Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 10/2020

01-10-2020 | Radial Nerve Palsy | Original Paper

Locking compression plate fixation versus intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures: which one is better? A single-centre prospective randomized study

Authors: Yavuz Akalın, İsmail Gökhan Şahin, Nazan Çevik, Burak Olcay Güler, Özgür Avci, Alpaslan Öztürk

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 10/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the radiological and clinical outcomes of interlocking nail (ILN) and locking plate fixation (LCP) for humeral shaft fractures.

Methods

A total of 63 patients with displaced humeral shaft fractures between October 2014 and January 2017 were evaluated prospectively. They were divided randomly into two as LCP fixation (group 1) and interlocking nail (ILN) (group 2). Functional outcomes were evaluated using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder scores, and Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaires, and pain was assessed with visual analogue scale (VAS).

Results

After fracture callus was radiologically observed, DASH, ASES, and UCLA scores as well as SF-36 questionnaires and VAS results were noted to have no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.109, p = 0.082, p = 0.146, p = 0.322, and p = 0.175, respectively). At the last follow-up (post-operative 24 months), the UCLA score was significantly better in group 1 (p = 0.034), whereas VAS result was significantly worse in group 2 (p = 0.017). DASH, ASES scores, and SF-36 questionnaires had no difference (p = 0.193, p = 0.088, p = 0.289). Other parameters revealed no significant differences. Fracture consolidation was observed at a mean of four months in both groups (3 to 7 months in group 1 and 3 to 8 months in group 2) (p = 0.189). Four patients in group 1 and five patients in group 2 underwent surgery for nonunion (p = 0.725). Post-operative radial nerve palsy was seen in one patient in group 2. Two patients in group 1 with superficial infection were treated with antibiotics, and they recovered.

Conclusions

Regarding our results, the LCP group had significantly better shoulder function than the ILN group, whereas the ILN group had significantly less pain, with similar complication rates. Therefore, both procedures are favourable surgical options for patients with humeral shaft fractures.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Carroll EA, Schweppe M, Langfitt M, Miller AN, Halvorson JJ (2012) Management of humeral shaft fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 20:11CrossRef Carroll EA, Schweppe M, Langfitt M, Miller AN, Halvorson JJ (2012) Management of humeral shaft fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 20:11CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Klenerman L (1966) Fractures of the shaft of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 48:105–111CrossRef Klenerman L (1966) Fractures of the shaft of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 48:105–111CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Shin S-J, Sohn H-S, Do N-H (2012) Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of humeral shaft fractures: a technique to aid fracture reduction and minimize complications. J Orthop Trauma 26:6CrossRef Shin S-J, Sohn H-S, Do N-H (2012) Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of humeral shaft fractures: a technique to aid fracture reduction and minimize complications. J Orthop Trauma 26:6CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Locking compression plate fixation versus intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures: which one is better? A single-centre prospective randomized study
Authors
Yavuz Akalın
İsmail Gökhan Şahin
Nazan Çevik
Burak Olcay Güler
Özgür Avci
Alpaslan Öztürk
Publication date
01-10-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 10/2020
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04696-6

Other articles of this Issue 10/2020

International Orthopaedics 10/2020 Go to the issue