Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 6/2008

01-12-2008 | Review

Closed suction surgical wound drainage after hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Authors: R. Clifton, S. Haleem, A. McKee, M. J. Parker

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 6/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

There is still debate over the use of drains following hip fracture surgery. We have performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature for randomised trials that related to the use of closed suction drains following hip fracture surgery. Six studies involving 664 patients were identified. There was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of wound healing complications, re-operations or requirement for blood transfusion between drained and un-drained wounds. All other outcomes reported failed to show any benefit from the use of drains. Further randomised trials are required and until they have been undertaken the efficacy of closed surgical drainage systems in hip fracture surgery is unknown.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cobb JP (1990) Why use drains? J Bone Jt Surg-British Volume 72:993–995 Cobb JP (1990) Why use drains? J Bone Jt Surg-British Volume 72:993–995
2.
go back to reference Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O’Rouke K, McGeer AJ, L’Abbe K (1992) Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 45:225–265CrossRef Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O’Rouke K, McGeer AJ, L’Abbe K (1992) Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 45:225–265CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Duranthon LD, Grimberg J, Vandenbussche E, Mondoloni B, Augereau P (2000) L’efficacite du drainage postoperatoire apres arthroplastie par prothese intermediaire scellee pour fracture du col du femur; resultats d’une etude prospective randomisee de 86 cas [Effectiveness of postoperative drainage after bipolar sealed endoprosthetic arthroplasty for femur neck fracture. Results of a prospective randomized study of 86 cases]. [French]. Rev Chir Orthop Repar Appar Mot 86(4):370–372 Duranthon LD, Grimberg J, Vandenbussche E, Mondoloni B, Augereau P (2000) L’efficacite du drainage postoperatoire apres arthroplastie par prothese intermediaire scellee pour fracture du col du femur; resultats d’une etude prospective randomisee de 86 cas [Effectiveness of postoperative drainage after bipolar sealed endoprosthetic arthroplasty for femur neck fracture. Results of a prospective randomized study of 86 cases]. [French]. Rev Chir Orthop Repar Appar Mot 86(4):370–372
4.
go back to reference Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327:556–560CrossRef Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327:556–560CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lautenbach EEG, Tiemessen CH, Cunningham S (2000) How effective is suction drainage? South African Bone and Joint Surgery 10(3):14–17 Lautenbach EEG, Tiemessen CH, Cunningham S (2000) How effective is suction drainage? South African Bone and Joint Surgery 10(3):14–17
6.
go back to reference Nicolajsen K, Kramhoft M, Hansen D (1996) The use of closed suction drains in femoral neck and intertrochanteric fractures [abstract]. Acta Orthop Scand., Suppl 267:30 Nicolajsen K, Kramhoft M, Hansen D (1996) The use of closed suction drains in femoral neck and intertrochanteric fractures [abstract]. Acta Orthop Scand., Suppl 267:30
7.
go back to reference Parker MJ, Roberts C, Handoll HH, Griffiths R (2006) Closed suction surgical wound drainage after orthopaedic surgery (Cochrane review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:Cd001825 Parker MJ, Roberts C, Handoll HH, Griffiths R (2006) Closed suction surgical wound drainage after orthopaedic surgery (Cochrane review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:Cd001825
8.
go back to reference Tjeenk RM, Vrancken Peeters MP, van den Ende E, Kastelein GW, Breslau PJ (2005) Wound drainage versus non-drainage for proximal femoral fractures; a prospective randomised study. Injury 36:100–104PubMed Tjeenk RM, Vrancken Peeters MP, van den Ende E, Kastelein GW, Breslau PJ (2005) Wound drainage versus non-drainage for proximal femoral fractures; a prospective randomised study. Injury 36:100–104PubMed
9.
go back to reference Varley GW, Milner S, Turner GM, Crisp AJ, Szypryt EP (1994) Ultrasound assessment of the efficacy of wound drains. J R Coll Surg Edinb 39(2):97–99PubMed Varley GW, Milner S, Turner GM, Crisp AJ, Szypryt EP (1994) Ultrasound assessment of the efficacy of wound drains. J R Coll Surg Edinb 39(2):97–99PubMed
10.
go back to reference Varley GW, Milner SA (1995) Wound drains in proximal femoral fracture surgery: a randomized prospective trial of 177 patients. J R Coll Surg Edinb 40:416–418PubMed Varley GW, Milner SA (1995) Wound drains in proximal femoral fracture surgery: a randomized prospective trial of 177 patients. J R Coll Surg Edinb 40:416–418PubMed
Metadata
Title
Closed suction surgical wound drainage after hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Authors
R. Clifton
S. Haleem
A. McKee
M. J. Parker
Publication date
01-12-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 6/2008
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-007-0420-z

Other articles of this Issue 6/2008

International Orthopaedics 6/2008 Go to the issue