Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 4/2020

01-04-2020 | Cholecystitis | Interventional Radiology

Management algorithm of acute cholecystitis after percutaneous cholecystostomy catheter placement based on outcomes from 377 patients

Authors: Abdulrahman Masrani, Daniel Young, John P. Karageorgiou, N. B. Mani, Daniel D. Picus, Seung Kwon Kim

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To report outcomes of percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) catheter placement in patients with acute cholecystitis (AC) and propose management algorithm of AC after PC catheter placement based on the outcomes.

Method and materials

Retrospective study was performed. 419 patients who underwent PC between July 2010 and September 2016 were included. Patients who underwent PC for indication other than AC were excluded. The primary outcome was definitive treatment of AC following PC, including cholecystectomy or percutaneous cholecystolithotomy. Secondary outcomes include removal of drainage catheter without further management or death with catheter in place. Based on outcomes, we proposed management algorithm of AC after PC catheter placement.

Results

377 of 419 patients underwent PC for treatment of AC (median age, 66 years; range 18–100 years). Technical success rate was 100% with 2.4% major complications rate and 1.6% minor complications rate. Following PC, 118 patients (31%) underwent definitive treatment with cholecystectomy. Sixty-one patients (16%) underwent definitive treatment with percutaneous cholecystolithotomy with removal of catheters. Seventy-four patients (20%) had their catheters removed upon resolution of cholecystitis without undergoing surgery or stone removal. Fifty patients (13%) died with catheters in place due to other comorbidities. Five patients (1%) still had their catheters in place at the end of the study.

Conclusion

PC remains a viable option for treatment of AC with low complication rate and can be used as bridge to definitive therapy. Our proposed management algorithm can be a guideline for the management of AC after PC catheter placement.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Strasberg SM. Clinical practice. Acute calculous cholecystitis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(26):2804-2811. Strasberg SM. Clinical practice. Acute calculous cholecystitis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(26):2804-2811.
2.
go back to reference Roulin D, Saadi A, Di Mare L, Demartines N, Halkic N. Early Versus Delayed Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis, Are the 72 hours Still the Rule?: A Randomized Trial. Ann Surg. 2016;264(5):717-722.CrossRef Roulin D, Saadi A, Di Mare L, Demartines N, Halkic N. Early Versus Delayed Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis, Are the 72 hours Still the Rule?: A Randomized Trial. Ann Surg. 2016;264(5):717-722.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Radder RW. Ultrasonically guided percutaneous catheter drainage for gallbladder empyema. Diagn Imaging. 1980;49(6):330-333.PubMed Radder RW. Ultrasonically guided percutaneous catheter drainage for gallbladder empyema. Diagn Imaging. 1980;49(6):330-333.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Sacks D, McClenny TE, Cardella JF, Lewis CA. Society of Interventional Radiology clinical practice guidelines. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14(9 Pt 2):S199-202.CrossRef Sacks D, McClenny TE, Cardella JF, Lewis CA. Society of Interventional Radiology clinical practice guidelines. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14(9 Pt 2):S199-202.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Zou YP, Du JD, Li WM, et al. Gallstone recurrence after successful percutaneous cholecystolithotomy: a 10-year follow-up of 439 cases. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2007;6(2):199-203.PubMed Zou YP, Du JD, Li WM, et al. Gallstone recurrence after successful percutaneous cholecystolithotomy: a 10-year follow-up of 439 cases. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2007;6(2):199-203.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Bundy J, Srinivasa RN, Gemmete JJ, Shields JJ, Chick JFB. Percutaneous Cholecystostomy: Long-Term Outcomes in 324 Patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018;41(6):928-934.CrossRef Bundy J, Srinivasa RN, Gemmete JJ, Shields JJ, Chick JFB. Percutaneous Cholecystostomy: Long-Term Outcomes in 324 Patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018;41(6):928-934.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Barie PS, Fischer E. Acute acalculous cholecystitis. J Am Coll Surg. 1995;180(2):232-244.PubMed Barie PS, Fischer E. Acute acalculous cholecystitis. J Am Coll Surg. 1995;180(2):232-244.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Byrne MF, Suhocki P, Mitchell RM, et al. Percutaneous cholecystostomy in patients with acute cholecystitis: experience of 45 patients at a US referral center. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;197(2):206-211CrossRef Byrne MF, Suhocki P, Mitchell RM, et al. Percutaneous cholecystostomy in patients with acute cholecystitis: experience of 45 patients at a US referral center. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;197(2):206-211CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Saad WE, Wallace MJ, Wojak JC, Kundu S, Cardella JF. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography, biliary drainage, and percutaneous cholecystostomy. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21(6):789-795.CrossRef Saad WE, Wallace MJ, Wojak JC, Kundu S, Cardella JF. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography, biliary drainage, and percutaneous cholecystostomy. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21(6):789-795.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kirkegard J, Horn T, Christensen SD, Larsen LP, Knudsen AR, Mortensen FV. Percutaneous cholecystostomy is an effective definitive treatment option for acute acalculous cholecystitis. Scand J Surg. 2015;104(4):238-243CrossRef Kirkegard J, Horn T, Christensen SD, Larsen LP, Knudsen AR, Mortensen FV. Percutaneous cholecystostomy is an effective definitive treatment option for acute acalculous cholecystitis. Scand J Surg. 2015;104(4):238-243CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Management algorithm of acute cholecystitis after percutaneous cholecystostomy catheter placement based on outcomes from 377 patients
Authors
Abdulrahman Masrani
Daniel Young
John P. Karageorgiou
N. B. Mani
Daniel D. Picus
Seung Kwon Kim
Publication date
01-04-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02449-y

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

Abdominal Radiology 4/2020 Go to the issue