Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 10/2019

01-10-2019 | Kidneys, Ureters, Bladder, Retroperitoneum

Characterization of adrenal lesions on chemical shift MRI: comparison of 1.5 T and 3 T MRI

Authors: İlhan Hekimsoy, Ezgi Güler, Mustafa Harman, Nevra Elmas

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 10/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To compare three chemical shift MRI techniques [two-dimensional (2D) dual gradient echo (dGRE), 3D VIBE, and 3D VIBE-Dixon] at 3 T and 2D dGRE technique at 1.5 T to assess their ability of detecting microscopic fat in adrenal adenomas and differentiating between adenomas and non-adenomas.

Methods

Seventy-eight patients with 97 lesions (78 adenomas, 19 non-adenomas) underwent both 1.5 T and 3 T chemical shift MRI. The Wilcoxon signed-ranked test was used to determine if there was significant difference between the signal intensity index (SII) values of each technique to assess their ability to detect microscopic fat in adrenal adenomas. ROC analysis was performed for the SII values of each technique, the adrenal-to-spleen SI ratio of 2D dGRE technique at 3 T, and the fat fraction values of the 3D VIBE-Dixon technique to identify the optimal threshold for differentiation of adrenal adenomas from non-adenomas.

Results

For detection of microscopic fat, the mean SII value of 2D dGRE technique at 1.5 T was significantly higher than that of the chemical shift imaging techniques at 3 T (p = 0.001). For discrimination of adenomas from non-adenomas, the area under the curve (AUC) and 95% confidence interval values of 2D dGRE technique at 1.5 T and 2D dGRE, 3D VIBE, 3D VIBE-Dixon techniques at 3 T were calculated as 1.00 (1.00–1.00), 0.991 (0.978–1.00), 0.999 (0.995–1.00), 0.993 (0.979–1.00), respectively, for the SII.

