Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 5/2013

01-05-2013 | Original Paper

Evaluation of Cam-type femoroacetabular impingement by ultrasound

Authors: Solveig Lerch, Andreas Kasperczyk, Janne Warnecke, Thomas Berndt, Oliver Rühmann

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 5/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

In the diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and X-ray are widely accepted methods for detection. When evaluating the hip head-neck junction using MRI, oblique axial sequences are required. However, the construction and analysis of these images are restricted to specialist radiologists and surgeons in the field of hip joint MRI. This study sought to investigate whether ultrasound, a simple and inexpensive method, can be used as a reliable tool for diagnosing Cam-type FAI.

Methods

Forty patients, with a mean age of 39 years (range, 18–61 years), were consecutively included in this prospective study, following a diagnosis of Cam-type FAI on an oblique axial MRI. All patients underwent ultrasound examination in the ventral longitudinal section at 20° external rotation, neutral position and 20° internal rotation. The alpha angle, anterior offset, offset-ratio, and anterior femoral distance (AFD) were measured using MRI and ultrasound.

Results

No significant differences were detected between the alpha angle on MRI and that using ultrasound in the neutral position or in 20° internal rotation, with strong correlations observed between these parameters (r = 0.67 for neutral position, r = 0.77 for 20° internal rotation). The Pearson’s correlation coefficient for the alpha angle on MRI and the ratio of AFD/anterior offset on ultrasound in internal rotation was 0.76 (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

