Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 6/2021

01-06-2021 | Original Paper

Long-term impact of scapular notching after reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Authors: C. Spiry, J. Berhouet, C. Agout, G. Bacle, Luc Favard

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 6/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Because it medializes the centre of rotation, one of the drawbacks of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is the risk of impingement between the humerus and lateral border of the scapula resulting in scapular notching. The long-term impact of this notching is not well known, either on function or the risk of glenoid loosening. The aim of this longitudinal study was to analyze the drawbacks of this notching.

Methods

Between 1993 and 2006, 81 patients (91 shoulders) underwent RSA for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis or massive cuff tear with or without osteoarthritis. This cohort was followed longitudinally with post-operative assessments done at one to two  years (T1), three to eight  years (T2), and nine+ years (T3). Before T3, 25 patients had died, nine were lost to follow-up, five  had the implants changed, and seven  had incomplete records. Thus, 45 shoulders were available for follow-up beyond nine years (mean follow-up of 12 years) and were used to determine the long-term impact of notching. Survival curves were generated using the occurrence of Sirveaux grade 3 or 4 notching and the presence of aseptic glenoid loosening as endpoints.

Results

The survivorship before grade 3 or 4 notching developed was 83% at five years, 60% at 10 years, and 43% at 15 years. In the end, aseptic glenoid loosening occurred in four shoulders, all of which had developed grade 4 notching. No glenoid loosening occurred in the population with grade 0, 1, 2, or 3 notching (p = 0.02). The Constant score significantly decreased between T2 and T3, although it was not different between shoulders with and without advanced notching.

Conclusions

Beyond the second year post-RSA, the number of shoulders with grade 3 or 4 notching increases steadily up to the longest follow-up. Grade 4 notching always preceded the occurrence of late glenoid loosening. The functional outcomes become significantly worse after the 9th year post-RSA, although they were not correlated to the presence of high-grade scapular notching.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Grammont PM, Baulot E (1993) Delta shoulder prosthesis for rotator cuff rupture. Orthopedics 16:65–68CrossRef Grammont PM, Baulot E (1993) Delta shoulder prosthesis for rotator cuff rupture. Orthopedics 16:65–68CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Baulot E, Chabernaud D, Grammont PM (1995) Results of Grammont’s inverted prosthesis in omarthritis associated with major cuff destruction. Apropos of 16 cases. Acta Orthop Belg 61(Suppl 1):112–119PubMed Baulot E, Chabernaud D, Grammont PM (1995) Results of Grammont’s inverted prosthesis in omarthritis associated with major cuff destruction. Apropos of 16 cases. Acta Orthop Belg 61(Suppl 1):112–119PubMed
15.
go back to reference Vanhove B, Beugnies A (2004) Grammont’s reverse shoulder prosthesis for rotator cuff arthropathy. A retrospective study of 32 cases. Acta Orthop Belg 70:219–225PubMed Vanhove B, Beugnies A (2004) Grammont’s reverse shoulder prosthesis for rotator cuff arthropathy. A retrospective study of 32 cases. Acta Orthop Belg 70:219–225PubMed
20.
go back to reference Goutallier D, Postel JM, Bernageau J, et al (1994) Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Pre- and postoperative evaluation by CT scan. Clin Orthop Relat Res 78–83 Goutallier D, Postel JM, Bernageau J, et al (1994) Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Pre- and postoperative evaluation by CT scan. Clin Orthop Relat Res 78–83
21.
go back to reference Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 160–164 Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 160–164
Metadata
Title
Long-term impact of scapular notching after reverse shoulder arthroplasty
Authors
C. Spiry
J. Berhouet
C. Agout
G. Bacle
Luc Favard
Publication date
01-06-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 6/2021
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-04998-3

Other articles of this Issue 6/2021

International Orthopaedics 6/2021 Go to the issue