Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 4/2013

01-04-2013

Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Outcomes in 513 Patients

Authors: Oktar Asoglu, Emre Balik, Enver Kunduz, Sumer Yamaner, Ali Akyuz, Mine Gulluoglu, Yersu Kapran, Dursun Bugra

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 4/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Few reports have demonstrated the feasibility and efficacy of laparoscopic resection in patients with rectal cancer (RC). The objective of the present study was to assess the effectiveness of laparoscopic resection for RC, with an emphasis on perioperative variables and long-term oncological outcomes.

Methods

This prospective study was carried out between January 2005 and September 2010 and included 513 patients diagnosed with RC who underwent laparoscopic surgery. Patients with locally advanced RC (cT3/cT4 or N+) received neoadjuvant treatment. Adjuvant treatment was applied to patients with stage II/III disease or according to the neoadjuvant protocol. All patients were followed-up prospectively for the evaluation of complications and oncological outcome. Survival rate analysis was performed using the Kaplan–Meier method.

Results

Sphincter-preserving surgery was performed on 389 patients, and the remaining 124 patients underwent abdominoperineal resection. Perioperative mortality occurred in only one patient (0.2 %), and 27 (5.3 %) intraoperative complications were recorded. The most common postoperative complication was anastomotic leakage (5.5 %). The conversion rate was 6.4 %. The mean number of harvested lymph nodes was 23.6 ± 13. The mean distance to the distal margin was 2.6 ± 1.9 (0–7) cm. Distal margin positivity was detected in 9 (1.7 %) patients. The circumferential margin was positive in 39 (7.6 %) cases. After a median follow-up period of 30 (1–78) months, recurrence occurred in a total of 59 patients (11.5 %). Local recurrence was detected in 16 patients (3.1 %), and both local and distant recurrence was found in 7 patients (1.4 %). Distant recurrence only was detected in 43 patients (8.4 %). The overall 5-year survival rate was 84 %, and the 5-year disease-free survival rate was 77.4 %. The local recurrence-free survival rate was 98.4 % at 2 years, 95.7 % at 3 years, and 94.3 % at 5 years.

