Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 11/2012

01-11-2012 | Original Paper

Application and survival curve of total hip arthroplasties: a systematic comparative analysis using worldwide hip arthroplasty registers

Authors: Patrick Sadoghi, Christian Schröder, Andreas Fottner, Arnd Steinbrück, Oliver Betz, Peter E. Müller, Volkmar Jansson, Andreas Hölzer

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 11/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the study was to compare primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) implantations between different countries in terms of THA number per inhabitant, age, and procedure type and to compare the survival curve including all THAs using hip arthroplasty registers.

Methods

THA registers were compared between different countries with respect to the number of primary implantations per inhabitant and age, procedure type and survival curve. We performed a literature search for all national hip arthroplasty registers providing annual reports for 2009 or, if not available, a more recent period. The data from these reports were analysed in terms of number, age distribution and procedure type of primary THAs and survival curves.

Results

We identified nine hip arthroplasty registers, which comprised sufficient data to be included. A large variation was found in the annual number of primary THA implantations per inhabitant. The procedure type varied greatly as well, e.g. in Sweden 67 % are cemented THAs whereas in Emilia-Romagna (Italy) 89 % are cementless THAs.

Conclusions

This study revealed large differences in terms of the annual number of primary THAs per inhabitant and primary THA procedure type across countries. These data can be used to rank local primary THA implantations within an international context.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kolling C, Simmen BR, Labek G, Goldhahn J (2007) Key factors for a successful national arthroplasty register. J Bone Jt Surg Br 89B:1567–1573 Kolling C, Simmen BR, Labek G, Goldhahn J (2007) Key factors for a successful national arthroplasty register. J Bone Jt Surg Br 89B:1567–1573
2.
go back to reference Migliore A, Perrini MR, Romanini E, Fella D, Cavallo A, Cerbo M, Jefferson T (2009) Comparison of the performance of hip implants with data from different arthroplasty registers. J Bone Jt Surg Br 91B:1545–1549 Migliore A, Perrini MR, Romanini E, Fella D, Cavallo A, Cerbo M, Jefferson T (2009) Comparison of the performance of hip implants with data from different arthroplasty registers. J Bone Jt Surg Br 91B:1545–1549
3.
go back to reference Stea S, Bordini B, De Clerico M, Petropulacos K, Toni A (2009) First hip arthroplasty register in Italy: 55,000 cases and 7 year follow-up. Int Orthop 33(2):339–46PubMedCrossRef Stea S, Bordini B, De Clerico M, Petropulacos K, Toni A (2009) First hip arthroplasty register in Italy: 55,000 cases and 7 year follow-up. Int Orthop 33(2):339–46PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Herberts P, Malchau H (2000) Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement—A review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 71:111–121PubMedCrossRef Herberts P, Malchau H (2000) Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement—A review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 71:111–121PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Labek G, Janda W, Agreiter M, Schuh R, Böhler N (2011) Organisation, data evaluation, interpretation and effect of arthroplasty register data on the outcome in terms of revision rate in total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 35(2):157–163PubMedCrossRef Labek G, Janda W, Agreiter M, Schuh R, Böhler N (2011) Organisation, data evaluation, interpretation and effect of arthroplasty register data on the outcome in terms of revision rate in total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 35(2):157–163PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Schuh R, Neumann D, Rauf R, Hofstaetter J, Boehler N, Labek G (2012) Revision rate of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: comparison of published literature and arthroplasty register data. Int Orthop 36(7):1349–1354 Schuh R, Neumann D, Rauf R, Hofstaetter J, Boehler N, Labek G (2012) Revision rate of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: comparison of published literature and arthroplasty register data. Int Orthop 36(7):1349–1354
7.
go back to reference Schuh R, Dorninger G, Agreiter M, Boehler N, Labek G (2012) Validity of published outcome data concerning anatomic graduated component total knee arthroplasty: a structured literature review including arthroplasty register data. Int Orthop 36(1):51–6PubMedCrossRef Schuh R, Dorninger G, Agreiter M, Boehler N, Labek G (2012) Validity of published outcome data concerning anatomic graduated component total knee arthroplasty: a structured literature review including arthroplasty register data. Int Orthop 36(1):51–6PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Labek G, Frischhut S, Schlichtherle R, Williams A, Thaler M (2011) Outcome of the cementless Taperloc stem: a comprehensive literature review including arthroplasty register data. Acta Orthop 82(2):143–148PubMedCrossRef Labek G, Frischhut S, Schlichtherle R, Williams A, Thaler M (2011) Outcome of the cementless Taperloc stem: a comprehensive literature review including arthroplasty register data. Acta Orthop 82(2):143–148PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Labek G, Klaus H, Schlichtherle