Top

Published in:

01-02-2020 | Hip-TEP | Original Paper

Dual mobility constructs in revision total hip arthroplasty: survivorship analysis in recurrent dislocation versus other indications at three to twelve-year follow-up

Authors: Nicolas de l’Escalopier, Valérie Dumaine, Guillaume Auberger, Antoine Babinet, Jean-Pierre Courpied, Philippe Anract, Moussa Hamadouche

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 2/2020

Abstract

Background

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical, radiologic, and survival results of dual mobility (DM) sockets in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed for instability versus revision THAs performed for other reasons.

Methods

From a computerized database, we identified 84 revision THAs using a modern DM socket performed in 81 patients with a mean age of 71 years. Indication for revision was recurrent dislocation in 47 hips, and other reasons in the remaining 37 hips. A survivorship analysis according to the actuarial method was carried out on the entire series using revision for any cause, revision for dislocation, and radiological cup loosening revised or not, as the end points.

Results

Of the 81 patients, twelve died, six were lost to follow-up, eight had been revised, and 55 patients (58 hips) were unrevised and alive at a mean follow-up of 6.4 years. Dislocation occurred in four of the 47 (8.5%) hips for which indication for revision was dislocation versus one of the remaining 37 (2.7%) hips [odds ratio = 3.4 (0.4–31.3), p = 0.07]. According to our criteria, three acetabular components of which one was revised were considered as loosened. When using revision for dislocation as the end-point, the survival rate at seven years was 90.4 ± 5.3% (IC_95%, 79.9–100) in the 47 hips for which the indication for revision was dislocation versus 100% in the remaining 37 hips (log-rank, p = 0.5).

Conclusions

The current study indicated that DM sockets represent an interesting solution to prevent dislocation in revision THAs at mid-term follow-up.

Langlais FL, Ropars M, Gaucher F et al (2008) Dual mobility cemented cups have low dislocation rates in THA revisions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:389–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-007-0047-9 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Lebeau N, Bayle M, Belhaouane R et al (2017) Total hip arthroplasty revision by dual-mobility acetabular cup cemented in a metal reinforcement: a 62 case series at a minimum 5 years’ follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 103:679–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2017.04.009 CrossRefPubMed

Vasukutty NL, Middleton RG, Matthews EC et al (2012) The double-mobility acetabular component in revision total hip replacement: the United Kingdom experience. Bone Joint J 94-B:603–608. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.94B5.27876 CrossRef

Sutter EG, McClellan TR, Attarian DE et al (2017) Outcomes of modular dual mobility acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 32:S220–S224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.03.035 CrossRef

Philippot R, Adam P, Reckhaus M et al (2009) Prevention of dislocation in total hip revision surgery using a dual mobility design. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95:407–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OTSR.2009.04.016 CrossRefPubMed

Prudhon JL, Steffann F, Ferreira A et al (2014) Cementless dual-mobility cup in total hip arthroplasty revision. Int Orthop 38:2463–2468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2448-1 CrossRefPubMed

Schneider L, Philippot R, Boyer B, Farizon F (2011) Revision total hip arthroplasty using a reconstruction cage device and a cemented dual mobility cup. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97:807–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2011.09.010 CrossRefPubMed

Simian E, Chatellard R, Druon J et al (2015) Dual mobility cup in revision total hip arthroplasty: dislocation rate and survival after 5 years. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 101:577–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OTSR.2015.05.002 CrossRefPubMed

Viste A, Desmarchelier R, Fessy MH (2017) Dual mobility cups in revision total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 41:535–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3363-4 CrossRefPubMed

10.

Wegrzyn J, Tebaa E, Jacquel A et al (2015) Can dual mobility cups prevent dislocation in all situations after revision total hip arthroplasty? J Arthroplast 30:631–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2014.10.034 CrossRef

11.

Civinini R, Carulli C, Matassi F et al (2012) A Dual-mobility cup reduces risk of dislocation in isolated acetabular revisions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:3542–3548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2428-y CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Pattyn C, Audenaert E (2012) Early complications after revision total hip arthroplasty with cemented dual-mobility socket and reinforcement ring. Acta Orthop Belg 78:357–361PubMed

13.

