Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 6/2014

01-06-2014

Development of a Composite Endpoint for Randomized Controlled Trials in Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Authors: Marielle M. E. Coolsen, Stefan H. E. M. Clermonts, Ronald M. van Dam, Bjorn Winkens, Massimo Malagó, Giuseppe K. Fusai, Cornelis H. C. Dejong, Steven W. M. Olde Damink

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 6/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been performed in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). An important factor contributing to this is the large number of patients needed to adequately power RCTs for relevant clinical single endpoints. A PD-specific composite endpoint (CEP) could solve this problem. The aim of the present study was to develop a PD-specific CEP, consisting of complications related to PD, allowing reduction in sample sizes and improving the ability to compare outcomes.

Methods

PD-specific CEP components were selected after a systematic review of the literature and consensus between 25 international pancreatic surgeons. Ultimately, prospective cohorts of patients who underwent PD in two high-volume HPB centers (London, UK, and Maastricht, NL) were used to assess the event rate and effect of implementing a PD-specific CEP.

Results

From a total of 18 single-component endpoints, intra-abdominal abscess, sepsis, post-PD hemorrhage, bile leakage, gastrojejunostomy leakage, leakage of the pancreatic anastomosis, delayed gastric emptying, and operative mortality within 90 days were selected to be included the PD-specific CEP. All eight components had consensus definitions and a Dindo–Clavien classification of 3 or more. The incidence of the PD-specific CEP was 24.7 % in the Maastricht cohort and 23.3 % in the London cohort. These incidence rates led to a twofold reduction in the theoretical calculated sample size for an adequately powered RCT on PD using this CEP as a primary endpoint.

