Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 4/2009

01-07-2009 | Original Article

Digital Imaging in Rhinoplasty

Authors: Xerxes Punthakee, Richard Rival, Philip Solomon

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 4/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Imaging in facial plastic surgery is becoming common. With the advances of digital imaging software, modifications of preoperative images for rhinoplasty patients can help to predict outcomes. The primary objective of this study was to determine whether preoperative digital image modification in rhinoplasty patients is useful in predicting postoperative outcomes.

Methods

Patients undergoing rhinoplasty were prospectively collected and underwent preoperative digital imaging modifications using computer software. Postoperative images were compared to the preoperative modified images. Rankings for similarity were performed by patients and surgeons. Wilcoxon ranked-pairs test was used to compare the groups with a predetermined P value of 0.05, and levels of agreement were assessed using weighted kappa scores.

Results

One hundred twelve patients were collected and postoperative images were taken 11 months after surgery (range = 6–30 months). Frontal images were rated as poor, average, very close, or identical by patients 6.2, 52.7, 33.0, and 8.0%, and by surgeons 2.7, 61.6, 34.8, and 0.9%, respectively (Wilcoxon test, P = 0.23). Lateral images were rated as poor, average, very close, or identical by patients 1.8, 18.8, 48.2, and 31.3%, and by surgeons 0.9, 24.1, 59.8, and 15.2%, respectively (Wilcoxon test, P = 0.0024). Weighted kappa scores for agreement were 0.42 for frontal views of patients and surgeons and 0.65 for lateral views.

Conclusion

Ratings by patients and surgeons comparing preoperative manipulated images with postoperative outcomes are predictive in approximately 75% of the patients, and lateral images are more useful for this goal. Level of agreement between patient and surgeon scoring is good for lateral images and moderate for frontal.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Galdino GM, DaSilva D, Gunter JP (2002) Digital photography for rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 109(4):1421–1434PubMedCrossRef Galdino GM, DaSilva D, Gunter JP (2002) Digital photography for rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 109(4):1421–1434PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bronz G (1999) The role of the computer imaging system in modern aesthetic plastic surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg 23(3):159–163PubMedCrossRef Bronz G (1999) The role of the computer imaging system in modern aesthetic plastic surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg 23(3):159–163PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Vuyk HD, Stroomer J, Vinayak B (1998) The role of computer imaging in facial plastic surgery consultation: a clinical study. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 23(3):235–243PubMedCrossRef Vuyk HD, Stroomer J, Vinayak B (1998) The role of computer imaging in facial plastic surgery consultation: a clinical study. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 23(3):235–243PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Sharp HR, Tingay RS, Coman S, Mills V, Roberts DN (2002) Computer imaging and patient satisfaction in rhinoplasty surgery. J Laryngol Otol 116(12):1009–1013PubMedCrossRef Sharp HR, Tingay RS, Coman S, Mills V, Roberts DN (2002) Computer imaging and patient satisfaction in rhinoplasty surgery. J Laryngol Otol 116(12):1009–1013PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Chavez AE, Dagum P, Koch RJ, Newman JP (1997) Legal issues of computer imaging in plastic surgery: a primer. Plast Reconstr Surg 100(6):1601–1608PubMedCrossRef Chavez AE, Dagum P, Koch RJ, Newman JP (1997) Legal issues of computer imaging in plastic surgery: a primer. Plast Reconstr Surg 100(6):1601–1608PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Parodi PC, Moreschi C, Rampino E, Codarini M, De Biasio F, Riberti C (2003) Corrective rhinoplasty: medical and legal aspects. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 23(5):356–361PubMed Parodi PC, Moreschi C, Rampino E, Codarini M, De Biasio F, Riberti C (2003) Corrective rhinoplasty: medical and legal aspects. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 23(5):356–361PubMed
7.
go back to reference Muhlbauer W, Holm C (2005) Computer imaging and surgical reality in aesthetic rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 115(7):2098–2104PubMedCrossRef Muhlbauer W, Holm C (2005) Computer imaging and surgical reality in aesthetic rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 115(7):2098–2104PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ewart CJ, Leonard CJ, Harper JG, Yu J (2006) A simple and inexpensive method of preoperative computer imaging for rhinoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 56(1):46–49PubMedCrossRef Ewart CJ, Leonard CJ, Harper JG, Yu J (2006) A simple and inexpensive method of preoperative computer imaging for rhinoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 56(1):46–49PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Digital Imaging in Rhinoplasty
Authors
Xerxes Punthakee
Richard Rival
Philip Solomon
Publication date
01-07-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 4/2009
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-009-9350-z

Other articles of this Issue 4/2009

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 4/2009 Go to the issue

Announcements

Announcements