Philippot R, Boyer B, Farizon F (2013) Intraprosthetic dislocation: a specific complication of the dual-mobility system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:965–970. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2639-2 CrossRefPubMed

14.

Fabry C, Langlois J, Hamadouche M, Bader R (2016) Intra-prosthetic dislocation of dual-mobility cups after total hip arthroplasty: potential causes from a clinical and biomechanical perspective. Int Orthop 40:901–906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-3000-7 CrossRefPubMed

15.

Fabry C, Woernle C, Bader R (2014) Self-centering dual-mobility total hip systems: Prediction of relative movements and realignment of different intermediate components. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 228:477–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411914531116 CrossRefPubMed

16.

Wegrzyn J, Pibarot V, Jacquel A et al (2014) Acetabular reconstruction using a Kerboull cross-plate, structural allograft and cemented dual-mobility cup in revision THA at a minimum 5-year follow-up. J Arthroplast 29:432–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.05.030 CrossRef

17.

Guyen O, Pibarot V, Vaz G et al (2009) Use of a dual mobility socket to manage total hip arthroplasty instability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:465–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0476-0 CrossRefPubMed

18.

Hamadouche M, Ropars M, Rodaix C et al (2017) Five to thirteen year results of a cemented dual mobility socket to treat recurrent dislocation. Int Orthop 41:513–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3343-8 CrossRefPubMed

19.

Leiber-Wackenheim F, Brunschweiler B, Ehlinger M et al (2011) Treatment of recurrent THR dislocation using of a cementless dual-mobility cup: a 59 cases series with a mean 8 years’ follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97:8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OTSR.2010.08.003 CrossRefPubMed

20.

Mertl P, Combes A, Leiber-Wackenheim F et al (2012) Recurrence of dislocation following total hip arthroplasty revision using dual mobility cups was rare in 180 hips followed over 7 years. HSS J 8:251–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-012-9301-0 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Hailer NP, Weiss RJ, Stark A, Kärrholm J (2012) Dual-mobility cups for revision due to instability are associated with a low rate of re-revisions due to dislocation. Acta Orthop 83:566–571. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2012.742395 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

van Heumen M, Heesterbeek PJC, Swierstra BA et al (2015) Dual mobility acetabular component in revision total hip arthroplasty for persistent dislocation: no dislocations in 50 hips after 1–5 years. J Orthop Traumatol 16:15–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10195-014-0318-7 CrossRefPubMed

23.

Jakobsen T, Kappel A, Hansen F, Krarup N (2014) The dislocating hip replacement - revision with a dual mobility cup in 56 consecutive patients. Open Orthop J 8:268–271. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874325001408010268 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Carulli C, Macera A, Matassi F, Civinini R, Innocenti M (2016) The use of a dual mobility cup in the management of recurrent dislocations of hip hemiarthroplasty. J Orthop Traumatol 17(2):131–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10195-015-0365-8 CrossRef

25.

Hartzler MA, Abdel MP, Sculco PK, et al. (2018) Otto Aufranc Award: dual-mobility constructs in revision THA reduced dislocation, rerevision, and reoperation compared with large femoral heads. 293–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999.0000000000000035 CrossRef

Title: Dual mobility constructs in revision total hip arthroplasty: survivorship analysis in recurrent dislocation versus other indications at three to twelve-year follow-up
Authors: Nicolas de l’Escalopier
Valérie Dumaine
Guillaume Auberger
Antoine Babinet
Jean-Pierre Courpied
Philippe Anract
Moussa Hamadouche
Publication date: 01-02-2020
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keywords: Hip-TEP
Hip-TEP
Published in: International Orthopaedics / Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-019-04445-4

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Dual mobility constructs in revision total hip arthroplasty: survivorship analysis in recurrent dislocation versus other indications at three to twelve-year follow-up

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

How do global sagittal alignment and posture change after total hip arthroplasty?

Outcome of primary deltoid ligament repair in acute ankle fractures: a meta-analysis of comparative studies

Could the tendon degeneration and the fatty infiltration of the gluteus medius affect clinical outcome in total hip arthroplasty?

Does the induced membrane have antibacterial properties? An experimental rat model of a chronic infected nonunion

Letter to the editor: Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Italian version of the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score

Safety and efficacy of percutaneous kyphoplasty assisted with O-arm navigation for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures at T6 to T9 vertebrae.