Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 11/2021

01-11-2021 | Invited Papers

Sensor and machine learning–based assessment of gap balancing in cadaveric unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgical training

Authors: Xiaowei Sun, Philippe Hernigou, Qidong Zhang, Nianfei Zhang, Weiguo Wang, Yang Chen, Wanshou Guo

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 11/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to assess the difference between flexion and extension contact forces—gap balance—after Oxford mobile-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) performed by surgeons with varying levels of experience.

Methods

Surgeons in a training programme performed UKAs on fresh frozen cadaveric specimens (n = 60). Contact force in the medial compartment of the knee was measured after UKA during extension and flexion using a force sensor, and values were clustered using an unsupervised machine learning (k-means algorithm). Univariate analysis was performed with general linear regression models to identify the explanatory variable.

Results

The level of experience was predictive of gap balance; surgeons were clustered into beginner, mid-level and experienced groups. Experienced surgeons’ mean difference between flexion and extension contact force was 83 N, which was significantly lower (p < 0.05) than that achieved by mid-level (215 N) or beginner (346 N) surgeons.

Conclusion

We found that the lowest mean difference between flexion and extension contact force after UKA was 83 N, which was achieved by surgeons with the most experience; this value can be considered the optimal value. Beginner and mid-level surgeons achieved values that were significantly lower. This study also demonstrates that machine learning can be used in combination with sensor technology for improving gap balancing judgement in UKA.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Arias-de la Torre J, Valderas JM, Evans JP, Martín V, Molina AJ, Muñoz L, Pons-Cabrafiga M, Espallargues M (2019) Differences in risk of revision and mortality between total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. The influence of hospital volume. J Arthroplasty 34:865–871CrossRef Arias-de la Torre J, Valderas JM, Evans JP, Martín V, Molina AJ, Muñoz L, Pons-Cabrafiga M, Espallargues M (2019) Differences in risk of revision and mortality between total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. The influence of hospital volume. J Arthroplasty 34:865–871CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Henkel C, Mikkelsen M, Pedersen AB, Rasmussen LE, Gromov K, Price A, Troelsen A (2019) Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: increasingly uniform patient demographics despite differences in surgical volume and usage-a descriptive study of 8,501 cases from the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Registry. Acta Orthop 90:354–359CrossRef Henkel C, Mikkelsen M, Pedersen AB, Rasmussen LE, Gromov K, Price A, Troelsen A (2019) Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: increasingly uniform patient demographics despite differences in surgical volume and usage-a descriptive study of 8,501 cases from the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Registry. Acta Orthop 90:354–359CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Mohammad HR, Matharu GS, Judge A, Murray DW (2020) The effect of surgeon caseload on the relative revision rate of cemented and cementless unicompartmental knee replacements: an analysis from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man. J Bone Joint Surg Am 102:644–653CrossRef Mohammad HR, Matharu GS, Judge A, Murray DW (2020) The effect of surgeon caseload on the relative revision rate of cemented and cementless unicompartmental knee replacements: an analysis from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man. J Bone Joint Surg Am 102:644–653CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hamilton TW, Rizkalla JM, Kontochristos L, Marks BE, Mellon SJ, Dodd CAF, Pandit HG, Murray DW (2017) The interaction of caseload and usage in determining outcomes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty 32:3228–3237CrossRef Hamilton TW, Rizkalla JM, Kontochristos L, Marks BE, Mellon SJ, Dodd CAF, Pandit HG, Murray DW (2017) The interaction of caseload and usage in determining outcomes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty 32:3228–3237CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Liddle AD, Pandit H, Judge A, Murray DW (2016) Effect of surgical caseload on revision rate following total and unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 98:1–8CrossRef Liddle AD, Pandit H, Judge A, Murray DW (2016) Effect of surgical caseload on revision rate following total and unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 98:1–8CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Schraknepper J, Dimitriou D, Helmy N, Hasler J, Radzanowski S, Flury A (2020) Influence of patient selection, component positioning and surgeon’s caseload on the outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 140:807–813CrossRef Schraknepper J, Dimitriou D, Helmy N, Hasler J, Radzanowski S, Flury A (2020) Influence of patient selection, component positioning and surgeon’s caseload on the outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 140:807–813CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hamilton WG, Ammeen D, Engh CA Jr, Engh GA (2010) Learning curve with minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 25:735–740CrossRef Hamilton WG, Ammeen D, Engh CA Jr, Engh GA (2010) Learning curve with minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 25:735–740CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bae JH, Kim JG, Lee SY, Lim HC, In Y, Lee S, Ji JH, Lee JH, Kim JM, Kim KI (2020) Epidemiology of bearing dislocations after mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: multicenter analysis of 67 bearing dislocations. J Arthroplasty 35:265–271CrossRef Bae JH, Kim JG, Lee SY, Lim HC, In Y, Lee S, Ji JH, Lee JH, Kim JM, Kim KI (2020) Epidemiology of bearing dislocations after mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: multicenter analysis of 67 bearing dislocations. J Arthroplasty 35:265–271CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Sun X, Liu P, Lu F, Wang W, Guo W, Zhang Q (2021) Bearing