Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 3/2019

01-03-2019

Rapid kVp switching dual-energy CT in the assessment of urolithiasis in patients with large body habitus: preliminary observations on image quality and stone characterization

Authors: Hamed Kordbacheh, Vinit Baliyan, Pranit Singh, Brian H. Eisner, Dushyant V. Sahani, Avinash R Kambadakone

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 3/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate the image quality (IQ) considerations of rapid kVp switching dual-energy CT (rsDECT) in the assessment of urolithiasis in patients with large body habitus and to evaluate whether it allows stone characterization.

Materials and methods

In this IRB-approved, HIPAA compliant retrospective study, 93 consecutive patients (M/F = 72/21, mean age 56.9 years, range 23–83 years) with large body habitus (> 90 kg/198 lbs) who underwent dual-energy (DE) stone protocol CT on a rapid kVp switching DECT scanner between January 2013 and December 2016 were included. Scan acquisition protocol included an initial unenhanced single-energy CT (SECT) scan of KUB followed by targeted DECT in the region of stones. Two readers evaluated both CT data sets (axial 5 mm 120 kVp/140 kVp QC/70 keV monoenergetic, material density water/iodine images and coronal/sagittal 3 mm images) for the assessment of image quality (Scores: 1–4) and characterization of stone composition (reference standard: crystallography).

Results

One hundred and five CT examinations were performed in 93 patients (mean body weight 105.12 ± 13.53 kg, range 91–154 kg), and a total of 321 urinary tract calculi (mean size-4.8 ± 3.2 mm, range 1.2–22 mm) were detected. Both SECT and targeted monoenergetic images were of acceptable image quality (mean IQ: 3.77 and 3.83, kappa 0.79 and 0.87 respectively). Material density water and iodine images had lower IQ scores (mean IQ: 2.97 and 3.09 respectively) with image quality deterioration due to severe photon starvation/streak artifacts in 20% (21/105) and 17% (18/105) scans, respectively. Characterization of stone composition into uric acid/non-uric acid stones was achieved in 93.14% (299/321) of calculi (mean size: 4.99 ± 3.3 mm, range 1.2–22 mm), while 7% (22/321) stones could not be characterized (mean size 3.03 ± 1.16 mm, range 1.6–6.4 mm) (p < 0.001). Most common reason for non-characterization was image quality deterioration of the material density iodine images due to severe photon starvation artifacts. On multivariate regression, stone size and patient weight were predictors of stone composition determination on DECT (p < 0.05). The transverse diameter had a weak negative correlation with stone composition determination, but it was not statistically significant. Stone characterization into uric acid vs. non-uric acid stones was accurate in 95% (n = 38/40) of stones in comparison with crystallography.

