Published in:
Open Access
01-06-2021 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Special Section: Diffuse Liver Disease
Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis in autoimmune hepatitis: Diagnostic value of liver magnetic resonance parametric mapping including extracellular volume fraction
Authors:
Narine Mesropyan, Patrick Kupczyk, Leona Dold, Tobias J. Weismüller, Alois M. Sprinkart, Burkhart Mädler, Claus C. Pieper, Daniel Kuetting, Christian P. Strassburg, Ulrike Attenberger, Julian A. Luetkens
Published in:
Abdominal Radiology
|
Issue 6/2021
Login to get access
Abstract
Purpose
Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is an immune-mediated chronic liver disease that leads to severe fibrosis and cirrhosis. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of T1 and T2 mapping as well as extracellular volume fraction (ECV) for non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis in AIH patients.
Methods
In this prospective study, 27 patients (age range: 19–77 years) with AIH underwent liver MRI. T1 and T2 relaxation times as well as ECV were quantified by mapping techniques. The presence of significant fibrosis (≥ F2) was defined as magnetic resonance elastography (MRE)-based liver stiffness ≥ 3.66 kPa. MRE was used as reference standard, against which the diagnostic performance of MRI-derived mapping parameters was tested. Diagnostic performance was compared by utilizing receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
Results
MRE-based liver stiffness correlated with both, hepatic native T1 (r = 0.69; P < 0.001) as well as ECV (r = 0.80; P < 0.001). For the assessment of significant fibrosis, ECV yielded a sensitivity of 85.7% (95% confidence interval (CI): 60.1–96.0%) and a specificity of 84.6% (CI 60.1–96.0%); hepatic native T1 yielded a sensitivity of 85.7% (CI 60.1–96.0%); and a specificity of 76.9% (CI 49.7–91.8%). Diagnostic performance of hepatic ECV (area under the curve (AUC): 0.885), native hepatic T1 (AUC: 0.846) for assessment of significant fibrosis was similar compared to clinical fibrosis scores (APRI (AUC: 0.852), FIB-4 (AUC: 0.758), and AAR (0.654) (P > 0.05 for each comparison)).
Conclusion
Quantitative mapping parameters such as T1 and ECV can identify significant fibrosis in AIH patients. Future studies are needed to explore the value of parametric mapping for the evaluation of different disease stages.