Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 11/2012

01-11-2012 | Knee Arthroplasty

The influence of the femoral force application point on tibial cementing pressure in cemented UKA: an experimental study

Authors: Sebastian Jaeger, Astrid Helling, Rudi G. Bitsch, Joern B. Seeger, Christian Schuld, Michael Clarius

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 11/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Aseptic loosening is the major cause for implant failure in cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Central positioning of the femoral pressure during the tibial cementation process is recommended to achieve equal pressure and a good cementation result. The aim of this study was to verify the central position of the femoral force application point (FFAP) at 45° flexion of the knee and to investigate the influence of ligament tension and cement penetration pressure (CPP) for UKA.

Materials and methods

Cemented Oxford UKAs were performed in 24 human legs. CPP and ligament tension forces (LTF) were measured. The FFAP was measured in a standardised manner in relation to the tibial implant length on lateral digital X-rays.

Results

The FFAP at 45° of knee flexion is located at 53.5 % and is not significantly different from the FFAP at 0° (p = 0.768). The CPP shows mean values at the anterior portion of 13.97 kPa (SD 16.11), at the implant keel of 24.34 kPa (SD 25.21) and at the posterior portion of 36.58 kPa (SD 26.51). The LTF shows a mean value of 194.35 N (SD 83.77).

Conclusion

The central position of the FFAP for the investigated cemented UKA with single radius femoral component at 45° flexion of the knee could be confirmed. A flexion angle of <45° does not influence the position of the FFAP significantly. More than 45° of flexion should be avoided because the FFAP shifts backwards significantly and may cause increased pressures posteriorly and therefore tilting of the component occurs during the cementation process.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ (1998) The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80(6):983–989PubMedCrossRef Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ (1998) The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80(6):983–989PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Berger RA, Meneghini RM, Jacobs JJ, Sheinkop MB, Valle CJD, Rosenberg AG, Galante JO (2005) Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(5):999–1006PubMedCrossRef Berger RA, Meneghini RM, Jacobs JJ, Sheinkop MB, Valle CJD, Rosenberg AG, Galante JO (2005) Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(5):999–1006PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Price AJ, Svard U (2011) A second decade lifetable survival analysis of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(1):174–179PubMedCrossRef Price AJ, Svard U (2011) A second decade lifetable survival analysis of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(1):174–179PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Australian Orthopaedic Association Annual Report (2011) National Joint Replacement Registry Australian Orthopaedic Association Annual Report (2011) National Joint Replacement Registry
5.
go back to reference Lee C (2005) The well-cemented total hip arthroplasty: theory and practice. Springer, Berlin Lee C (2005) The well-cemented total hip arthroplasty: theory and practice. Springer, Berlin
6.
go back to reference Svard UC, Price AJ (2001) Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83(2):191–194PubMedCrossRef Svard UC, Price AJ (2001) Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83(2):191–194PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Emerson JRH, Higgins LL (2008) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the oxford prosthesis in patients with medial compartment arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(1):118–122PubMedCrossRef Emerson JRH, Higgins LL (2008) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the oxford prosthesis in patients with medial compartment arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(1):118–122PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Price AJ, Dodd CAF, Svard UGC, Murray DW (2005) Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients younger and older than 60 years of age. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87(11):1488–1492PubMedCrossRef Price AJ, Dodd CAF, Svard UGC, Murray DW (2005) Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients younger and older than 60 years of age. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87(11):1488–1492PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Price AJ, Short A, Kellett C, Beard D, Gill H, Pandit H, Dodd CAF, Murray DW (2005) Ten-year in vivo wear measurement of a fully congruent mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87(11):1493–1497PubMedCrossRef Price AJ, Short A, Kellett C, Beard D, Gill H, Pandit H, Dodd CAF, Murray DW (2005) Ten-year in vivo wear measurement of a fully congruent mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87(11):1493–1497PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Price AJ, Waite JC, Svard U (2005) Long-term clinical results of the medial Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 435:171–180PubMedCrossRef Price AJ, Waite JC, Svard U (2005) Long-term clinical results of the medial Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 435:171–180PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Aleto TJ, Berend ME, Ritter MA, Faris PM, Meneghini RM (2008) Early failure of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty leading to revision. J Arthroplasty 23(2):159–163PubMedCrossRef Aleto TJ, Berend ME, Ritter MA, Faris PM, Meneghini RM (2008) Early failure of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty leading to revision. J Arthroplasty 23(2):159–163PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Goodfellow J, O’Connor J, Dodd C, Murray D (2006) Unicompartmental arthroplasty with the Oxford knee. Oxford University Press, Oxford Goodfellow J, O’Connor J, Dodd C, Murray D (2006) Unicompartmental arthroplasty with the Oxford knee. Oxford University Press, Oxford
13.
