Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 8/2010

01-08-2010

Prognostic Impact of Para-aortic Lymph Node Metastasis in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Authors: Yoshiaki Murakami, Kenichiro Uemura, Takeshi Sudo, Yasushi Hashimoto, Yoshio Yuasa, Taijiro Sueda

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 8/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The aim of the present study was to clarify the prognostic impact of para-aortic lymph node metastasis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Methods

Medical records of 103 consecutive patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, who underwent pancreatic resection with regional and para-aortic lymph node dissection were reviewed retrospectively. Clinicopathological factors and survival were compared between patients with and without para-aortic lymph node metastasis.

Results

Tumor size (p = 0.045), extrapancreatic nerve plexus invasion (p = 0.043), UICC pT factor (p = 0.026), and surgical margin status (p = 0.002) were associated significantly with para-aortic lymph node metastasis. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.001) and absence of extrapancreatic nerve plexus invasion (p = 0.041) were associated independently with longer survival, but para-aortic lymph node metastasis (p = 0.078) was not associated significantly with survival by multivariate analysis. The 2- and 5-year survival rates and median survival time of patients with and without para-aortic lymph node metastasis were 12, 0%, 12.4 months and 49, 23%, 14.5 months, respectively, and there was a significant difference in survival between the two groups by a log-rank test (p < 0.001). Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved the survival of patients with para-aortic lymph node metastasis (p = 0.025).

