Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 9/2018

01-09-2018 | Original Paper

Soft tissue tension is four times lower in the unstable primary total hip arthroplasty

Authors: Takeshi Ogawa, Masaki Takao, Hidetoshi Hamada, Takashi Sakai, Nobuhiko Sugano

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 9/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The aim was to compare patients who suffered recurrent dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA) with those who did not to clarify the degree of soft tissue tension in dislocation patients.

Methods

The subjects were 18 hips with recurrent dislocation (unstable THA group) and 37 hips without dislocation (stable THA group). To evaluate soft tissue tension, radiographs were taken while applying distal traction at traction forces of 40, 30, and 20% of the body weight (BW) and femoral head displacement was measured. Acetabular offset, femoral offset, limb offset, and leg length discrepancy were measured in patients with a normal contralateral hip joint.

Results

The mean femoral head displacement in the unstable THA group was 5.6 mm at 40% of the BW, 4.6 mm at 30% of the BW, and 3.5 mm at 20% of the BW. In the stable THA group, the mean femoral head displacement was 1.4 mm at 40% of the BW, 1.1 mm at 30% of the BW, and 0.9 mm at 20% of the BW. Significant differences were seen between the groups at all traction forces. Furthermore, on comparing the unstable and stable THA groups, femoral offset was found to significantly be smaller in the affected side than in the healthy side in the unstable THA group.

Conclusions

We found that soft tissue tension is approximately fourfold lower in patients exhibiting recurrent dislocations following THA than in patients exhibiting no dislocations and that femoral offset was related to decreased soft tissue tension.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Patel PD, Potts A, Froimson MI (2007) The dislocating hip arthroplasty: prevention and treatment. J Arthroplast 22:86–90CrossRef Patel PD, Potts A, Froimson MI (2007) The dislocating hip arthroplasty: prevention and treatment. J Arthroplast 22:86–90CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Berry DJ, von Knoch M, Schleck CD, Harmsen WS (2004) The cumulative long-term risk of dislocation after primary Charnley total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:9–14CrossRefPubMed Berry DJ, von Knoch M, Schleck CD, Harmsen WS (2004) The cumulative long-term risk of dislocation after primary Charnley total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:9–14CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Parvizi J, Kim KI, Goldberg G, Mallo G, Hozack WJ (2006) Recurrent instability after total hip arthroplasty: beware of subtle component malpositioning. Clin Orthop Relat Res 447:60–65CrossRefPubMed Parvizi J, Kim KI, Goldberg G, Mallo G, Hozack WJ (2006) Recurrent instability after total hip arthroplasty: beware of subtle component malpositioning. Clin Orthop Relat Res 447:60–65CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR (1978) Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60:217–220CrossRefPubMed Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR (1978) Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60:217–220CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Widmer KH, Zurfluh B (2004) Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. J Orthop Res 22:815–821CrossRefPubMed Widmer KH, Zurfluh B (2004) Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. J Orthop Res 22:815–821CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Nishihara S, Sugano N, Nishii T, Ohzono K, Yoshikawa H (2003) Measurements of pelvic flexion angle using three-dimensional computed tomography. Clin Orthop Relat Res 411:140–151CrossRef Nishihara S, Sugano N, Nishii T, Ohzono K, Yoshikawa H (2003) Measurements of pelvic flexion angle using three-dimensional computed tomography. Clin Orthop Relat Res 411:140–151CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kingsley PC, Olmsted KL (1948) A study to determine the angle of anteversion of the neck of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 30:745–751CrossRef Kingsley PC, Olmsted KL (1948) A study to determine the angle of anteversion of the neck of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 30:745–751CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Murray DW (1993) The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:228–232CrossRefPubMed Murray DW (1993) The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:228–232CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Shon WY, Baldini T, Peterson MG, Wright TM, Salvati EA (2005) Impingement in total hip arthroplasty a study of retrieved acetabular components. J Arthroplast 20:427–435CrossRef Shon WY, Baldini T, Peterson MG, Wright TM, Salvati EA (2005) Impingement in total hip arthroplasty a study of retrieved acetabular components. J Arthroplast 20:427–435CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ranawat CS, Maynard MJ (1991) Modern techniques of cemented total hip arthroplasty. Tech Orthop 6:17–25CrossRef Ranawat CS, Maynard MJ (1991) Modern techniques of cemented total hip arthroplasty. Tech Orthop 6:17–25CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Berry DJ, von Knoch M, Schleck CD, Harmsen WS (2005) Effect of femoral head diameter and operative approach on risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:2456–2463CrossRefPubMed Berry DJ, von Knoch M, Schleck CD, Harmsen WS (2005) Effect of femoral head diameter and operative approach on risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:2456–2463CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Soft tissue tension is four times lower in the unstable primary total hip arthroplasty
Authors
Takeshi Ogawa
Masaki Takao
Hidetoshi Hamada
Takashi Sakai
Nobuhiko Sugano
Publication date
01-09-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 9/2018
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3908-9

Other articles of this Issue 9/2018

International Orthopaedics 9/2018 Go to the issue