go back to reference Kretzer JP, Jakubowitz E, Reinders J, Lietz E, Moradi B, Hofmann K, Sonntag R (2011) Wear analysis of unicondylar mobile bearing and fixed bearing knee systems: a knee simulator study. Acta Biomater 7(2):710–715PubMedCrossRef Kretzer JP, Jakubowitz E, Reinders J, Lietz E, Moradi B, Hofmann K, Sonntag R (2011) Wear analysis of unicondylar mobile bearing and fixed bearing knee systems: a knee simulator study. Acta Biomater 7(2):710–715PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Goodfellow J, O’Connor J (1978) The mechanics of the knee and prosthesis design. J Bone Joint Surg Br B 60(3):358–369 Goodfellow J, O’Connor J (1978) The mechanics of the knee and prosthesis design. J Bone Joint Surg Br B 60(3):358–369
15.
go back to reference Tillmann B (1987) Anatomie des Menschen Lehrbuch und Atlas—Band I Bewegungsapparat. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart Tillmann B (1987) Anatomie des Menschen Lehrbuch und Atlas—Band I Bewegungsapparat. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart
16.
go back to reference Miller RK, Goodfellow JW, Murray DW, O’Connor JJ (1998) In vitro measurement of patellofemoral force after three types of knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80(5):900–906PubMedCrossRef Miller RK, Goodfellow JW, Murray DW, O’Connor JJ (1998) In vitro measurement of patellofemoral force after three types of knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80(5):900–906PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Price AJ, Oppold PT, Murray DW, Zavatsky AB (2006) Simultaneous in vitro measurement of patellofemoral kinematics and forces following Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88(12):1591–1595PubMedCrossRef Price AJ, Oppold PT, Murray DW, Zavatsky AB (2006) Simultaneous in vitro measurement of patellofemoral kinematics and forces following Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88(12):1591–1595PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Price AJ, Rees JL, Beard DJ, Gill RH, Dodd CA, Murray DM (2004) Sagittal plane kinematics of a mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at 10 years: a comparative in vivo fluoroscopic analysis. J Arthroplasty 19(5):590–597PubMedCrossRef Price AJ, Rees JL, Beard DJ, Gill RH, Dodd CA, Murray DM (2004) Sagittal plane kinematics of a mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at 10 years: a comparative in vivo fluoroscopic analysis. J Arthroplasty 19(5):590–597PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Robinson BJ, Rees JL, Price AJ, Beard DJ, Murray DW, Smith PM, Dodd CAF (2002) Dislocation of the bearing of the Oxford lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty. A radiological assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84(5):653–657PubMedCrossRef Robinson BJ, Rees JL, Price AJ, Beard DJ, Murray DW, Smith PM, Dodd CAF (2002) Dislocation of the bearing of the Oxford lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty. A radiological assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84(5):653–657PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Iesaka K, Tsumura H, Sonoda H, Sawatari T, Takasita M, Torisu T (2002) The effects of tibial component inclination on bone stress after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Biomech 35(7):969–974PubMedCrossRef Iesaka K, Tsumura H, Sonoda H, Sawatari T, Takasita M, Torisu T (2002) The effects of tibial component inclination on bone stress after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Biomech 35(7):969–974PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Sawatari T, Tsumura H, Iesaka K, Furushiro Y, Torisu T (2005) Three-dimensional finite element analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty—the influence of tibial component inclination. J Orthop Res 23(3):549–554PubMedCrossRef Sawatari T, Tsumura H, Iesaka K, Furushiro Y, Torisu T (2005) Three-dimensional finite element analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty—the influence of tibial component inclination. J Orthop Res 23(3):549–554PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Breusch SJ, Schneider U, Reitzel T, Kreutzer J, Ewerbeck V, Lukoschek M (2001) Significance of jet lavage for in vitro and in vivo cement penetration. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 139(1):52–63PubMedCrossRef Breusch SJ, Schneider U, Reitzel T, Kreutzer J, Ewerbeck V, Lukoschek M (2001) Significance of jet lavage for in vitro and in vivo cement penetration. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 139(1):52–63PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Krause WR, Krug W, Miller J (1982) Strength of the cement-bone interface. Clin Orthop Relat Res 163:290–299PubMed Krause WR, Krug W, Miller J (1982) Strength of the cement-bone interface. Clin Orthop Relat Res 163:290–299PubMed
24.
go back to reference Clarius M, Seeger JB, Jaeger S, Mohr G, Bitsch RG (2011) The importance of pulsed lavage on interface temperature and ligament tension force in cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 27(4):372–376CrossRef Clarius M, Seeger JB, Jaeger S, Mohr G, Bitsch RG (2011) The importance of pulsed lavage on interface temperature and ligament tension force in cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 27(4):372–376CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Clarius M, Mohr G, Jaeger S, Seeger JB, Bitsch RG (2010) Femoral fixation pattern in cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty—an experimental cadaver study. Knee 17(6):398–402PubMedCrossRef Clarius M, Mohr G, Jaeger S, Seeger JB, Bitsch RG (2010) Femoral fixation pattern in cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty—an experimental cadaver study. Knee 17(6):398–402PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Kopec M, Milbrandt JC, Duellman T, Mangan D, Allan DG (2009) Effect of hand packing versus cement gun pressurisation on cement mantle in total knee arthroplasty. Can J Surg 52(6):490–494PubMed Kopec M, Milbrandt JC, Duellman T, Mangan D, Allan DG (2009) Effect of hand packing versus cement gun pressurisation on cement mantle in total knee arthroplasty. Can J Surg 52(6):490–494PubMed
Metadata
Title
The influence of the femoral force application point on tibial cementing pressure in cemented UKA: an experimental study
Authors
Sebastian Jaeger
Astrid Helling
Rudi G. Bitsch
Joern B. Seeger
Christian Schuld
Michael Clarius
Publication date
01-11-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 11/2012
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-012-1582-8

Other articles of this Issue 11/2012

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 11/2012 Go to the issue