Conclusions

The proposed PD-specific CEP enables clinical investigators to adequately power RCTs on PD and increases the feasibility, comparability, and utility in meta-analysis.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kaido T (2006) Analysis of randomized controlled trials on hepatopancreatic surgery. Dig Dis Sci 51:1761–1766PubMedCrossRef Kaido T (2006) Analysis of randomized controlled trials on hepatopancreatic surgery. Dig Dis Sci 51:1761–1766PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kaido T (2006) Recent randomized controlled trials in pancreaticoduodenectomy. Pancreas 33:228–232PubMedCrossRef Kaido T (2006) Recent randomized controlled trials in pancreaticoduodenectomy. Pancreas 33:228–232PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA et al (2006) 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg 10:1199–1210 discussion 1210–1211PubMedCrossRef Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA et al (2006) 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg 10:1199–1210 discussion 1210–1211PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference DeOliveira ML, Winter JM, Schafer M et al (2006) Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: a novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 244:931–937 discussion 937–939PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef DeOliveira ML, Winter JM, Schafer M et al (2006) Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: a novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 244:931–937 discussion 937–939PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference de Wilde RF, Besselink MG, van der Tweel I et al (2012) Impact of nationwide centralization of pancreaticoduodenectomy on hospital mortality. Br J Surg 99:404–410PubMedCrossRef de Wilde RF, Besselink MG, van der Tweel I et al (2012) Impact of nationwide centralization of pancreaticoduodenectomy on hospital mortality. Br J Surg 99:404–410PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Washburn K (2008) Endpoints in trials for clinical liver transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 13:252–256PubMedCrossRef Washburn K (2008) Endpoints in trials for clinical liver transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 13:252–256PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Freemantle N, Calvert M, Wood J et al (2003) Composite outcomes in randomized trials: greater precision but with greater uncertainty? JAMA 289:2554–2559PubMedCrossRef Freemantle N, Calvert M, Wood J et al (2003) Composite outcomes in randomized trials: greater precision but with greater uncertainty? JAMA 289:2554–2559PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference van den Broek MA, van Dam RM, van Breukelen GJ et al (2011) Development of a composite endpoint for randomized controlled trials in liver surgery. Br J Surg 98:1138–1145PubMedCrossRef van den Broek MA, van Dam RM, van Breukelen GJ et al (2011) Development of a composite endpoint for randomized controlled trials in liver surgery. Br J Surg 98:1138–1145PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference TIME Investigators (2001) Trial of invasive versus medical therapy in elderly patients with chronic symptomatic coronary–artery disease (TIME): a randomised trial. Lancet 358(9286):951–957CrossRef TIME Investigators (2001) Trial of invasive versus medical therapy in elderly patients with chronic symptomatic coronary–artery disease (TIME): a randomised trial. Lancet 358(9286):951–957CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Niewoehner DE, Erbland ML, Deupree RH et al (1999) Effect of systemic glucocorticoids on exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group. N Engl J Med 340:1941–1947PubMedCrossRef Niewoehner DE, Erbland ML, Deupree RH et al (1999) Effect of systemic glucocorticoids on exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group. N Engl J Med 340:1941–1947PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Sinha IP, Gallagher R, Williamson PR et al (2012) Development of a core outcome set for clinical trials in childhood asthma: a survey of clinicians, parents, and young people. Trials 13:103PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Sinha IP, Gallagher R, Williamson PR et al (2012) Development of a core outcome set for clinical trials in childhood asthma: a survey of clinicians, parents, and young people. Trials 13:103PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Taylor DW, Barnett HJ, Haynes RB et al (1999) Low-dose and high-dose acetylsalicylic acid for patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: a randomised controlled trial. ASA and Carotid Endarterectomy (ACE) Trial Collaborators. Lancet 353(9171):2179–2184PubMedCrossRef Taylor DW, Barnett HJ, Haynes RB et al (1999) Low-dose and high-dose acetylsalicylic acid for patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: a randomised controlled trial. ASA and Carotid Endarterectomy (ACE) Trial Collaborators. Lancet 353(9171):2179–2184PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Yusuf S, Sleight P, Pogue J et al (2000) Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators. N Engl J Med 342:145–153PubMedCrossRef Yusuf S, Sleight P, Pogue J et al (2000) Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators. N Engl J Med 342:145–153PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Diener MK, Seiler CM, Rossion I et al (2011) Efficacy of stapler versus hand-sewn closure after distal pancreatectomy (DISPACT): a randomised, controlled multicentre trial. Lancet 377(9776):1514–1522PubMedCrossRef Diener MK, Seiler CM, Rossion I et al (2011) Efficacy of stapler versus hand-sewn closure after distal pancreatectomy (DISPACT): a randomised, controlled multicentre trial. Lancet 377(9776):1514–1522PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ramos-De la Medina A, Sarr MG (2006) Somatostatin analogues in the prevention of pancreas-related complications after pancreatic resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 13:190–193PubMedCrossRef Ramos-De la Medina A, Sarr MG (2006) Somatostatin analogues in the prevention of pancreas-related complications after pancreatic resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 13:190–193PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference van der Gaag NA, Rauws EA, van Eijck CH et al (2010) Preoperative biliary drainage for cancer of the head of the pancreas. N Engl J Med 362:129–137PubMedCrossRef van der Gaag NA, Rauws EA, van Eijck CH et al (2010) Preoperative biliary drainage for cancer of the head of the pancreas. N Engl J Med 362:129–137PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG (2009) The accordion severity grading system of surgical complications. Ann Surg 250:177–186PubMedCrossRef Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG (2009) The accordion severity grading system of surgical complications. Ann Surg 250:177–186PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C et al (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761–768PubMedCrossRef Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C et al (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761–768PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Welsch T, Eisele H, Zschabitz S et al (2011) Critical appraisal of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) consensus definition of postoperative hemorrhage after pancreatoduodenectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396:783–791PubMedCrossRef Welsch T, Eisele H, Zschabitz S et al (2011) Critical appraisal of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) consensus definition of postoperative hemorrhage after pancreatoduodenectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396:783–791PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13PubMedCrossRef Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Houwink EJ, Henneman L, Westerneng M et al (2012) Prioritization of future genetics education for general practitioners: a Delphi study. Genet Med 14(3):323–329PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Houwink EJ, Henneman L, Westerneng M et al (2012) Prioritization of future genetics education for general practitioners: a Delphi study. Genet Med 14(3):323–329PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Gerstein HC, Yusuf S, Bosch J et al (2006) Effect of rosiglitazone on the frequency of diabetes in patients with impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting glucose: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 368(9541):1096–1105PubMedCrossRef Gerstein HC, Yusuf S, Bosch J et al (2006) Effect of rosiglitazone on the frequency of diabetes in patients with impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting glucose: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 368(9541):1096–1105PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Ferreira-Gonzalez I, Busse JW, Heels-Ansdell D et al (2007) Problems with use of composite end points in cardiovascular trials: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 334(7597):786PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Ferreira-Gonzalez I, Busse JW, Heels-Ansdell D et al (2007) Problems with use of composite end points in cardiovascular trials: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 334(7597):786PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Ferreira-Gonzalez I, Permanyer-Miralda G, Busse JW et al (2007) Methodologic discussions for using and interpreting composite endpoints are limited, but still identify major concerns. J Clin Epidemiol 60:651–657 discussion 658–662PubMedCrossRef Ferreira-Gonzalez I, Permanyer-Miralda G, Busse JW et al (2007) Methodologic discussions for using and interpreting composite endpoints are limited, but still identify major concerns. J Clin Epidemiol 60:651–657 discussion 658–662PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Tomlinson G, Detsky AS (2010) Composite end points in randomized trials: there is no free lunch. JAMA 303:267–268PubMedCrossRef Tomlinson G, Detsky AS (2010) Composite end points in randomized trials: there is no free lunch. JAMA 303:267–268PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference van den Broek MA, van Dam RM, Malago M et al (2009) Feasibility of randomized controlled trials in liver surgery using surgery-related mortality or morbidity as endpoint. Br J Surg 96:1005–1014PubMedCrossRef van den Broek MA, van Dam RM, Malago M et al (2009) Feasibility of randomized controlled trials in liver surgery using surgery-related mortality or morbidity as endpoint. Br J Surg 96:1005–1014PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Development of a Composite Endpoint for Randomized Controlled Trials in Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Authors
Marielle M. E. Coolsen
Stefan H. E. M. Clermonts
Ronald M. van Dam
Bjorn Winkens
Massimo Malagó
Giuseppe K. Fusai
Cornelis H. C. Dejong
Steven W. M. Olde Damink
Publication date
01-06-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 6/2014
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2421-y

Other articles of this Issue 6/2014

World Journal of Surgery 6/2014 Go to the issue