Top

International Orthopaedics

Published in:

01-04-2013 | Original Paper

Modular acetabular reconstructive cup in acetabular revision total hip arthroplasty at a minimum ten year follow-up

Authors: Takashi Sakai, Kenji Ohzono, Takashi Nishii, Masaki Takao, Hidenobu Miki, Nobuo Nakamura, Nobuhiko Sugano

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 4/2013

Abstract

Purpose

Modular acetabular reconstructive cups have been introduced in an attempt to offer initial rigid fixation by iliac lag screws and ischial pegs, to support bone grafts with a flanged metal socket, and to restore original hip center in acetabular revision. The purpose of this study was to clarify minimum ten year follow-up results of this cup system with morsellised allografts in revision cases.

Methods

We retrospectively investigated 54 acetabular revisions at a mean of 11 years (range, ten to 14 years). The indications were Paprosky’s type 2B (eight hip), 2C (eight hips), 3A (23 hips), 3B (nine hips), and 4 (six hips).

Results

Using aseptic loosening as the endpoints, the survival rate was 89.3 % (95 % CI 81–98). Radiographically, one type 3A hip, three type 3B hips and one type 4 hip showed aseptic loosening while no type 2 hips or no cemented cups showed loosening.

Conclusions

The modular reconstructive cups for acetabular revision showed bone stock restoration and stable implantation.

Comba F, Buttaro M, Pusso R, Piccaluga F (2006) Acetabular reconstruction with impacted bone allografts and cemented acetabular components. A 2- to 13-year follow-up study of 142 aseptic revisions. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:865–869PubMedCrossRef

Garcia-Cimbrelo E, Cruz-Pardos A, Garcia-Rey E, Ortega-Chamarro J (2010) The survival and fate of acetabular reconstruction with impaction grafting for large defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:3304–3313PubMedCrossRef

Jeffery M, Scott G, Freeman M (2003) Failure of an uncemented non-porous metal-backed prosthesis with augmentation using impacted allograft for acetabular revision. 12- to 17-year results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85:182–186PubMedCrossRef

Kawanabe K, Akiyama H, Onishi E, Nakamura T (2007) Revision total hip replacement using the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device with morsellised or bulk graft. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:26–31PubMedCrossRef

Okano K, Miyata N, Enomoto H, Osaki M, Shindo H (2010) Revision with impacted bone allografts and the Kerboull cross plate for massive bone defect of the acetabulum. J Arthroplasty 25:594–599PubMedCrossRef

Oonishi H, Iwaki Y, Kin N, Kushitani S, Murata N, Wakitani S, Imoto K (1997) Hydroxyapatite in revision of total hip replacements with massive acetabular defects. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79:87–92PubMedCrossRef

Sakai T, Ohzono K, Nishii T, Miki H, Takao M, Sugano N (2010) Grafting with hydroxyapatite grannules for defects of acetabular bone at revision total hip replacement. A minimum ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:1215–1221PubMed

Schreurs BW, Keurentjes JC, Gardeniers JWM, Verdonschot N, Slooff TJJH, Veth RPH (2009) Acetabular revision with impacted morsellised cancellous bone grafting and a cemented acetabular component. A 20-to 25-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:1148–1153PubMedCrossRef

Sporer SM, O’Rourke M, Chong P, Paprosky WG (2005) The use of structural distal femoral allografts for acetabular reconstruction. Average 10-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:760–765PubMedCrossRef

10.

Sudo A, Hasegawa M, Fukuda A, Kawamura G, Muraki M, Uchida A (2007) Acetabular reconstruction using a cementless cup and hydroxyapatite granules. J Arthroplasty 22:828–832PubMedCrossRef

11.

Tanaka C, Shikata J, Ikenaga M, Takahashi M (2003) Acetabular reconstruction using a Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device and hydroxyapatite granules. A 3- to 8- year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 18:719–725PubMedCrossRef

12.

van Haaren EH, Heyligers IC, Alexander FGM, Wuisman PIJM (2007) High rate of failure of impaction grafting in large acetabular defects. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:296–300PubMedCrossRef

13.

