Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 6/2018

01-12-2018 | Original Article

Quality of Life Gain After Septorhinoplasty: An Analysis of Health Utility and Cost Utility Values Associated with Septorhinoplasty

Authors: Dare Oladokun, Andre Baumgart, Ingo Baumann, Olcay Cem Bulut

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 6/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Septorhinoplasty is a common procedure performed in rhinology and facial plastic surgery. Despite this, the health benefits associated with the procedure remain controversial. In this study, a health utility assessment of patients undergoing septorhinoplasty was performed. Health gains associated with the procedure, and the cost at which they were acquired, were also determined.

Methods

Sixty-seven patients undergoing septorhinoplasty at a German tertiary-level hospital were included in the study. Study participants completed the Short Form 36 (SF-36) and satisfaction questionnaires before and 12 months after septorhinoplasty. The Short Form six-dimensional (SF-6D) instrument was used to acquire quality-adjusted life year (QALY) values from SF-36 responses, thus allowing estimation of pre- and post-operative health utilities. Health utility gains after septorhinoplasty were determined and combined with cost data to estimate cost per QALY gained.

Results

Patients undergoing septorhinoplasty reported mean pre-operative health utility values of 0.70 pre-operatively and 0.74 post-operatively resulting in health gains of 0.04 QALYs. Patients satisfied with their procedures had significant health utility gains, while dissatisfied patients did not experience any significant gains. The cost of septorhinoplasty to statutory health insurance was €3487.69. When compared to the baseline, the incremental utility ratio for septorhinoplasty was €94,797.30 per QALY gained.

