Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 1/2022

04-02-2022 | Breast Augmentation | Response to Letter to the Editor

Invited Response on: Soft Weight Hybrid (SWEH) Breast Augmentation Concept: The Benefits of the Association of Small Volume Silicone Implants and Fat Grafting

Author: Alexandre Mendonça Munhoz

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Special Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Excerpt

Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Munhoz AM, Marques AA, Maximiliano J (2021) Optimizing surgical outcomes with small volume silicone implants associated with autogenous fat grafting in primary and revision breast surgery: Soft Weight Hybrid (SWEH) Concept. Aesthet Plast Surg (Online First) Munhoz AM, Marques AA, Maximiliano J (2021) Optimizing surgical outcomes with small volume silicone implants associated with autogenous fat grafting in primary and revision breast surgery: Soft Weight Hybrid (SWEH) Concept. Aesthet Plast Surg (Online First)
2.
go back to reference Munhoz AM, Clemens MW, Nahabedian MY (2019) Breast implant surfaces and their impact on current practices: where we are now and where are we going? Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 7(10):2466CrossRef Munhoz AM, Clemens MW, Nahabedian MY (2019) Breast implant surfaces and their impact on current practices: where we are now and where are we going? Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 7(10):2466CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Maximiliano J, Munhoz AM, Pedron M, Pinto AC et al (2020) Hybrid breast augmentation: a reliable formula for preoperative assessment of fat graft volume based on implant volume and projection. Aesth Surg J 40(8):438–452CrossRef Maximiliano J, Munhoz AM, Pedron M, Pinto AC et al (2020) Hybrid breast augmentation: a reliable formula for preoperative assessment of fat graft volume based on implant volume and projection. Aesth Surg J 40(8):438–452CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Munhoz AM, Maximiliano J, Marques Neto AA (2020) Subfascial ergonomic axillary hybrid (SEAH) breast augmentation: A surgical approach combining the advantages of incision, pocket, silicone Gel, and fat grafting in primary and revision breast augmentation surgery. Aesth Surg J. (in press) Munhoz AM, Maximiliano J, Marques Neto AA (2020) Subfascial ergonomic axillary hybrid (SEAH) breast augmentation: A surgical approach combining the advantages of incision, pocket, silicone Gel, and fat grafting in primary and revision breast augmentation surgery. Aesth Surg J. (in press)
5.
go back to reference Munhoz AM, Maximiliano J, Marques Neto AA, Duarte DW, et al. (2021) Zones for fat grafting in hybrid breast augmentation revisited: Standardization for intraoperative planning of fat grafting based on breast cleavage units. Plast Recontr Surg. (in press) Munhoz AM, Maximiliano J, Marques Neto AA, Duarte DW, et al. (2021) Zones for fat grafting in hybrid breast augmentation revisited: Standardization for intraoperative planning of fat grafting based on breast cleavage units. Plast Recontr Surg. (in press)
6.
go back to reference Sampaio Goes JC, Munhoz AM, Gemperli R (2015) The subfascial approach to primary and secondary breast augmentation with autologous fat grafting and form-stable implants. Clin Plast Surg 42(4):551–564CrossRef Sampaio Goes JC, Munhoz AM, Gemperli R (2015) The subfascial approach to primary and secondary breast augmentation with autologous fat grafting and form-stable implants. Clin Plast Surg 42(4):551–564CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Munhoz AM, Santanelli di Pompeo F, De Mezerville R (2017) Nanotechnology, nanosurfaces and silicone gel breast implants: current aspects. Case Reports Plast Surg Hand Surg. 4(1):99–113CrossRef Munhoz AM, Santanelli di Pompeo F, De Mezerville R (2017) Nanotechnology, nanosurfaces and silicone gel breast implants: current aspects. Case Reports Plast Surg Hand Surg. 4(1):99–113CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Swanson E (2017) Underestimating implant volumes in cosmetic breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 5(9):e1483CrossRef Swanson E (2017) Underestimating implant volumes in cosmetic breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 5(9):e1483CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Munhoz AM, Marques Filho A, Ferrari O (2020) Single-stage augmentation mastopexy with composite reverse inferior muscle sling technique for autologous reinforcement of the inferior pole: technical refinements and outcomes. Aesthet Surg J 40(6):356–373 Munhoz AM, Marques Filho A, Ferrari O (2020) Single-stage augmentation mastopexy with composite reverse inferior muscle sling technique for autologous reinforcement of the inferior pole: technical refinements and outcomes. Aesthet Surg J 40(6):356–373
10.
