Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 3/2012

Open Access 01-06-2012 | Original Article

Improving the Longevity and Results of Mastopexy and Breast Reduction Procedures: Reconstructing an Internal Breast Support System with Biocompatible Mesh to Replace the Supporting Function of the Ligamentous Suspension

Authors: Petrus V. van Deventer, Frank R. Graewe, Elisabeth Würinger

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 3/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The reasons for recurrent ptosis in mastopexy and breast reduction procedures are twofold. First, available surgical techniques do not reconstruct the normal breast anatomy responsible for maintaining breast shape. Second, in many instances the techniques rely on atrophied tissue to provide long-term support. The discovery in 1997 of the ligamentous suspension (the supporting system of the breast) gave rise to the concept that reconstruction of this anatomical structure was needed to ensure a sustained postoperative result. Applying the latest knowledge regarding the structural and vascular anatomy of the breast in the surgical technique and utilizing material other than atrophied breast tissue enabled us to prevent the recurrence of breast ptosis.

Methods

A surgical technique was developed to replace the supportive function of a failed ligamentous suspension in 112 patients with ptotic breasts. This was done by reconstructing an internal breast-supporting system (IBSS) with biocompatible mesh.

Results

Satisfactory breast shape, nipple projection, and upper breast fullness was obtained with this technique in mastopexy patients with moderate-sized ptotic breasts. In patients with larger breasts good results were obtained with a simultaneous breast reduction. The longest follow-up is 6 years 3 months.

Conclusions

With this technique recurrent breast ptosis can be prevented in mastopexy and breast reduction procedures. The results are such that it eliminates the need for silicone prostheses to obtain satisfactory upper-breast fullness. The surgical technique is especially indicated in patients with skin of poor quality or patients with high expectations.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bustos RA (1992) Periareolar mammaplasty with silicone supporting lamina. Plast Reconstr Surg 89:646–657PubMedCrossRef Bustos RA (1992) Periareolar mammaplasty with silicone supporting lamina. Plast Reconstr Surg 89:646–657PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Johnson GW (1981) Central core reduction mammoplasties and Marlex suspension of breast tissue. Aesthet Plast Surg 5:77–84CrossRef Johnson GW (1981) Central core reduction mammoplasties and Marlex suspension of breast tissue. Aesthet Plast Surg 5:77–84CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Goés JC (1998) Periareolar mastopexy and reduction with mesh support–double skin technique. In: Surgery of the Breast: Principles and Art. Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia, pp 697–707 Goés JC (1998) Periareolar mastopexy and reduction with mesh support–double skin technique. In: Surgery of the Breast: Principles and Art. Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia, pp 697–707
4.
go back to reference Goés JC (1996) Periareolar mammaplasty. Double skin technique with application of polyglactin or mixed mesh. Plast Reconstr Surg 97:959–968PubMedCrossRef Goés JC (1996) Periareolar mammaplasty. Double skin technique with application of polyglactin or mixed mesh. Plast Reconstr Surg 97:959–968PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Goés JC (2002) Periareolar mammaplasty. Double-skin technique with application of mesh support. Clin Plast Surg 29:349–364CrossRef Goés JC (2002) Periareolar mammaplasty. Double-skin technique with application of mesh support. Clin Plast Surg 29:349–364CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Goés JC (2003) Periareolar mammaplasty. Double skin technique with mesh support. Aesthet Surg J 23:129–135PubMedCrossRef Goés JC (2003) Periareolar mammaplasty. Double skin technique with mesh support. Aesthet Surg J 23:129–135PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Goés JC, Godoy PM, Goes RS, Henriques LJ, Landecker A, Lyra EC (2004) The application of mesh support in periareolar breast surgery: clinical and mammographic evaluation. Aesthet Plast Surg 28:268–274CrossRef Goés JC, Godoy PM, Goes RS, Henriques LJ, Landecker A, Lyra EC (2004) The application of mesh support in periareolar breast surgery: clinical and mammographic evaluation. Aesthet Plast Surg 28:268–274CrossRef
8.
go back to reference De Bruijn HP, Johannes S (2008) Mastopexy with 3D preshaped mesh for long-term results: development of the internal bra system. Aesthet Plast Surg 32:757–765CrossRef De Bruijn HP, Johannes S (2008) Mastopexy with 3D preshaped mesh for long-term results: development of the internal bra system. Aesthet Plast Surg 32:757–765CrossRef
9.
go back to reference De Bruijn HP, Ten Thije RHW, Johannes S (2009) Mastopexy with mesh reinforcement: the mechanical characteristics of polyester mesh in the female breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:364–371PubMedCrossRef De Bruijn HP, Ten Thije RHW, Johannes S (2009) Mastopexy with mesh reinforcement: the mechanical characteristics of polyester mesh in the female breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:364–371PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Würinger E, Mader N, Posch E, Holle J (1998) Nerve and vessel supplying ligamentous suspension of the mammary gland. Plast Reconstr Surg 101:1486–1493PubMedCrossRef Würinger E, Mader N, Posch E, Holle J (1998) Nerve and vessel supplying ligamentous suspension of the mammary gland. Plast Reconstr Surg 101:1486–1493PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Würinger E, Tschabitscher M (2002) New aspects of the topographical anatomy of the mammary gland regarding its neurovascular supply along a regular ligamentous suspension. Eur J Morphol 40:181–189CrossRef Würinger E, Tschabitscher M (2002) New aspects of the topographical anatomy of the mammary gland regarding its neurovascular supply along a regular ligamentous suspension. Eur J Morphol 40:181–189CrossRef
12.
go back to reference van Deventer PV (2004) The blood supply to the nipple-areola complex of the human mammary gland. Aesthet Plast Surg 28:393–398CrossRef van Deventer PV (2004) The blood supply to the nipple-areola complex of the human mammary gland. Aesthet Plast Surg 28:393–398CrossRef
13.
go back to reference van Deventer PV, Page BJ, Graewe FR (2008) The safety of pedicles in breast reduction and mastopexy procedures. Aesthet Plast Surg 32:307–312CrossRef van Deventer PV, Page BJ, Graewe FR (2008) The safety of pedicles in breast reduction and mastopexy procedures. Aesthet Plast Surg 32:307–312CrossRef
14.
go back to reference van Deventer PV, Graewe FR (2010) Enhanching pedicle safety in mastopexy and breast reduction procedures: the posteroinferomedial pedicle, retaining the medial vertical ligament of Würinger. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:786–793PubMedCrossRef van Deventer PV, Graewe FR (2010) Enhanching pedicle safety in mastopexy and breast reduction procedures: the posteroinferomedial pedicle, retaining the medial vertical ligament of Würinger. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:786–793PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Khan UD (2010) Breast augmentation, antibiotic prophylaxis, and infection: comparative analysis of 1, 628 primary augmentation mammoplasties assessing the role and efficacy of antibiotics prophylaxis duration. Aesthet Plast Surg 34:42–47CrossRef Khan UD (2010) Breast augmentation, antibiotic prophylaxis, and infection: comparative analysis of 1, 628 primary augmentation mammoplasties assessing the role and efficacy of antibiotics prophylaxis duration. Aesthet Plast Surg 34:42–47CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Improving the Longevity and Results of Mastopexy and Breast Reduction Procedures: Reconstructing an Internal Breast Support System with Biocompatible Mesh to Replace the Supporting Function of the Ligamentous Suspension
Authors
Petrus V. van Deventer
Frank R. Graewe
Elisabeth Würinger
Publication date
01-06-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-011-9845-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 3/2012 Go to the issue