Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 4/2013

01-04-2013

A Nodal Positivity Constant: New Perspectives in Lymph Node Evaluation and Colorectal Cancer

Authors: Niamh M. Hogan, Desmond C. Winter

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 4/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To date, associations between the number of lymph nodes evaluated, staging, and survival have been examined in the context of large population-based studies conducted by a small number of investigators. Therefore, although high-quality data are available, perspective is lacking.

Methods

Studies for this paper were identified by searches of Medline, Scopus, PubMed, and manual searching of references from articles, using the search terms ‘‘colorectal cancer’’, ‘‘nodal status’’ and ‘‘lymph node’’.

Results

It is clear that survival benefit increases with the increasing number of lymph nodes harvested. Despite this observation, there has been no significant increase in the proportion of node-positive cancers over the past two decades.

Conclusion

The nodal positivity rate for colorectal cancer consistently approximates 40 % across a wide range of studies internationally, a phenomenon that has not previously been recognized in the literature. We review the evidence and introduce the concept of a nodal positivity constant.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Edge SB, Compton CC (2010) The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol 17:1471–1474PubMedCrossRef Edge SB, Compton CC (2010) The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol 17:1471–1474PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Swanson RS, Compton CC, Stewart AK et al (2003) The prognosis of T3N0 colon cancer is dependent on the number of lymph nodes examined. Ann Surg Oncol 10:65–71PubMedCrossRef Swanson RS, Compton CC, Stewart AK et al (2003) The prognosis of T3N0 colon cancer is dependent on the number of lymph nodes examined. Ann Surg Oncol 10:65–71PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Le Voyer TE, Sigurdson ER, Hanlon AL et al (2003) Colon cancer survival is associated with increasing number of lymph nodes analyzed: a secondary survey of intergroup trial INT-0089. J Clin Oncol 21:2912–2919PubMedCrossRef Le Voyer TE, Sigurdson ER, Hanlon AL et al (2003) Colon cancer survival is associated with increasing number of lymph nodes analyzed: a secondary survey of intergroup trial INT-0089. J Clin Oncol 21:2912–2919PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Chang GJ, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Skibber JM et al (2007) Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst 99:433–441PubMedCrossRef Chang GJ, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Skibber JM et al (2007) Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst 99:433–441PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Baxter NN, Ricciardi R, Simunovic M et al (2010) An evaluation of the relationship between lymph node number and staging in pT3 colon cancer using population-based data. Dis Colon Rectum 53:65–70PubMedCrossRef Baxter NN, Ricciardi R, Simunovic M et al (2010) An evaluation of the relationship between lymph node number and staging in pT3 colon cancer using population-based data. Dis Colon Rectum 53:65–70PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Baxter NN (2009) Is lymph node count an ideal quality indicator for cancer care? J Surg Oncol 99:265–268PubMedCrossRef Baxter NN (2009) Is lymph node count an ideal quality indicator for cancer care? J Surg Oncol 99:265–268PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ricciardi R, Baxter NN (2007) Association versus causation versus quality improvement: setting benchmarks for lymph node evaluation in colon cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 99:414–415PubMedCrossRef Ricciardi R, Baxter NN (2007) Association versus causation versus quality improvement: setting benchmarks for lymph node evaluation in colon cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 99:414–415PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ricciardi R, Madoff RD, Rothenberger DA et al (2006) Population-based analyses of lymph node metastases in colorectal cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 4:1522–1527PubMedCrossRef Ricciardi R, Madoff RD, Rothenberger DA et al (2006) Population-based analyses of lymph node metastases in colorectal cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 4:1522–1527PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Baxter NN, Morris AM, Rothenberger DA et al (2005) Impact of preoperative radiation for rectal cancer on subsequent lymph node evaluation: a population-based analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 61:426–431PubMedCrossRef Baxter NN, Morris AM, Rothenberger DA et al (2005) Impact of preoperative radiation for rectal cancer on subsequent lymph node evaluation: a population-based analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 61:426–431PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Baxter NN, Virnig DJ, Rothenberger DA et al (2005) Lymph node evaluation in colorectal cancer patients: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:219–225PubMedCrossRef Baxter NN, Virnig DJ, Rothenberger DA et al (2005) Lymph node evaluation in colorectal cancer patients: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:219–225PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Parsons HM, Tuttle TM, Kuntz KM et al (2011) Association between lymph node evaluation for