Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 5/2010

Open Access 01-05-2010

Was There Shortening of the Interval Between Diagnosis and Treatment of Colorectal Cancer in Southern Netherlands Between 2005 and 2008?

Authors: L. N. van Steenbergen, V. E. P. P. Lemmens, H. J. T. Rutten, H. Martijn, J. W. W. Coebergh

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 5/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The Dutch Cancer Society proposed that the interval between diagnosis and start of treatment should be less than 15 working days. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the interval from diagnosis to treatment for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) shortened between 2005 and 2008 in hospitals in southern Netherlands.

Methods

Patients with CRC diagnosed in six hospitals in southern Netherlands during January to December in 2005 (n = 445) and January to July in 2008 (n = 353) were included. The time between diagnosis and start of treatment was assessed, and the proportion of patients treated within the recommended time (<15 working days) was calculated.

Results

The time to treatment for colon cancer patients was 13 working days in 2005 and 17 working days in 2008. For rectal cancer patients, the median time to preoperative radiotherapy was 28 working days in 2005 and 30 working days in 2008, and the median time to surgical treatment for rectal cancer patients was 26 working days in 2005 and 18 working days in 2008. Time to treatment did not shorten between 2005 and 2008 for colon and rectal cancer patients, except for rectal cancer patients who underwent surgery as initial treatment in patients aged >70 years and those with stage I disease. Substantial variation was seen among hospitals.

