Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 3/2012

01-03-2012 | Original Paper

Bone remodelling around the Metha short stem in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry study

Authors: Matthias Lerch, Annelene von der Haar-Tran, Henning Windhagen, Bernd A. Behrens, Patrick Wefstaedt, Christina M. Stukenborg-Colsman

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 3/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

On the basis of positive clinical results with mid- and long-term follow-up using the Mayo short stem, the Metha neck-preserving stem (BBraun, Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany) was introduced. The purpose of this study was to validate the implant design by direct acquisition of bone remodelling data from total hip arthroplasty (THA) recipients using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).

Methods

After power analysis, 25 patients were included in this prospective study. Patients were examined clinically and underwent DEXA examinations preoperatively and postoperatively at one week, six months and one and two years after THA. Gruen zones were adapted to the short stem design (R1–R7).

Results

The Harris Hip Score (HHS) increased significantly by 31 points. No stem had to be revised. Bone mineral density (BMD) in the greater trochanter decreased significantly from 0.78 g/cm2 postoperatively to 0.72 g/cm2 two years after surgery. Marginal changes were seen in the lateral distal regions (R4–R5). In the minor trochanter region, BMD increased significantly after two years by 12.9%. In the calcar region, BMD exceeded the baseline value by 6.1% two years after implantation.