Conclusions

This study successfully estimated the health utilities and gains associated with septorhinoplasty. The findings indicate that the procedure has associated health gains but at a high cost–utility ratio. These values provide a reference point for further much-needed economic evaluations.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Balaguer Garcia R, Mompo Romero L, Carrasco Llatas M, Cuesta Gonzalez MT, Dalmau Galofre J (2009) Septoplasty and rhinoplasty, a descriptive study. Acta Otorrinolaringol Espanola 60:383–389CrossRef Balaguer Garcia R, Mompo Romero L, Carrasco Llatas M, Cuesta Gonzalez MT, Dalmau Galofre J (2009) Septoplasty and rhinoplasty, a descriptive study. Acta Otorrinolaringol Espanola 60:383–389CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Baumann I (2010) Quality of life before and after septoplasty and rhinoplasty. Laryngorhinootologie 89(Suppl 1):S35–S45CrossRef Baumann I (2010) Quality of life before and after septoplasty and rhinoplasty. Laryngorhinootologie 89(Suppl 1):S35–S45CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bulut OC, Wallner F, Plinkert PK, Prochnow S, Kuhnt C, Baumann I (2015) Quality of life after septorhinoplasty measured with the Functional Rhinoplasty Outcome Inventory 17 (FROI-17). Rhinology 53:54–58CrossRef Bulut OC, Wallner F, Plinkert PK, Prochnow S, Kuhnt C, Baumann I (2015) Quality of life after septorhinoplasty measured with the Functional Rhinoplasty Outcome Inventory 17 (FROI-17). Rhinology 53:54–58CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Balikci HH, Gurdal MM (2014) Satisfaction outcomes in open functional septorhinoplasty: prospective analysis. J Craniofac Surg 25:377–379CrossRef Balikci HH, Gurdal MM (2014) Satisfaction outcomes in open functional septorhinoplasty: prospective analysis. J Craniofac Surg 25:377–379CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Biggs TC, Fraser LR, Ward MJ, Sunkaraneni VS, Harries PG, Salib RJ (2015) Patient reported outcome measures in septorhinoplasty surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 97:63–65CrossRef Biggs TC, Fraser LR, Ward MJ, Sunkaraneni VS, Harries PG, Salib RJ (2015) Patient reported outcome measures in septorhinoplasty surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 97:63–65CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Roblin DG, Eccles R (2002) What, if any, is the value of septal surgery? Clin Otolaryngol 27:77–80CrossRef Roblin DG, Eccles R (2002) What, if any, is the value of septal surgery? Clin Otolaryngol 27:77–80CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Andrews PJ, Choudhury N, Takhar A, Poirrier AL, Jacques T, Randhawa PS (2015) The need for an objective measure in septorhinoplasty surgery: are we any closer to finding an answer? Clin Otolaryngol 40:698–703CrossRef Andrews PJ, Choudhury N, Takhar A, Poirrier AL, Jacques T, Randhawa PS (2015) The need for an objective measure in septorhinoplasty surgery: are we any closer to finding an answer? Clin Otolaryngol 40:698–703CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Cingi C, Songu M, Bal C (2011) Outcomes research in rhinoplasty: body image and quality of life. Am J Rhinol Allergy 25:263–267CrossRef Cingi C, Songu M, Bal C (2011) Outcomes research in rhinoplasty: body image and quality of life. Am J Rhinol Allergy 25:263–267CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Black N (2013) Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare. BMJ 346:f167CrossRef Black N (2013) Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare. BMJ 346:f167CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bullinger M (1995) German translation and psychometric testing of the SF-36 health survey: preliminary results from the IQOLA project. International Quality of Life Assessment. Soc Sci Med 41:1359–1366CrossRef Bullinger M (1995) German translation and psychometric testing of the SF-36 health survey: preliminary results from the IQOLA project. International Quality of Life Assessment. Soc Sci Med 41:1359–1366CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M (2002) The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ 21(2):271–292CrossRef Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M (2002) The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ 21(2):271–292CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Rhee JS, Arganbright JM, McMullin BT, Hannley M (2008) Evidence supporting functional rhinoplasty or nasal valve repair: a 25-year systematic review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 139:10–20CrossRef Rhee JS, Arganbright JM, McMullin BT, Hannley M (2008) Evidence supporting functional rhinoplasty or nasal valve repair: a 25-year systematic review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 139:10–20CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Steele TO, Mace JC, Dedhia R, Rudmik L, Smith TL, Alt JA (2016) Health utility values for patients with recurrent acute rhinosinusitis undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery: a nested case control study. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 6(11):1182–1187CrossRef Steele TO, Mace JC, Dedhia R, Rudmik L, Smith TL, Alt JA (2016) Health utility values for patients with recurrent acute rhinosinusitis undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery: a nested case control study. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 6(11):1182–1187CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Soler ZM, Wittenberg E, Schlosser RJ, Mace JC, Smith TL (2011) Health state utility values in patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 121:2672–2678CrossRef Soler ZM, Wittenberg E, Schlosser RJ, Mace JC, Smith TL (2011) Health state utility values in patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 121:2672–2678CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Luk LJ, Steele TO, Mace JC, Soler ZM, Rudmik L, Smith TL (2015) Health utility outcomes in patients undergoing medical management for chronic rhinosinusitis: a prospective multiinstitutional study. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 5:1018–1027CrossRef Luk LJ, Steele TO, Mace JC, Soler ZM, Rudmik L, Smith TL (2015) Health utility outcomes in patients undergoing medical management for chronic rhinosinusitis: a prospective multiinstitutional study. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 5:1018–1027CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Barton GR, Bankart J, Davis AC, Summerfield QA (2004) Comparing utility scores before and after hearing-aid provision : results according to the EQ-5D, HUI3 and SF-6D. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 3:103–105CrossRef Barton GR, Bankart J, Davis AC, Summerfield QA (2004) Comparing utility scores before and after hearing-aid provision : results according to the EQ-5D, HUI3 and SF-6D. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 3:103–105CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Arnoldner C, Lin VY, Honeder C, Shipp D, Nedzelski J, Chen J (2014) Ten-year health-related quality of life in cochlear implant recipients: prospective SF-36 data with SF-6D conversion. Laryngoscope 124:278–282CrossRef Arnoldner C, Lin VY, Honeder C, Shipp D, Nedzelski J, Chen J (2014) Ten-year health-related quality of life in cochlear implant recipients: prospective SF-36 data with SF-6D conversion. Laryngoscope 124:278–282CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Feeny D, Wu L, Eng K (2004) Comparing short form 6D, standard gamble, and Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 utility scores: results from total hip arthroplasty patients. Qual Life Res 13:1659–1670CrossRef Feeny D, Wu L, Eng K (2004) Comparing short form 6D, standard gamble, and Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 utility scores: results from total hip arthroplasty patients. Qual Life Res 13:1659–1670CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Hatoum HT, Brazier JE, Akhras KS (2004) Comparison of the HUI3 with the SF-36 preference based SF-6D in a clinical trial setting. Value Health 7:602–609CrossRef Hatoum HT, Brazier JE, Akhras KS (2004) Comparison of the HUI3 with the SF-36 preference based SF-6D in a clinical trial setting. Value Health 7:602–609CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Grutters JP, Joore MA, van der Horst F, Verschuure H, Dreschler WA, Anteunis LJ (2007) Choosing between measures: comparison of EQ-5D, HUI2 and HUI3 in persons with hearing complaints. Qual Life Res 16:1439–1449CrossRef Grutters JP, Joore MA, van der Horst F, Verschuure H, Dreschler WA, Anteunis LJ (2007) Choosing between measures: comparison of EQ-5D, HUI2 and HUI3 in persons with hearing complaints. Qual Life Res 16:1439–1449CrossRef
24.
go back to reference McKenna SP (2011) Measuring patient-reported outcomes: moving beyond misplaced common sense to hard science. BMC Med 9:86CrossRef McKenna SP (2011) Measuring patient-reported outcomes: moving beyond misplaced common sense to hard science. BMC Med 9:86CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Picavet VA, Gabriels L, Grietens J et al (2013) Preoperative symptoms of body dysmorphic disorder determine postoperative satisfaction and quality of life in aesthetic rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 131(4):861–868CrossRef Picavet VA, Gabriels L, Grietens J et al (2013) Preoperative symptoms of body dysmorphic disorder determine postoperative satisfaction and quality of life in aesthetic rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 131(4):861–868CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Herruer JM, Prins JB, van Heerbeek N, Verhage-Damen GW, Ingels KJ (2015) Negative predictors for satisfaction in patients seeking facial cosmetic surgery: a systematic review. Plastics Reconstr Surg 135:1596–1605CrossRef Herruer JM, Prins JB, van Heerbeek N, Verhage-Damen GW, Ingels KJ (2015) Negative predictors for satisfaction in patients seeking facial cosmetic surgery: a systematic review. Plastics Reconstr Surg 135:1596–1605CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Quality of Life Gain After Septorhinoplasty: An Analysis of Health Utility and Cost Utility Values Associated with Septorhinoplasty
Authors
Dare Oladokun
Andre Baumgart
Ingo Baumann
Olcay Cem Bulut
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 6/2018
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-018-1226-7

Other articles of this Issue 6/2018

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 6/2018 Go to the issue