go back to reference Munhoz AM, Maximiliano J, Marques Neto AA (2022) Reoperative augmentation mammoplasty: an algorithm to optimize soft-tissue support / pocket control and smooth implant stability with composite reverse inferior muscle sling (CRIMS) and its technical variations. Aesthet Plast Surg (in press) Munhoz AM, Maximiliano J, Marques Neto AA (2022) Reoperative augmentation mammoplasty: an algorithm to optimize soft-tissue support / pocket control and smooth implant stability with composite reverse inferior muscle sling (CRIMS) and its technical variations. Aesthet Plast Surg (in press)
11.
go back to reference Munhoz AM (2020) Reoperative transaxillary approach algorithm: extending the surgical alternatives for secondary breast augmentation in the era of scarless surgery. Aesth Surg J 40(11):1179–1192CrossRef Munhoz AM (2020) Reoperative transaxillary approach algorithm: extending the surgical alternatives for secondary breast augmentation in the era of scarless surgery. Aesth Surg J 40(11):1179–1192CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Munhoz AM, Neto AAM, Chala L, Mello G, Tucunduva T (2021) Clinical and MRI evaluation of silicone gel implants with RFID-M traceability system: a prospective controlled cohort study related to safety and image quality in MRI follow-up. Aesth Plast Surg. 45(6):2645–2655CrossRef Munhoz AM, Neto AAM, Chala L, Mello G, Tucunduva T (2021) Clinical and MRI evaluation of silicone gel implants with RFID-M traceability system: a prospective controlled cohort study related to safety and image quality in MRI follow-up. Aesth Plast Surg. 45(6):2645–2655CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Govrin-Yehudain O, Calderon N, Govrin-Yehudain J (2021) Five year safety and satisfaction with the lightweight breast implant. Aesthet Surg J 10:054 Govrin-Yehudain O, Calderon N, Govrin-Yehudain J (2021) Five year safety and satisfaction with the lightweight breast implant. Aesthet Surg J 10:054
14.
go back to reference Govrin-Yehudain J, Dvir H, Preise D, Govrin-Yehudain O, Govreen-Segal D (2015) Lightweight breast implants: a novel solution for breast augmentation and reconstruction mammaplasty. Aesthet Surg J 35(8):965–971CrossRef Govrin-Yehudain J, Dvir H, Preise D, Govrin-Yehudain O, Govreen-Segal D (2015) Lightweight breast implants: a novel solution for breast augmentation and reconstruction mammaplasty. Aesthet Surg J 35(8):965–971CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Doloff JC, Veish O, de Mezerville R, Sforza M et al (2021) The surface topography of silicone breast implants mediates the foreign body response in mice, rabbits and humans. Nat Biomed Eng. 5(10):1115–1130CrossRef Doloff JC, Veish O, de Mezerville R, Sforza M et al (2021) The surface topography of silicone breast implants mediates the foreign body response in mice, rabbits and humans. Nat Biomed Eng. 5(10):1115–1130CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sforza M, Hammond DC, Botti G, Hedén P et al (2019) Expert consensus on the use of a new bioengineered, cell-friendly, smooth surface breast implant. Aesthet Surg J. 39(Supplement_3):95–102CrossRef Sforza M, Hammond DC, Botti G, Hedén P et al (2019) Expert consensus on the use of a new bioengineered, cell-friendly, smooth surface breast implant. Aesthet Surg J. 39(Supplement_3):95–102CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Jones P, Mempin M, Hu H, Chowdhury D, Foley M, Cooter R, Adams WP Jr, Vickery K, Deva AK (2018) The functional influence of breast implant outer shell morphology on bacterial attachment and growth. Plast Reconstr Surg 142(4):837–849CrossRef Jones P, Mempin M, Hu H, Chowdhury D, Foley M, Cooter R, Adams WP Jr, Vickery K, Deva AK (2018) The functional influence of breast implant outer shell morphology on bacterial attachment and growth. Plast Reconstr Surg 142(4):837–849CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Munhoz AM (2019) The functional influence of breast implant outer shell morphology on bacterial attachment and growth. Plast Reconstr Surg 144(1):143e–144eCrossRef Munhoz AM (2019) The functional influence of breast implant outer shell morphology on bacterial attachment and growth. Plast Reconstr Surg 144(1):143e–144eCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Munhoz AM (2021) Relevance of breast silicone elastomer surface roughness and area to the inflammatory process and immune system activation: is it time to reexamine this issue? Aesthet Surg J 41(8):NP129–NP131CrossRef Munhoz AM (2021) Relevance of breast silicone elastomer surface roughness and area to the inflammatory process and immune system activation: is it time to reexamine this issue? Aesthet Surg J 41(8):NP129–NP131CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Invited Response on: Soft Weight Hybrid (SWEH) Breast Augmentation Concept: The Benefits of the Association of Small Volume Silicone Implants and Fat Grafting
Author
Alexandre Mendonça Munhoz
Publication date
04-02-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue Special Issue 1/2022
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02750-1

Other articles of this Special Issue 1/2022

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 1/2022 Go to the issue