colon cancer and node positivity over the past 20 years. JAMA 306:1089–1097PubMedCrossRef Parsons HM, Tuttle TM, Kuntz KM et al (2011) Association between lymph node evaluation for colon cancer and node positivity over the past 20 years. JAMA 306:1089–1097PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Center MM, Jemal A, Smith RA et al (2009) Worldwide variations in colorectal cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 59:366–378PubMedCrossRef Center MM, Jemal A, Smith RA et al (2009) Worldwide variations in colorectal cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 59:366–378PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K et al (2009) Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation—technical notes and outcome. Colorectal Dis 11:354–364 Discussion 364–355PubMedCrossRef Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K et al (2009) Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation—technical notes and outcome. Colorectal Dis 11:354–364 Discussion 364–355PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Porter PL, El-Bastawissi AY, Mandelson MT et al (1999) Breast tumor characteristics as predictors of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:2020–2028PubMedCrossRef Porter PL, El-Bastawissi AY, Mandelson MT et al (1999) Breast tumor characteristics as predictors of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:2020–2028PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hakama M, Holli K, Isola J et al (1995) Aggressiveness of screen-detected breast cancers. Lancet 345:221–224PubMedCrossRef Hakama M, Holli K, Isola J et al (1995) Aggressiveness of screen-detected breast cancers. Lancet 345:221–224PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Prandi M, Lionetto R, Bini A et al (2002) Prognostic evaluation of stage B colon cancer patients is improved by an adequate lymphadenectomy: results of a secondary analysis of a large scale adjuvant trial. Ann Surg 235:458–463PubMedCrossRef Prandi M, Lionetto R, Bini A et al (2002) Prognostic evaluation of stage B colon cancer patients is improved by an adequate lymphadenectomy: results of a secondary analysis of a large scale adjuvant trial. Ann Surg 235:458–463PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Anonymous (1999) Efficacy of adjuvant fluorouracil and folinic acid in B2 colon cancer: International Multicentre Pooled Analysis of B2 Colon Cancer Trials (IMPACT B2) investigators. J Clin Oncol 17:1356–1363 Anonymous (1999) Efficacy of adjuvant fluorouracil and folinic acid in B2 colon cancer: International Multicentre Pooled Analysis of B2 Colon Cancer Trials (IMPACT B2) investigators. J Clin Oncol 17:1356–1363
19.
go back to reference Gill S, Loprinzi CL, Sargent DJ et al (2004) Pooled analysis of fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy for stage II and III colon cancer: who benefits and by how much? J Clin Oncol 22:1797–1806PubMedCrossRef Gill S, Loprinzi CL, Sargent DJ et al (2004) Pooled analysis of fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy for stage II and III colon cancer: who benefits and by how much? J Clin Oncol 22:1797–1806PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Johnson PM, Porter GA, Ricciardi R et al (2006) Increasing negative lymph node count is independently associated with improved long-term survival in stage IIIB and IIIC colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:3570–3575PubMedCrossRef Johnson PM, Porter GA, Ricciardi R et al (2006) Increasing negative lymph node count is independently associated with improved long-term survival in stage IIIB and IIIC colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:3570–3575PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Goldstein NS (2002) Lymph node recoveries from 2427 pT3 colorectal resection specimens spanning 45 years: recommendations for a minimum number of recovered lymph nodes based on predictive probabilities. Am J Surg Pathol 26:179–189PubMedCrossRef Goldstein NS (2002) Lymph node recoveries from 2427 pT3 colorectal resection specimens spanning 45 years: recommendations for a minimum number of recovered lymph nodes based on predictive probabilities. Am J Surg Pathol 26:179–189PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Poller DN (2000) Method of specimen fixation and pathological dissection of colorectal cancer influences retrieval of lymph nodes and tumour nodal stage. Eur J Surg Oncol 26:758–762PubMedCrossRef Poller DN (2000) Method of specimen fixation and pathological dissection of colorectal cancer influences retrieval of lymph nodes and tumour nodal stage. Eur J Surg Oncol 26:758–762PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Wong SL (2011) Lymph node evaluation in colon cancer assessing the link between quality indicators and quality. JAMA 306:1139–1141PubMedCrossRef Wong SL (2011) Lymph node evaluation in colon cancer assessing the link between quality indicators and quality. JAMA 306:1139–1141PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Sobin LH, Compton CC (2010) TNM seventh edition: what’s new, what’s changed: communication from the International Union Against Cancer and the American Joint Committee on Cancer. Cancer 116:5336–5339PubMedCrossRef Sobin LH, Compton CC (2010) TNM seventh edition: what’s new, what’s changed: communication from the International Union Against Cancer and the American Joint Committee on Cancer. Cancer 116:5336–5339PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Puppa G, Sonzogni A, Colombari R et al (2012) TNM staging system of colorectal carcinoma: a critical appraisal of challenging issues. Arch Pathol Lab Med 134:837–852 Puppa G, Sonzogni A, Colombari R et al (2012) TNM staging system of colorectal carcinoma: a critical appraisal of challenging issues. Arch Pathol Lab Med 134:837–852