Conclusions

The prognosis of patients with para-aortic lymph node metastasis is poor in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. However, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy may improve survival.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Tan HP, Smith J, Garberoglio CA (1996) Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: an update. J Am Coll Surg 183:164–184PubMed Tan HP, Smith J, Garberoglio CA (1996) Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: an update. J Am Coll Surg 183:164–184PubMed
3.
go back to reference Sener SF, Fremgen A, Menck HR et al (1999) Pancreatic cancer: a report of treatment and survival trends for 100, 313 patients diagnosed from 1985–1995, using the National Cancer Database. J Am Coll Surg 189:1–7CrossRefPubMed Sener SF, Fremgen A, Menck HR et al (1999) Pancreatic cancer: a report of treatment and survival trends for 100, 313 patients diagnosed from 1985–1995, using the National Cancer Database. J Am Coll Surg 189:1–7CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Murakami Y, Uemura K, Sasaki T et al (2005) Long-term survival of pancreatic cancer patient diagnosed by positive telomerase activity of pancreatic juice. Surgery 138:962–963CrossRefPubMed Murakami Y, Uemura K, Sasaki T et al (2005) Long-term survival of pancreatic cancer patient diagnosed by positive telomerase activity of pancreatic juice. Surgery 138:962–963CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Murakami Y, Uemura K, Sudo T et al (2008) Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival after surgical resection for pancreatic carcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 12:534–541CrossRefPubMed Murakami Y, Uemura K, Sudo T et al (2008) Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival after surgical resection for pancreatic carcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 12:534–541CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA et al (2006) 1423 Pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg 10:1199–1211CrossRefPubMed Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA et al (2006) 1423 Pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg 10:1199–1211CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Moon HJ, An JY, Heo JS et al (2006) Predicting survival after surgical resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Pancreas 32:37–43CrossRefPubMed Moon HJ, An JY, Heo JS et al (2006) Predicting survival after surgical resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Pancreas 32:37–43CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Wagner M, Redaelli C, Lietz M et al (2004) Curative resection is the single most important factor determining outcome in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 91:586–594CrossRefPubMed Wagner M, Redaelli C, Lietz M et al (2004) Curative resection is the single most important factor determining outcome in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 91:586–594CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kuhlmann KF, de Castro SM, Wesseling JG et al (2004) Surgical treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma; actual survival and prognostic factors in 343 patients. Eur J Cancer 40:549–558CrossRefPubMed Kuhlmann KF, de Castro SM, Wesseling JG et al (2004) Surgical treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma; actual survival and prognostic factors in 343 patients. Eur J Cancer 40:549–558CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Matsuno S, Egawa S, Fukuyama S et al (2004) Pancreatic Cancer Registry in Japan: 20 years of experience. Pancreas 28:219–230CrossRefPubMed Matsuno S, Egawa S, Fukuyama S et al (2004) Pancreatic Cancer Registry in Japan: 20 years of experience. Pancreas 28:219–230CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Berger AC, Meszoely IM, Ross EA et al (2004) Undetectable preoperative levels of serum CA 19–9 correlate with improved survival for patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 11:644–649CrossRefPubMed Berger AC, Meszoely IM, Ross EA et al (2004) Undetectable preoperative levels of serum CA 19–9 correlate with improved survival for patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 11:644–649CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Richter A, Niedergethmann M, Sturm JW et al (2003) Long-term results of partial pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head: 25-year experience. World J Surg 27:324–329CrossRefPubMed Richter A, Niedergethmann M, Sturm JW et al (2003) Long-term results of partial pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head: 25-year experience. World J Surg 27:324–329CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Wenger FA, Peter F, Zieren J et al (2000) Prognosis factors in carcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Dig Surg 17:29–35CrossRefPubMed Wenger FA, Peter F, Zieren J et al (2000) Prognosis factors in carcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Dig Surg 17:29–35CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL et al (2000) Resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas-616 patients: results, outcomes, and prognostic indicators. J Gastrointest Surg 4:567–579CrossRefPubMed Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL et al (2000) Resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas-616 patients: results, outcomes, and prognostic indicators. J Gastrointest Surg 4:567–579CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Nagakawa T, Kobayashi H, Ueno K et al (1994) Clinical study of lymphatic flow to the paraaortic lymph nodes in carcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Cancer 73:1155–1162CrossRefPubMed Nagakawa T, Kobayashi H, Ueno K et al (1994) Clinical study of lymphatic flow to the paraaortic lymph nodes in carcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Cancer 73:1155–1162CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Kayahara M, Nagakawa T, Ohta T et al (1999) Analysis of paraaortic lymph node involvement in pancreatic carcinoma: a significant indication for surgery? Cancer 85:583–590CrossRefPubMed Kayahara M, Nagakawa T, Ohta T et al (1999) Analysis of paraaortic lymph node involvement in pancreatic carcinoma: a significant indication for surgery? Cancer 85:583–590CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Yoshida T, Matsumoto T, Sasaki A et al (2004) Outcome of paraaortic node-positive pancreatic head and bile duct adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg 187:736–740CrossRefPubMed