Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 9/2018

01-09-2018 | Original Paper

Periprosthetic femoral fracture as cause of early revision after short stem hip arthroplasty—a multicentric analysis

Authors: Sang-Min Kim, Seung-Beom Han, Kee Hyung Rhyu, Jeong Joon Yoo, Kwang-Jun Oh, Je Hyun Yoo, Kyung-Jae Lee, Seung-Jae Lim

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 9/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The objective of this study was to analyze the prevalence and causes of early re-operation after hip replacement surgery using short bone-preserving stems in a large multicentre series. Specifically, we evaluated the clinical features of periprosthetic fractures occurring around short stems.

Methods

A total of 897 patients (1089 hips) who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty or bipolar hemiarthroplasty from January 2011 to February 2015 using short bone-preserving femoral stems were recruited. Mean patient age was 57.4 years (range, 18–97 years), with a male ratio of 49.7% (541/1089). Re-operation for any reason within two years was used as an endpoint. The incidence and clinical characteristics of the periprosthetic femoral fractures were also recorded. Mean follow-up period was 5.1 years (range, 2–7.9 years).

Results

Early re-operation for any reason was identified in 16 (1.5%) of 1089 hips. The main reason for re-operation was periprosthetic femoral fracture, which accounted for eight (50%) of the 16 re-operations. The overall incidence of periprosthetic femoral fracture at two years was 1.1% (12/1089). According to the Vancouver classification, two fractures were AG type and the other ten were B1 type. Advanced age, higher American Society of Anesthesiologist grade, femur morphology of Dorr type C, and the use of a calcar-loading stem increased the risk for periprosthetic femoral fracture.