27.
go back to reference Ueno H, Mochizuki H, Hashiguchi Y et al (2001) Prognostic determinants of patients with lateral nodal involvement by rectal cancer. Ann Surg 234:190–197PubMedCrossRef Ueno H, Mochizuki H, Hashiguchi Y et al (2001) Prognostic determinants of patients with lateral nodal involvement by rectal cancer. Ann Surg 234:190–197PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Kim JC, Lee KH, Yu CS et al (2004) The clinicopathological significance of inferior mesenteric lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 30:271–279PubMedCrossRef Kim JC, Lee KH, Yu CS et al (2004) The clinicopathological significance of inferior mesenteric lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 30:271–279PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Newland RC, Dent OF, Lyttle MN et al (1994) Pathologic determinants of survival associated with colorectal cancer with lymph node metastases: a multivariate analysis of 579 patients. Cancer 73:2076–2082PubMedCrossRef Newland RC, Dent OF, Lyttle MN et al (1994) Pathologic determinants of survival associated with colorectal cancer with lymph node metastases: a multivariate analysis of 579 patients. Cancer 73:2076–2082PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Huh JW, Kim YJ, Kim HR (2012) Distribution of lymph node metastases is an independent predictor of survival for sigmoid colon and rectal cancer. Ann Surg 255:70–78PubMedCrossRef Huh JW, Kim YJ, Kim HR (2012) Distribution of lymph node metastases is an independent predictor of survival for sigmoid colon and rectal cancer. Ann Surg 255:70–78PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Belt EJ, Te Velde EA, Krijgsman O et al (2011) High lymph node yield is related to microsatellite instability in colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 19:1222–1230PubMedCrossRef Belt EJ, Te Velde EA, Krijgsman O et al (2011) High lymph node yield is related to microsatellite instability in colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 19:1222–1230PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Menon AG, Fleuren GJ, Alphenaar EA et al (2003) A basal membrane-like structure surrounding tumour nodules may prevent intraepithelial leucocyte infiltration in colorectal cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother 52:121–126PubMed Menon AG, Fleuren GJ, Alphenaar EA et al (2003) A basal membrane-like structure surrounding tumour nodules may prevent intraepithelial leucocyte infiltration in colorectal cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother 52:121–126PubMed
35.
go back to reference Menon AG, Janssen-van Rhijn CM, Morreau H et al (2004) Immune system and prognosis in colorectal cancer: a detailed immunohistochemical analysis. Lab Invest 84:493–501PubMedCrossRef Menon AG, Janssen-van Rhijn CM, Morreau H et al (2004) Immune system and prognosis in colorectal cancer: a detailed immunohistochemical analysis. Lab Invest 84:493–501PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Rushfeldt C, Sveinbjornsson B, Seljelid R et al (1999) Early events of hepatic metastasis formation in mice: role of Kupffer and NK-cells in natural and interferon-gamma-stimulated defense. J Surg Res 82:209–215PubMedCrossRef Rushfeldt C, Sveinbjornsson B, Seljelid R et al (1999) Early events of hepatic metastasis formation in mice: role of Kupffer and NK-cells in natural and interferon-gamma-stimulated defense. J Surg Res 82:209–215PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Houston AM, Michael-Robinson JM, Walsh MD et al (2008) The “Fas counterattack” is not an active mode of tumor immune evasion in colorectal cancer with high-level microsatellite instability. Hum Pathol 39:243–250PubMedCrossRef Houston AM, Michael-Robinson JM, Walsh MD et al (2008) The “Fas counterattack” is not an active mode of tumor immune evasion in colorectal cancer with high-level microsatellite instability. Hum Pathol 39:243–250PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R et al (2001) Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:10869–10874PubMedCrossRef Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R et al (2001) Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:10869–10874PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Loboda A, Nebozhyn MV, Watters JW et al (2011) EMT is the dominant program in human colon cancer. BMC Med Genomics 4:9PubMedCrossRef Loboda A, Nebozhyn MV, Watters JW et al (2011) EMT is the dominant program in human colon cancer. BMC Med Genomics 4:9PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Stricker T, Catenacci DV, Seiwert TY (2011) Molecular profiling of cancer: the future of personalized cancer medicine—a primer on cancer biology and the tools necessary to bring molecular testing to the clinic. Semin Oncol 38:173–185PubMedCrossRef Stricker T, Catenacci DV, Seiwert TY (2011) Molecular profiling of cancer: the future of personalized cancer medicine—a primer on cancer biology and the tools necessary to bring molecular testing to the clinic. Semin Oncol 38:173–185PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Bui L, Rempel E, Reeson D et al (2006) Lymph node counts, rates of positive lymph nodes, and patient survival for colon cancer surgery in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study. J Surg Oncol 