Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 2/2019

01-02-2019 | Original Paper

Treatment of infection following intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures—results of the ORS/ISFR expert group survey

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The lack of universally accepted treatment principles and protocols to manage infected intramedullary (IM) nails following tibial fractures continues to challenge us, eliciting a demand for clear guidelines. Our response to this problem was to create an ORS/ISFR taskforce to identify potential solutions and trends based on published evidence and practices globally.

Materials and methods

A questionnaire of reported treatment methods was created based on a published meta-analysis on the topic. Treatment methods were divided in two groups: A (retained nail) and B (nail removed). Experts scored the questionnaire items on a scale of 1–4 twice, before and after revealing the success rates for each stage of infection. Inter- and intra-observer variability analysis among experts’ personal scores and between experts’ scores was performed. An agreement mean and correlation degree between experts’ scores was calculated. Finally, a success rate report between groups was performed.

Results

Experts underestimated success rate of an individual treatment method compared to published data. The mean difference between experts’ scores and published results was + 26.3 ± 46 percentage points. Inter-observer agreement mean was poor (< 0.2) for both rounds. Intra-observer agreement mean across different treatment methods showed a wide variability (18.3 to 64.8%). Experts agree more with published results for nail removal on stage 2 and 3 infections.

Conclusions

Experts’ and published data strongly agree to retain the implant for stage 1 infections. A more aggressive approach (nail removal) favoured for infection stages 2 and 3. However, literature supports both treatment strategies.

Evidence

Clinical Question
Literature
1.
go back to reference Court-Brown CM, Keating JF, McQueen MM (1992) Infection after intramedullary nailing of the tibia. Incidence and protocol for management. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74(5):770–774CrossRefPubMed Court-Brown CM, Keating JF, McQueen MM (1992) Infection after intramedullary nailing of the tibia. Incidence and protocol for management. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74(5):770–774CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Tsang STJ, Mills LA, Frantzias J et al (2016) Exchange nailing for nonunion of diaphyseal fractures of the tibia. Bone Joint J 98(4):534–541CrossRefPubMed Tsang STJ, Mills LA, Frantzias J et al (2016) Exchange nailing for nonunion of diaphyseal fractures of the tibia. Bone Joint J 98(4):534–541CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Court-Brown CM (2004) Reamed intramedullary tibial nailing: an overview and analysis of 1106 cases. J Trauma 18(2):96–101 Court-Brown CM (2004) Reamed intramedullary tibial nailing: an overview and analysis of 1106 cases. J Trauma 18(2):96–101
11.
go back to reference Schenker ML, Yannascoli S, Baldwin KD, Ahn J, Mehta S, (2012) Does timing to operative debridement affect infectious complications in open long-bone fractures? A systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Am, (94)12 p. 1057–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.K.00582. Schenker ML, Yannascoli S, Baldwin KD, Ahn J, Mehta S, (2012) Does timing to operative debridement affect infectious complications in open long-bone fractures? A systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Am, (94)12 p. 1057–64. doi:https://​doi.​org/​10.​2106/​JBJS.​K.​00582.
18.
go back to reference Kertzman P, Császár NB, Furia JP, Schmitz C, (2017) Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy is efficient and safe in the treatment of fracture nonunions of superficial bones: a retrospective case series. J Orthop Res, 12(1) p.164. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-017-0667-z. Kertzman P, Császár NB, Furia JP, Schmitz C, (2017) Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy is efficient and safe in the treatment of fracture nonunions of superficial bones: a retrospective case series. J Orthop Res, 12(1) p.164. doi: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s13018-017-0667-z.
20.
go back to reference Mioc ML, Prejbeanu R, Deleanu B, Anglitoiu B, Haragus H, Niculescu M, (2018) Extra-articular distal tibia fractures-controversies regarding treatment options. A single-centre prospective comparative study. Int Orthop. 2018 Jan 22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3775-4. Mioc ML, Prejbeanu R, Deleanu B, Anglitoiu B, Haragus H, Niculescu M, (2018) Extra-articular distal tibia fractures-controversies regarding treatment options. A single-centre prospective comparative study. Int Orthop. 2018 Jan 22. doi: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00264-018-3775-4.
24.
go back to reference Romano CL, Romano D, Logoluso N, Drago L (2011) Bone and joint infections in adults: a comprehensive classification proposal. Eur Orthop Traumatol 1(6):207–217CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Romano CL, Romano D, Logoluso N, Drago L (2011) Bone and joint infections in adults: a comprehensive classification proposal. Eur Orthop Traumatol 1(6):207–217CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Treatment of infection following intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures—results of the ORS/ISFR expert group survey
Publication date
01-02-2019
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3964-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

International Orthopaedics 2/2019 Go to the issue