dislocation of mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in East Asian countries: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 16:28CrossRef Sun X, Liu P, Lu F, Wang W, Guo W, Zhang Q (2021) Bearing dislocation of mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in East Asian countries: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 16:28CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ro KH, Heo JW, Lee DH (2018) Bearing dislocation and progression of osteoarthritis after mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty vary between Asian and Western patients: a meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 476:946–960CrossRef Ro KH, Heo JW, Lee DH (2018) Bearing dislocation and progression of osteoarthritis after mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty vary between Asian and Western patients: a meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 476:946–960CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hernigou P, Deschamps G (2004) Alignment influences wear in the knee after medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. Clinical orthopaedics and related research:161–165. Hernigou P, Deschamps G (2004) Alignment influences wear in the knee after medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. Clinical orthopaedics and related research:161–165.
14.
go back to reference Elmallah RK, Mistry JB, Cherian JJ, Chughtai M, Bhave A, Roche MW, Mont MA (2016) Can we really “feel” a balanced total knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 31:102–105CrossRef Elmallah RK, Mistry JB, Cherian JJ, Chughtai M, Bhave A, Roche MW, Mont MA (2016) Can we really “feel” a balanced total knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 31:102–105CrossRef
16.
go back to reference van der Linde JA, Beath KJ, Leong AKL (2018) The reliability of sensor-assisted soft tissue measurements in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 33:2502-2505.e2512CrossRef van der Linde JA, Beath KJ, Leong AKL (2018) The reliability of sensor-assisted soft tissue measurements in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 33:2502-2505.e2512CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ettinger M, Zoch JM, Becher C, Hurschler C, Stukenborg-Colsman C, Claassen L, Ostermeier S, Calliess T (2015) In vitro kinematics of fixed versus mobile bearing in unicondylar knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135:871–877CrossRef Ettinger M, Zoch JM, Becher C, Hurschler C, Stukenborg-Colsman C, Claassen L, Ostermeier S, Calliess T (2015) In vitro kinematics of fixed versus mobile bearing in unicondylar knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135:871–877CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Jaeger S, Helling A, Bitsch RG, Seeger JB, Schuld C, Clarius M (2012) The influence of the femoral force application point on tibial cementing pressure in cemented UKA: an experimental study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132:1589–1594CrossRef Jaeger S, Helling A, Bitsch RG, Seeger JB, Schuld C, Clarius M (2012) The influence of the femoral force application point on tibial cementing pressure in cemented UKA: an experimental study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132:1589–1594CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Brimacombe JM, Wilson DR, Hodgson AJ, Ho KC, Anglin C (2009) Effect of calibration method on Tekscan sensor accuracy. J Biomech Eng 131:034503CrossRef Brimacombe JM, Wilson DR, Hodgson AJ, Ho KC, Anglin C (2009) Effect of calibration method on Tekscan sensor accuracy. J Biomech Eng 131:034503CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Wilson DC, Niosi CA, Zhu QA, Oxland TR, Wilson DR (2006) Accuracy and repeatability of a new method for measuring facet loads in the lumbar spine. J Biomech 39:348–353CrossRef Wilson DC, Niosi CA, Zhu QA, Oxland TR, Wilson DR (2006) Accuracy and repeatability of a new method for measuring facet loads in the lumbar spine. J Biomech 39:348–353CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Gustke KA, Golladay GJ, Roche MW, Elson LC, Anderson CR (2014) Primary TKA patients with quantifiably balanced soft-tissue achieve significant clinical gains sooner than unbalanced patients. Adv Orthop 2014:628695CrossRef Gustke KA, Golladay GJ, Roche MW, Elson LC, Anderson CR (2014) Primary TKA patients with quantifiably balanced soft-tissue achieve significant clinical gains sooner than unbalanced patients. Adv Orthop 2014:628695CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Gustke KA, Golladay GJ, Roche MW, Elson LC, Anderson CR (2014) A new method for defining balance: promising short-term clinical outcomes of sensor-guided TKA. J Arthroplasty 29:955–960CrossRef Gustke KA, Golladay GJ, Roche MW, Elson LC, Anderson CR (2014) A new method for defining balance: promising short-term clinical outcomes of sensor-guided TKA. J Arthroplasty 29:955–960CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Nodzo SR, Franceschini V, Gonzalez Della Valle A (2017) Intraoperative load-sensing variability during cemented, posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 32:66–70CrossRef Nodzo SR, Franceschini V, Gonzalez Della Valle A (2017) Intraoperative load-sensing variability during cemented, posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 32:66–70CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Meneghini RM, Ziemba-Davis MM, Lovro LR, Ireland PH, Damer BM (2016) Can intraoperative sensors determine the “target” ligament balance? Early outcomes in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 31:2181–2187CrossRef Meneghini RM, Ziemba-Davis MM, Lovro LR, Ireland PH, Damer BM (2016) Can intraoperative sensors determine the “target” ligament balance? Early outcomes in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 31:2181–2187CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Sensor and machine learning–based assessment of gap balancing in cadaveric unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgical training
Authors
Xiaowei Sun
Philippe Hernigou
Qidong Zhang
Nianfei Zhang
Weiguo Wang
Yang Chen
Wanshou Guo
Publication date
01-11-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 11/2021
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-05176-1

Other articles of this Issue 11/2021

International Orthopaedics 11/2021 Go to the issue