Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 5/2012

01-05-2012 | Original Paper

Computer Tomography assessment of the fusion rate after posterior arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis

Authors: Mathieu Thaunat, Xavier Bajard, Philippe Boisrenoult, Philippe Beaufils, Philippe Oger

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 5/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to assess the fusion rate on CT examinations and to correlate clinically the functional result with the degree of bone fusion in the subtalar joint after posterior arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis (PASTA).

Methods

Fourteen cases, from 36 to 84 years old, were retrospectively followed-up for a minimum of one year (range 12–92 months). A CT scan had been systematically performed at the six-month follow-up visit. The CT scans were examined in sagittal 2-mm-thick reformatted slices, measuring the length of the joint surface and the length of the fused portion of the joint space on each image.

Results

At six months, the average fusion ratio was 39±19% (range 0–69%). Fusion defined by a fusion ratio superior or equal to 33% on the CT scan was observed in 11 cases. One patient had a delayed union and required a revision of fixation. One patient had a bilateral nonunion. Mean average AOFAS score improved from 51±10 to 77±9 at last follow-up.

Conclusion

Compared to open procedures, the posterior arthroscopic fusion seems to offer a promising alternative. However, our results suggest that the fusion rate following PASTA is not as favourable as reported in previous studies. Factors such as adequate compression and stable fixation provided by the screws together with the surgeons’ experience with this demanding technique are of the utmost importance. A 33% CT fusion ratio threshold could accurately discriminate between clinical stability and instability.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Albert A, Deleu PA, Leemrijse T, Maldague P, Devos Bevernage B (2011) Posterior arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis: Ten cases at one-year follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97:401–405PubMedCrossRef Albert A, Deleu PA, Leemrijse T, Maldague P, Devos Bevernage B (2011) Posterior arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis: Ten cases at one-year follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97:401–405PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Amendola A, Lee KB, Saltzman CL, Suh JS (2007) Technique and early experience with posterior arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int 28:298–302PubMedCrossRef Amendola A, Lee KB, Saltzman CL, Suh JS (2007) Technique and early experience with posterior arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int 28:298–302PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Angus P, Cowell H (1986) Triple arthrodesis—A critical long term review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 68:260–265PubMed Angus P, Cowell H (1986) Triple arthrodesis—A critical long term review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 68:260–265PubMed
4.
go back to reference Beimers L, De Leeuw PA, Van Dijk CN (2009) A 3-portal approach for arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:830–834PubMedCrossRef Beimers L, De Leeuw PA, Van Dijk CN (2009) A 3-portal approach for arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:830–834PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Carro LP, Golanó P, Vega J (2007) Arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis: the posterior approach in the prone position. Arthroscopy 23:445PubMed Carro LP, Golanó P, Vega J (2007) Arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis: the posterior approach in the prone position. Arthroscopy 23:445PubMed
6.
go back to reference Dorsey ML, Liu PT, Roberts CC, Kile TA (2009) Correlation of arthrodesis stability with degree of joint fusion on MDCT. Am J Roentgenol 192:496–499CrossRef Dorsey ML, Liu PT, Roberts CC, Kile TA (2009) Correlation of arthrodesis stability with degree of joint fusion on MDCT. Am J Roentgenol 192:496–499CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Easley ME, Trnka HJ, Schon LC, Myerson MS (2000) Isolated subtalar arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:613–624PubMed Easley ME, Trnka HJ, Schon LC, Myerson MS (2000) Isolated subtalar arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:613–624PubMed
8.
go back to reference El Shazly O, Nassar W, El Badrawy A (2009) Arthroscopic subtalar fusion for post-traumatic subtalar arthritis. Arthroscopy 25:783–787PubMedCrossRef El Shazly O, Nassar W, El Badrawy A (2009) Arthroscopic subtalar fusion for post-traumatic subtalar arthritis. Arthroscopy 25:783–787PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Glanzmann MC, Sanhueza-Hernandez R (2007) Arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis for symptomatic osteoarthritis of the hindfoot: a prospective study of 41 cases. Foot Ankle Int 28:2–7PubMedCrossRef Glanzmann MC, Sanhueza-Hernandez R (2007) Arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis for symptomatic osteoarthritis of the hindfoot: a prospective study of 41 cases. Foot Ankle Int 28:2–7PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Jones CP, Coughlin MJ, Shurnas PS (2006) Prospective CT scan evaluation of hindfoot nonunions treated with revision surgery and low-intensity ultrasound stimulation. Foot Ankle Int 27:229–235PubMed Jones CP, Coughlin MJ, Shurnas PS (2006) Prospective CT scan evaluation of hindfoot nonunions treated with revision surgery and low-intensity ultrasound stimulation. Foot Ankle Int 27:229–235PubMed
11.
go back to reference Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M (1994) Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 15:349–353PubMed Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M (1994) Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 15:349–353PubMed
12.
go back to reference Lee KB, Park CH, Seon JK, Kim MS (2010) Arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis using a posterior 2-portal approach in the prone position. Arthroscopy 26:230–238PubMedCrossRef Lee KB, Park CH, Seon JK, Kim MS (2010) Arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis using a posterior 2-portal approach in the prone position. Arthroscopy 26:230–238PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Scranton PE Jr (1999) Comparison of open isolated subtalar arthrodesis with autogenous bone graft versus outpatient arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis using injectable bone morphogenic protein-enhanced graft. Foot Ankle Int 20:162–165PubMed Scranton PE Jr (1999) Comparison of open isolated subtalar arthrodesis with autogenous bone graft versus outpatient arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis using injectable bone morphogenic protein-enhanced graft. Foot Ankle Int 20:162–165PubMed
14.
go back to reference Tasto JP (2006) Arthroscopy of the subtalar joint and arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis. Instr Course Lect 55:555–564PubMed Tasto JP (2006) Arthroscopy of the subtalar joint and arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis. Instr Course Lect 55:555–564PubMed
15.
go back to reference Van Dijk CN, Scholten PE, Krips R (2000) A 2-portal endoscopic approach for diagnosis and treatment of posterior ankle pathology. Arthroscopy 16:871–876PubMedCrossRef Van Dijk CN, Scholten PE, Krips R (2000) A 2-portal endoscopic approach for diagnosis and treatment of posterior ankle pathology. Arthroscopy 16:871–876PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Computer Tomography assessment of the fusion rate after posterior arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis
Authors
Mathieu Thaunat
Xavier Bajard
Philippe Boisrenoult
Philippe Beaufils
Philippe Oger
Publication date
01-05-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 5/2012
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1448-7

Other articles of this Issue 5/2012

International Orthopaedics 5/2012 Go to the issue