Conclusion

Chemical shift MRI at 1.5 T using the 2D dGRE technique provided the most accurate differentiation between adenomas and non-adenomas. However, there was no statistically significant difference between chemical shift imaging techniques at 1.5 T and 3 T.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Boland GW, Blake MA, Hahn PF, Mayo-Smith WW (2008) Incidental adrenal lesions: principles, techniques, and algorithms for imaging characterization. Radiology 249(3):756-775.CrossRefPubMed Boland GW, Blake MA, Hahn PF, Mayo-Smith WW (2008) Incidental adrenal lesions: principles, techniques, and algorithms for imaging characterization. Radiology 249(3):756-775.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Dunnick NR, Korobkin M (2002) Imaging of adrenal incidentalomas: current status. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179(3):559-568.CrossRefPubMed Dunnick NR, Korobkin M (2002) Imaging of adrenal incidentalomas: current status. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179(3):559-568.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Bovio S, Cataldi A, Reimondo G, et al. (2006) Prevalence of adrenal incidentaloma in a contemporary computerized tomography series. J Endocrinol Invest 29(4):298-302.CrossRefPubMed Bovio S, Cataldi A, Reimondo G, et al. (2006) Prevalence of adrenal incidentaloma in a contemporary computerized tomography series. J Endocrinol Invest 29(4):298-302.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Song JH, Chaudhry FS, Mayo-Smith WW (2008) The incidental adrenal mass on CT: prevalence of adrenal disease in 1,049 consecutive adrenal masses in patients with no known malignancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190(5):1163-1168.CrossRefPubMed Song JH, Chaudhry FS, Mayo-Smith WW (2008) The incidental adrenal mass on CT: prevalence of adrenal disease in 1,049 consecutive adrenal masses in patients with no known malignancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190(5):1163-1168.CrossRefPubMed
5.
6.
go back to reference Savci G, Yazici Z, Sahin N, Akgoz S, Tuncel E (2006) Value of chemical shift subtraction MRI in characterization of adrenal masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(1):130-135.CrossRefPubMed Savci G, Yazici Z, Sahin N, Akgoz S, Tuncel E (2006) Value of chemical shift subtraction MRI in characterization of adrenal masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(1):130-135.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Marin D, Soher BJ, Dale BM, Boll DT, Youngblood RS, Merkle EM (2010) Characterization of adrenal lesions: comparison of 2D and 3D dual gradient-echo MR imaging at 3 T--preliminary results. Radiology 254(1):179-187.CrossRefPubMed Marin D, Soher BJ, Dale BM, Boll DT, Youngblood RS, Merkle EM (2010) Characterization of adrenal lesions: comparison of 2D and 3D dual gradient-echo MR imaging at 3 T--preliminary results. Radiology 254(1):179-187.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ream JM, Gaing B, Mussi TC, Rosenkrantz AB (2015) Characterization of adrenal lesions at chemical-shift MRI: a direct intraindividual comparison of in- and opposed-phase imaging at 1.5 T and 3 T. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204(3):536-541. Ream JM, Gaing B, Mussi TC, Rosenkrantz AB (2015) Characterization of adrenal lesions at chemical-shift MRI: a direct intraindividual comparison of in- and opposed-phase imaging at 1.5 T and 3 T. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204(3):536-541.
9.
go back to reference Adam SZ, Nikolaidis P, Horowitz JM, et al. (2016) Chemical Shift MR Imaging of the Adrenal Gland: Principles, Pitfalls, and Applications. Radiographics 36(2):414-432.CrossRefPubMed Adam SZ, Nikolaidis P, Horowitz JM, et al. (2016) Chemical Shift MR Imaging of the Adrenal Gland: Principles, Pitfalls, and Applications. Radiographics 36(2):414-432.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Soher BJ, Dale BM, Merkle EM (2007) A review of MR physics: 3 T versus 1.5 T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 15(3):277-290, v. Soher BJ, Dale BM, Merkle EM (2007) A review of MR physics: 3 T versus 1.5 T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 15(3):277-290, v.
11.
go back to reference Merkle EM, Schindera ST (2007) MR imaging of the adrenal glands: 1.5 T versus 3 T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 15(3):365-372, vii. Merkle EM, Schindera ST (2007) MR imaging of the adrenal glands: 1.5 T versus 3 T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 15(3):365-372, vii.
12.
go back to reference Schindera ST, Soher BJ, Delong DM, Dale BM, Merkle EM (2008) Effect of echo time pair selection on quantitative analysis for adrenal tumor characterization with in-phase and opposed-phase MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology 248(1):140-147.CrossRefPubMed Schindera ST, Soher BJ, Delong DM, Dale BM, Merkle EM (2008) Effect of echo time pair selection on quantitative analysis for adrenal tumor characterization with in-phase and opposed-phase MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology 248(1):140-147.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Marin D, Dale BM, Bashir MR, et al. (2012) Effectiveness of a three-dimensional dual gradient echo two-point Dixon technique for the characterization of adrenal lesions at 3 Tesla. Eur Radiol 22(1):259-268.CrossRefPubMed Marin D, Dale BM, Bashir MR, et al. (2012) Effectiveness of a three-dimensional dual gradient echo two-point Dixon technique for the characterization of adrenal lesions at 3 Tesla. Eur Radiol 22(1):259-268.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Nakamura S, Namimoto T, Morita K, et al. (2012) Characterization of adrenal lesions using chemical shift MRI: comparison between 1.5 Tesla and two echo time pair selection at 3.0 Tesla MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 35(1):95-102. Nakamura S, Namimoto T, Morita K, et al. (2012) Characterization of adrenal lesions using chemical shift MRI: comparison between 1.5 Tesla and two echo time pair selection at 3.0 Tesla MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 35(1):95-102.