Conclusions

Time to treatment for patients with CRC in southern Netherlands did not shorten between 2005 and 2008. The time to treatment should be reduced to meet the advice of the Dutch Cancer Society.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Martijn H, Voogd AC, van de Poll-Franse LV et al (2003) Improved survival of patients with rectal cancer since 1980: a population-based study. Eur J Cancer 39:2073–2079CrossRefPubMed Martijn H, Voogd AC, van de Poll-Franse LV et al (2003) Improved survival of patients with rectal cancer since 1980: a population-based study. Eur J Cancer 39:2073–2079CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Lemmens VEPP, van Steenbergen LN, Janssen-Heijnen MLG et al. (2010) Trends in colorectal cancer in the south of The Netherlands 1975–2007. Acta Oncol (in press) Lemmens VEPP, van Steenbergen LN, Janssen-Heijnen MLG et al. (2010) Trends in colorectal cancer in the south of The Netherlands 1975–2007. Acta Oncol (in press)
5.
go back to reference Signaleringscommissie Kanker (2005) Advies inzake wachttijdnormen in de kankerzorg. KWF Kankerbestrijding Signaleringscommissie Kanker (2005) Advies inzake wachttijdnormen in de kankerzorg. KWF Kankerbestrijding
6.
go back to reference Korsgaard M, Pedersen L, Laurberg S (2008) Delay of diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer: a population-based Danish study. Cancer Detect Prev 32:45–51CrossRefPubMed Korsgaard M, Pedersen L, Laurberg S (2008) Delay of diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer: a population-based Danish study. Cancer Detect Prev 32:45–51CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Department of Health (2000) Referral guidelines for suspected cancer. Department of Health, London, UK Department of Health (2000) Referral guidelines for suspected cancer. Department of Health, London, UK
9.
go back to reference Ramos M, Esteva M, Cabeza E et al (2008) Lack of association between diagnostic and therapeutic delay and stage of colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 44:510–521CrossRefPubMed Ramos M, Esteva M, Cabeza E et al (2008) Lack of association between diagnostic and therapeutic delay and stage of colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 44:510–521CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Risberg T, Sorbye SW, Norum J et al (1996) Diagnostic delay causes more psychological distress in female than in male cancer patients. Anticancer Res 16:995–999PubMed Risberg T, Sorbye SW, Norum J et al (1996) Diagnostic delay causes more psychological distress in female than in male cancer patients. Anticancer Res 16:995–999PubMed
11.
go back to reference Schag CA, Ganz PA, Polinsky ML et al (1993) Characteristics of women at risk for psychosocial distress in the year after breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 11:783–793PubMed Schag CA, Ganz PA, Polinsky ML et al (1993) Characteristics of women at risk for psychosocial distress in the year after breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 11:783–793PubMed
12.
go back to reference Stapley S, Peters TJ, Sharp D et al (2006) The mortality of colorectal cancer in relation to the initial symptom at presentation to primary care and to the duration of symptoms: a cohort study using medical records. Br J Cancer 95:1321–1325CrossRefPubMed Stapley S, Peters TJ, Sharp D et al (2006) The mortality of colorectal cancer in relation to the initial symptom at presentation to primary care and to the duration of symptoms: a cohort study using medical records. Br J Cancer 95:1321–1325CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Janssen-Heijnen MLG, Louwman WJ, van de Poll-Franse LV et al (2005) Results of 50 years cancer registry in the south of The Netherlands: 1955–2004. Eindhoven Cancer Registry, Eindhoven (in Dutch) Janssen-Heijnen MLG, Louwman WJ, van de Poll-Franse LV et al (2005) Results of 50 years cancer registry in the south of The Netherlands: 1955–2004. Eindhoven Cancer Registry, Eindhoven (in Dutch)
14.
go back to reference Janssen-Heijnen ML, Houterman S, Lemmens VE et al (2005) Prognostic impact of increasing age and co-morbidity in cancer patients: a population-based approach. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 55:231–240CrossRefPubMed Janssen-Heijnen ML, Houterman S, Lemmens VE et al (2005) Prognostic impact of increasing age and co-morbidity in cancer patients: a population-based approach. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 55:231–240CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Van Duijn C, Keij I (2002) Sociaal-economische status indicator op postcode niveau. Maandstatistiek van de Bevolking 50:32–35 Van Duijn C, Keij I (2002) Sociaal-economische status indicator op postcode niveau. Maandstatistiek van de Bevolking 50:32–35
16.
go back to reference Schouten LJ, Hoppener P, van den Brandt PA et al (1993) Completeness of cancer registration in Limburg, The Netherlands. Int J Epidemiol 22:369–376CrossRefPubMed Schouten LJ, Hoppener P, van den Brandt PA et al (1993) Completeness of cancer registration in Limburg, The Netherlands. Int J Epidemiol 22:369–376CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Fritz A, Percy C, Jack A et al (2000) International classification of diseases for oncology, 3rd edn. World Health Organisation, Geneva Fritz A, Percy C, Jack A et al (2000) International classification of diseases for oncology, 3rd edn. World Health Organisation, Geneva
18.
go back to reference Executive NHS (1997) The new NHS—modern. Dependable. Department of Health, London, UK Executive NHS (1997) The new NHS—modern. Dependable. Department of Health, London, UK
19.
go back to reference Flashman K, O’Leary DP, Senapati A et al (2004) The Department of Health’s “two week standard” for bowel cancer: is it working? Gut 53:387–391CrossRefPubMed Flashman K, O’Leary DP, Senapati A et al (2004) The Department of Health’s “two week standard” for bowel cancer: is it working? Gut 53:387–391CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference EL NIV (2008) Evaluatie Sneller Beter pijler 3: Resultaten van een verbeterprogramma voor ziekenhuizen. NIVEL, Utrecht EL NIV (2008) Evaluatie Sneller Beter pijler 3: Resultaten van een verbeterprogramma voor ziekenhuizen. NIVEL, Utrecht
Metadata
Title
Was There Shortening of the Interval Between Diagnosis and Treatment of Colorectal Cancer in Southern Netherlands Between 2005 and 2008?
Authors
L. N. van Steenbergen
V. E. P. P. Lemmens
H. J. T. Rutten
H. Martijn
J. W. W. Coebergh
Publication date
01-05-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 5/2010
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0480-x

Other articles of this Issue 5/2010

World Journal of Surgery 5/2010 Go to the issue