Conclusion

Periprosthetic femoral fracture was the major reason for re-operation after hip replacement surgery using short bone-preserving stems accounting for 50% (8/16) of re-operations two years post-operatively, but did not seem to deteriorate survivorship of implanted prostheses.
Literature
1.
go back to reference McCalden RW, Korczak A, Somerville L, Yuan X, Naudie DD (2015) A randomised trial comparing a short and a standard-length metaphyseal engaging cementless femoral stem using radiostereometric analysis. Bone Joint J 97-B:595–602CrossRefPubMed McCalden RW, Korczak A, Somerville L, Yuan X, Naudie DD (2015) A randomised trial comparing a short and a standard-length metaphyseal engaging cementless femoral stem using radiostereometric analysis. Bone Joint J 97-B:595–602CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference van Oldenrijk J, Molleman J, Klaver M, Poolman RW, Haverkamp D (2014) Revision rate after short-stem total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of 49 studies. Acta Orthop 85:250–258CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van Oldenrijk J, Molleman J, Klaver M, Poolman RW, Haverkamp D (2014) Revision rate after short-stem total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of 49 studies. Acta Orthop 85:250–258CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Ulrich SD, Seyler TM, Bennett D, Delanois RE, Saleh KJ, Thongtrangan I, Kuskowski M, Cheng EY, Sharkey PF, Parvizi J, Stiehl JB, Mont MA (2008) Total hip arthroplasties: what are the reasons for revision? Int Orthop 32:597–604CrossRefPubMed Ulrich SD, Seyler TM, Bennett D, Delanois RE, Saleh KJ, Thongtrangan I, Kuskowski M, Cheng EY, Sharkey PF, Parvizi J, Stiehl JB, Mont MA (2008) Total hip arthroplasties: what are the reasons for revision? Int Orthop 32:597–604CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Streit MR, Merle C, Clarius M, Aldinger PR (2011) Late peri-prosthetic femoral fracture as a major mode of failure in uncemented primary hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:178–183CrossRefPubMed Streit MR, Merle C, Clarius M, Aldinger PR (2011) Late peri-prosthetic femoral fracture as a major mode of failure in uncemented primary hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:178–183CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Leonardsson O, Karrholm J, Akesson K, Garellick G, Rogmark C (2012) Higher risk of reoperation for bipolar and uncemented hemiarthroplasty. Acta Orthop 83:459–466CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Leonardsson O, Karrholm J, Akesson K, Garellick G, Rogmark C (2012) Higher risk of reoperation for bipolar and uncemented hemiarthroplasty. Acta Orthop 83:459–466CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Jakubowitz E, Seeger JB, Lee C, Heisel C, Kretzer JP, Thomsen MN (2009) Do short-stemmed-prostheses induce periprosthetic fractures earlier than standard hip stems? A biomechanical ex-vivo study of two different stem designs. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129:849–855CrossRefPubMed Jakubowitz E, Seeger JB, Lee C, Heisel C, Kretzer JP, Thomsen MN (2009) Do short-stemmed-prostheses induce periprosthetic fractures earlier than standard hip stems? A biomechanical ex-vivo study of two different stem designs. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129:849–855CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Bishop NE, Burton A, Maheson M, Morlock MM (2010) Biomechanics of short hip endoprostheses—the risk of bone failure increases with decreasing implant size. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 25:666–674CrossRef Bishop NE, Burton A, Maheson M, Morlock MM (2010) Biomechanics of short hip endoprostheses—the risk of bone failure increases with decreasing implant size. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 25:666–674CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Thien TM, Chatziagorou G, Garellick G, Furnes O, Havelin LI, Makela K, Overgaard S, Pedersen A, Eskelinen A, Pulkkinen P, Karrholm J (2014) Periprosthetic femoral fracture within two years after total hip replacement: analysis of 437,629 operations in the Nordic Arthroplasty Register association database. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:e167CrossRefPubMed Thien TM, Chatziagorou G, Garellick G, Furnes O, Havelin LI, Makela K, Overgaard S, Pedersen A, Eskelinen A, Pulkkinen P, Karrholm J (2014) Periprosthetic femoral fracture within two years after total hip replacement: analysis of 437,629 operations in the Nordic Arthroplasty Register association database. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:e167CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Khanuja HS, Banerjee S, Jain D, Pivec R, Mont MA (2014) Short bone-conserving stems in cementless hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:1742–1752CrossRefPubMed Khanuja HS, Banerjee S, Jain D, Pivec R, Mont MA (2014) Short bone-conserving stems in cementless hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:1742–1752CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, Hoke R, Le Duff M, Amstutz HC (2006) The value of patient activity level in the outcome of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 21:547–552CrossRef Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, Hoke R, Le Duff M, Amstutz HC (2006) The value of patient activity level in the outcome of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 21:547–552CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Dorr LD, Absatz M, Gruen TA, Saberi MT, Doerzbacher JF (1990) Anatomic porous replacement hip arthroplasty: first 100 consecutive cases. Semin Arthroplast 1:77–86 Dorr LD, Absatz M, Gruen TA, Saberi MT, Doerzbacher JF (1990) Anatomic porous replacement hip arthroplasty: first 100 consecutive cases. Semin Arthroplast 1:77–86