15.
go back to reference Song J, Zhang C, Liu Q, et al. (2012) Utility of chemical shift and diffusion-weighted imaging in characterization of hyperattenuating adrenal lesions at 3.0T. Eur J Radiol 81(9):2137-2143. Song J, Zhang C, Liu Q, et al. (2012) Utility of chemical shift and diffusion-weighted imaging in characterization of hyperattenuating adrenal lesions at 3.0T. Eur J Radiol 81(9):2137-2143.
16.
go back to reference Fujiyoshi F, Nakajo M, Fukukura Y, Tsuchimochi S (2003) Characterization of adrenal tumors by chemical shift fast low-angle shot MR imaging: comparison of four methods of quantitative evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180(6):1649-1657.CrossRefPubMed Fujiyoshi F, Nakajo M, Fukukura Y, Tsuchimochi S (2003) Characterization of adrenal tumors by chemical shift fast low-angle shot MR imaging: comparison of four methods of quantitative evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180(6):1649-1657.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Merkle EM, Dale BM (2006) Abdominal MRI at 3.0 T: the basics revisited. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(6):1524-1532. Merkle EM, Dale BM (2006) Abdominal MRI at 3.0 T: the basics revisited. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(6):1524-1532.
18.
go back to reference Merkle EM, Nelson RC (2006) Dual gradient-echo in-phase and opposed-phase hepatic MR imaging: a useful tool for evaluating more than fatty infiltration or fatty sparing. Radiographics 26(5):1409-1418.CrossRefPubMed Merkle EM, Nelson RC (2006) Dual gradient-echo in-phase and opposed-phase hepatic MR imaging: a useful tool for evaluating more than fatty infiltration or fatty sparing. Radiographics 26(5):1409-1418.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference von Falkenhausen MM, Lutterbey G, Morakkabati-Spitz N, et al. (2006) High-field-strength MR imaging of the liver at 3.0 T: intraindividual comparative study with MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology 241(1):156-166. von Falkenhausen MM, Lutterbey G, Morakkabati-Spitz N, et al. (2006) High-field-strength MR imaging of the liver at 3.0 T: intraindividual comparative study with MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology 241(1):156-166.
20.
go back to reference Ho LM, Paulson EK, Brady MJ, Wong TZ, Schindera ST (2008) Lipid-poor adenomas on unenhanced CT: does histogram analysis increase sensitivity compared with a mean attenuation threshold? AJR Am J Roentgenol 191(1):234-238.CrossRefPubMed Ho LM, Paulson EK, Brady MJ, Wong TZ, Schindera ST (2008) Lipid-poor adenomas on unenhanced CT: does histogram analysis increase sensitivity compared with a mean attenuation threshold? AJR Am J Roentgenol 191(1):234-238.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Song JH, Chaudhry FS, Mayo-Smith WW (2007) The incidental indeterminate adrenal mass on CT (> 10 H) in patients without cancer: is further imaging necessary? Follow-up of 321 consecutive indeterminate adrenal masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189(5):1119-1123.CrossRefPubMed Song JH, Chaudhry FS, Mayo-Smith WW (2007) The incidental indeterminate adrenal mass on CT (> 10 H) in patients without cancer: is further imaging necessary? Follow-up of 321 consecutive indeterminate adrenal masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189(5):1119-1123.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Gupta RT, Ho LM, Marin D, Boll DT, Barnhart HX, Nelson RC (2010) Dual-energy CT for characterization of adrenal nodules: initial experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194(6):1479-1483.CrossRefPubMed Gupta RT, Ho LM, Marin D, Boll DT, Barnhart HX, Nelson RC (2010) Dual-energy CT for characterization of adrenal nodules: initial experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194(6):1479-1483.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Shinozaki K, Yoshimitsu K, Honda H, et al. (2001) Metastatic adrenal tumor from clear-cell renal cell carcinoma: a pitfall of chemical shift MR imaging. Abdom Imaging 26(4):439-442.CrossRefPubMed Shinozaki K, Yoshimitsu K, Honda H, et al. (2001) Metastatic adrenal tumor from clear-cell renal cell carcinoma: a pitfall of chemical shift MR imaging. Abdom Imaging 26(4):439-442.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Sydow BD, Rosen MA, Siegelman ES (2006) Intracellular lipid within metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma of the adrenal gland: a potential diagnostic pitfall of chemical shift imaging of the adrenal gland. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187(5):W550-W551.CrossRefPubMed Sydow BD, Rosen MA, Siegelman ES (2006) Intracellular lipid within metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma of the adrenal gland: a potential diagnostic pitfall of chemical shift imaging of the adrenal gland. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187(5):W550-W551.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Characterization of adrenal lesions on chemical shift MRI: comparison of 1.5 T and 3 T MRI
Authors
İlhan Hekimsoy
Ezgi Güler
Mustafa Harman
Nevra Elmas
Publication date
01-10-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 10/2019
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02067-3

Other articles of this Issue 10/2019

Abdominal Radiology 10/2019 Go to the issue