Conclusion

In patients with large body habitus, rsDECT allowed characterization of most calculi (93%) despite image quality deterioration due to photon starvation/streak artifacts in up to 20% of material density images. Stone size and patient weight were predictors of stone composition determination on DECT, and small calculi in very large patients may not be characterized.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sturm R, Hattori A (2013) Morbid obesity rates continue to rise rapidly in the US. Int J Obes 2005. 37(6):889–891 Sturm R, Hattori A (2013) Morbid obesity rates continue to rise rapidly in the US. Int J Obes 2005. 37(6):889–891
3.
go back to reference Uppot RN, Sahani DV, Hahn PF, et al. (2006) Effect of obesity on image quality: fifteen-year longitudinal study for evaluation of dictated radiology reports 1. Radiology. 240(2):435–439CrossRef Uppot RN, Sahani DV, Hahn PF, et al. (2006) Effect of obesity on image quality: fifteen-year longitudinal study for evaluation of dictated radiology reports 1. Radiology. 240(2):435–439CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Scales CD, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS (2012) Urologic diseases in America project. Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol 62(1):160–165CrossRef Scales CD, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS (2012) Urologic diseases in America project. Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol 62(1):160–165CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Pak CY, Sakhaee K, Peterson RD, Poindexter JR, Frawley WH (2001) Biochemical profile of idiopathic uric acid nephrolithiasis. Kidney Int. 60(2):757–761CrossRef Pak CY, Sakhaee K, Peterson RD, Poindexter JR, Frawley WH (2001) Biochemical profile of idiopathic uric acid nephrolithiasis. Kidney Int. 60(2):757–761CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ekeruo WO, Tan YH, Young MD, et al. (2004) Metabolic risk factors and the impact of medical therapy on the management of nephrolithiasis in obese patients. J Urol. 172(1):159–163CrossRef Ekeruo WO, Tan YH, Young MD, et al. (2004) Metabolic risk factors and the impact of medical therapy on the management of nephrolithiasis in obese patients. J Urol. 172(1):159–163CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Semins MJ, Shore AD, Makary MA, et al. (2010) The association of increasing body mass index and kidney stone disease. J Urol. 183(2):571–575CrossRef Semins MJ, Shore AD, Makary MA, et al. (2010) The association of increasing body mass index and kidney stone disease. J Urol. 183(2):571–575CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Carbone A, Al Salhi Y, Tasca A, et al. (2018) Obesity and kidney stone disease: a systematic review. Minerva Urol E Nefrol Ital J Urol Nephrol. 70(4):393–400 Carbone A, Al Salhi Y, Tasca A, et al. (2018) Obesity and kidney stone disease: a systematic review. Minerva Urol E Nefrol Ital J Urol Nephrol. 70(4):393–400
9.
go back to reference Najeeb Q, Masood I, Bhaskar N, et al. (2013) Effect of BMI and urinary pH on urolithiasis and its composition. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transplant. 24(1):60–66CrossRef Najeeb Q, Masood I, Bhaskar N, et al. (2013) Effect of BMI and urinary pH on urolithiasis and its composition. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transplant. 24(1):60–66CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Chou Y-H, Su C-M, Li C-C, et al. (2011) Difference in urinary stone components between obese and non-obese patients. Urol Res. 39(4):283–287CrossRef Chou Y-H, Su C-M, Li C-C, et al. (2011) Difference in urinary stone components between obese and non-obese patients. Urol Res. 39(4):283–287CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Daudon M, Traxer O, Conort P, Lacour B, Jungers P (2006) Type 2 diabetes increases the risk for uric acid stones. J Am Soc Nephrol JASN. 17(7):2026–2033CrossRef Daudon M, Traxer O, Conort P, Lacour B, Jungers P (2006) Type 2 diabetes increases the risk for uric acid stones. J Am Soc Nephrol JASN. 17(7):2026–2033CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hess B (2012) Metabolic syndrome, obesity and kidney stones. Arab J Urol. 10(3):258–264CrossRef Hess B (2012) Metabolic syndrome, obesity and kidney stones. Arab J Urol. 10(3):258–264CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Brisbane W, Bailey MR, Sorensen MD (2016) An overview of kidney stone imaging techniques. Nat Rev Urol. 13(11):654–662CrossRef Brisbane W, Bailey MR, Sorensen MD (2016) An overview of kidney stone imaging techniques. Nat Rev Urol. 13(11):654–662CrossRef
14.
go back to reference McCarthy CJ, Baliyan V, Kordbacheh H, et al. (2016) Radiology of renal stone disease. Int J Surg Lond Engl. 36(Pt D):638–646CrossRef McCarthy CJ, Baliyan V, Kordbacheh H, et al. (2016) Radiology of renal stone disease. Int J Surg Lond Engl. 36(Pt D):638–646CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Daudon M, Lacour B, Jungers P (2006) Influence of body size on urinary stone composition in men and women. Urol Res. 34(3):193–199CrossRef Daudon M, Lacour B, Jungers P (2006) Influence of body size on urinary stone composition in men and women. Urol Res. 34(3):193–199CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Megibow AJ, Sahani D (2012) Best practice: implementation and use of abdominal dual-energy CT in routine patient care. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 199(5 Suppl):S71–S77CrossRef Megibow AJ, Sahani D (2012) Best practice: implementation and use of abdominal dual-energy CT in routine patient care. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 199(5 Suppl):S71–S77CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kulkarni NM, Eisner BH, Pinho DF, et al. (2013) Determination of renal stone composition in phantom and patients using single-source dual-energy computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 37(1):37–45CrossRef Kulkarni NM, Eisner BH, Pinho DF, et al. (2013) Determination of renal stone composition in phantom and patients using single-source dual-energy computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 37(1):37–45CrossRef