Conclusions

Our results, together with the review of the literature, clearly demonstrate that laparoscopic resection for RC is a feasible method at specialized high-volume centers. The long-term outcomes are at least as good as those from open surgery as long as the principles of oncologic surgery are respected and faithfully performed.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Aziz O, Constantinides V, Tekkis PP et al (2006) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 13:413–424PubMedCrossRef Aziz O, Constantinides V, Tekkis PP et al (2006) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 13:413–424PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Gao F, Cao YF, Chen LS (2006) Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 21:652–656PubMedCrossRef Gao F, Cao YF, Chen LS (2006) Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 21:652–656PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Asoglu O, Matlim T, Karanlik H et al (2009) Impact of laparoscopic surgery on bladder and sexual function after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 23:296–303PubMedCrossRef Asoglu O, Matlim T, Karanlik H et al (2009) Impact of laparoscopic surgery on bladder and sexual function after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 23:296–303PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Balik E, Asoglu O, Saglam S et al (2010) Effects of surgical laparoscopic experience on the short-term postoperative outcome of rectal cancer: results of a high volume single center institution. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 20:93–99PubMedCrossRef Balik E, Asoglu O, Saglam S et al (2010) Effects of surgical laparoscopic experience on the short-term postoperative outcome of rectal cancer: results of a high volume single center institution. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 20:93–99PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Vignali A, Fazio VW, Lavery IC et al (1997) Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patients. J Am Coll Surg 185:105–113PubMed Vignali A, Fazio VW, Lavery IC et al (1997) Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patients. J Am Coll Surg 185:105–113PubMed
6.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hermanek P, Hermanek P, Hohenberger W et al (2003) The pathological assessment of mesorectal excision: implications for further treatment and quality management. Int J Colorectal Dis 18:335–341PubMed Hermanek P, Hermanek P, Hohenberger W et al (2003) The pathological assessment of mesorectal excision: implications for further treatment and quality management. Int J Colorectal Dis 18:335–341PubMed
8.
go back to reference Feliciotti F, Guerrieri M, Paganini AM et al (2003) Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open resections for rectal cancer for 124 unselected patients. Surg Endosc 17:1530–1535PubMedCrossRef Feliciotti F, Guerrieri M, Paganini AM et al (2003) Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open resections for rectal cancer for 124 unselected patients. Surg Endosc 17:1530–1535PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ng SS, Leung KL, Lee JF et al (2008) Laparoscopic-assisted versus open abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg Oncol 15:2418–2425; Erratum. Ann Surg Oncol 2009 16:229 Ng SS, Leung KL, Lee JF et al (2008) Laparoscopic-assisted versus open abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg Oncol 15:2418–2425; Erratum. Ann Surg Oncol 2009 16:229
10.
go back to reference Ng SS, Leung KL, Lee JF et al (2009) Long-term morbidity and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted anterior resection for upper rectal cancer: 10-year results of a prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 52:558–566PubMedCrossRef Ng SS, Leung KL, Lee JF et al (2009) Long-term morbidity and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted anterior resection for upper rectal cancer: 10-year results of a prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 52:558–566PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Law WL, Poon JT, Fan JK et al (2009) Comparison of outcome of open and laparoscopic resection for stage II and stage III rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1488–1493PubMedCrossRef Law WL, Poon JT, Fan JK et al (2009) Comparison of outcome of open and laparoscopic resection for stage II and stage III rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1488–1493PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Laurent C, Leblanc F, Wütrich P et al (2009) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: long-term oncologic results. Ann Surg 250:54–61PubMedCrossRef Laurent C, Leblanc F, Wütrich P et al (2009) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: long-term oncologic results. Ann Surg 250:54–61PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J et al (2010) Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 97:1638–1645PubMedCrossRef Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J et al (2010) Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 97:1638–1645PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Li S, Chi P, Lin H et al (2011) Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery versus open resection for middle and lower rectal cancer: an NTCLES study. Surg Endosc 25:3175–3182PubMedCrossRef Li S, Chi P, Lin H et al (2011) Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery versus open resection for middle and lower rectal cancer: an NTCLES study. Surg Endosc 25:3175–3182PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Liang X, Hou S, Liu H et al (2011) Effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic resection versus open surgery in patients with rectal cancer: a randomized, controlled trial from China. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:381–385PubMedCrossRef Liang X, Hou S, Liu H et al (2011) Effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic resection versus open surgery in patients with rectal cancer: a randomized, controlled trial from China. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:381–385PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Baik SH, Gincherman M, Mutch MG et al (2011) Laparoscopic vs open resection for patients with rectal cancer: comparison of perioperative outcomes and long-term survival. Dis Colon Rectum 54:6–14PubMedCrossRef Baik SH, Gincherman M, Mutch MG et al (2011) Laparoscopic vs open resection for patients with rectal cancer: comparison of perioperative outcomes and long-term survival. Dis Colon Rectum 54:6–14PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Leroy J, Jamali F, Forbes L et al (2004) Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer surgery: long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 18:281–289PubMedCrossRef Leroy J, Jamali F, Forbes L et al (2004) Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer surgery: long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 18:281–289PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Dulucq JL, Wintringer P, Stabilini C et al (2005) Laparoscopic rectal resection with anal sphincter preservation for rectal cancer: long-term outcome. Surg Endosc 19:1468–1474PubMedCrossRef Dulucq JL, Wintringer P, Stabilini C et al (2005) Laparoscopic rectal resection with anal sphincter preservation for rectal cancer: long-term outcome. Surg Endosc 19:1468–1474PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Agha A, Fürst A, Hierl J et al (2008) Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: oncological results and clinical outcome of 225 patients. Surg Endosc 22:2229–2237PubMedCrossRef Agha A, Fürst A, Hierl J et al (2008) Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: oncological results and clinical outcome of 225 patients. Surg Endosc 22:2229–2237PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Pugliese R, Di Lernia S, Sansonna F et al (2008) Results of laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal adenocarcinoma: retrospective analysis of 157 cases. Am J Surg 195:233–238PubMedCrossRef Pugliese R, Di Lernia S, Sansonna F et al (2008) Results of laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal adenocarcinoma: retrospective analysis of 157 cases. Am J Surg 195:233–238PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Ng KH, Ng DC, Cheung HY et al (2009) Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancers: lessons learned from 579 cases. Ann Surg 249:82–86PubMedCrossRef Ng KH, Ng DC, Cheung HY et al (2009) Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancers: lessons learned from 579 cases. Ann Surg 249:82–86PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Milsom JW, de Oliveira O, Trencheva KI Jr et al (2009) Long-term outcomes of patients undergoing curative laparoscopic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1215–1222PubMedCrossRef Milsom JW, de Oliveira O, Trencheva KI Jr et al (2009) Long-term outcomes of patients undergoing curative laparoscopic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1215–1222PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Cheung HY, Ng KH, Leung AL et al (2011) Laparoscopic sphincter-preserving total mesorectal excision: 10-year report. Colorectal Dis 13:627–631PubMedCrossRef Cheung HY, Ng KH, Leung AL et al (2011) Laparoscopic sphincter-preserving total mesorectal excision: 10-year report. Colorectal Dis 13:627–631PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Nagtegaal ID, Quirke P (2008) What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer? J Clin Oncol 26:303–312PubMedCrossRef Nagtegaal ID, Quirke P (2008) What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer? J Clin Oncol 26:303–312PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Wiggers T, van de Velde CJ (2002) The circumferential margin in rectal cancer. Recommendations based on the Dutch Total Mesorectal Excision Study. Eur J Cancer 38:973–976PubMedCrossRef Wiggers T, van de Velde CJ (2002) The circumferential margin in rectal cancer. Recommendations based on the Dutch Total Mesorectal Excision Study. Eur J Cancer 38:973–976PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Franks PJ, Bosanquet N, Thorpe H et al (2006) Short-term costs of conventional vs. laparoscopic assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial). Br J Cancer 95:6–12PubMedCrossRef Franks PJ, Bosanquet N, Thorpe H et al (2006) Short-term costs of conventional vs. laparoscopic assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial). Br J Cancer 95:6–12PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, Kapiteijn E et al (2003) Radiotherapy does not compensate for positive resection margins in rectal cancer patients: report of a multicenter randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 55:1311–1320PubMedCrossRef Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, Kapiteijn E et al (2003) Radiotherapy does not compensate for positive resection margins in rectal cancer patients: report of a multicenter randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 55:1311–1320PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365(9472):1718–1726PubMedCrossRef Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365(9472):1718–1726PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Folkesson J, Birgisson H, Pahlman L et al (2005) Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial: long lasting benefits from radiotherapy on survival and local recurrence rate. J Clin Oncol 23:5644–5650PubMedCrossRef Folkesson J, Birgisson H, Pahlman L et al (2005) Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial: long lasting benefits from radiotherapy on survival and local recurrence rate. J Clin Oncol 23:5644–5650PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference van Gijn W, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID et al (2011) Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer: 12-year follow-up of the multicentre, randomised controlled TME trial. Lancet Oncol 12:575–582PubMedCrossRef van Gijn W, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID et al (2011) Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer: 12-year follow-up of the multicentre, randomised controlled TME trial. Lancet Oncol 12:575–582PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W et al (2004) Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351:1731–1740PubMedCrossRef Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W et al (2004) Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351:1731–1740PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Outcomes in 513 Patients
Authors
Oktar Asoglu
Emre Balik
Enver Kunduz
Sumer Yamaner
Ali Akyuz
Mine Gulluoglu
Yersu Kapran
Dursun Bugra
Publication date
01-04-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 4/2013
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-1927-7

Other articles of this Issue 4/2013

World Journal of Surgery 4/2013 Go to the issue