The results show strong correlations between MRI and ultrasound measurements in patients with Cam-type FAI. Consequently, ultrasound may provide a useful tool for the early diagnosis of Cam-type FAI in daily practice.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M et al (2003) Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 417:112–120PubMed Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M et al (2003) Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 417:112–120PubMed
2.
go back to reference Harris WH (1986) Etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 213:20–33PubMed Harris WH (1986) Etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 213:20–33PubMed
3.
go back to reference Tanzer M, Noiseux N (2004) Osseous abnormalities and early osteoarthritis: the role of hip impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 429:170-7 Tanzer M, Noiseux N (2004) Osseous abnormalities and early osteoarthritis: the role of hip impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 429:170-7
4.
go back to reference Imam S, Khanduja V (2011) Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of femoroacetabular impingement. Int Orthop 35:1427–1435PubMedCrossRef Imam S, Khanduja V (2011) Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of femoroacetabular impingement. Int Orthop 35:1427–1435PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kusma M, Bachelier F, Schneider G, Dienst M (2009) Femoroacetabular impingement. Clinical and radiological diagnostics. Orthopade 38:402–411PubMedCrossRef Kusma M, Bachelier F, Schneider G, Dienst M (2009) Femoroacetabular impingement. Clinical and radiological diagnostics. Orthopade 38:402–411PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Mamisch TC, Werlen S, Zilkens C et al (2009) Radiological diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement. Radiologe 49:425–433PubMedCrossRef Mamisch TC, Werlen S, Zilkens C et al (2009) Radiological diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement. Radiologe 49:425–433PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Cavaignac E, Chiron P, Espie A et al (2012) Experimental study of an original radiographic view for diagnosis of cam-type anterior femoroacetabular impingement. Int Orthop 36:1783–1788PubMedCrossRef Cavaignac E, Chiron P, Espie A et al (2012) Experimental study of an original radiographic view for diagnosis of cam-type anterior femoroacetabular impingement. Int Orthop 36:1783–1788PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Notzli HP, Wyss TF, Stoecklin CH et al (2002) The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:556–560PubMedCrossRef Notzli HP, Wyss TF, Stoecklin CH et al (2002) The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:556–560PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Eijer H, Leunig M, Mahomed MN, Ganz R (2001) Cross-table lateral radiographs for screening of anterior femoral head-neck offset in patients with femoro-acetabular impingement. Hip Int 11:37–41 Eijer H, Leunig M, Mahomed MN, Ganz R (2001) Cross-table lateral radiographs for screening of anterior femoral head-neck offset in patients with femoro-acetabular impingement. Hip Int 11:37–41
10.
go back to reference Burstein D, Velyvis J, Scott KT et al (2001) Protocol issues for delayed Gd(DTPA)(2-)-enhanced MRI (dGEMRIC) for clinical evaluation of articular cartilage. Magn Reson Med 45:36–41PubMedCrossRef Burstein D, Velyvis J, Scott KT et al (2001) Protocol issues for delayed Gd(DTPA)(2-)-enhanced MRI (dGEMRIC) for clinical evaluation of articular cartilage. Magn Reson Med 45:36–41PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Troelsen A, Jacobsen S, Bolvig L et al (2007) Ultrasound versus magnetic resonance arthrography in acetabular labral tear diagnostics: a prospective comparison in 20 dysplastic hips. Acta Radiol 48:1004–1010PubMedCrossRef Troelsen A, Jacobsen S, Bolvig L et al (2007) Ultrasound versus magnetic resonance arthrography in acetabular labral tear diagnostics: a prospective comparison in 20 dysplastic hips. Acta Radiol 48:1004–1010PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Troelsen A, Mechlenburg I, Gelineck J et al (2009) What is the role of clinical tests and ultrasound in acetabular labral tear diagnostics? Acta Orthop 80:314–318PubMedCrossRef Troelsen A, Mechlenburg I, Gelineck J et al (2009) What is the role of clinical tests and ultrasound in acetabular labral tear diagnostics? Acta Orthop 80:314–318PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lohan DG, Seeger LL, Motamedi K et al (2009) Cam-type femoral-acetabular impingement: is the alpha angle the best MR arthrography has to offer? Skeletal Radiol 38:855–862PubMedCrossRef Lohan DG, Seeger LL, Motamedi K et al (2009) Cam-type femoral-acetabular impingement: is the alpha angle the best MR arthrography has to offer? Skeletal Radiol 38:855–862PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310PubMedCrossRef Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Casartelli NC, Leunig M, Item-Glatthorn JF et al (2012) Hip flexor muscle fatigue in patients with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement. Int Orthop 36:967–973PubMedCrossRef Casartelli NC, Leunig M, Item-Glatthorn JF et al (2012) Hip flexor muscle fatigue in patients with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement. Int Orthop 36:967–973PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Beck M, Kalhor M, Leunig M, Ganz R (2005) Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage: femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:1012–1018PubMedCrossRef Beck M, Kalhor M, Leunig M, Ganz R (2005) Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage: femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:1012–1018PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Dudda M, Albers C, Mamisch TC et al (2009) Do normal radiographs exclude asphericity of the femoral head-neck junction? Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:651–659PubMedCrossRef Dudda M, Albers C, Mamisch TC et al (2009) Do normal radiographs exclude asphericity of the femoral head-neck junction? Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:651–659PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ito K, Minka MA, Leunig M et al (2001) Femoroacetabular impingement and the cam-effect. A MRI-based quantitative anatomical study of the femoral head-neck offset. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:171–176PubMedCrossRef Ito K, Minka MA, Leunig M et al (2001) Femoroacetabular impingement and the cam-effect. A MRI-based quantitative anatomical study of the femoral head-neck offset. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:171–176PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Meyer DC, Beck M, Ellis T et al (2006) Comparison of six radiographic projections to assess femoral head/neck asphericity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 445:181–185PubMed Meyer DC, Beck M, Ellis T et al (2006) Comparison of six radiographic projections to assess femoral head/neck asphericity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 445:181–185PubMed
20.
go back to reference Pfirrmann CW, Mengiardi B, Dora C et al (2006) Cam and pincer femoroacetabular impingement: characteristic MR arthrographic findings in 50 patients. Radiology 240:778–785PubMedCrossRef Pfirrmann CW, Mengiardi B, Dora C et al (2006) Cam and pincer femoroacetabular impingement: characteristic MR arthrographic findings in 50 patients. Radiology 240:778–785PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Papalia R, Del BA, Franceschi F et al (2012) Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome management: arthroscopy or open surgery? Int Orthop 36:903–914PubMedCrossRef Papalia R, Del BA, Franceschi F et al (2012) Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome management: arthroscopy or open surgery? Int Orthop 36:903–914PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Domayer SE, Ziebarth K, Chan J et al (2011) Femoroacetabular cam-type impingement: diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of radiographic views compared to radial MRI. Eur J Radiol 80:805–810PubMedCrossRef Domayer SE, Ziebarth K, Chan J et al (2011) Femoroacetabular cam-type impingement: diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of radiographic views compared to radial MRI. Eur J Radiol 80:805–810PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Nepple JJ, Martel JM, Kim YJ et al (2012) Do plain radiographs correlate with CT for imaging of Cam-type femoroacetabular impingement? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:3313–3320PubMedCrossRef Nepple JJ, Martel JM, Kim YJ et al (2012) Do plain radiographs correlate with CT for imaging of Cam-type femoroacetabular impingement? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:3313–3320PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Rakhra KS, Sheikh AM, Allen D, Beaule PE (2009) Comparison of MRI alpha angle measurement planes in femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:660–665PubMedCrossRef Rakhra KS, Sheikh AM, Allen D, Beaule PE (2009) Comparison of MRI alpha angle measurement planes in femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:660–665PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Barton C, Salineros MJ, Rakhra KS, Beaule PE (2011) Validity of the alpha angle measurement on plain radiographs in the evaluation of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:464–469PubMedCrossRef Barton C, Salineros MJ, Rakhra KS, Beaule PE (2011) Validity of the alpha angle measurement on plain radiographs in the evaluation of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:464–469PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Kutty S, Schneider P, Faris P et al (2012) Reliability and predictability of the centre-edge angle in the assessment of pincer femoroacetabular impingement. Int Orthop 36:505–510PubMedCrossRef Kutty S, Schneider P, Faris P et al (2012) Reliability and predictability of the centre-edge angle in the assessment of pincer femoroacetabular impingement. Int Orthop 36:505–510PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of Cam-type femoroacetabular impingement by ultrasound
Authors
Solveig Lerch
Andreas Kasperczyk
Janne Warnecke
Thomas Berndt
Oliver Rühmann
Publication date
01-05-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 5/2013
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-1844-2

Other articles of this Issue 5/2013

International Orthopaedics 5/2013 Go to the issue