Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 4/2012

01-04-2012 | Original Paper

Clinical reliability of closed techniques and comparison with open strategies to achieve union at the docking site

Authors: Giovanni Lovisetti, Francesco Sala, Anna N. Miller, Ahmed M. Thabet, Vincenzo Zottola, Dario Capitani

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 4/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This retrospective review follows 31 tibial nonunions to compare union at the docking site using closed versus open strategies. In this cohort of patients, all but five were infected nonunions.

Methods

Thirteen patients initially treated with single compression were compared with 18 patients treated by open revision of the docking site. In the single compression group, an average of 6.5 cm of bone was resected and index lengthening was 2.04. In the open revision group, a mean of 9.4 cm was resected and the index lengthening was 1.73.

Results

Consolidation at the docking site occurred in all subjects in both groups. There was no statistical difference between the two groups. Conclusive evidence of superiority of one modality of treatment over the other cannot be drawn from our data.

Conclusions

The simple compression procedure requires less invasive surgery and is probably less demanding and more cost-effective in short transports.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bumbasirević M, Tomić S, Lesić A et al (2010) War-related infected tibial nonunion with bone and soft-tissue loss treated with bone transport using the Ilizarov method. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130:739–749PubMedCrossRef Bumbasirević M, Tomić S, Lesić A et al (2010) War-related infected tibial nonunion with bone and soft-tissue loss treated with bone transport using the Ilizarov method. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130:739–749PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Cattaneo R, Catagni MA, Johnson EE (1992) The treatment of infected nonunions and segmental defects of the tibia by the methods of Ilizarov. Clin Orthop Relat Res 280:143–152PubMed Cattaneo R, Catagni MA, Johnson EE (1992) The treatment of infected nonunions and segmental defects of the tibia by the methods of Ilizarov. Clin Orthop Relat Res 280:143–152PubMed
3.
go back to reference Dendrinos GK, Kontos S, Lyritsis E (1995) Use of the Ilizarov technique for treatment of non-union of the tibia associated with infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77(6):835–846PubMed Dendrinos GK, Kontos S, Lyritsis E (1995) Use of the Ilizarov technique for treatment of non-union of the tibia associated with infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77(6):835–846PubMed
4.
go back to reference Einhorn TA (1998) The cell and molecular biology of fracture healing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 355:S7–S21PubMedCrossRef Einhorn TA (1998) The cell and molecular biology of fracture healing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 355:S7–S21PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Elbatrawy Y, Fayed M (2009) Deformity correction with an external fixator: ease of use and accuracy? Orthopedics 32:82PubMed Elbatrawy Y, Fayed M (2009) Deformity correction with an external fixator: ease of use and accuracy? Orthopedics 32:82PubMed
6.
go back to reference El-Alfy B, El-Mowafi H, El-Moghazy N (2010) Distraction osteogenesis in management of composite bone and soft tissue defects. Int Orthop 34(1):115–118PubMedCrossRef El-Alfy B, El-Mowafi H, El-Moghazy N (2010) Distraction osteogenesis in management of composite bone and soft tissue defects. Int Orthop 34(1):115–118PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Garcia FL, Picado CH, Garcia SB (2009) Histology of the regenerate and docking site in bone transport. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129(4):549–558PubMedCrossRef Garcia FL, Picado CH, Garcia SB (2009) Histology of the regenerate and docking site in bone transport. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129(4):549–558PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Giotakis N, Narayan B, Nayagam S (2007) Distraction osteogenesis and nonunion of the docking site: is there an ideal treatment option? Injury 38(Suppl 1):S100–S107PubMedCrossRef Giotakis N, Narayan B, Nayagam S (2007) Distraction osteogenesis and nonunion of the docking site: is there an ideal treatment option? Injury 38(Suppl 1):S100–S107PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Green SA (1994) Skeletal defects. A comparison of bone grafting and bone transport for segmental skeletal defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res 301:111–117PubMed Green SA (1994) Skeletal defects. A comparison of bone grafting and bone transport for segmental skeletal defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res 301:111–117PubMed
10.