Yoshida T, Matsumoto T, Sasaki A et al (2004) Outcome of paraaortic node-positive pancreatic head and bile duct adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg 187:736–740CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Sakai M, Nakao A, Kaneko T et al (2005) Para-aortic lymph node metastasis in carcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Surgery 137:606–611CrossRefPubMed Sakai M, Nakao A, Kaneko T et al (2005) Para-aortic lymph node metastasis in carcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Surgery 137:606–611CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Shimada K, Sakamoto Y, Sano T et al (2006) The role of paraaortic lymph node involvement on early recurrence and survival after macroscopic curative resection with extended lymphadenectomy for pancreatic carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 203:345–352CrossRefPubMed Shimada K, Sakamoto Y, Sano T et al (2006) The role of paraaortic lymph node involvement on early recurrence and survival after macroscopic curative resection with extended lymphadenectomy for pancreatic carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 203:345–352CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Doi R, Kami K, Ito D et al (2007) Prognostic implication of para-aortic lymph node metastasis in resectable pancreatic cancer. World J Surg 31:147–154CrossRefPubMed Doi R, Kami K, Ito D et al (2007) Prognostic implication of para-aortic lymph node metastasis in resectable pancreatic cancer. World J Surg 31:147–154CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Murakami Y, Uemura K, Ohge H et al (2006) Intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasms and mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas differentiated by ovarian-type stroma. Surgery 140:448–453CrossRefPubMed Murakami Y, Uemura K, Ohge H et al (2006) Intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasms and mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas differentiated by ovarian-type stroma. Surgery 140:448–453CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Murakami Y, Uemura K, Hayashidani Y et al (2007) Predictive factors of malignant or invasive intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. J Gastrointest Surg 11:338–344CrossRefPubMed Murakami Y, Uemura K, Hayashidani Y et al (2007) Predictive factors of malignant or invasive intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. J Gastrointest Surg 11:338–344CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference International Union Against Cancer (UICC) (2002) TNM classification of malignant tumors, vol 6. Wiley-Liss, New York International Union Against Cancer (UICC) (2002) TNM classification of malignant tumors, vol 6. Wiley-Liss, New York
24.
go back to reference Murakami Y, Uemura K, Sudo T et al (2008) Adjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1 chemotherapy after surgical resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg 195:757–762CrossRefPubMed Murakami Y, Uemura K, Sudo T et al (2008) Adjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1 chemotherapy after surgical resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg 195:757–762CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Oettle H, Post S, Neuhaus P et al (2007) Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine vs. observation in patients undergoing curative-intent resection of pancreatic cancer: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 297:267–277CrossRefPubMed Oettle H, Post S, Neuhaus P et al (2007) Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine vs. observation in patients undergoing curative-intent resection of pancreatic cancer: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 297:267–277CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Nakamura K, Yamaguchi T, Ishihara T et al (2006) Phase II trial of oral S-1 combined with gemcitabine in metastatic pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer 94:1575–1579PubMed Nakamura K, Yamaguchi T, Ishihara T et al (2006) Phase II trial of oral S-1 combined with gemcitabine in metastatic pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer 94:1575–1579PubMed
27.
go back to reference Murakami Y, Uemura K, Sudo T et al (2009) Impact of adjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1 chemotherapy after surgical resection for adenocarcinoma of the body or tail of the pancreas. J Gastrointest Surg 13:85–92CrossRefPubMed Murakami Y, Uemura K, Sudo T et al (2009) Impact of adjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1 chemotherapy after surgical resection for adenocarcinoma of the body or tail of the pancreas. J Gastrointest Surg 13:85–92CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Connor S, Bosonnet L, Ghaneh P et al (2004) Survival of patients with periampullary carcinoma is predicted by lymph node 8a but not by lymph node 16b1 status. Br J Surg 91:1592–1599CrossRefPubMed Connor S, Bosonnet L, Ghaneh P et al (2004) Survival of patients with periampullary carcinoma is predicted by lymph node 8a but not by lymph node 16b1 status. Br J Surg 91:1592–1599CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Riediger H, Keck T, Wellner U et al (2004) The lymph node ratio is the strongest prognostic factor after resection of pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 13:1337–1344CrossRef Riediger H, Keck T, Wellner U et al (2004) The lymph node ratio is the strongest prognostic factor after resection of pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 13:1337–1344CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Massucco P, Ribero D, Sgotto E et al (2009) Prognostic significance of lymph node metastases in pancreatic head cancer treated with extended lymphadenectomy: not just a matter of numbers. Ann Surg Oncol 16:3323–3332CrossRefPubMed Massucco P, Ribero D, Sgotto E et al (2009) Prognostic significance of lymph node metastases in pancreatic head cancer treated with extended lymphadenectomy: not just a matter of numbers. Ann Surg Oncol 16:3323–3332CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Prognostic Impact of Para-aortic Lymph Node Metastasis in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
Authors
Yoshiaki Murakami
Kenichiro Uemura
Takeshi Sudo
Yasushi Hashimoto
Yoshio Yuasa
Taijiro Sueda
Publication date
01-08-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 8/2010
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0577-2

Other articles of this Issue 8/2010

World Journal of Surgery 8/2010 Go to the issue