R, Williams A, Agreiter M (2011) Revision rates after total ankle arthroplasty in sample-based clinical studies and national registries. Foot Ankle Int 32(8):740–745PubMedCrossRef Labek G, Klaus H, Schlichtherle R, Williams A, Agreiter M (2011) Revision rates after total ankle arthroplasty in sample-based clinical studies and national registries. Foot Ankle Int 32(8):740–745PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Labek G, Sekyra K, Pawelka W, Janda W, Stöckl B (2011) Outcome and reproducibility of data concerning the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a structured literature review including arthroplasty registry data. Acta Orthop 82(2):131–135PubMedCrossRef Labek G, Sekyra K, Pawelka W, Janda W, Stöckl B (2011) Outcome and reproducibility of data concerning the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a structured literature review including arthroplasty registry data. Acta Orthop 82(2):131–135PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Labek G, Kovac S, Levasic V, Janda W, Zagra L (2012) The outcome of the cementless tapered SL-Plus stem: an analysis of arthroplasty register data. Int Orthop 36(6):1149–1154PubMedCrossRef Labek G, Kovac S, Levasic V, Janda W, Zagra L (2012) The outcome of the cementless tapered SL-Plus stem: an analysis of arthroplasty register data. Int Orthop 36(6):1149–1154PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Boyer P, Boutron I, Ravaud P (2011) Scientific production and impact of national registers: the example of orthopaedic national registers. Osteoarthr Cartil 19(7):858–863PubMedCrossRef Boyer P, Boutron I, Ravaud P (2011) Scientific production and impact of national registers: the example of orthopaedic national registers. Osteoarthr Cartil 19(7):858–863PubMedCrossRef
14.
15.
go back to reference Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register (2010) Dansk Hoftealloplastik Register. Årsrapport 2010. Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register. http://www.dhr.dk. Accessed 10/28/2011 Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register (2010) Dansk Hoftealloplastik Register. Årsrapport 2010. Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register. http://​www.​dhr.​dk. Accessed 10/28/2011
16.
go back to reference Register of Orthopaedic Prosthetic Implants (2010) Overall data hip, knee and shoulder arthroplasty in the Emilia-Romagna Region (Italy). 1st January 2000 - 31st December 2009. Register of Orthopaedic Prosthetic Implants. https://ripo.cineca.it. Accessed 10/28/2011 Register of Orthopaedic Prosthetic Implants (2010) Overall data hip, knee and shoulder arthroplasty in the Emilia-Romagna Region (Italy). 1st January 2000 - 31st December 2009. Register of Orthopaedic Prosthetic Implants. https://​ripo.​cineca.​it. Accessed 10/28/2011
17.
19.
21.
go back to reference Necas L, Katina S, Kokavec M, Uhlárová J. Slovenský artroplastický register. analýza 2003 - 2008 (2009) Slovak Arthroplasty Register. https://sar.mfn.sk/. Accessed 10/28/2011 Necas L, Katina S, Kokavec M, Uhlárová J. Slovenský artroplastický register. analýza 2003 - 2008 (2009) Slovak Arthroplasty Register. https://​sar.​mfn.​sk/​. Accessed 10/28/2011
22.
go back to reference Garellick G, Kärrholm J, Rogmark C, Herberts P. Swedish (2010) Hip Arthroplasty Register. Annual Report 2009. Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. http://www.shpr.se. Accessed 10/28/2011 Garellick G, Kärrholm J, Rogmark C, Herberts P. Swedish (2010) Hip Arthroplasty Register. Annual Report 2009. Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. http://​www.​shpr.​se. Accessed 10/28/2011
23.
24.
go back to reference Statistics Denmark (2010) Population at the first day of the quarter by region, sex, age, marital status, ancestry, country of origin and citizenship. http://www.statbank.dk. Accessed 11/01/2011 Statistics Denmark (2010) Population at the first day of the quarter by region, sex, age, marital status, ancestry, country of origin and citizenship. http://​www.​statbank.​dk. Accessed 11/01/2011
25.
go back to reference Italian National Institute of Statistics (2010) Resident population by age, sex and marital status on 1st January 2009. http://demo.istat.it. Accessed 11/01/2011 Italian National Institute of Statistics (2010) Resident population by age, sex and marital status on 1st January 2009. http://​demo.​istat.​it. Accessed 11/01/2011
30.
32.
33.
go back to reference Furnes O, Lie SA, Espehaug B, Vollset SE, Engesaeter LB, Havelin LI (2001) Hip disease and the prognosis of total hip replacements - A review of 53 698 primary total hip replacements reported to the Norwegian arthroplasty register 1987–99. J Bone Jt Surg Br 83B:579–586CrossRef Furnes O, Lie SA, Espehaug B, Vollset SE, Engesaeter LB, Havelin LI (2001) Hip disease and the prognosis of total hip replacements - A review of 53 698 primary total hip replacements reported to the Norwegian arthroplasty register 1987–99. J Bone Jt Surg Br 83B:579–586CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Application and survival curve of total hip arthroplasties: a systematic comparative analysis using worldwide hip arthroplasty registers
Authors
Patrick Sadoghi
Christian Schröder
Andreas Fottner
Arnd Steinbrück
Oliver Betz
Peter E. Müller
Volkmar Jansson
Andreas Hölzer
Publication date
01-11-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 11/2012
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1614-6

Other articles of this Issue 11/2012

International Orthopaedics 11/2012 Go to the issue