Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 10/2011

01-10-2011

Pancreatic Cancer, Healthcare Cost, and Loss of Productivity: A Register-based Approach

Authors: Bobby Tingstedt, Erik Andersson, Anton Flink, Kristian Bolin, Björn Lindgren, Roland Andersson

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 10/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Despite the fact that pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death, there is little empirical evidence on its direct healthcare costs and, especially, its indirect costs due to loss of production.

Methods

The present study is a retrospective analysis of all patients with pancreatic cancer (excluding endocrine cancer) in the primary catchment area of Lund University Hospital, Sweden, during the period 2005–2007. Detailed information on all diagnostic and therapeutic investigations, interventions, and postoperative course and long-term follow-up was collected, as well as absenteeism from work due to the health problem, from which direct costs were calculated. The indirect costs for loss of production due to sickness and premature death were calculated by the human capital method. A total of 83 patients were included, for an incidence rate of 9.9 patients/100,000 inhabitants.

Results

Direct treatment cost per pancreatic-cancer patient was estimated at EUR 16,066 for each patient’s remaining lifetime. Hospitalization accounted for the major expenditure—60% of the lifetime treatment cost. Patients with resectable tumor had a mean cost of EUR 19,809; locally advanced disease, EUR 14,899; and metastatic disease, €16,179. Younger patients and men had a higher than average lifetime treatment cost. The loss of productivity was estimated at EUR 287,420 per patient younger than 65 years of age, of which premature mortality accounted for 79%.

