Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 2/2021

01-02-2021 | Rectal Cancer | Hollow Organ GI

Utility of texture analysis on T2-weighted MR for differentiating tumor deposits from mesorectal nodes in rectal cancer patients, in a retrospective cohort

Authors: Isha D. Atre, Kulyada Eurboonyanun, Yoshifumi Noda, Anushri Parakh, Aileen O’Shea, Rita Maria Lahoud, Naomi M. Sell, Hiroko Kunitake, Mukesh G. Harisinghani

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 2/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the utility of MR texture analysis for differentiating tumor deposits from mesorectal nodes in rectal cancer.

Materials and methods

Pretreatment MRI of 40 patients performed between 2006 and 2018 with pathologically proven tumor deposits and/or malignant nodes in the setting of rectal cancer were retrospectively reviewed. In total, 25 tumor deposits (TDs) and 71 positive lymph nodes (LNs) were analyzed for morphological and first-order texture analysis features on T2-weighted axial images. MR morphological features (lesion shape, size, signal heterogeneity, contrast enhancement) were analyzed and agreed in consensus by two experienced radiologists followed by assessment with Fisher’s exact test. Texture analysis of the lesions was performed using TexRAD, a proprietary software algorithm. First-order texture analysis features (mean, standard deviation, skewness, entropy, kurtosis, MPP) were obtained after applying spatial scaling filters (SSF; 0, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6). Univariate analysis was performed with non-parametric Mann–Whitney U test. The results of univariate analysis were reassessed with generalized estimating equations followed by multivariate analysis. Using histopathology as a gold standard, diagnostic accuracy was assessed by obtaining area under the receiver operating curve.

Results

MR morphological parameter, lesion shape was a strong discriminator between TDs and LNs with a p value of 0.02 (AUC: 0.76, 95% CI of 0.66 to 0.84, SE: 0.06) and sensitivity, specificity of 90% and 68%, respectively. Skewness extracted at fine filter (SSF-2) was the only significant texture analysis parameter for distinguishing TDs from LNs with p value of 0.03 (AUC: 0.70, 95% CI of 0.59 to 0.79, SE: 0.06) and sensitivity, specificity of 70% and 72%, respectively. When lesion shape and skewness-2 were combined into a single model, the diagnostic accuracy was improved with AUC of 0.82 (SE: 0.05, 95% CI of 0.72 to 0.88 with p value of < 0.01). This model also showed a high sensitivity of 91% with specificity of 68%.

Conclusion

Lesion shape on MR can be a useful predictor for distinguishing TDs from positive LNs in rectal cancer patients. When interpreted along with MR texture parameter of skewness, accuracy is further improved.
Literature
7.
go back to reference Basnet, S., Lou, Q. F., Liu, N., Rana, R., Shah, A., Khadka, M., Warrier, H., Sigdel, S., Dhakal, S., Devkota, A., Mishra, R., Sapkota, G., Zheng, L., & Ge, H. Y. (2018). Tumor deposit is an independent prognostic indicator in patients who underwent radical resection for colorectal cancer. Journal of Cancer, 9(21), 3979–3985. https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.27475CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Basnet, S., Lou, Q. F., Liu, N., Rana, R., Shah, A., Khadka, M., Warrier, H., Sigdel, S., Dhakal, S., Devkota, A., Mishra, R., Sapkota, G., Zheng, L., & Ge, H. Y. (2018). Tumor deposit is an independent prognostic indicator in patients who underwent radical resection for colorectal cancer. Journal of Cancer, 9(21), 3979–3985. https://​doi.​org/​10.​7150/​jca.​27475CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Nagayoshi, K., Ueki, T., Nishioka, Y., Manabe, T., Mizuuchi, Y., Hirahashi, M., Oda, Y., & Tanaka, M. (2014). Tumor deposit is a poor prognostic indicator for patients who have stage II and III colorectal cancer with fewer than 4 lymph node metastases but not for those with 4 or more. Diseases of the colon and rectum, 57(4), 467–474. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000059CrossRefPubMed Nagayoshi, K., Ueki, T., Nishioka, Y., Manabe, T., Mizuuchi, Y., Hirahashi, M., Oda, Y., & Tanaka, M. (2014). Tumor deposit is a poor prognostic indicator for patients who have stage II and III colorectal cancer with fewer than 4 lymph node metastases but not for those with 4 or more. Diseases of the colon and rectum, 57(4), 467–474. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​DCR.​0000000000000059​CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Shu Z, Fang S, Ding Z, Mao D, Pang P, Gong X (2018) Application value of texture analysis of magnetic resonance images in prediction of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy efficacy for rectal cance]. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi Chin J Gastrointest Surg 21:1051–1058 Shu Z, Fang S, Ding Z, Mao D, Pang P, Gong X (2018) Application value of texture analysis of magnetic resonance images in prediction of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy efficacy for rectal cance]. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi Chin J Gastrointest Surg 21:1051–1058
16.
go back to reference Cancer (UK) NCC for (2011) Summary of the 5th edition of the TNM staging system for colorectal cancer and comparison with Dukes’ stage. National Collaborating Centre for Cancer (UK) Cancer (UK) NCC for (2011) Summary of the 5th edition of the TNM staging system for colorectal cancer and comparison with Dukes’ stage. National Collaborating Centre for Cancer (UK)
24.
go back to reference Goldstein NS, Turner JR (2000) Pericolonic tumor deposits in patients with T3N+MO colon adenocarcinomas: markers of reduced disease-free survival and intra-abdominal metastases and their implications for TNM classification. Cancer 88:2228–2238CrossRef Goldstein NS, Turner JR (2000) Pericolonic tumor deposits in patients with T3N+MO colon adenocarcinomas: markers of reduced disease-free survival and intra-abdominal metastases and their implications for TNM classification. Cancer 88:2228–2238CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Utility of texture analysis on T2-weighted MR for differentiating tumor deposits from mesorectal nodes in rectal cancer patients, in a retrospective cohort
Authors
Isha D. Atre
Kulyada Eurboonyanun
Yoshifumi Noda
Anushri Parakh
Aileen O’Shea
Rita Maria Lahoud
Naomi M. Sell
Hiroko Kunitake
Mukesh G. Harisinghani
Publication date
01-02-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 2/2021
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02653-w

Other articles of this Issue 2/2021

Abdominal Radiology 2/2021 Go to the issue