18.
19.
go back to reference Caramia G, Di Gregorio L, Tarantino ML, et al. (2004) Uric acid, phosphate and oxalate stones: treatment and prophylaxis. Urol Int. 72(Suppl 1):24–28CrossRef Caramia G, Di Gregorio L, Tarantino ML, et al. (2004) Uric acid, phosphate and oxalate stones: treatment and prophylaxis. Urol Int. 72(Suppl 1):24–28CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Duan X, Li Z, Yu L, et al. (2015) Characterization of urinary stone composition by use of third-generation dual-source dual-energy CT with increased spectral separation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 205(6):1203–1207CrossRef Duan X, Li Z, Yu L, et al. (2015) Characterization of urinary stone composition by use of third-generation dual-source dual-energy CT with increased spectral separation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 205(6):1203–1207CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Leng S, Huang A, Cardona JM, et al. (2016) Dual-energy CT for quantification of urinary stone composition in mixed stones: a phantom study. Am J Roentgenol. 207(2):321–329CrossRef Leng S, Huang A, Cardona JM, et al. (2016) Dual-energy CT for quantification of urinary stone composition in mixed stones: a phantom study. Am J Roentgenol. 207(2):321–329CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Wisenbaugh ES, Paden RG, Silva AC, Humphreys MR (2014) Dual-energy vs conventional computed tomography in determining stone composition. Urology. 83(6):1243–1247CrossRef Wisenbaugh ES, Paden RG, Silva AC, Humphreys MR (2014) Dual-energy vs conventional computed tomography in determining stone composition. Urology. 83(6):1243–1247CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Akand M, Koplay M, Islamoglu N, et al. (2016) Role of dual-source dual-energy computed tomography versus X-ray crystallography in prediction of the stone composition: a retrospective non-randomized pilot study. Int Urol Nephrol. 48(9):1413–1420CrossRef Akand M, Koplay M, Islamoglu N, et al. (2016) Role of dual-source dual-energy computed tomography versus X-ray crystallography in prediction of the stone composition: a retrospective non-randomized pilot study. Int Urol Nephrol. 48(9):1413–1420CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Qu M, Jaramillo-Alvarez G, Ramirez-Giraldo JC, et al. (2012) Urinary stone differentiation in patients with large body size using dual-energy dual-source computed tomography. Eur Radiol. 23(5):1408–1414CrossRef Qu M, Jaramillo-Alvarez G, Ramirez-Giraldo JC, et al. (2012) Urinary stone differentiation in patients with large body size using dual-energy dual-source computed tomography. Eur Radiol. 23(5):1408–1414CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Jepperson MA, Cernigliaro JG, Sella D, et al. (2013) Dual-energy CT for the evaluation of urinary calculi: image interpretation, pitfalls and stone mimics. Clin Radiol. 68(12):e707–e714CrossRef Jepperson MA, Cernigliaro JG, Sella D, et al. (2013) Dual-energy CT for the evaluation of urinary calculi: image interpretation, pitfalls and stone mimics. Clin Radiol. 68(12):e707–e714CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Le NTT, Robinson J, Lewis SJ (2015) Obese patients and radiography literature: what do we know about a big issue? J Med Radiat Sci. 62(2):132–141CrossRef Le NTT, Robinson J, Lewis SJ (2015) Obese patients and radiography literature: what do we know about a big issue? J Med Radiat Sci. 62(2):132–141CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Desai GS, Fuentes Orrego JM, Kambadakone AR, Sahani DV (2013) Performance of iterative reconstruction and automated tube voltage selection on the image quality and radiation dose in abdominal CT scans. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 37(6):897–903CrossRef Desai GS, Fuentes Orrego JM, Kambadakone AR, Sahani DV (2013) Performance of iterative reconstruction and automated tube voltage selection on the image quality and radiation dose in abdominal CT scans. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 37(6):897–903CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Desai GS, Uppot RN, Yu EW, Kambadakone AR, Sahani DV (2012) Impact of iterative reconstruction on image quality and radiation dose in multidetector CT of large body size adults. Eur Radiol. 22(8):1631–1640CrossRef Desai GS, Uppot RN, Yu EW, Kambadakone AR, Sahani DV (2012) Impact of iterative reconstruction on image quality and radiation dose in multidetector CT of large body size adults. Eur Radiol. 22(8):1631–1640CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Shaqdan KW, Kambadakone AR, Hahn P, Sahani DV (2018) Experience with iterative reconstruction techniques for abdominopelvic computed tomography in morbidly and super obese patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 42(1):124–132CrossRef Shaqdan KW, Kambadakone AR, Hahn P, Sahani DV (2018) Experience with iterative reconstruction techniques for abdominopelvic computed tomography in morbidly and super obese patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 42(1):124–132CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Soenen O, Balliauw C, Oyen R, Zanca F (2017) Dose and image quality in low-dose CT for urinary stone disease: added value of automatic tube current modulation and iterative reconstruction techniques. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 174(2):242–249PubMed Soenen O, Balliauw C, Oyen R, Zanca F (2017) Dose and image quality in low-dose CT for urinary stone disease: added value of automatic tube current modulation and iterative reconstruction techniques. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 174(2):242–249PubMed