Conclusions

Stress shielding seems to occur at the greater trochanter due to the vast cross-section of the implant. However, the aim of proximal load transfer of the Metha stem seems to be partially achieved. DEXA analysis revealed a concentrated load distribution on the medial portion of the femur, which is an important region to guarantee long-term implant survival.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Morrey BF, Adams RA, Kessler M (2000) A conservative femoral replacement for total hip arthroplasty. A prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82:952–8PubMedCrossRef Morrey BF, Adams RA, Kessler M (2000) A conservative femoral replacement for total hip arthroplasty. A prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82:952–8PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Huiskes R, Weinans H, van RB (1992) The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials. Clin Orthop Relat Res 124–34. Huiskes R, Weinans H, van RB (1992) The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials. Clin Orthop Relat Res 124–34.
3.
go back to reference Falez F, Casella F, Panegrossi G et al (2008) Perspectives on metaphyseal conservative stems. J Orthop Traumatol 9:49–54PubMedCrossRef Falez F, Casella F, Panegrossi G et al (2008) Perspectives on metaphyseal conservative stems. J Orthop Traumatol 9:49–54PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Brodner W, Bitzan P, Lomoschitz F et al (2004) Changes in bone mineral density in the proximal femur after cementless total hip arthroplasty. A five-year longitudinal study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:20–6PubMed Brodner W, Bitzan P, Lomoschitz F et al (2004) Changes in bone mineral density in the proximal femur after cementless total hip arthroplasty. A five-year longitudinal study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:20–6PubMed
5.
go back to reference Sabo D, Reiter A, Simank HG et al (1998) Periprosthetic mineralization around cementless total hip endoprosthesis: longitudinal study and cross-sectional study on titanium threaded acetabular cup and cementless Spotorno stem with DEXA. Calcif Tissue Int 62:177–82PubMedCrossRef Sabo D, Reiter A, Simank HG et al (1998) Periprosthetic mineralization around cementless total hip endoprosthesis: longitudinal study and cross-sectional study on titanium threaded acetabular cup and cementless Spotorno stem with DEXA. Calcif Tissue Int 62:177–82PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Speirs AD, Heller MO, Taylor WR et al (2007) Influence of changes in stem positioning on femoral loading after THR using a short-stemmed hip implant. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon ) 22:431–9CrossRef Speirs AD, Heller MO, Taylor WR et al (2007) Influence of changes in stem positioning on femoral loading after THR using a short-stemmed hip implant. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon ) 22:431–9CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Cohen B, Rushton N (1995) Accuracy of DEXA measurement of bone mineral density after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:479–83PubMed Cohen B, Rushton N (1995) Accuracy of DEXA measurement of bone mineral density after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:479–83PubMed
8.
go back to reference Martini F, Lebherz C, Mayer F et al (2000) Precision of the measurements of periprosthetic bone mineral density in hips with a custom-made femoral stem. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82:1065–71PubMedCrossRef Martini F, Lebherz C, Mayer F et al (2000) Precision of the measurements of periprosthetic bone mineral density in hips with a custom-made femoral stem. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82:1065–71PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Mortimer ES, Rosenthall L, Paterson I, Bobyn JD (1996) Effect of rotation on periprosthetic bone mineral measurements in a hip phantom. Clin Orthop Relat Res 269–74. Mortimer ES, Rosenthall L, Paterson I, Bobyn JD (1996) Effect of rotation on periprosthetic bone mineral measurements in a hip phantom. Clin Orthop Relat Res 269–74.
10.
go back to reference Albanese CV, Rendine M, De PF et al (2006) Bone remodelling in THA: A comparative DXA scan study between conventional implants and a new stemless femoral component. A preliminary report. Hip Int 16(Suppl 3):9–15PubMed Albanese CV, Rendine M, De PF et al (2006) Bone remodelling in THA: A comparative DXA scan study between conventional implants and a new stemless femoral component. A preliminary report. Hip Int 16(Suppl 3):9–15PubMed
11.
go back to reference Panisello JJ, Herrero L, Herrera A et al (2006) Bone remodelling after total hip arthroplasty using an uncemented anatomic femoral stem: a three-year prospective study using bone densitometry. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong ) 14:32–7 Panisello JJ, Herrero L, Herrera A et al (2006) Bone remodelling after total hip arthroplasty using an uncemented anatomic femoral stem: a three-year prospective study using bone densitometry. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong ) 14:32–7
12.
go back to reference Aldinger PR, Sabo D, Pritsch M et al (2003) Pattern of periprosthetic bone remodeling around stable uncemented tapered hip stems: a prospective 84-month follow-up study and a median 156-month cross-sectional study with DXA. Calcif Tissue Int 73:115–21PubMedCrossRef Aldinger PR, Sabo D, Pritsch M et al (2003) Pattern of periprosthetic bone remodeling around stable uncemented tapered hip stems: a prospective 84-month follow-up study and a median 156-month cross-sectional study with DXA. Calcif Tissue Int 73:115–21PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Korovessis P, Droutsas P, Piperos G et al (1997) Course of bone mineral content changes around cementless Zweymueller total hip arthroplasty. A 4-year follow-up study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 116:60–5PubMedCrossRef Korovessis P, Droutsas P, Piperos G et al (1997) Course of bone mineral content changes around cementless Zweymueller total hip arthroplasty. A 4-year follow-up study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 116:60–5PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Skoldenberg OG, Boden HS, Salemyr MO et al (2006) Periprosthetic proximal bone loss after uncemented hip arthroplasty is related to stem size: DXA measurements in 138 patients followed for 2–7 years. Acta Orthop 77:386–92PubMedCrossRef Skoldenberg OG, Boden HS, Salemyr MO et al (2006) Periprosthetic proximal bone loss after uncemented hip arthroplasty is related to stem size: DXA measurements in 138 patients followed for 2–7 years. Acta Orthop 77:386–92PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Mulier M, Jaecques SV, Raaijmaakers M et al (2011) Early periprosthetic bone remodelling around cemented and uncemented custom-made femoral components and their uncemented acetabular cups. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131:941–8PubMedCrossRef Mulier M, Jaecques SV, Raaijmaakers M et al (2011) Early periprosthetic bone remodelling around cemented and uncemented custom-made femoral components and their uncemented acetabular cups. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131:941–8PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Pitto RP, Hayward A, Walker C, Shim VB (2010) Femoral bone density changes after total hip arthroplasty with uncemented taper-design stem: a five year follow-up study. Int Orthop 34:783–7PubMedCrossRef Pitto RP, Hayward A, Walker C, Shim VB (2010) Femoral bone density changes after total hip arthroplasty with uncemented taper-design stem: a five year follow-up study. Int Orthop 34:783–7PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Rahmy AI, Gosens T, Blake GM et al (2004) Periprosthetic bone remodelling of two types of uncemented femoral implant with proximal hydroxyapatite coating: a 3-year follow-up study addressing the influence of prosthesis design and preoperative bone density on periprosthetic bone loss. Osteoporos Int 15:281–9PubMedCrossRef Rahmy AI, Gosens T, Blake GM et al (2004) Periprosthetic bone remodelling of two types of uncemented femoral implant with proximal hydroxyapatite coating: a 3-year follow-up study addressing the influence of prosthesis design and preoperative bone density on periprosthetic bone loss. Osteoporos Int 15:281–9PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Braun A, Lazovic D, Zigan R (2007) Modular short-stem prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty: implant positioning and the influence of navigation. Orthopedics 30:148–52 Braun A, Lazovic D, Zigan R (2007) Modular short-stem prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty: implant positioning and the influence of navigation. Orthopedics 30:148–52
19.
go back to reference Katano H (2007) Periprosthetic Bone Mineral Density in Bicontact SD Stem. Five to Ten Years Follwo-up. In: Weller S, Braun A, Eingartner C, Maurer F, Weise K, Winter E, Volkmann R (eds) The Bicontact Hip Arthroplasty System 1987–2007. Tübingen, Georg Thieme Verlag, pp 63–69 Katano H (2007) Periprosthetic Bone Mineral Density in Bicontact SD Stem. Five to Ten Years Follwo-up. In: Weller S, Braun A, Eingartner C, Maurer F, Weise K, Winter E, Volkmann R (eds) The Bicontact Hip Arthroplasty System 1987–2007. Tübingen, Georg Thieme Verlag, pp 63–69
20.
go back to reference Thorey F, Lerch M, Klages P, et al. (2010) Ist eine metaphysäre Verankerung durch neue Kurzschaftsysteme realisierbar? Welche Potentiale verbergen sich hinter diesen Designkonzepten für unseren Klinikalltag? 58 Jahrestagung der Vereinigung Süddeutscher Orthopäden e V Poster No. 48: Thorey F, Lerch M, Klages P, et al. (2010) Ist eine metaphysäre Verankerung durch neue Kurzschaftsysteme realisierbar? Welche Potentiale verbergen sich hinter diesen Designkonzepten für unseren Klinikalltag? 58 Jahrestagung der Vereinigung Süddeutscher Orthopäden e V Poster No. 48:
21.
go back to reference Albanese CV, Santori FS, Pavan L et al (2009) Periprosthetic DXA after total hip arthroplasty with short vs. ultra-short custom-made femoral stems: 37 patients followed for 3 years. Acta Orthop 80:291–7PubMedCrossRef Albanese CV, Santori FS, Pavan L et al (2009) Periprosthetic DXA after total hip arthroplasty with short vs. ultra-short custom-made femoral stems: 37 patients followed for 3 years. Acta Orthop 80:291–7PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Decking R, Puhl W, Simon U, Claes LE (2006) Changes in strain distribution of loaded proximal femora caused by different types of cementless femoral stems. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon ) 21:495–501CrossRef Decking R, Puhl W, Simon U, Claes LE (2006) Changes in strain distribution of loaded proximal femora caused by different types of cementless femoral stems. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon ) 21:495–501CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Sychterz CJ, Topoleski LD, Sacco M, Engh CA, Sr. (2001) Effect of femoral stiffness on bone remodeling after uncemented arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 218–27. Sychterz CJ, Topoleski LD, Sacco M, Engh CA, Sr. (2001) Effect of femoral stiffness on bone remodeling after uncemented arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 218–27.
24.
go back to reference Tanzer M, Kantor S, Rosenthall L, Bobyn JD (2001) Femoral remodeling after porous-coated total hip arthroplasty with and without hydroxyapatite-tricalcium phosphate coating: a prospective randomized trial. J Arthroplasty 16:552–8PubMedCrossRef Tanzer M, Kantor S, Rosenthall L, Bobyn JD (2001) Femoral remodeling after porous-coated total hip arthroplasty with and without hydroxyapatite-tricalcium phosphate coating: a prospective randomized trial. J Arthroplasty 16:552–8PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Bobyn JD, Mortimer ES, Glassman AH, et al. (1992) Producing and avoiding stress shielding. Laboratory and clinical observations of noncemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 79–96. Bobyn JD, Mortimer ES, Glassman AH, et al. (1992) Producing and avoiding stress shielding. Laboratory and clinical observations of noncemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 79–96.
26.
go back to reference Munting E, Smitz P, Van SN et al (1997) Effect of a stemless femoral implant for total hip arthroplasty on the bone mineral density of the proximal femur. A prospective longitudinal study. J Arthroplasty 12:373–9PubMedCrossRef Munting E, Smitz P, Van SN et al (1997) Effect of a stemless femoral implant for total hip arthroplasty on the bone mineral density of the proximal femur. A prospective longitudinal study. J Arthroplasty 12:373–9PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Bone remodelling around the Metha short stem in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry study
Authors
Matthias Lerch
Annelene von der Haar-Tran
Henning Windhagen
Bernd A. Behrens
Patrick Wefstaedt
Christina M. Stukenborg-Colsman
Publication date
01-03-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1361-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

International Orthopaedics 3/2012 Go to the issue