Wang JW, Fong CY, Su YS, Yu HN (2006) Acetabular revision with morsellised allogenic bone graft and a cemented metal-backed component. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:586–591PubMedCrossRef

14.

Sadoghi P, Schröder C, Fottner A, Steinbrück A, Betz O, Müller PE, Jansson V, Hölzer A (2012) Application and survival curve of total hip arthroplasties: a systematic comparative analysis using worldwide hip arthroplasty registers. Int Orthop 36:2197–2203PubMedCrossRef

15.

Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM (1994) Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty: a six year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 9:33–44PubMedCrossRef

16.

Babis GC, Sakellariou VI, Chatziantoniou AN, Soucacos PN, Megas P (2011) High complication rate in reconstruction of Paprosky type IIIa acetabular defects using an oblong implant with modular side plates and a hook. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:1592–1596PubMedCrossRef

17.

Friesenbichler J, Schwarzkopf R, Sadoghi P, Marwin SE, Glehr M, Maurer-Ertl W, Leithner A (2012) Failure rate of a rotating hinge knee design due to yoke fracture of the hinged tibial insert: a retrospective data analysis and review of the literature. Int Orthop 36:993–998PubMedCrossRef

18.

Lingaraj K, Teo YH, Bergman N (2009) The management of severe acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty using modular porous metal components. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:1555–1560PubMedCrossRef

19.

Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty: an end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51:737–755PubMed

20.

Asayama I, Chamnongkich S, Simpson KJ, Kinsey TL, Mahoney OM (2005) Reconstructed hip joints position and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 20:414–420PubMedCrossRef

21.

Nunn D, Freeman MAR, Hill PF, Evans SJW (1989) The measurement of migration of the acetabular component of hip prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 71:629–631PubMed

22.

Ochs BG, Schmid U, Rieth J, Ateschrang A, Weise K, Ochs U (2008) Acetabular bone reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A comparison of freeze-dried, irradiated and chemically-treated allograft vitalized with autologous marrow versus frozen non-irradiated allograft. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:1164–1171PubMedCrossRef

23.

DeLee JG, Charnley J (1976) Radiographic demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 121:20–32PubMed

24.

Hoenig JM, Heisey DM (2001) The abuse of power: the pervasive fallacy of power calculations for data analysis. Am Stat 55:19–24CrossRef

25.

Takao M, Nakamura N, Ohzono K, Sakai T, Nishii T, Sugano N (2011) The results of a press-fit-only technique for acetabular fixation in hip dysplasia. J Arthroplasty 26:562–568PubMedCrossRef

26.

van der Donk S, Buma P, Slooff TJJH, Gardeniers JWM, Schreurs BW (2002) Incorporation of morsellised bone grafts: a study of 24 acetabular biopsy specimens. Clin Orthop Relat Res 396:131–141PubMedCrossRef

27.

Winter E, Piert M, Volkmann R, Maurer F, Eingartner C, Weise K, Weller S (2001) Allogeneic cancellous bone graft and a Burch-Schneider ring for acetabular reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:862–867PubMed

Title: Modular acetabular reconstructive cup in acetabular revision total hip arthroplasty at a minimum ten year follow-up
Authors: Takashi Sakai
Kenji Ohzono
Takashi Nishii
Masaki Takao
Hidenobu Miki
Nobuo Nakamura
Nobuhiko Sugano
Publication date: 01-04-2013
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: International Orthopaedics / Issue 4/2013
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-1818-4

ACC 2024 Congress

Springer Medicine

Modular acetabular reconstructive cup in acetabular revision total hip arthroplasty at a minimum ten year follow-up

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

ACC 2024 Congress

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 4/2013

Smoking is a risk factor of organ/space surgical site infection in orthopaedic surgery with implant materials

Finite element analysis of the pelvis after modular hemipelvic endoprosthesis reconstruction

Double dome osteotomy for the treatment of cubitus varus in children

Impact factors of orthopaedic journals between 2000 and 2010: trends and comparisons with other surgical specialties

Mid-term results of Bernese periacetabular osteotomy for developmental dysplasia of hip in middle aged patients

Reply to comment on Hu et al. “Allograft versus autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an up-to-date meta-analysis of prospective studies”