Conclusions

Adding the cost of palliative care estimated in a previous Swedish study, health-care costs and productivity losses for pancreatic cancer would add up to a substantial economic burden for Sweden at large in 2009 (population 9.1 million), between EUR 86 million and EUR 93 million.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Weir H, Thun M, Hankey B et al (2003) Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2000, featuring the uses of surveillance data for Cancer prevention and control. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:1276–1299PubMed Weir H, Thun M, Hankey B et al (2003) Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2000, featuring the uses of surveillance data for Cancer prevention and control. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:1276–1299PubMed
2.
go back to reference Lillemoe K, Cameron J (2000) Pancreatic cancer: state of the art care. Adv Surg 34:249–271PubMed Lillemoe K, Cameron J (2000) Pancreatic cancer: state of the art care. Adv Surg 34:249–271PubMed
4.
go back to reference Du W, Touchette D, Vaitkevicius V et al (2000) Cost analysis of pancreatic carcinoma treatment. Cancer 89:1917–1924PubMedCrossRef Du W, Touchette D, Vaitkevicius V et al (2000) Cost analysis of pancreatic carcinoma treatment. Cancer 89:1917–1924PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Jemal A, Clegg L, Ward E et al (2004) Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2001, with a special feature regarding survival. CA Cancer J Clin 101:3–27 Jemal A, Clegg L, Ward E et al (2004) Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2001, with a special feature regarding survival. CA Cancer J Clin 101:3–27
6.
go back to reference Burris H, Moore M, Andersen J et al (1997) Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 15:2403–2413PubMed Burris H, Moore M, Andersen J et al (1997) Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 15:2403–2413PubMed
7.
go back to reference Andersson B, Aho U, Pendse M et al (2007) Gemcitabine treatment in pancreatic cancer—prognostic factors and outcome. Ann Gastroenterol 20:130–137 Andersson B, Aho U, Pendse M et al (2007) Gemcitabine treatment in pancreatic cancer—prognostic factors and outcome. Ann Gastroenterol 20:130–137
8.
go back to reference Cress R, Yin D, Clarke L et al (2006) Survival among patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: a population-based study (United States). Cancer Causes Control 17:403–409PubMedCrossRef Cress R, Yin D, Clarke L et al (2006) Survival among patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: a population-based study (United States). Cancer Causes Control 17:403–409PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Alexakis N, Halloran C, Raraty M et al (2004) Current standards of surgery for pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 91:1410–1427PubMedCrossRef Alexakis N, Halloran C, Raraty M et al (2004) Current standards of surgery for pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 91:1410–1427PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Yeo C, Abrahmas R, Grochow L et al (1997) Pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic carcinoma: postoperative adjuvant chemoradiation improves survival. A prospective single-institution experience. Ann Surg 225:621–633PubMedCrossRef Yeo C, Abrahmas R, Grochow L et al (1997) Pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic carcinoma: postoperative adjuvant chemoradiation improves survival. A prospective single-institution experience. Ann Surg 225:621–633PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Wilson L, Lightwood J (1999) Pancreatic cancer: total costs and utilization of health services. J Surg Oncol 71:171–181PubMedCrossRef Wilson L, Lightwood J (1999) Pancreatic cancer: total costs and utilization of health services. J Surg Oncol 71:171–181PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Chang S, Long S, Kutikova L et al (2006) Burden of pancreatic cancer and disease progression: economic analysis in the US. Oncology 70:71–80PubMedCrossRef Chang S, Long S, Kutikova L et al (2006) Burden of pancreatic cancer and disease progression: economic analysis in the US. Oncology 70:71–80PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hjelmgren J, Ceberg J, Persson U et al (2003) The cost of treating pancreatic cancer. Acta Oncol 42:218–226PubMedCrossRef Hjelmgren J, Ceberg J, Persson U et al (2003) The cost of treating pancreatic cancer. Acta Oncol 42:218–226PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Müller-Nordhorn J, Bruggenjurgen B, Bohmig M et al (2005) Direct and indirect costs in a prospective cohort of patients with pancreatic cancer. Aliment Pharmacol 22:405–415CrossRef Müller-Nordhorn J, Bruggenjurgen B, Bohmig M et al (2005) Direct and indirect costs in a prospective cohort of patients with pancreatic cancer. Aliment Pharmacol 22:405–415CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hodgson T, Meiners M (1982) Cost-of-illness methodology: a guide to current practices and procedures. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc 60:429–462PubMedCrossRef Hodgson T, Meiners M (1982) Cost-of-illness methodology: a guide to current practices and procedures. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc 60:429–462PubMedCrossRef
16.
17.
go back to reference Wiseman V, Mooney G (1998) Burden of illness estimates for priority setting: a debate revisited. Health Policy 43:243–251PubMedCrossRef Wiseman V, Mooney G (1998) Burden of illness estimates for priority setting: a debate revisited. Health Policy 43:243–251PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Barlow WE (2009) Overview of methods to estimate the medical costs of cancer. Med Care 47(7 Suppl 1):S33–S36PubMedCrossRef Barlow WE (2009) Overview of methods to estimate the medical costs of cancer. Med Care 47(7 Suppl 1):S33–S36PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Fishman PA, Hornbrook MC (2009) Assigning resources to health care use for health services research. Options and consequences. Med Care 47(7 Suppl 1):S70–S75PubMedCrossRef Fishman PA, Hornbrook MC (2009) Assigning resources to health care use for health services research. Options and consequences. Med Care 47(7 Suppl 1):S70–S75PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lund University Hospital (2009) Internal debit price list Lund University Hospital (2009) Internal debit price list
21.
go back to reference Statistics Sweden (various years) Life tables. Swedish Government Printing Office, Stockholm Statistics Sweden (various years) Life tables. Swedish Government Printing Office, Stockholm
22.
go back to reference Statistics Sweden (2009) Labour force survey. Swedish Government Printing Office, Stockholm Statistics Sweden (2009) Labour force survey. Swedish Government Printing Office, Stockholm
23.
go back to reference Statistics Sweden (2009) Statistics on incomes and taxes. Swedish Government Printing Office, Stockholm Statistics Sweden (2009) Statistics on incomes and taxes. Swedish Government Printing Office, Stockholm
24.
go back to reference Statistics Sweden (2002) Household patterns of time use. Swedish Government Printing Office, Stockholm Statistics Sweden (2002) Household patterns of time use. Swedish Government Printing Office, Stockholm
Metadata
Title
Pancreatic Cancer, Healthcare Cost, and Loss of Productivity: A Register-based Approach
Authors
Bobby Tingstedt
Erik Andersson
Anton Flink
Kristian Bolin
Björn Lindgren
Roland Andersson
Publication date
01-10-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 10/2011
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1208-2

Other articles of this Issue 10/2011

World Journal of Surgery 10/2011 Go to the issue