13.
go back to reference Khalily C, Lester DK (2002) Results of a tapered cementless femoral stem implanted in varus. J Arthroplast 17:463–466CrossRef Khalily C, Lester DK (2002) Results of a tapered cementless femoral stem implanted in varus. J Arthroplast 17:463–466CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC (1979) “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res:17–27 Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC (1979) “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res:17–27
15.
go back to reference Kim SM, Lim SJ, Moon YW, Kim YT, Ko KR, Park YS (2013) Cementless modular total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than fifty with femoral head osteonecrosis: minimum fifteen-year follow-up. J Arthroplast 28:504–509CrossRef Kim SM, Lim SJ, Moon YW, Kim YT, Ko KR, Park YS (2013) Cementless modular total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than fifty with femoral head osteonecrosis: minimum fifteen-year follow-up. J Arthroplast 28:504–509CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Masri BA, Meek RM, Duncan CP (2004) Periprosthetic fractures evaluation and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res:80–95 Masri BA, Meek RM, Duncan CP (2004) Periprosthetic fractures evaluation and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res:80–95
18.
go back to reference Kavanagh BF (1992) Femoral fractures associated with total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 23:249–257PubMed Kavanagh BF (1992) Femoral fractures associated with total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 23:249–257PubMed
19.
go back to reference Lindahl H (2007) Epidemiology of periprosthetic femur fracture around a total hip arthroplasty. Injury 38:651–654CrossRefPubMed Lindahl H (2007) Epidemiology of periprosthetic femur fracture around a total hip arthroplasty. Injury 38:651–654CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Lowenhielm G, Hansson LI, Karrholm J (1989) Fracture of the lower extremity after total hip replacement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 108:141–143CrossRefPubMed Lowenhielm G, Hansson LI, Karrholm J (1989) Fracture of the lower extremity after total hip replacement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 108:141–143CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Daniel J, Pradhan C, Ziaee H, McMinn DJ (2008) A clinicoradiologic study of the Birmingham mid-head resection device. Orthopedics 31 Daniel J, Pradhan C, Ziaee H, McMinn DJ (2008) A clinicoradiologic study of the Birmingham mid-head resection device. Orthopedics 31
22.
go back to reference McMinn DJ, Pradhan C, Ziaee H, Daniel J (2011) Is mid-head resection a durable conservative option in the presence of poor femoral bone quality and distorted anatomy? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:1589–1597CrossRefPubMed McMinn DJ, Pradhan C, Ziaee H, Daniel J (2011) Is mid-head resection a durable conservative option in the presence of poor femoral bone quality and distorted anatomy? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:1589–1597CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Rahman L, Muirhead-Allwood SK (2011) The Birmingham mid-head resection arthroplasty—minimum two year clinical and radiological follow-up: an independent single surgeon series. Hip Int 21:356–360CrossRefPubMed Rahman L, Muirhead-Allwood SK (2011) The Birmingham mid-head resection arthroplasty—minimum two year clinical and radiological follow-up: an independent single surgeon series. Hip Int 21:356–360CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Dorr LD, Faugere MC, Mackel AM, Gruen TA, Bognar B, Malluche HH (1993) Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur. Bone 14:231–242CrossRefPubMed Dorr LD, Faugere MC, Mackel AM, Gruen TA, Bognar B, Malluche HH (1993) Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur. Bone 14:231–242CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Patel RM, Smith MC, Woodward CC, Stulberg SD (2012) Stable fixation of short-stem femoral implants in patients 70 years and older. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:442–449CrossRefPubMed Patel RM, Smith MC, Woodward CC, Stulberg SD (2012) Stable fixation of short-stem femoral implants in patients 70 years and older. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:442–449CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Stulberg SD, Dolan M (2008) The short stem: a thinking man’s alternative to surface replacement. Orthopedics 31:885–886CrossRefPubMed Stulberg SD, Dolan M (2008) The short stem: a thinking man’s alternative to surface replacement. Orthopedics 31:885–886CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Berry DJ (2003) Periprosthetic fractures associated with osteolysis: a problem on the rise. J Arthroplast 18:107–111CrossRef Berry DJ (2003) Periprosthetic fractures associated with osteolysis: a problem on the rise. J Arthroplast 18:107–111CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Lindahl H, Garellick G, Regner H, Herberts P, Malchau H (2006) Three hundred and twenty-one periprosthetic femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:1215–1222CrossRefPubMed Lindahl H, Garellick G, Regner H, Herberts P, Malchau H (2006) Three hundred and twenty-one periprosthetic femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:1215–1222CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Abdel