93:439–445PubMedCrossRef Bui L, Rempel E, Reeson D et al (2006) Lymph node counts, rates of positive lymph nodes, and patient survival for colon cancer surgery in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study. J Surg Oncol 93:439–445PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Kotake K, Honjo S, Sugihara K et al (2011) Number of lymph nodes retrieved is an important determinant of survival of patients with stage II and stage III colorectal cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 42:29–35PubMedCrossRef Kotake K, Honjo S, Sugihara K et al (2011) Number of lymph nodes retrieved is an important determinant of survival of patients with stage II and stage III colorectal cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 42:29–35PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Lemmens VE, van Lijnschoten I, Janssen-Heijnen ML et al (2006) Pathology practice patterns affect lymph node evaluation and outcome of colon cancer: a population-based study. Ann Oncol 17:1803–1809PubMedCrossRef Lemmens VE, van Lijnschoten I, Janssen-Heijnen ML et al (2006) Pathology practice patterns affect lymph node evaluation and outcome of colon cancer: a population-based study. Ann Oncol 17:1803–1809PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Piso P, Dahlke MH, Mirena P et al (2004) Total mesorectal excision for middle and lower rectal cancer: a single institution experience with 337 consecutive patients. J Surg Oncol 86:115–121PubMedCrossRef Piso P, Dahlke MH, Mirena P et al (2004) Total mesorectal excision for middle and lower rectal cancer: a single institution experience with 337 consecutive patients. J Surg Oncol 86:115–121PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Shen SS, Haupt BX, Ro JY et al (2009) Number of lymph nodes examined and associated clinicopathologic factors in colorectal carcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 133:781–786PubMed Shen SS, Haupt BX, Ro JY et al (2009) Number of lymph nodes examined and associated clinicopathologic factors in colorectal carcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 133:781–786PubMed
46.
go back to reference Rullier A, Laurent C, Capdepont M et al (2008) Lymph nodes after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal carcinoma: number, status, and impact on survival. Am J Surg Pathol 32:45–50PubMedCrossRef Rullier A, Laurent C, Capdepont M et al (2008) Lymph nodes after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal carcinoma: number, status, and impact on survival. Am J Surg Pathol 32:45–50PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Akasu T, Takawa M, Yamamoto S et al (2008) Intersphincteric resection for very low rectal adenocarcinoma: univariate and multivariate analyses of risk factors for recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol 15:2668–2676PubMedCrossRef Akasu T, Takawa M, Yamamoto S et al (2008) Intersphincteric resection for very low rectal adenocarcinoma: univariate and multivariate analyses of risk factors for recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol 15:2668–2676PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Gunderson LL, Jessup JM, Sargent DJ et al (2009) Revised tumor and node categorization for rectal cancer based on surveillance, epidemiology, and end results and rectal pooled analysis outcomes. J Clin Oncol 28:256–263PubMedCrossRef Gunderson LL, Jessup JM, Sargent DJ et al (2009) Revised tumor and node categorization for rectal cancer based on surveillance, epidemiology, and end results and rectal pooled analysis outcomes. J Clin Oncol 28:256–263PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Meguid RA, Slidell MB, Wolfgang CL et al (2008) Is there a difference in survival between right- versus left-sided colon cancers? Ann Surg Oncol 15:2388–2394PubMedCrossRef Meguid RA, Slidell MB, Wolfgang CL et al (2008) Is there a difference in survival between right- versus left-sided colon cancers? Ann Surg Oncol 15:2388–2394PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Wang H, Wei XZ, Fu CG et al (2010) Patterns of lymph node metastasis are different in colon and rectal carcinomas. World J Gastroenterol 16:5375–5379PubMedCrossRef Wang H, Wei XZ, Fu CG et al (2010) Patterns of lymph node metastasis are different in colon and rectal carcinomas. World J Gastroenterol 16:5375–5379PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Evans MD, Robinson S, Badiani S et al (2011) Same surgeon: different centre equals differing lymph node harvest following colorectal cancer resection. Int J Surg Oncol 2011:406517PubMed Evans MD, Robinson S, Badiani S et al (2011) Same surgeon: different centre equals differing lymph node harvest following colorectal cancer resection. Int J Surg Oncol 2011:406517PubMed
52.
go back to reference Rosenberg R, Engel J, Bruns C et al (2010) The prognostic value of lymph node ratio in a population-based collective of colorectal cancer patients. Ann Surg 251:1070–1078PubMedCrossRef Rosenberg R, Engel J, Bruns C et al (2010) The prognostic value of lymph node ratio in a population-based collective of colorectal cancer patients. Ann Surg 251:1070–1078PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A Nodal Positivity Constant: New Perspectives in Lymph Node Evaluation and Colorectal Cancer
Authors
Niamh M. Hogan
Desmond C. Winter
Publication date
01-04-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 4/2013
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1891-7

Other articles of this Issue 4/2013

World Journal of Surgery 4/2013 Go to the issue