Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2016

01-10-2016 | Original Article

Analysis of Lower Breast Pole Length and Nipple–Areola Complex Position Following Superior Pedicle, Short Horizontal Scar Breast Reduction

Authors: Ozan Bitik, Hakan Uzun

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 5/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Postoperative changes following superior pedicle breast reduction are closely related to the pattern of skin resection. We have observed that the superior pedicle, short horizontal scar breast reduction technique provides a stable breast shape in the long term. We test the validity of our clinical observations through objective analysis of postoperative dimensional changes following superior pedicle, short horizontal scar breast reduction.

Methods

Of 42 patients who underwent superior pedicle, short horizontal scar breast reductions between January 2011 and June 2012, 38 (75 breasts) were available for long-term follow-up. The midclavicular point-to-superior areolar border distance (A), the inferior areolar border-to-inframammary fold (IMF) distance (B), and the areolar diameter (C) were measured and recorded at the time of (1) preoperative markings, (2) first postoperative visit, and (3) 2-year postoperative follow-up visit. The specifications of the preoperative markings were recorded to analyze their correlation with actual breast dimensions.

Results

The superior border of the nipple–areola complex (NAC) was located, on average, 1.2 cm higher at the first postoperative visit when compared with the markings (P < 0.001). The nipple–areola position did not change significantly in the long term (P = 0.224). The average postoperative increase in the IMF-to-inferior areolar border distance between the first postoperative visit and the long-term follow-up visit was 0.3 cm (P < 0.001). Although statistically significant, this extent of change (4.5 %) in the lower pole vertical length was clinically unidentifiable, and pseudoptosis did not occur after superior pedicle, short horizontal scar mammaplasty.

Conclusion

Long-term stability of the NAC position and lower breast pole length makes superior pedicle, short horizontal scar breast reduction a predictable and dependable option for primary breast reduction/mastopexy and for a matching procedure.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ahmad J, Lista F (2008) Vertical scar reduction mammaplasty: the fate of nipple-areola complex position and inferior pole length. Plast Reconstr Surg 121(4):1084–1091CrossRefPubMed Ahmad J, Lista F (2008) Vertical scar reduction mammaplasty: the fate of nipple-areola complex position and inferior pole length. Plast Reconstr Surg 121(4):1084–1091CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Alexandre Andrade Souza LF, de Azevedo Ferreira Á et al (2011) Comparative analysis of mammaplasty techniques based on the long-term effect on the nipple-areolar-complex to inframammary crease distance. Rev Bras Cir Plást 26(4):664–669CrossRef Alexandre Andrade Souza LF, de Azevedo Ferreira Á et al (2011) Comparative analysis of mammaplasty techniques based on the long-term effect on the nipple-areolar-complex to inframammary crease distance. Rev Bras Cir Plást 26(4):664–669CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Persichetti P, Simone P, Palazzolo D et al (2012) Reduction of the opposite breast in patients with a breast reconstructed with an implant: validity of the inverted “T”, superior pedicle technique, with an inferiorly-based dermal adipose flap. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 46(5):339–343CrossRefPubMed Persichetti P, Simone P, Palazzolo D et al (2012) Reduction of the opposite breast in patients with a breast reconstructed with an implant: validity of the inverted “T”, superior pedicle technique, with an inferiorly-based dermal adipose flap. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 46(5):339–343CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Zehm S, Puelzl P, Wechselberger G, Ulmer H, Piza-Katzer H (2012) Inferior pole length and long-term aesthetic outcome after superior and inferior pedicled reduction mammaplasty. Aesthet Plast Surg 36(5):1128–1133CrossRef Zehm S, Puelzl P, Wechselberger G, Ulmer H, Piza-Katzer H (2012) Inferior pole length and long-term aesthetic outcome after superior and inferior pedicled reduction mammaplasty. Aesthet Plast Surg 36(5):1128–1133CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Rohrich RJ, Thornton JF, Jakubietz RG, Jakubietz MG, Grunert JG (2004) The limited scar mastopexy: current concepts and approaches to correct breast ptosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 114(6):1622–1630CrossRefPubMed Rohrich RJ, Thornton JF, Jakubietz RG, Jakubietz MG, Grunert JG (2004) The limited scar mastopexy: current concepts and approaches to correct breast ptosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 114(6):1622–1630CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Marchac D, de Olarte G (1982) Reduction mammaplasty and correction of ptosis with a short inframammary scar. Plast Reconstr Surg 69(1):45–55CrossRefPubMed Marchac D, de Olarte G (1982) Reduction mammaplasty and correction of ptosis with a short inframammary scar. Plast Reconstr Surg 69(1):45–55CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Marchac D, Sagher U (1988) Mammaplasty with a short horizontal scar. Evaluation and results after 9 years. Clin Plast Surg 15(4):627–639PubMed Marchac D, Sagher U (1988) Mammaplasty with a short horizontal scar. Evaluation and results after 9 years. Clin Plast Surg 15(4):627–639PubMed
8.
go back to reference Ramirez OM (2002) Reduction mammaplasty with the “owl” incision and no undermining. Plast Reconstr Surg 109(2):512–522 discussion 23-4 CrossRefPubMed Ramirez OM (2002) Reduction mammaplasty with the “owl” incision and no undermining. Plast Reconstr Surg 109(2):512–522 discussion 23-4 CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Gulyas G (2004) Marking the position of the nipple-areola complex for mastopexy and breast reduction surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 113(7):2085–2090CrossRefPubMed Gulyas G (2004) Marking the position of the nipple-areola complex for mastopexy and breast reduction surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 113(7):2085–2090CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Kuran I, Tumerdem B (2007) Vertical reduction mammaplasty: preventing skin redundancy at the vertical scar in women with large breasts or poor skin elasticity. Aesthet Surg J 27(3):336–341CrossRefPubMed Kuran I, Tumerdem B (2007) Vertical reduction mammaplasty: preventing skin redundancy at the vertical scar in women with large breasts or poor skin elasticity. Aesthet Surg J 27(3):336–341CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Analysis of Lower Breast Pole Length and Nipple–Areola Complex Position Following Superior Pedicle, Short Horizontal Scar Breast Reduction
Authors
Ozan Bitik
Hakan Uzun
Publication date
01-10-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 5/2016
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-016-0663-4

Other articles of this Issue 5/2016

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2016 Go to the issue