MP, Houdek MT, Watts CD, Lewallen DG, Berry DJ (2016) Epidemiology of periprosthetic femoral fractures in 5417 revision total hip arthroplasties: a 40-year experience. Bone Joint J 98-B:468–474CrossRefPubMed Abdel MP, Houdek MT, Watts CD, Lewallen DG, Berry DJ (2016) Epidemiology of periprosthetic femoral fractures in 5417 revision total hip arthroplasties: a 40-year experience. Bone Joint J 98-B:468–474CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Berend ME, Smith A, Meding JB, Ritter MA, Lynch T, Davis K (2006) Long-term outcome and risk factors of proximal femoral fracture in uncemented and cemented total hip arthroplasty in 2551 hips. J Arthroplast 21:53–59CrossRef Berend ME, Smith A, Meding JB, Ritter MA, Lynch T, Davis K (2006) Long-term outcome and risk factors of proximal femoral fracture in uncemented and cemented total hip arthroplasty in 2551 hips. J Arthroplast 21:53–59CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Carli AV, Negus JJ, Haddad FS (2017) Periprosthetic femoral fractures and trying to avoid them: what is the contribution of femoral component design to the increased risk of periprosthetic femoral fracture? Bone Joint J 99-B:50–59CrossRefPubMed Carli AV, Negus JJ, Haddad FS (2017) Periprosthetic femoral fractures and trying to avoid them: what is the contribution of femoral component design to the increased risk of periprosthetic femoral fracture? Bone Joint J 99-B:50–59CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Jones C, Aqil A, Clarke S, Cobb JP (2015) Short uncemented stems allow greater femoral flexibility and may reduce peri-prosthetic fracture risk: a dry bone and cadaveric study. J Orthop Traumatol 16:229–235CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jones C, Aqil A, Clarke S, Cobb JP (2015) Short uncemented stems allow greater femoral flexibility and may reduce peri-prosthetic fracture risk: a dry bone and cadaveric study. J Orthop Traumatol 16:229–235CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
34.
go back to reference Meek RM, Norwood T, Smith R, Brenkel IJ, Howie CR (2011) The risk of peri-prosthetic fracture after primary and revision total hip and knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:96–101CrossRefPubMed Meek RM, Norwood T, Smith R, Brenkel IJ, Howie CR (2011) The risk of peri-prosthetic fracture after primary and revision total hip and knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:96–101CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Cook RE, Jenkins PJ, Walmsley PJ, Patton JT, Robinson CM (2008) Risk factors for periprosthetic fractures of the hip: a survivorship analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:1652–1656CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cook RE, Jenkins PJ, Walmsley PJ, Patton JT, Robinson CM (2008) Risk factors for periprosthetic fractures of the hip: a survivorship analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:1652–1656CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
go back to reference Gromov K, Bersang A, Nielsen CS, Kallemose T, Husted H, Troelsen A (2017) Risk factors for postoperative periprosthetic fractures following primary total hip arthroplasty with a proximally coated double-tapered cementless femoral component. Bone Joint J 99-B:451–457CrossRefPubMed Gromov K, Bersang A, Nielsen CS, Kallemose T, Husted H, Troelsen A (2017) Risk factors for postoperative periprosthetic fractures following primary total hip arthroplasty with a proximally coated double-tapered cementless femoral component. Bone Joint J 99-B:451–457CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Kim YH, Oh JH (2012) A comparison of a conventional versus a short, anatomical metaphyseal-fitting cementless femoral stem in the treatment of patients with a fracture of the femoral neck. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94:774–781CrossRefPubMed Kim YH, Oh JH (2012) A comparison of a conventional versus a short, anatomical metaphyseal-fitting cementless femoral stem in the treatment of patients with a fracture of the femoral neck. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94:774–781CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Feyen H, Shimmin AJ (2014) Is the length of the femoral component important in primary total hip replacement? Bone Joint J 96-B:442–448CrossRefPubMed Feyen H, Shimmin AJ (2014) Is the length of the femoral component important in primary total hip replacement? Bone Joint J 96-B:442–448CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Nieuwenhuijse MJ, Valstar ER, Kaptein BL, Nelissen RG (2012) The Exeter femoral stem continues to migrate during its first decade after implantation: 10–12 years of follow-up with radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Acta Orthop 83:129–134CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nieuwenhuijse MJ, Valstar ER, Kaptein BL, Nelissen RG (2012) The Exeter femoral stem continues to migrate during its first decade after implantation: 10–12 years of follow-up with radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Acta Orthop 83:129–134CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Periprosthetic femoral fracture as cause of early revision after short stem hip arthroplasty—a multicentric analysis
Authors
Sang-Min Kim
Seung-Beom Han
Kee Hyung Rhyu
Jeong Joon Yoo
Kwang-Jun Oh
Je Hyun Yoo
Kyung-Jae Lee
Seung-Jae Lim
Publication date
01-09-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 9/2018
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3930-y

Other articles of this Issue 9/2018

International Orthopaedics 9/2018 Go to the issue