go back to reference Guerreschi F, Azzam W, Camagni M et al (2010) Tetrafocal bone transport of the tibia with circular external fixation: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:190–195PubMedCrossRef Guerreschi F, Azzam W, Camagni M et al (2010) Tetrafocal bone transport of the tibia with circular external fixation: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:190–195PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hutson JJ Jr, Dayicioglu D, Oeltjen JC et al (2010) The treatment of Gustilo grade IIIB tibia fractures with application of antibiotic spacer, flap, and sequential distraction osteogenesis. Ann Plast Surg 64:541–552PubMed Hutson JJ Jr, Dayicioglu D, Oeltjen JC et al (2010) The treatment of Gustilo grade IIIB tibia fractures with application of antibiotic spacer, flap, and sequential distraction osteogenesis. Ann Plast Surg 64:541–552PubMed
12.
go back to reference Ilizarov GA, Ledyaev VI (1992) The replacement of long tubular bone defects by lengthening distraction osteotomy of one of the fragments. Clin Orthop Relat Res 280:7–10PubMed Ilizarov GA, Ledyaev VI (1992) The replacement of long tubular bone defects by lengthening distraction osteotomy of one of the fragments. Clin Orthop Relat Res 280:7–10PubMed
13.
go back to reference Lovisetti G, Sala F, Thabet AM et al (2011) Osteocutaneous thermal necrosis of the leg salvaged by TSF/Ilizarov reconstruction. Report of 7 patients. Int Orthop 35(1):121–126PubMedCrossRef Lovisetti G, Sala F, Thabet AM et al (2011) Osteocutaneous thermal necrosis of the leg salvaged by TSF/Ilizarov reconstruction. Report of 7 patients. Int Orthop 35(1):121–126PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Paley D, Catagni MA, Argnani F et al (1989) Ilizarov treatment of tibial nonunions with bone loss. Clin Orthop Relat Res 241:146–165PubMed Paley D, Catagni MA, Argnani F et al (1989) Ilizarov treatment of tibial nonunions with bone loss. Clin Orthop Relat Res 241:146–165PubMed
15.
go back to reference Paley D, Maar DC (2000) Ilizarov bone transport treatment for tibial defects. J Orthop Trauma 14(2):76–85PubMedCrossRef Paley D, Maar DC (2000) Ilizarov bone transport treatment for tibial defects. J Orthop Trauma 14(2):76–85PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Rozbruch SR, Pugsley JS, Fragomen T et al (2008) Repair of tibial nonunions and bone defects with the Taylor Spatial Frame. J Orthop Trauma 22:88–95PubMedCrossRef Rozbruch SR, Pugsley JS, Fragomen T et al (2008) Repair of tibial nonunions and bone defects with the Taylor Spatial Frame. J Orthop Trauma 22:88–95PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Rozbruch RS, Weitzman AM, Watson JT et al (2006) Simultaneous treatment of tibial bone and soft-tissue defects with the Ilizarov method. J Orthop Trauma 20:197–205 Rozbruch RS, Weitzman AM, Watson JT et al (2006) Simultaneous treatment of tibial bone and soft-tissue defects with the Ilizarov method. J Orthop Trauma 20:197–205
21.
go back to reference Sala F, Thabet AM, Castelli F et al (2011) Bone transport for postinfectious segmental tibial bone defects with a combined Ilizarov/Taylor spatial frame technique. J Orthop Trauma 25(3):162–168PubMedCrossRef Sala F, Thabet AM, Castelli F et al (2011) Bone transport for postinfectious segmental tibial bone defects with a combined Ilizarov/Taylor spatial frame technique. J Orthop Trauma 25(3):162–168PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Saleh M, Rees A (1995) Bifocal surgery for deformity and bone loss after lower-limb fractures. Comparison of bone-transport and compression-distraction methods. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77(3):429–434PubMed Saleh M, Rees A (1995) Bifocal surgery for deformity and bone loss after lower-limb fractures. Comparison of bone-transport and compression-distraction methods. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77(3):429–434PubMed
23.
go back to reference Song HR, Cho SH, Koo KH et al (1998) Tibial bone defects treated by internal bone transport using the Ilizarov method. Int Orthop 22:293–297PubMedCrossRef Song HR, Cho SH, Koo KH et al (1998) Tibial bone defects treated by internal bone transport using the Ilizarov method. Int Orthop 22:293–297PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Uzel AP, Lemonne F, Casoli V (2010) Tibial segmental bone defect reconstruction by Ilizarov type bone transport in an induced membrane. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 96:194–198PubMedCrossRef Uzel AP, Lemonne F, Casoli V (2010) Tibial segmental bone defect reconstruction by Ilizarov type bone transport in an induced membrane. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 96:194–198PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Clinical reliability of closed techniques and comparison with open strategies to achieve union at the docking site
Authors
Giovanni Lovisetti
Francesco Sala
Anna N. Miller
Ahmed M. Thabet
Vincenzo Zottola
Dario Capitani
Publication date
01-04-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 4/2012
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1260-4

Other articles of this Issue 4/2012

International Orthopaedics 4/2012 Go to the issue