMed
29.
go back to reference Henderson AJ, Landolt MA, McDonald MF et al (2003) The living anonymous kidney donor: lunatic or saint? Am J Transplant 3:203–213PubMedCrossRef Henderson AJ, Landolt MA, McDonald MF et al (2003) The living anonymous kidney donor: lunatic or saint? Am J Transplant 3:203–213PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Dew MA, Jacobs CL, Jowsey SG et al (2007) Guidelines for the psychosocial evaluation of living unrelated kidney donors in the United States. Am J Transplant 7:1047–1054PubMedCrossRef Dew MA, Jacobs CL, Jowsey SG et al (2007) Guidelines for the psychosocial evaluation of living unrelated kidney donors in the United States. Am J Transplant 7:1047–1054PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Olbrisch ME, Benedict SM, Haller DL et al (2001) Psychosocial assessment of living organ donors: clinical and ethical considerations. Prog Transplant 11:40–49PubMed Olbrisch ME, Benedict SM, Haller DL et al (2001) Psychosocial assessment of living organ donors: clinical and ethical considerations. Prog Transplant 11:40–49PubMed
32.
go back to reference Neidich EM, Neidich AB, Cooper JT et al (2012) The ethical complexities of online organ solicitation via donor-patient websites: avoiding the “beauty contest”. Am J Transplant 12:43–47PubMedCrossRef Neidich EM, Neidich AB, Cooper JT et al (2012) The ethical complexities of online organ solicitation via donor-patient websites: avoiding the “beauty contest”. Am J Transplant 12:43–47PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference International Summit on Transplant Tourism and Organ Trafficking (2008) The Declaration of Istanbul on Organ Trafficking and Transplant Tourism. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 3:1227–1231CrossRef International Summit on Transplant Tourism and Organ Trafficking (2008) The Declaration of Istanbul on Organ Trafficking and Transplant Tourism. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 3:1227–1231CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Council of Europe (2000) Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with Regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. J Med Philos 25:259–266CrossRef Council of Europe (2000) Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with Regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. J Med Philos 25:259–266CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Ghods AJ, Savaj S (2006) Iranian model of paid and regulated living-unrelated kidney donation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 1:1136–1145PubMedCrossRef Ghods AJ, Savaj S (2006) Iranian model of paid and regulated living-unrelated kidney donation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 1:1136–1145PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Radcliffe-Richards J, Daar AS, Guttmann RD et al (1998) The case for allowing kidney sales. Lancet 351:1950–1952PubMedCrossRef Radcliffe-Richards J, Daar AS, Guttmann RD et al (1998) The case for allowing kidney sales. Lancet 351:1950–1952PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Schwindt R, Vining AR (1986) Proposal for a future delivery market for transplant organs. J Health Polit Policy Law 11:483–500PubMedCrossRef Schwindt R, Vining AR (1986) Proposal for a future delivery market for transplant organs. J Health Polit Policy Law 11:483–500PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Cohen LR (1989) Increasing the supply of transplant organs: the virtues of a futures market. George Wash Law Rev 58:1–51 Cohen LR (1989) Increasing the supply of transplant organs: the virtues of a futures market. George Wash Law Rev 58:1–51
40.
go back to reference Hansmann H (1989) The economics and ethics of markets for human organs. J Health Polit Policy Law 14:57–85PubMedCrossRef Hansmann H (1989) The economics and ethics of markets for human organs. J Health Polit Policy Law 14:57–85PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Peters TG (1991) Life or death. The issue of payment in cadaveric organ donation. JAMA 265:1302–1305PubMedCrossRef Peters TG (1991) Life or death. The issue of payment in cadaveric organ donation. JAMA 265:1302–1305PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Sells RA (1992) The case against buying organs and a futures market in transplants. Transplant Proc 24:2198–2202PubMed Sells RA (1992) The case against buying organs and a futures market in transplants. Transplant Proc 24:2198–2202PubMed
43.
go back to reference Sheehy E, Conrad SL, Brigham LE et al (2003) Estimating the number of potential organ donors in the United States. N Engl J Med 349:667–674PubMedCrossRef Sheehy E, Conrad SL, Brigham LE et al (2003) Estimating the number of potential organ donors in the United States. N Engl J Med 349:667–674PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Matas AJ, Schnitzler M (2004) Payment for living donor (vendor) kidneys: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Am J Transplant 4:216–221PubMedCrossRef Matas AJ, Schnitzler M (2004) Payment for living donor (vendor) kidneys: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Am J Transplant 4:216–221PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Sickand M, Cuerden MS, Klarenbach SW et al (2009) Reimbursing live organ donors for incurred non-medical expenses: a global perspective on policies and programs. Am J Transplant 9:2825–2836PubMedCrossRef Sickand M, Cuerden MS, Klarenbach SW et al (2009) Reimbursing live organ donors for incurred non-medical expenses: a global perspective on policies and programs. Am J Transplant 9:2825–2836PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Hippen B, Ross LF, Sade RM (2009) Saving lives is more important than abstract moral concerns: financial incentives should be used to increase organ donation. Ann Thorac Surg 88:1053–1061PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Hippen B, Ross LF, Sade RM (2009) Saving lives is more important than abstract moral concerns: financial incentives should be used to increase organ donation. Ann Thorac Surg 88:1053–1061PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge
49.
go back to reference Marshall PA, Thomasma DC, Daar AS (1996) Marketing human organs: the autonomy paradox. Theor Med 17:1–18PubMedCrossRef Marshall PA, Thomasma DC, Daar AS (1996) Marketing human organs: the autonomy paradox. Theor Med 17:1–18PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Ethical Issues Regarding Related and Nonrelated Living Organ Donors
Author
Giuliano Testa
Publication date
01-07-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 7/2014
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2549-4

Other articles of this Issue 7/2014

World Journal of Surgery 7/2014 Go to the issue

Best Paper at Breast Surgery International Congress, ISW, Helsinki, Finland, August 2013

Time to Breast Cancer Relapse Predicted By Primary Tumour Characteristics, Not Lymph Node Involvement