31.
go back to reference Andrabi Y, Pianykh O, Agrawal M, et al. (2015) Radiation dose consideration in kidney stone CT examinations: integration of iterative reconstruction algorithms with routine clinical practice. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 204(5):1055–1063CrossRef Andrabi Y, Pianykh O, Agrawal M, et al. (2015) Radiation dose consideration in kidney stone CT examinations: integration of iterative reconstruction algorithms with routine clinical practice. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 204(5):1055–1063CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Desai GS, Thabet A, Elias AYA, Sahani DV (2013) Comparative assessment of three image reconstruction techniques for image quality and radiation dose in patients undergoing abdominopelvic multidetector CT examinations. Br J Radiol. 86(1021):20120161CrossRef Desai GS, Thabet A, Elias AYA, Sahani DV (2013) Comparative assessment of three image reconstruction techniques for image quality and radiation dose in patients undergoing abdominopelvic multidetector CT examinations. Br J Radiol. 86(1021):20120161CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Prakash P, Kalra MK, Kambadakone AK, et al. (2010) Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Invest Radiol. 45(4):202–210CrossRef Prakash P, Kalra MK, Kambadakone AK, et al. (2010) Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Invest Radiol. 45(4):202–210CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Eliahou R, Hidas G, Duvdevani M, Sosna J (2010) Determination of renal stone composition with dual-energy computed tomography: an emerging application. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI. 31(4):315–320CrossRef Eliahou R, Hidas G, Duvdevani M, Sosna J (2010) Determination of renal stone composition with dual-energy computed tomography: an emerging application. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI. 31(4):315–320CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Boll DT, Patil NA, Paulson EK, et al. (2009) Renal stone assessment with dual-energy multidetector CT and advanced postprocessing techniques: improved characterization of renal stone composition—pilot study 1. Radiology. 250(3):813–820CrossRef Boll DT, Patil NA, Paulson EK, et al. (2009) Renal stone assessment with dual-energy multidetector CT and advanced postprocessing techniques: improved characterization of renal stone composition—pilot study 1. Radiology. 250(3):813–820CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Matlaga BR, Kawamoto S, Fishman E (2008) Dual source computed tomography: a novel technique to determine stone composition. Urology. 72(5):1164–1168CrossRef Matlaga BR, Kawamoto S, Fishman E (2008) Dual source computed tomography: a novel technique to determine stone composition. Urology. 72(5):1164–1168CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Stolzmann P, Kozomara M, Chuck N, et al. (2010) In vivo identification of uric acid stones with dual-energy CT: diagnostic performance evaluation in patients. Abdom Imaging. 35(5):629–635CrossRef Stolzmann P, Kozomara M, Chuck N, et al. (2010) In vivo identification of uric acid stones with dual-energy CT: diagnostic performance evaluation in patients. Abdom Imaging. 35(5):629–635CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Primak AN, Fletcher JG, Vrtiska TJ, et al. (2007) Noninvasive differentiation of uric acid versus non-uric acid kidney stones using dual-energy CT. Acad Radiol. 14(12):1441–1447CrossRef Primak AN, Fletcher JG, Vrtiska TJ, et al. (2007) Noninvasive differentiation of uric acid versus non-uric acid kidney stones using dual-energy CT. Acad Radiol. 14(12):1441–1447CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Tamm EP, Le O, Liu X, et al. (2017) “How to” incorporate dual energy imaging into a high volume abdominal imaging practice. Abdom Radiol N Y. 42(3):688–701CrossRef Tamm EP, Le O, Liu X, et al. (2017) “How to” incorporate dual energy imaging into a high volume abdominal imaging practice. Abdom Radiol N Y. 42(3):688–701CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Van Der Kooy K, Leenen R, Seidell JC, Deurenberg P, Visser M (1993) Abdominal diameters as indicators of visceral fat: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and anthropometry. Br J Nutr. 70(01):47CrossRef Van Der Kooy K, Leenen R, Seidell JC, Deurenberg P, Visser M (1993) Abdominal diameters as indicators of visceral fat: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and anthropometry. Br J Nutr. 70(01):47CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Rapid kVp switching dual-energy CT in the assessment of urolithiasis in patients with large body habitus: preliminary observations on image quality and stone characterization
Authors
Hamed Kordbacheh
Vinit Baliyan
Pranit Singh
Brian H. Eisner
Dushyant V. Sahani
Avinash R Kambadakone
Publication date
01-03-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1808-5

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Abdominal Radiology 3/2019 Go to the issue

Classics in Abdominal Radiology

The “zebra spleen”